Economic Value Added (EVA)
EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Boston Scientific Corp. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Boston Scientific Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
Boston Scientific Corp., economic profit calculation
US$ in millions
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT shows significant fluctuation over the five-year period. It started at a relatively strong level of 1711 million USD in 2018, but sharply declined to 829 million USD in 2019 and further plunged to 153 million USD in 2020. There was a notable recovery in 2021, with NOPAT increasing to 1270 million USD, followed by a slight decrease to 1099 million USD in 2022. Overall, the trend indicates volatility with a partial recovery after 2020's steep drop.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable across the five years, fluctuating within a narrow range between 11.12% and 11.79%. It marginally decreased from 11.79% in 2018 to 11.12% in 2020, then increased slightly to 11.63% by 2022. The consistency suggests stable funding costs despite other financial fluctuations.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital exhibited a strong upward trend throughout the period, increasing steadily from 16047 million USD in 2018 to 22868 million USD in 2022. The year-over-year growth indicates ongoing investment in the company's capital base, expanding by approximately 42% over these five years.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit remained negative during the entire period, reflecting an economic loss each year when considering the cost of capital. The loss deepened substantially from -181 million USD in 2018 to a trough of -2187 million USD in 2020. Although there was some improvement in 2021 with a reduction in loss to -1235 million USD, economic profit worsened again in 2022 to -1560 million USD. This pattern suggests persistent challenges in generating returns exceeding capital costs despite investments.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Boston Scientific Corp., NOPAT calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).
5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).
8 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Income (Loss)
- The net income demonstrates significant volatility over the analyzed periods. It increased markedly from US$1,671 million in 2018 to a peak of US$4,700 million in 2019. However, the year 2020 saw a sharp reversal, with net income turning into a loss of US$82 million. Following this dip, net income recovered to US$1,041 million in 2021 but declined again to US$698 million in 2022. Overall, the trend indicates substantial fluctuations, with the highest profitability recorded in 2019 and a noticeable setback in 2020, followed by a partial recovery and a subsequent decline.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT figures display a different pattern compared to net income. Beginning at US$1,711 million in 2018, NOPAT fell steadily to US$829 million in 2019 and then to a low of US$153 million in 2020. However, it experienced a strong recovery in the subsequent two years, rising to US$1,270 million in 2021 and slightly decreasing to US$1,099 million in 2022. This implies that while operational profitability was significantly impacted during 2019 and 2020, there was a notable operational improvement in 2021 and 2022, albeit not reaching the levels seen in 2018.
- Comparative Insights
- The considerable divergence between net income and NOPAT in 2019, where net income peaked but NOPAT decreased, may suggest the influence of non-operating factors such as gains, losses, or tax effects that boosted net income independently from operational performance. The loss in net income in 2020 contrasted with a very low but positive NOPAT indicates operational struggles compounded by additional factors impacting overall profitability negatively. The recovery trend in both metrics in 2021 highlights an improvement phase, although 2022 figures show some erosion in profitability relative to 2021. The continued volatility points to potential underlying operational and external challenges affecting the company’s financial outcomes across the five-year period.
Cash Operating Taxes
Boston Scientific Corp., cash operating taxes calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
- The income tax expense exhibited significant fluctuations over the five-year period. In 2018 and 2019, the company recorded substantial tax benefits of -$249 million and -$4,013 million, respectively. However, the trend reversed in 2020, with a slight positive tax expense of $2 million, followed by a gradual increase to $36 million in 2021 and $443 million in 2022. This shift from large tax benefits to increasing tax expenses suggests a considerable change in tax-related factors affecting the company, possibly reflecting changes in profitability, tax regulations, or deferred tax assets and liabilities.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes showed a consistent upward trend throughout the period analyzed. Starting with a negative value of -$33 million in 2018, cash taxes rose to $377 million in 2019, before experiencing a slight decrease to $165 million in 2020. From 2020 onwards, cash taxes increased steadily to $252 million in 2021 and further to $552 million in 2022. This progression indicates growing cash tax outflows, which may correlate with increasing taxable income, changes in tax strategies, or adjustments in tax payment timings.
Invested Capital
Boston Scientific Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of capital in progress.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases experienced a significant increase from 7,364 million USD in 2018 to 10,351 million USD in 2019. Following this peak, the figure showed a gradual decline over the next three years, decreasing to 9,614 million USD in 2020, 9,525 million USD in 2021, and further to 9,343 million USD by the end of 2022. This pattern indicates a notable rise in leverage in 2019 followed by a steady reduction in debt levels thereafter.
- Stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity demonstrated a consistent and substantial upward trend throughout the period. Starting at 8,726 million USD in 2018, equity rose sharply to 13,877 million USD in 2019, and continued to grow annually, reaching 15,326 million USD in 2020, 16,622 million USD in 2021, and 17,573 million USD in 2022. This steady increase reflects a strengthening equity base over the five-year span.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital showed a pattern of continuous growth, rising from 16,047 million USD in 2018 to 20,389 million USD in 2019. Growth continued but at a slower pace in subsequent years, reaching 21,053 million USD in 2020, 22,038 million USD in 2021, and 22,868 million USD in 2022. The data suggests a deliberate increase in capital investment over time, with the most notable expansion occurring between 2018 and 2019.
Cost of Capital
Boston Scientific Corp., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 5.50% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $0.01 per share | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Outstanding debt obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Outstanding debt obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 5.50% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $0.01 per share | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Outstanding debt obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Outstanding debt obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 5.50% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $0.01 per share | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Outstanding debt obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Outstanding debt obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 5.50% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $0.01 per share | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Outstanding debt obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Outstanding debt obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| 5.50% Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $0.01 per share | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Outstanding debt obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Outstanding debt obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
Boston Scientific Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | ||||||
| Elevance Health Inc. | ||||||
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | ||||||
| Medtronic PLC | ||||||
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit shows a negative value across all observed years, indicating persistent economic losses. It worsened significantly from -181 million US dollars in 2018 to -2187 million US dollars in 2020. Although there was some improvement in 2021 to -1235 million US dollars, the economic profit declined again in 2022 to -1560 million US dollars, suggesting recurring challenges in generating value beyond the cost of capital.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital displays a steady increase over the five-year period, starting at 16,047 million US dollars in 2018 and rising to 22,868 million US dollars in 2022. This consistent growth in capital investment may indicate ongoing expansion or increased resource allocation despite negative economic profit outcomes.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio remains negative throughout the time frame, reflecting returns below the cost of capital. It deteriorates sharply from -1.13% in 2018 to -10.39% in 2020, which aligns with the peak negative economic profit in the same year. There is partial recovery in 2021 to -5.61%, but the ratio declines again to -6.82% in 2022, reinforcing the company's challenges in achieving economic profitability despite significant capital investment.
- Overall Analysis
- The data reveals a period marked by substantial value destruction as indicated by the negative economic profits and spread ratios. Despite increasing invested capital, the company has struggled to translate these investments into positive economic returns. The trend suggests either operational inefficiencies, high capital costs, or other structural factors impeding the creation of excess economic value over the observed years.
Economic Profit Margin
Boston Scientific Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | ||||||
| Adjusted net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | ||||||
| Elevance Health Inc. | ||||||
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | ||||||
| Medtronic PLC | ||||||
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Adjusted Net Sales
- The adjusted net sales demonstrate an overall upward trend during the period analyzed. Sales increased from 9,823 million US dollars at the end of 2018 to 12,707 million US dollars by the end of 2022. Despite a dip in 2020 to 9,908 million US dollars, sales recovered and continued to grow in the subsequent years, reaching the highest value in 2022. This pattern indicates resilience and growth potential in the company's revenue-generating capacity.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit consistently showed negative values throughout the period, indicating that the company did not generate surplus profit above its cost of capital. The situation was most adverse in 2020, with an economic loss of 2,187 million US dollars, representing the largest deficit in the timeframe. Although economic profit improved slightly in 2021 to -1,235 million US dollars, it worsened again in 2022 to -1,560 million US dollars. This trend reveals challenges in converting sales growth into economic profitability.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin, expressed as a percentage, remained negative in all years, aligning with the economic profit figures. The margin declined sharply from -1.84% in 2018 to -22.08% in 2020, reflecting substantial inefficiencies or high costs relative to revenues during that year. Although there was an improvement to -10.31% in 2021, the margin deteriorated again in 2022 to -12.28%. These fluctuations suggest ongoing difficulties in managing profitability relative to sales, with only partial recovery after the peak negative margin in 2020.
- Summary
- While the company’s adjusted net sales demonstrated growth and recovery after the 2020 downturn, economic profit and economic profit margin remained persistently negative, with considerable volatility. This indicates that despite increasing revenues, the company has faced persistent challenges in achieving economic profitability, possibly due to high costs or capital charges. The partial improvements observed in 2021 were not sustained into 2022, highlighting the need for enhanced operational efficiencies or strategic adjustments to improve financial performance.