Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Long-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-11-30).
The analysis of long-term activity ratios reveals a pronounced V-shaped trend characterized by a severe contraction between 2020 and 2021, followed by a robust recovery through 2023. The synchronization across asset-based metrics indicates a systemic impact on revenue-generating capacity relative to the investment base.
- Asset Utilization Efficiency
- Net fixed asset turnover and total asset turnover exhibited nearly identical trajectories over the six-year period. Both metrics remained stable from 2018 to 2019 before experiencing a precipitous decline, reaching their lowest points in 2021 at 0.05 and 0.04, respectively. The inclusion of right-of-use assets in the fixed asset turnover calculation resulted in negligible variance, suggesting that operating leases did not significantly alter the overall efficiency profile. By 2023, these ratios recovered to 0.54 and 0.44, effectively returning to pre-2020 operational levels.
- Equity Turnover and Capital Structure
- Equity turnover demonstrated the most significant volatility and a divergence from asset turnover patterns during the recovery phase. While the ratio declined from 0.82 in 2019 to a low of 0.16 in 2021, the subsequent increase was exponential, reaching 1.72 in 2022 and 3.14 in 2023. This sharp acceleration indicates that revenue growth has outpaced the growth of equity, or that the equity base was substantially reduced during the period of crisis, leading to a much higher turnover of equity relative to total assets.
- Comparative Analysis of Recovery Patterns
- A comparison between total asset turnover and equity turnover highlights a shift in the financial leverage profile. While the total asset turnover returned to 2018 levels by 2023, the equity turnover ended the period significantly higher than its baseline. This divergence suggests that the recovery in revenue generation is being supported by a leaner equity base, increasing the reliance on other forms of financing or reflecting the impact of accumulated losses on shareholders' equity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Net Fixed Asset Turnover
| Nov 30, 2023 | Nov 30, 2022 | Nov 30, 2021 | Nov 30, 2020 | Nov 30, 2019 | Nov 30, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | 21,593) | 12,168) | 1,908) | 5,595) | 20,825) | 18,881) | |
| Property and equipment, net | 40,116) | 38,687) | 38,107) | 38,073) | 38,131) | 35,336) | |
| Long-term Activity Ratio | |||||||
| Net fixed asset turnover1 | 0.54 | 0.31 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.55 | 0.53 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Net Fixed Asset Turnover, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | 61.98 | 69.41 | 38.27 | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 27.25 | 25.55 | 13.33 | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 4.55 | 4.43 | 4.27 | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 12.13 | 10.33 | 12.16 | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 0.95 | 0.92 | 0.94 | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | 4.87 | 4.92 | 4.56 | 3.77 | — | — | |
| Net Fixed Asset Turnover, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Services | 2.93 | 2.73 | 2.39 | — | — | — | |
| Net Fixed Asset Turnover, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 3.51 | 3.48 | 3.32 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-11-30).
1 2023 Calculation
Net fixed asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Property and equipment, net
= 21,593 ÷ 40,116 = 0.54
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory between 2018 and 2023 is characterized by extreme volatility in operational efficiency, reflecting a profound contraction and subsequent recovery of revenue-generating capabilities relative to the fixed asset base.
- Revenue and Asset Base Correlation
- Revenues experienced a severe disruption, falling from a peak of 20,825 million US$ in 2019 to a minimum of 1,908 million US$ in 2021, before recovering to 21,593 million US$ in 2023. Conversely, net property and equipment remained relatively inelastic, increasing from 35,336 million US$ in 2018 to 40,116 million US$ in 2023. This indicates that the fixed asset base was maintained or expanded despite the temporary collapse in revenue.
- Net Fixed Asset Turnover Trends
- The net fixed asset turnover ratio, which measures the efficiency of a company's fixed assets in generating sales, followed a mirrored path to revenues. The ratio remained stable between 0.53 and 0.55 from 2018 to 2019. A precipitous decline occurred in 2020 and 2021, with the ratio reaching a nadir of 0.05. This collapse signifies a period of critical underutilization of the company's capital infrastructure.
