AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 4, 2016.

Analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment

Microsoft Excel

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure

Baxter International Inc., balance sheet: property, plant and equipment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Land 116 225 220 190 184
Buildings and leasehold improvements 1,389 2,673 2,670 2,181 2,099
Machinery and equipment 5,414 7,687 7,360 6,691 6,384
Equipment with customers 1,238 1,353 1,361 1,295 1,205
Construction in progress 833 2,870 2,184 1,512 1,101
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 8,990 14,808 13,795 11,869 10,973
Accumulated depreciation (4,604) (6,110) (5,963) (5,771) (5,448)
Property, plant and equipment (PP&E), net 4,386 8,698 7,832 6,098 5,525

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


Between 2011 and 2014, a consistent expansion of the asset base was observed, followed by a significant contraction in 2015. Gross property, plant and equipment increased steadily from US$ 10,973 million in 2011 to a peak of US$ 14,808 million in 2014, before dropping sharply to US$ 8,990 million by the end of 2015.

Asset Growth and Capital Investment (2011–2014)
During this four-year period, there was a strategic increase in capital expenditures. Machinery and equipment saw the most substantial growth, rising from US$ 6,384 million to US$ 7,687 million. Simultaneously, construction in progress experienced rapid growth, increasing from US$ 1,101 million in 2011 to US$ 2,870 million in 2014, indicating significant ongoing investments in new facilities or capacity expansions.
Asset Contraction and Divestiture (2015)
The 2015 fiscal year is characterized by a marked reduction across nearly all asset categories. Gross property, plant and equipment decreased by approximately 39% compared to the previous year. This decline was most evident in construction in progress, which fell from US$ 2,870 million to US$ 833 million, and buildings and leasehold improvements, which decreased from US$ 2,673 million to US$ 1,389 million. Such a comprehensive reduction suggests a major divestiture of business segments or a corporate spin-off.
Depreciation and Net Book Value Trends
Accumulated depreciation increased gradually from 2011 to 2014, reflecting the aging of the growing asset base. However, in 2015, accumulated depreciation decreased from US$ -6,110 million to US$ -4,604 million. This decrease, coinciding with the drop in gross assets, confirms that a significant portion of depreciated assets was removed from the balance sheet. Consequently, the net property, plant and equipment value, which had grown from US$ 5,525 million in 2011 to US$ 8,698 million in 2014, fell to US$ 4,386 million in 2015.
Stability of Customer-Based Equipment
Equipment with customers remained the most stable asset class throughout the period. While other categories experienced volatile swings, this item fluctuated only slightly, moving from US$ 1,205 million in 2011 to US$ 1,238 million in 2015, suggesting that the core customer-facing equipment model was largely unaffected by the asset reductions seen in other categories.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Asset Age Ratios (Summary)

Baxter International Inc., asset age ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Average age ratio 51.88% 41.90% 43.93% 49.41% 50.50%
Estimated total useful life (years) 15 18 20 20 19
Estimated age, time elapsed since purchase (years) 8 8 9 10 10
Estimated remaining life (years) 7 10 11 10 9

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


The analysis of asset age ratios indicates a period of relative asset rejuvenation between 2011 and 2014, followed by a significant shift in accounting estimates in 2015 that increased the proportional age of the property, plant, and equipment base.

Average Age Ratio Trends
A consistent downward trend in the average age ratio is observed from 2011 to 2014, declining from 50.50% to 41.90%. This contraction suggests that the asset base was becoming younger relative to its total useful life, likely due to the integration of new capital expenditures. However, this trend reversed abruptly in 2015, with the ratio rising to 51.88%, the highest level in the observed period.
Useful Life and Asset Age Dynamics
The estimated total useful life remained stable between 18 and 20 years from 2011 through 2014. In 2015, a downward revision occurred, reducing the estimated total useful life to 15 years. During the same period, the estimated age of assets—the time elapsed since purchase—showed a slight improvement, decreasing from 10 years in 2011 to 8 years by 2015.
Remaining Asset Life Analysis
The estimated remaining life peaked at 11 years in 2013 before falling to 7 years by 2015. The sharp decline in remaining life in 2015 is primarily attributable to the reduction in the total estimated useful life rather than an increase in the chronological age of the assets. This suggests a change in the expected utility or a strategic reclassification of the assets' lifespan.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Age

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 4,604 6,110 5,963 5,771 5,448
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 8,990 14,808 13,795 11,869 10,973
Land 116 225 220 190 184
Asset Age Ratio
Average age1 51.88% 41.90% 43.93% 49.41% 50.50%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

2015 Calculations

1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, at cost – Land)
= 100 × 4,604 ÷ (8,990 – 116) = 51.88%


From 2011 to 2014, a consistent expansion of the asset base was observed, with property, plant and equipment at cost increasing from 10,973 million US$ to 14,808 million US$. During this period, accumulated depreciation also rose steadily, reaching 6,110 million US$ by the end of 2014. However, the fiscal year 2015 marked a significant reversal, characterized by a sharp decline in both gross asset cost and accumulated depreciation, suggesting a substantial divestiture or restructuring of fixed assets.

