Stock Analysis on Net

Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 4, 2016.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin 
Quarterly Data

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Baxter International Inc., decomposition of ROE (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Jun 30, 2016 56.39% = 30.02% × 1.88
Mar 31, 2016 43.44% = 22.58% × 1.92
Dec 31, 2015 10.94% = 4.62% × 2.37
Sep 30, 2015 21.93% = 8.51% × 2.58
Jun 30, 2015 27.33% = 7.27% × 3.76
Mar 31, 2015 32.67% = 9.54% × 3.43
Dec 31, 2014 30.75% = 9.63% × 3.19
Sep 30, 2014 22.25% = 7.32% × 3.04
Jun 30, 2014 22.47% = 7.59% × 2.96
Mar 31, 2014 23.25% = 7.98% × 2.91
Dec 31, 2013 23.77% = 7.78% × 3.06
Sep 30, 2013 28.13% = 8.63% × 3.26
Jun 30, 2013 30.47% = 9.34% × 3.26
Mar 31, 2013 32.90% = 11.27% × 2.92
Dec 31, 2012 33.53% = 11.41% × 2.94
Sep 30, 2012 32.19% = 11.58% × 2.78
Jun 30, 2012 34.93% = 12.40% × 2.82
Mar 31, 2012 33.34% = 11.94% × 2.79

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-03-31).


The analysis of the quarterly financial metrics reveals important trends in the company's profitability and financial structure over the examined periods.

Return on Assets (ROA)
The ROA showed a generally declining trend from early 2012 through 2015, starting above 11% and dropping below 8% by the end of 2014, indicating a reduction in asset efficiency. Notably, there was a modest recovery in late 2014 followed by stabilization around 7–9% during much of 2015. However, a significant improvement occurred in 2016, with ROA sharply increasing to over 22% and then above 30%, suggesting a marked enhancement in asset utilization efficiency during that year.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage remained relatively stable around 2.7 to 3.2 from 2012 through mid-2015, reflecting consistent use of debt relative to equity. There was a peak in mid-2015 reaching about 3.76, indicating higher leverage at that time. From late 2015 into 2016, leverage declined steadily to below 2, signaling a substantial reduction in debt levels or an increase in equity, potentially contributing to the observed changes in returns.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE tracked a downward pattern from over 33% in early 2012 to low 20’s and even a low near 10% by early 2016, mirroring the contraction seen in ROA and reflecting decreased overall profitability on shareholder equity. Toward the end of the data series in 2016, ROE exhibited a strong rebound, surging above 43% and then reaching over 56%. This surge surpasses prior peaks, suggesting highly improved profitability and efficient equity use during this period.

In summary, the company experienced a period of declining returns from 2012 through 2015 accompanied by relatively stable or slightly increasing leverage, followed by a marked reduction in leverage and substantial improvements in both asset and equity returns during 2016. These shifts may indicate operational improvements, enhanced financial management, or other favorable changes impacting profitability and capital structure in the most recent periods evaluated.


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Baxter International Inc., decomposition of ROE (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Jun 30, 2016 56.39% = 47.74% × 0.63 × 1.88
Mar 31, 2016 43.44% = 39.42% × 0.57 × 1.92
Dec 31, 2015 10.94% = 9.71% × 0.48 × 2.37
Sep 30, 2015 21.93% = 14.50% × 0.59 × 2.58
Jun 30, 2015 27.33% = 16.11% × 0.45 × 3.76
Mar 31, 2015 32.67% = 15.57% × 0.61 × 3.43
Dec 31, 2014 30.75% = 14.98% × 0.64 × 3.19
Sep 30, 2014 22.25% = 11.29% × 0.65 × 3.04
Jun 30, 2014 22.47% = 12.05% × 0.63 × 2.96
Mar 31, 2014 23.25% = 12.87% × 0.62 × 2.91
Dec 31, 2013 23.77% = 13.19% × 0.59 × 3.06
Sep 30, 2013 28.13% = 14.89% × 0.58 × 3.26
Jun 30, 2013 30.47% = 15.47% × 0.60 × 3.26
Mar 31, 2013 32.90% = 16.07% × 0.70 × 2.92
Dec 31, 2012 33.53% = 16.39% × 0.70 × 2.94
Sep 30, 2012 32.19% = 16.36% × 0.71 × 2.78
Jun 30, 2012 34.93% = 16.30% × 0.76 × 2.82
Mar 31, 2012 33.34% = 16.02% × 0.75 × 2.79

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-03-31).


