AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Baxter International Inc. (NYSE:BAX)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 4, 2016.

Analysis of Solvency Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Solvency Ratios (Summary)

Debt Ratios

Coverage Ratios

Baxter International Inc., solvency ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Debt Ratios
Debt to equity 0.74 1.15 1.08 0.85 0.79
Debt to capital 0.42 0.53 0.52 0.46 0.44
Debt to assets 0.31 0.36 0.35 0.29 0.27
Financial leverage 2.37 3.19 3.06 2.94 2.90
Coverage Ratios
Interest coverage 3.93 15.60 17.45 26.57 31.53
Fixed charge coverage 2.30 6.85 7.91 10.17 10.52

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


The solvency profile between 2011 and 2015 is characterized by a period of increasing leverage followed by a significant deleveraging event in 2015, coupled with a consistent and steep decline in debt coverage capacity.

Leverage and Capital Structure
A steady increase in reliance on debt is observed from 2011 through 2014. The debt to equity ratio rose from 0.79 to a peak of 1.15, while the debt to assets ratio increased from 0.27 to 0.36 over the same period. Financial leverage followed a similar trajectory, peaking at 3.19 in 2014. This trend indicates an expansion of the company's debt burden relative to its equity and asset base during these four years.
A sharp reversal occurred in 2015, where all leverage metrics decreased significantly. The debt to equity ratio fell to 0.74, and financial leverage dropped to 2.37, the lowest level in the analyzed period. This suggests a substantial restructuring of the balance sheet or a significant injection of equity.
Debt Serviceability
Despite the improvement in leverage ratios in 2015, the ability to service debt obligations deteriorated continuously throughout the five-year period. The interest coverage ratio experienced a severe decline, falling from 31.53 in 2011 to 3.93 in 2015.
Similarly, the fixed charge coverage ratio showed a consistent downward trend, decreasing from 10.52 in 2011 to 2.30 in 2015. This indicates that the margin of safety for meeting fixed financial obligations has narrowed considerably over time.

In summary, while the company successfully reduced its overall leverage ratios by the end of 2015, the persistent decline in both interest and fixed charge coverage suggests a weakening operational capacity to support its debt obligations relative to previous years.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Debt to Equity

Baxter International Inc., debt to equity calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Short-term debt 1,775 913 181 27 256
Current maturities of long-term debt and lease obligations 810 786 859 323 190
Long-term debt and lease obligations, excluding current maturities 3,935 7,606 8,126 5,580 4,749
Total debt 6,520 9,305 9,166 5,930 5,195
 
Total Baxter shareholders’ equity 8,846 8,120 8,463 6,938 6,585
Solvency Ratio
Debt to equity1 0.74 1.15 1.08 0.85 0.79
Benchmarks
Debt to Equity, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Debt to equity = Total debt ÷ Total Baxter shareholders’ equity
= 6,520 ÷ 8,846 = 0.74

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data indicates a period of increasing leverage from 2011 to 2014, followed by a significant deleveraging phase in 2015. The solvency profile shifted from a conservative position to a more aggressive debt-funded structure before returning to a lower risk level by the end of the analyzed period.

Total Debt Evolution
Total debt exhibited a consistent upward trajectory between 2011 and 2014, rising from 5,195 million US$ to a peak of 9,305 million US$. This represents a substantial increase in liabilities over a four-year span. However, a sharp reduction occurred in 2015, with total debt falling to 6,520 million US$, indicating a major debt repayment or restructuring event.
Shareholders' Equity Growth
Total shareholders' equity maintained a generally positive growth trend, increasing from 6,585 million US$ in 2011 to 8,846 million US$ by 2015. A minor contraction was observed in 2014, where equity decreased to 8,120 million US$, although it recovered to its highest point in the subsequent year.
Debt to Equity Ratio Analysis
The debt to equity ratio reflects the coinciding movements of liabilities and equity. The ratio rose steadily from 0.79 in 2011 to a peak of 1.15 in 2014, signaling a period where the company relied more heavily on debt financing relative to equity. By 2015, the ratio declined to 0.74, the lowest value in the five-year sequence, confirming a strengthened solvency position and a significant reduction in financial leverage.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Debt to Capital