- Recovery and Operational Restoration
- A robust recovery in asset efficiency is observed from 2022 onward. The turnover ratio rose to 0.31 in 2022 and reached 0.54 by 2023. This return to pre-2020 levels demonstrates that the fixed asset base has regained its capacity to generate revenue at a rate consistent with historical performance, effectively neutralizing the impact of the operational standstill experienced in previous years.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Net Fixed Asset Turnover (including Operating Lease, Right-of-Use Asset)
Carnival Corp. & plc, net fixed asset turnover (including operating lease, right-of-use asset) calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Nov 30, 2023 | Nov 30, 2022 | Nov 30, 2021 | Nov 30, 2020 | Nov 30, 2019 | Nov 30, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | 21,593) | 12,168) | 1,908) | 5,595) | 20,825) | 18,881) | |
| Property and equipment, net | 40,116) | 38,687) | 38,107) | 38,073) | 38,131) | 35,336) | |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets, net | 1,265) | 1,274) | 1,333) | 1,370) | —) | —) | |
| Property and equipment, net (including operating lease, right-of-use asset) | 41,381) | 39,961) | 39,440) | 39,443) | 38,131) | 35,336) | |
| Long-term Activity Ratio | |||||||
| Net fixed asset turnover (including operating lease, right-of-use asset)1 | 0.52 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.55 | 0.53 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Net Fixed Asset Turnover (including Operating Lease, Right-of-Use Asset), Competitors2 | |||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | 35.54 | 32.43 | 13.98 | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 14.35 | 13.01 | 8.31 | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 1.72 | 1.64 | 1.54 | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 7.52 | 6.14 | 6.62 | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.61 | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | 2.28 | 2.21 | 1.99 | 1.64 | — | — | |
| Net Fixed Asset Turnover (including Operating Lease, Right-of-Use Asset), Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Services | 1.77 | 1.63 | 1.36 | — | — | — | |
| Net Fixed Asset Turnover (including Operating Lease, Right-of-Use Asset), Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 2.69 | 2.66 | 2.52 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-11-30).
1 2023 Calculation
Net fixed asset turnover (including operating lease, right-of-use asset) = Revenues ÷ Property and equipment, net (including operating lease, right-of-use asset)
= 21,593 ÷ 41,381 = 0.52
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of long-term activity ratios reveals a significant volatility in asset utilization efficiency between 2018 and 2023, closely mirroring fluctuations in total revenues. While the asset base remained relatively stable and grew incrementally, the capacity to generate revenue from those assets experienced a severe contraction followed by a substantial recovery.
- Revenue and Asset Base Correlation
- Revenues peaked in 2019 at 20,825 million US$ before experiencing a precipitous decline to a low of 1,908 million US$ in 2021. Conversely, property and equipment, net, demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory, increasing from 35,336 million US$ in 2018 to 41,381 million US$ in 2023. This divergence indicates that the company continued to maintain and expand its fixed asset base despite a period of extreme revenue instability.
- Net Fixed Asset Turnover Trends
- The net fixed asset turnover ratio highlights a sharp decline in operational efficiency during the 2020-2021 period. The ratio fell from 0.55 in 2019 to 0.14 in 2020, reaching a nadir of 0.05 in 2021. This suggests that the revenue-generating potential of the fixed asset base was nearly neutralized during this interval.
- Recovery and Stabilization
- A strong recovery trend is observed starting in 2022, with the turnover ratio rising to 0.30 and further accelerating to 0.52 by November 30, 2023. The return to a 0.52 ratio indicates that asset utilization efficiency has effectively returned to levels seen in 2018 (0.53), despite the total value of fixed assets being approximately 17% higher in 2023 than in 2018.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Total Asset Turnover
| Nov 30, 2023 | Nov 30, 2022 | Nov 30, 2021 | Nov 30, 2020 | Nov 30, 2019 | Nov 30, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | 21,593) | 12,168) | 1,908) | 5,595) | 20,825) | 18,881) | |
| Total assets | 49,120) | 51,703) | 53,344) | 53,593) | 45,058) | 42,401) | |
| Long-term Activity Ratio | |||||||
| Total asset turnover1 | 0.44 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.46 | 0.45 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Total Asset Turnover, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.44 | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 0.88 | 0.67 | 0.46 | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 1.23 | 1.25 | 1.13 | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 0.80 | 0.67 | 0.72 | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.43 | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | 1.22 | 1.15 | 0.93 | 0.80 | — | — | |
| Total Asset Turnover, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Services | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.60 | — | — | — | |
| Total Asset Turnover, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.88 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-11-30).
