Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
Between 2011 and 2015, a significant volatility is observed in the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, characterized by a substantial peak in 2013 followed by a consistent decline. The trajectory suggests a period of aggressive asset acquisition or a major business combination occurring around 2013, followed by subsequent amortization and potential asset impairment.
- Goodwill Trends
- Goodwill experienced a sharp increase from 2,317 million USD in 2011 to a peak of 4,205 million USD in 2013. Following this peak, a downward trend is evident, with the balance decreasing to 2,687 million USD by 2015, which may indicate impairment charges or divestitures of business units.
- Analysis of Intangible Asset Components
- Developed technology and patents showed a marked increase, rising from 1,100 million USD in 2011 to 2,278 million USD in 2014, before declining to 1,742 million USD in 2015. Indefinite-lived intangible assets exhibited extreme volatility, spiking from 22 million USD in 2012 to 465 million USD in 2013, and subsequently falling sharply to 86 million USD by 2015.
- Amortization and Net Asset Valuation
- Accumulated amortization grew steadily from -585 million USD in 2011 to a peak of -914 million USD in 2014. This consistent increase in amortization contributed to the contraction of net intangible assets, which peaked at 2,294 million USD in 2013 and declined to 1,349 million USD by the end of 2015.
- Consolidated Asset Position
- The total value of goodwill and net intangible assets more than doubled between 2012 and 2013, increasing from 3,316 million USD to 6,499 million USD. By December 31, 2015, this consolidated figure retracted to 4,036 million USD, reflecting a significant reduction from the 2013 high.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
Baxter International Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
An analysis of the financial statements from 2011 to 2015 reveals a significant disparity between reported and adjusted figures, resulting from the systematic removal of goodwill and intangible assets. Both total assets and shareholders' equity exhibit fluctuations over the five-year period, with a notable peak in reported values occurring in 2014 followed by a contraction in 2015.
- Total Asset Trends
- Reported total assets increased from 19,073 million in 2011 to a peak of 25,917 million in 2014, before declining to 20,975 million in 2015. Adjusted total assets followed a corresponding trajectory, peaking at 22,043 million in 2014. The gap between reported and adjusted assets indicates a substantial volume of intangible assets and goodwill, which reached its highest point in 2013 and 2014.
- Shareholders' Equity Trends
- Reported shareholders' equity demonstrated a general upward trend, rising from 6,585 million in 2011 to 8,846 million in 2015. In contrast, adjusted shareholders' equity remained relatively stagnant between 2011 and 2014, fluctuating within a narrow range between 4,246 million and 4,436 million. A significant increase in adjusted equity occurred in 2015, rising to 6,159 million, which suggests an improvement in tangible net worth during that period.
- Impact of Intangible Asset Removal
- The difference between reported and adjusted figures shows that the impact of goodwill and intangible assets was most pronounced in 2013, where the adjustment amount reached 4,205 million. By 2015, this difference narrowed to 2,687 million. This reduction indicates a decrease in the proportion of the balance sheet comprised of intangible assets, either through impairment charges, divestitures, or a shift in asset composition.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
Baxter International Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
The adjustment of financial ratios through the removal of goodwill and intangible assets reveals a consistent divergence between reported performance and tangible asset productivity. Throughout the period from 2011 to 2015, adjusted ratios consistently indicate higher asset efficiency and equity returns, alongside a more aggressive financial risk profile.
- Total Asset Turnover
- Adjusted total asset turnover remained consistently higher than reported values, starting at 0.83 in 2011 compared to a reported 0.73. This indicates that the core tangible asset base generates revenue more efficiently than the total asset base, which is weighed down by intangible assets. Despite this premium, both metrics followed a general downward trajectory, reaching their lowest points in 2015 at 0.55 and 0.48, respectively.