Average Age Ratio Trend
Between 2011 and 2014, the average age ratio exhibited a steady downward trend, declining from 50.50% to 41.90%. This contraction indicates a period of modernization where the acquisition of new capital assets outpaced the depreciation of existing ones, effectively lowering the relative age of the overall asset portfolio.
Asset Base Compression in 2015
In 2015, property, plant and equipment at cost decreased by approximately 39%, falling to 8,990 million US$. Simultaneously, land holdings dropped from 225 million US$ to 116 million US$. The concurrent reduction in accumulated depreciation to 4,604 million US$ confirms a large-scale removal of assets from the balance sheet.
Impact on Asset Relative Age
Following the asset reductions in 2015, the average age ratio experienced a sharp increase to 51.88%, the highest level in the analyzed period. This reversal suggests that the assets removed from the portfolio were relatively newer, leaving behind a remaining asset base with a higher proportion of accumulated depreciation relative to its cost.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Total Useful Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, at cost 8,990 14,808 13,795 11,869 10,973
Land 116 225 220 190 184
Depreciation expense 597 809 681 597 572
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated total useful life1 15 18 20 20 19

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

2015 Calculations

1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant and equipment, at cost – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (8,990 – 116) ÷ 597 = 15


The period between 2011 and 2015 is characterized by an initial expansion of the asset base followed by a sharp contraction in the final year. From 2011 to 2014, property, plant, and equipment at cost increased steadily from 10,973 million US dollars to a peak of 14,808 million US dollars. However, by December 31, 2015, this value decreased significantly to 8,990 million US dollars, representing a substantial reduction in the company's total fixed asset holdings.

Estimated Total Useful Life
The estimated total useful life of assets remained relatively stable between 19 and 20 years from 2011 to 2013. A downward trend began in 2014, with the estimate falling to 18 years, and accelerated in 2015 to 15 years. This contraction suggests a shift in the composition of the asset portfolio toward assets with shorter operational lifespans or a revision in accounting estimates regarding asset utility.
Depreciation Expense Analysis
Depreciation expenses trended upward in alignment with the growth of the asset base from 2011 to 2014, rising from 572 million US dollars to 809 million US dollars. In 2015, the depreciation expense declined to 597 million US dollars, which correlates with the overall decrease in the total cost of property, plant, and equipment.
Land Valuation Trends
Land holdings showed a gradual increase from 184 million US dollars in 2011 to 225 million US dollars in 2014. In 2015, land values fell sharply to 116 million US dollars. The simultaneous decline in land, overall equipment cost, and estimated useful life indicates a significant divestiture or structural reorganization of the company's physical infrastructure during the 2015 fiscal year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 4,604 6,110 5,963 5,771 5,448
Depreciation expense 597 809 681 597 572
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Time elapsed since purchase1 8 8 9 10 10

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

2015 Calculations

1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 4,604 ÷ 597 = 8


The financial data for the period between 2011 and 2015 reveals a distinct shift in the composition and valuation of property, plant, and equipment. While the initial years show a steady progression in depreciation metrics, the final year of the analysis indicates a significant structural change in the asset base.

Accumulated Depreciation and Annual Expense Trends
From 2011 to 2014, accumulated depreciation exhibited a consistent upward trajectory, increasing from 5,448 million USD to 6,110 million USD. This growth was mirrored by the annual depreciation expense, which rose steadily from 572 million USD to a peak of 809 million USD in 2014. However, 2015 marked a sharp reversal, with accumulated depreciation falling to 4,604 million USD and the annual depreciation expense decreasing to 597 million USD. This substantial contraction suggests a significant disposal of older, fully or partially depreciated assets or a corporate divestiture.
Asset Age and Time Elapsed Since Purchase
The estimated time elapsed since purchase shows a gradual downward trend, moving from 10 years in 2011 and 2012 to 8 years by 2014 and 2015. This reduction in the average age of assets indicates a period of capital reinvestment where newer assets were introduced to the balance sheet, offsetting the age of the existing inventory.
Correlation Analysis
The correlation between the decrease in asset age and the abrupt drop in accumulated depreciation in 2015 suggests a strategic modernization of the asset portfolio. The removal of older assets from the ledger likely reduced the accumulated depreciation balance and lowered the subsequent annual depreciation expense, resulting in a younger, more streamlined asset base by the end of the observed period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Remaining Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property, plant and equipment (PP&E), net 4,386 8,698 7,832 6,098 5,525
Land 116 225 220 190 184
Depreciation expense 597 809 681 597 572
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated remaining life1 7 10 11 10 9

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

2015 Calculations

1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant and equipment (PP&E), net – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (4,386 – 116) ÷ 597 = 7


The financial trajectory of property, plant, and equipment from 2011 to 2015 is characterized by a period of expansion followed by a significant contraction. Between 2011 and 2014, net assets grew steadily, peaking at 8,698 million US dollars. However, a substantial reduction occurred in 2015, where net assets fell to 4,386 million US dollars, representing a decrease of approximately 50% from the previous year's peak.

Asset Base and Land Valuation
A consistent upward trend in both net property, plant, and equipment and land was observed from 2011 through 2014. Land holdings increased from 184 million US dollars to 225 million US dollars during this window. In 2015, a sharp decline was recorded in both categories, with land values dropping to 116 million US dollars, suggesting a major divestiture or restructuring of the asset portfolio.
Depreciation Expense Trends
Depreciation expenses mirrored the growth of the asset base, rising from 572 million US dollars in 2011 to a peak of 809 million US dollars in 2014. The subsequent decline to 597 million US dollars in 2015 aligns with the overall reduction in net PP&E, indicating that the decrease in depreciation was a direct result of a smaller depreciable asset base.
Estimated Remaining Useful Life
The estimated remaining life of assets showed volatility over the five-year period. An initial increase from 9 years in 2011 to a peak of 11 years in 2013 suggests the integration of newer assets with longer lifespans. This trend reversed after 2013, culminating in a significant drop to 7 years by 2015. This reduction in estimated remaining life indicates a shift in the composition of the asset portfolio toward older assets or the removal of long-lived assets during the 2015 contraction.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?