Baxter International Inc., debt to capital calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Short-term debt 1,775 913 181 27 256
Current maturities of long-term debt and lease obligations 810 786 859 323 190
Long-term debt and lease obligations, excluding current maturities 3,935 7,606 8,126 5,580 4,749
Total debt 6,520 9,305 9,166 5,930 5,195
Total Baxter shareholders’ equity 8,846 8,120 8,463 6,938 6,585
Total capital 15,366 17,425 17,629 12,868 11,780
Solvency Ratio
Debt to capital1 0.42 0.53 0.52 0.46 0.44
Benchmarks
Debt to Capital, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Debt to capital = Total debt ÷ Total capital
= 6,520 ÷ 15,366 = 0.42

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The solvency profile between 2011 and 2015 is characterized by a period of leverage expansion followed by a significant deleveraging event in the final year. The overall trend indicates a gradual increase in the reliance on debt to fund capital through 2014, which was abruptly reversed in 2015.

Total Debt Trends
Total debt experienced a consistent upward trajectory from 2011 to 2014, rising from 5,195 million to 9,305 million. A particularly sharp increase is noted between 2012 and 2013, where debt grew by approximately 54%. This trend reversed in 2015, with total debt contracting to 6,520 million.
Total Capital Evolution
Total capital increased from 11,780 million in 2011 to a peak of 17,629 million in 2013. Following this peak, capital levels remained relatively stable in 2014 before decreasing to 15,366 million in 2015, a decline that corresponds with the reduction in total debt.
Debt to Capital Ratio Analysis
The debt to capital ratio rose steadily from 0.44 in 2011 to a maximum of 0.53 in 2014, reflecting an increasing proportion of debt within the total capital structure. However, by December 31, 2015, the ratio dropped to 0.42, the lowest point in the five-year period, indicating a shift toward a more conservative solvency position.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Debt to Assets

Baxter International Inc., debt to assets calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Short-term debt 1,775 913 181 27 256
Current maturities of long-term debt and lease obligations 810 786 859 323 190
Long-term debt and lease obligations, excluding current maturities 3,935 7,606 8,126 5,580 4,749
Total debt 6,520 9,305 9,166 5,930 5,195
 
Total assets 20,975 25,917 25,869 20,390 19,073
Solvency Ratio
Debt to assets1 0.31 0.36 0.35 0.29 0.27
Benchmarks
Debt to Assets, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Debt to assets = Total debt ÷ Total assets
= 6,520 ÷ 20,975 = 0.31

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of solvency ratios between 2011 and 2015 reveals a period of increasing financial leverage followed by a notable contraction in both debt and asset levels.

Debt and Asset Growth (2011–2014)
A consistent upward trend in total debt is observed from December 31, 2011, through December 31, 2014, with debt rising from US$ 5,195 million to US$ 9,305 million. During the same period, total assets expanded from US$ 19,073 million to US$ 25,917 million. This simultaneous growth resulted in a steady increase in the debt to assets ratio, which climbed from 0.27 to a peak of 0.36, indicating that the expansion of the asset base was increasingly financed through debt.
Balance Sheet Contraction and Deleveraging (2014–2015)
A significant reversal occurred by December 31, 2015, characterized by a substantial decrease in total debt to US$ 6,520 million and a reduction in total assets to US$ 20,975 million. The debt to assets ratio consequently declined to 0.31. This pattern suggests a strategic shift toward deleveraging and a contraction of the balance sheet, effectively reducing the proportion of assets funded by debt compared to the 2014 peak.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Financial Leverage

Baxter International Inc., financial leverage calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Total assets 20,975 25,917 25,869 20,390 19,073
Total Baxter shareholders’ equity 8,846 8,120 8,463 6,938 6,585
Solvency Ratio
Financial leverage1 2.37 3.19 3.06 2.94 2.90
Benchmarks
Financial Leverage, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total Baxter shareholders’ equity
= 20,975 ÷ 8,846 = 2.37

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2011 and 2015, the capital structure exhibited a period of progressive leverage growth followed by a significant contraction in the final year. The relationship between total assets and shareholders' equity indicates a shift in the company's solvency profile and asset base management over this five-year interval.