- Financial Leverage
- The exclusion of goodwill and intangible assets resulted in a significant increase in financial leverage ratios. Adjusted leverage rose from 3.93 in 2011 to a peak of 5.19 in 2014, whereas reported leverage peaked at a lower 3.19 in the same year. This discrepancy demonstrates that a substantial portion of the balance sheet is comprised of intangible assets; when these are removed, the company's reliance on debt relative to tangible assets is far more pronounced.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- A substantial premium is observed in adjusted ROE compared to reported ROE across the entire five-year period. While reported ROE fluctuated from 33.77% in 2011 to 10.94% in 2015, the adjusted ROE reached a peak of 58.81% in 2014. The magnitude of this difference suggests that the returns generated on tangible equity are significantly higher than those reported on the total equity base.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- Adjusted ROA consistently exceeded reported ROA, although the variance was less extreme than that observed in ROE. Both metrics exhibited a similar declining trend, with adjusted ROA falling from 13.27% in 2011 to 5.29% in 2015, and reported ROA falling from 11.66% to 4.62% over the same period.
A synchronized decline across all efficiency and profitability metrics is evident by December 31, 2015. The widening gap between reported and adjusted leverage, particularly between 2011 and 2014, highlights a period of increasing financial risk relative to tangible assets, followed by a notable reduction in both reported and adjusted leverage in 2015.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Total assets
= 9,968 ÷ 20,975 = 0.48
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 9,968 ÷ 18,288 = 0.55
An analysis of the asset base and efficiency ratios from 2011 to 2015 reveals a consistent variance between reported and adjusted figures, indicating a significant presence of intangible assets and goodwill. Total assets experienced growth between 2011 and 2014, peaking at 25,917 million USD before declining to 20,975 million USD in 2015. The adjusted asset base followed a similar trajectory, though it remained consistently lower than the reported total, suggesting that the exclusion of non-physical assets provides a more focused view of the company's tangible operating base.
- Asset Turnover Trends
- Both reported and adjusted total asset turnover ratios exhibited a general downward trend over the five-year period. Reported turnover declined from 0.73 in 2011 to 0.48 in 2015. Similarly, adjusted turnover decreased from 0.83 in 2011 to 0.55 in 2015. A temporary recovery in efficiency occurred in 2014, where both metrics saw a slight increase before dropping to their lowest levels in 2015.
- Impact of Intangible Asset Adjustments
- The adjusted total asset turnover is consistently higher than the reported turnover across all periods. This gap indicates that the inclusion of goodwill and intangible assets in the reported figures artificially lowers the perceived efficiency of the asset base. By removing these items, the adjusted ratio demonstrates a higher capacity for the tangible assets to generate revenue.
- Comparative Efficiency Analysis
- The variance between reported and adjusted turnover reflects the relative weight of intangible assets. In 2011, the adjusted turnover was 0.10 points higher than the reported turnover. By 2015, while both ratios fell, the adjusted turnover remained 0.07 points higher than the reported figure. The overall decline in both ratios suggests a systemic reduction in asset utilization efficiency, regardless of whether intangible assets are considered.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total Baxter shareholders’ equity
= 20,975 ÷ 8,846 = 2.37
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total Baxter shareholders’ equity
= 18,288 ÷ 6,159 = 2.97
The financial performance from 2011 to 2015 reveals a consistent divergence between reported and adjusted metrics, indicating that intangible assets and goodwill represent a significant portion of the balance sheet. While reported figures suggest a more stable capital structure, the adjusted figures highlight a more volatile and highly leveraged financial position during the first four years of the period.
- Asset Base Trends
- Reported total assets grew from US$ 19,073 million in 2011 to a peak of US$ 25,917 million in 2014, before contracting to US$ 20,975 million in 2015. Adjusted total assets followed a similar trajectory but remained consistently lower than reported assets, confirming that a substantial volume of assets consisted of non-tangible items throughout the analysis period.
- Shareholders' Equity Analysis
- A notable discrepancy is observed between reported and adjusted equity. Reported shareholders' equity climbed steadily from US$ 6,585 million in 2011 to US$ 8,846 million in 2015. In contrast, adjusted shareholders' equity remained nearly flat between 2011 and 2014, fluctuating slightly around the US$ 4,200 million mark, before increasing sharply to US$ 6,159 million in 2015.