Net Profit Margin
The net profit margin generally exhibits a declining trend from early 2012 through mid-2016, moving from 16.02% to below 10% by the first quarter of 2016. There is a notable recovery starting in the first quarter of 2014, with the margin increasing from 11.29% to nearly 15.57% by mid-2015. However, this upward momentum is interrupted by a sharp decline in late 2015. A striking anomaly occurs in the first two quarters of 2016, where net profit margins surge dramatically to 39.42% and 47.74%, respectively, indicating a significant and unusual increase in profitability during this period.
Asset Turnover
Asset turnover demonstrates a gradual decrease from 0.75 in the first quarter of 2012 to a low of 0.45 in the second quarter of 2015, indicating a reduced efficiency in generating sales from assets. Following this period, asset turnover shows signs of improvement, recovering to 0.63 by mid-2016. This pattern suggests fluctuating but generally weakening operational efficiency until a recent rebound.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage ratios fluctuate over the time span, starting near 2.79 and peaking at 3.76 in the second quarter of 2015. After reaching this high level, leverage declines steadily, falling to 1.88 by mid-2016. This reduction in leverage may imply a strategic de-risking or deleveraging effort, reducing dependency on borrowed funds or liabilities.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE declines from a strong 33.34% in early 2012 to a low of 10.94% by the first quarter of 2016, reflecting diminished overall profitability relative to equity. This decline correlates with earlier observed declines in net profit margin and asset turnover. A dramatic recovery is observed in the first half of 2016, with ROE soaring to 43.44% and then 56.39%, paralleling the extraordinary increases seen in net profit margins, suggesting a significant positive development affecting shareholder returns in this period.
Summary
Overall, the data reflect a complex financial performance trajectory with an initial period of profitability and efficiency decline through early 2016, characterized by decreasing profit margins, deteriorating asset efficiency, and fluctuating leverage. From mid-2015 onwards, the company appears to reduce leverage and gradually improve asset turnover, setting the stage for a strong resurgence in profitability metrics by mid-2016. The extremely high profitability and return on equity in early 2016 suggest an exceptional event or operational improvement impacting financial performance during that time frame.

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Baxter International Inc., decomposition of ROA (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Jun 30, 2016 30.02% = 47.74% × 0.63
Mar 31, 2016 22.58% = 39.42% × 0.57
Dec 31, 2015 4.62% = 9.71% × 0.48
Sep 30, 2015 8.51% = 14.50% × 0.59
Jun 30, 2015 7.27% = 16.11% × 0.45
Mar 31, 2015 9.54% = 15.57% × 0.61
Dec 31, 2014 9.63% = 14.98% × 0.64
Sep 30, 2014 7.32% = 11.29% × 0.65
Jun 30, 2014 7.59% = 12.05% × 0.63
Mar 31, 2014 7.98% = 12.87% × 0.62
Dec 31, 2013 7.78% = 13.19% × 0.59
Sep 30, 2013 8.63% = 14.89% × 0.58
Jun 30, 2013 9.34% = 15.47% × 0.60
Mar 31, 2013 11.27% = 16.07% × 0.70
Dec 31, 2012 11.41% = 16.39% × 0.70
Sep 30, 2012 11.58% = 16.36% × 0.71
Jun 30, 2012 12.40% = 16.30% × 0.76
Mar 31, 2012 11.94% = 16.02% × 0.75

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-03-31).


Net Profit Margin
The net profit margin exhibits an overall declining trend from early 2012 through mid-2016, beginning at approximately 16.02% and gradually decreasing to a low near 9.71% by the first quarter of 2016. Notably, there is a marked increase in the last two periods, surging to 39.42% and subsequently 47.74%. This indicates a significant improvement in profitability during the most recent quarters analyzed, following several years of downward movement.
Asset Turnover
Asset turnover ratios show a gentle but consistent decrease over the initial years, dropping from 0.75 in March 2012 to a trough around 0.45 by mid-2015. After this point, the ratio recovers somewhat, rising to 0.63 by mid-2016. This pattern suggests a reduction in the efficiency of asset utilization over the long term, with a partial recovery occurring near the end of the period analyzed.
Return on Assets (ROA)
ROA follows a trend broadly comparable to the net profit margin, declining from about 11.94% in early 2012 to a low of 4.62% around the first quarter of 2016. Then, it sharply increases, reaching levels exceeding 30% in the final period. This sharp increase in ROA aligns with the improvement seen in profitability margins and asset turnover, reflecting enhanced overall asset efficiency and return in the latest quarters.