Asset and Equity Dynamics
Total assets grew from 19,073 million US$ in 2011 to a peak of 25,917 million US$ in 2014, before experiencing a sharp decline to 20,975 million US$ in 2015. Shareholders' equity followed a generally positive trajectory, rising from 6,585 million US$ in 2011 to 8,846 million US$ in 2015, with only a slight decrease observed in 2014.
Financial Leverage Trends
The financial leverage ratio increased steadily from 2.90 in 2011 to 3.19 in 2014, indicating an increasing reliance on debt to finance the expansion of the asset base. This trend was reversed in 2015, where the ratio dropped significantly to 2.37, the lowest point in the analyzed period.
Analysis of Solvency Shift
The marked reduction in financial leverage in 2015 is attributable to the simultaneous decrease in total assets and the increase in shareholders' equity. This movement suggests a deleveraging event, likely driven by asset divestitures or a strategic reduction in liabilities, which resulted in a more conservative capital structure and improved solvency margins by the end of 2015.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Interest Coverage

Baxter International Inc., interest coverage calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income attributable to Baxter 968 2,497 2,012 2,326 2,224
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest — — — — 32
Less: Income from discontinued operations, net of tax 575 551 — — —
Add: Income tax expense 35 493 537 563 553
Add: Interest expense 146 167 155 113 92
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 574 2,606 2,704 3,002 2,901
Solvency Ratio
Interest coverage1 3.93 15.60 17.45 26.57 31.53
Benchmarks
Interest Coverage, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Interest coverage = EBIT ÷ Interest expense
= 574 ÷ 146 = 3.93

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data indicates a significant deterioration in the solvency position between 2011 and 2015, characterized by a consistent decline in the capacity to cover interest obligations from operating profits.

Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT)
Operating earnings remained relatively stable from 2011 through 2014, peaking at US$ 3,002 million in 2012 and maintaining a baseline above US$ 2,600 million. However, a severe contraction occurred in 2015, with EBIT falling to US$ 574 million, representing a precipitous drop in the funds available for debt servicing.
Interest Expense
Debt servicing costs exhibited a steady upward trend for the majority of the period, increasing from US$ 92 million in 2011 to a peak of US$ 167 million in 2014. A marginal decrease to US$ 146 million was recorded in 2015, though costs remained substantially higher than the initial 2011 levels.
Interest Coverage Ratio
A continuous downward trend is observed in the interest coverage ratio, which declined from 31.53 in 2011 to 3.93 in 2015. While the ratio remained comfortably high through 2014, the collapse in EBIT during 2015 led to an acute erosion of the safety margin. This trajectory indicates a transition from a position of extreme solvency to one of significantly heightened financial vulnerability.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Fixed Charge Coverage

Baxter International Inc., fixed charge coverage calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income attributable to Baxter 968 2,497 2,012 2,326 2,224
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest — — — — 32
Less: Income from discontinued operations, net of tax 575 551 — — —
Add: Income tax expense 35 493 537 563 553
Add: Interest expense 146 167 155 113 92
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 574 2,606 2,704 3,002 2,901
Add: Operating lease rent expense 184 250 214 202 203
Earnings before fixed charges and tax 758 2,856 2,918 3,204 3,104
 
Interest expense 146 167 155 113 92
Operating lease rent expense 184 250 214 202 203
Fixed charges 330 417 369 315 295
Solvency Ratio
Fixed charge coverage1 2.30 6.85 7.91 10.17 10.52
Benchmarks
Fixed Charge Coverage, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Fixed charge coverage = Earnings before fixed charges and tax ÷ Fixed charges
= 758 ÷ 330 = 2.30

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The solvency profile from 2011 to 2015 exhibits a significant deterioration in the ability to service fixed obligations. A consistent downward trend in the coverage ratio indicates a weakening financial cushion, culminating in a sharp contraction by the end of the observed period.

Earnings before fixed charges and tax
Earnings remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2014, peaking at 3,204 million USD in 2012 before slightly declining to 2,856 million USD in 2014. However, a precipitous decline occurred in 2015, with earnings falling to 758 million USD, representing a substantial contraction of approximately 73% compared to the prior year.
Fixed charges
Fixed obligations experienced a steady increase for the first four years, rising from 295 million USD in 2011 to 417 million USD in 2014. A reversal occurred in 2015, with charges decreasing to 330 million USD, although this reduction was not sufficient to compensate for the simultaneous collapse in earnings.
Fixed charge coverage ratio
The coverage ratio declined monotonically over the five-year span. From a high of 10.52 in 2011, the ratio eroded to 6.85 by 2014. The most critical decline occurred in 2015, where the ratio plummeted to 2.30. This trajectory reflects a marked reduction in the margin of safety available to meet fixed financial commitments.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?