1 2023 Calculation
Total asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Total assets
= 21,593 ÷ 49,120 = 0.44
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory between 2018 and 2023 is characterized by a severe contraction followed by a robust recovery in operational efficiency. The period exhibits a profound decoupling of revenue generation and asset utilization, particularly between 2020 and 2021, before returning to baseline performance levels by the end of the analyzed period.
- Revenue Volatility
- Revenues experienced a sharp decline, falling from a peak of 20,825 million US$ in 2019 to a nadir of 1,908 million US$ in 2021. This represents a substantial loss of earning power during the middle of the period. However, a strong recovery trend followed, with revenues climbing to 21,593 million US$ by November 30, 2023, surpassing pre-crisis levels.
- Asset Base Dynamics
- Total assets showed an inverse relationship with revenue during the downturn. While revenues crashed, the asset base expanded from 42,401 million US$ in 2018 to a peak of 53,593 million US$ in 2020. A gradual reduction in total assets is observed from 2021 onward, ending at 49,120 million US$ in 2023, suggesting a streamlining of the balance sheet or asset depreciation following the period of peak expansion.
- Total Asset Turnover Efficiency
- The total asset turnover ratio mirrors the volatility of revenues. The ratio remained stable at 0.45 and 0.46 in 2018 and 2019, indicating consistent asset productivity. A collapse occurred in 2020 and 2021, with the ratio plummeting to 0.10 and then 0.04, respectively, reflecting a period of extreme asset underutilization. Efficiency improved significantly in 2022 (0.24) and returned to 0.44 by 2023, effectively restoring the asset-to-revenue efficiency to near-2018 levels.
The data indicates that the organization successfully navigated a period of near-total operational standstill. The return of the total asset turnover ratio to 0.44 suggests that the asset base is once again generating revenue at a rate consistent with historical norms, marking a full recovery of investment activity efficiency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Equity Turnover
| Nov 30, 2023 | Nov 30, 2022 | Nov 30, 2021 | Nov 30, 2020 | Nov 30, 2019 | Nov 30, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | 21,593) | 12,168) | 1,908) | 5,595) | 20,825) | 18,881) | |
| Shareholders’ equity | 6,882) | 7,065) | 12,144) | 20,555) | 25,365) | 24,443) | |
| Long-term Activity Ratio | |||||||
| Equity turnover1 | 3.14 | 1.72 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.82 | 0.77 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Equity Turnover, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | 1.21 | 1.51 | 1.25 | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | — | 6.14 | 1.77 | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 3.22 | 3.65 | 3.29 | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 1.27 | 0.97 | 1.05 | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Equity Turnover, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Services | 42.99 | 34.91 | 10.21 | — | — | — | |
| Equity Turnover, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 3.82 | 4.14 | 3.70 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-11-30).
1 2023 Calculation
Equity turnover = Revenues ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 21,593 ÷ 6,882 = 3.14
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of equity turnover reveals a period of extreme volatility characterized by a severe operational contraction followed by a rapid recovery in revenue generation efficiency relative to the equity base.
- Revenue Trends
- Revenues exhibited a stable trajectory from 2018 to 2019, peaking at US$ 20,825 million. A precipitous decline followed, reaching a nadir of US$ 1,908 million in 2021. From 2022 onward, a strong recovery phase is observed, with revenues rebounding to US$ 21,593 million by 2023, surpassing pre-contraction levels.
- Shareholders' Equity Trajectory
- A consistent downward trend in shareholders' equity is evident over the six-year period. While equity remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2019 at approximately US$ 24-25 billion, it entered a phase of sustained erosion starting in 2020. By November 30, 2023, shareholders' equity decreased to US$ 6,882 million, representing a significant reduction in the company's net asset base.
- Equity Turnover Dynamics
- The equity turnover ratio reflects the intersection of rebounding revenues and a shrinking equity base. After maintaining a range of 0.77 to 0.82 in 2018-2019, the ratio collapsed to 0.16 in 2021, indicating a severe impairment in the ability to generate sales from equity investments. However, the ratio surged to 1.72 in 2022 and reached 3.14 in 2023. This sharp increase is not solely a result of improved operational efficiency but is heavily driven by the substantial reduction in the denominator (shareholders' equity) alongside the restoration of revenue streams.
In summary, the data indicates a structural shift in the company's financial position. The current high equity turnover ratio suggests a leaner equity base supporting a fully recovered revenue stream, which markedly differs from the capital structure observed prior to 2020.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?