- Financial Leverage Comparison
- Reported financial leverage showed moderate movement, peaking at 3.19 in 2014 before declining to 2.37 in 2015. However, adjusted financial leverage was markedly higher and exhibited greater volatility, rising from 3.93 in 2011 to a peak of 5.19 in 2014. The gap between these two ratios demonstrates that removing intangible assets significantly increases the calculated leverage, suggesting a higher reliance on debt relative to tangible equity.
- 2015 Convergence
- The year 2015 marked a significant shift in the leverage profile. Adjusted financial leverage dropped precipitously from 5.19 to 2.97, closely aligning with the reported leverage of 2.37. This decline corresponds with the substantial increase in adjusted shareholders' equity, indicating a reduction in the proportion of intangible assets relative to the total equity base or a fundamental restructuring of the balance sheet.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to Baxter ÷ Total Baxter shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 968 ÷ 8,846 = 10.94%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to Baxter ÷ Adjusted total Baxter shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 968 ÷ 6,159 = 15.72%
The financial performance from 2011 to 2015 reveals a significant divergence between reported and adjusted equity metrics, characterized by a substantial contraction in profitability ratios during the final year of the observed period.
- Shareholders' Equity Trends
- Reported total shareholders' equity exhibited a general upward trajectory, increasing from 6,585 million US dollars in 2011 to 8,846 million US dollars in 2015. Conversely, adjusted shareholders' equity remained relatively stagnant between 2011 and 2014, fluctuating within a narrow range between 4,246 million and 4,436 million US dollars, before experiencing a sharp increase to 6,159 million US dollars in 2015.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
- Reported ROE remained relatively robust between 2011 and 2014, fluctuating between 23.77% and 33.77%, before falling precipitously to 10.94% in 2015. Adjusted ROE operated at significantly higher levels throughout most of the period, peaking at 58.81% in 2014. However, this metric also saw a severe decline in 2015, dropping to 15.72%.
- Impact of Intangible Asset Adjustments
- A consistent and wide gap is observed between reported and adjusted ROE, indicating that the exclusion of goodwill and intangible assets from the equity base significantly inflates the return percentage. This suggests that the company's earnings were high relative to its tangible equity. The sharp convergence of both reported and adjusted ROE in 2015 indicates a systemic decline in profitability that outweighed the effects of equity adjustments.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to Baxter ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 968 ÷ 20,975 = 4.62%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to Baxter ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 968 ÷ 18,288 = 5.29%
An examination of asset utilization and return metrics between 2011 and 2015 reveals a period of asset base expansion followed by a significant contraction, alongside a general decline in profitability relative to those assets.
- Asset Composition and Adjustments
- Total reported assets increased from 19,073 million USD in 2011 to a peak of 25,917 million USD in 2014, before decreasing to 20,975 million USD in 2015. Adjusted total assets, which exclude goodwill and intangible assets, followed a similar trajectory, peaking at 22,043 million USD in 2014. The variance between reported and adjusted assets grew from 2,317 million USD in 2011 to 3,874 million USD in 2014, indicating an increase in the proportion of intangible assets and goodwill within the total asset structure during the growth phase.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Analysis
- The Adjusted ROA remained consistently higher than the Reported ROA throughout the entire period. In 2011, the Adjusted ROA was 13.27% compared to a Reported ROA of 11.66%. This trend continued through 2015, with Adjusted ROA at 5.29% and Reported ROA at 4.62%. The consistent positive spread between these two metrics demonstrates that the exclusion of goodwill and intangible assets provides a more favorable view of the efficiency of the remaining operating assets.
- Temporal Trends and Volatility
- A general downward trajectory in return metrics is evident over the five-year span. Both reported and adjusted figures experienced a notable decline in 2013, followed by a moderate recovery in 2014. However, 2015 saw a sharp deterioration in performance, with the Adjusted ROA falling to its lowest level of 5.29%. This decline occurred in tandem with a reduction in the asset base, suggesting that the drop in earnings was more substantial than the reduction in total assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?