Stock Analysis on Net

Ross Stores Inc. (NASDAQ:ROST)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since December 7, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Ross Stores Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The analysis of the financial data over six annual periods reveals several key trends regarding the company's profitability, capital structure, and value creation.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
The NOPAT shows a general upward trend from 2017 to 2022, starting at approximately 1.2 billion USD and increasing to about 1.88 billion USD. There is a consistent growth trajectory with a slight dip in 2021 to around 210 million USD, which appears to be an anomaly amid otherwise steady increases. This suggests improved operating efficiency and profitability over the years, excluding the 2021 deviation.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital demonstrates a gradual decline across the periods, decreasing from 14.19% in 2017 to 13.69% in 2022. This reduction indicates a slightly lower required return on invested capital, which may reflect improved risk profile, market conditions, or capital structure optimization.
Invested Capital
Invested capital has increased steadily from approximately 6 billion USD in 2017 to about 9.25 billion USD in 2022. The rise reflects ongoing investments and expansion in assets or operations, notably with a significant increase between 2020 and 2021, suggesting substantial capital deployment during that period.
Economic Profit
Economic profit exhibits a positive and increasing pattern from 2017 to 2020, rising from around 348 million USD to nearly 793 million USD, highlighting strong value creation over this timeframe. However, in 2021, economic profit drops sharply to a negative figure exceeding 1 billion USD, indicating value erosion during that year. This decline aligns with the previously noted drop in NOPAT and spike in invested capital, suggesting that the capital employed in 2021 did not generate sufficient returns. In 2022, economic profit rebounds to over 600 million USD, evidencing recovery and resumed value creation.

Overall, the company experienced steady growth in operating profit and invested capital, accompanied by a decreasing cost of capital, supporting economic value addition over the majority of the period. The anomalous results in 2021, marked by a steep reduction in operating profit and economic profit, paired with elevated invested capital, suggest challenges likely caused by extraordinary circumstances. The subsequent recovery in 2022 indicates effective management response and restoration of financial performance.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Ross Stores Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Net earnings
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents2
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability3
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense4
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes5
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income6
Investment income, after taxes7
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings.

3 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

4 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings.

6 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


The financial data reveals the following trends over the six-year period:

Net Earnings
Net earnings generally increased from 2017 through 2020, rising from approximately 1,117,654 thousand US dollars to 1,660,928 thousand US dollars. However, in 2021 there was a significant decline to 85,382 thousand US dollars, which represents a substantial drop. In 2022, net earnings recovered strongly to 1,722,589 thousand US dollars, exceeding prior peak levels.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT followed a similar upward trend initially, climbing steadily from 1,203,081 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 1,766,422 thousand US dollars in 2020. In 2021, there was a sharp decrease to 209,948 thousand US dollars, mirroring the decline seen in net earnings. In 2022, NOPAT rebounded to 1,877,216 thousand US dollars, representing the highest value recorded during the period.

The data reflects strong growth from 2017 to 2020 in both net earnings and NOPAT. The pronounced dip in 2021 could indicate an extraordinary circumstance or operational disruption impacting profitability. The swift recovery in 2022 suggests that the company regained operational efficiency and profitability following the 2021 downturn. Overall, despite the temporary contraction, the longer-term trend is one of increasing profitability.


Cash Operating Taxes

Ross Stores Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes over the six-year period ending in early 2022. A detailed examination of the trends is as follows:

Provision for Income Taxes
Beginning with a value of approximately $668.5 million in early 2017, the provision for income taxes remains relatively stable through 2018 at around $678 million. However, it experiences a notable decline in 2019 to about $463.4 million and maintains a similar level in 2020 with approximately $503.4 million. A remarkable drop occurs in 2021, with the provision plummeting to roughly $20.9 million, before rebounding sharply in 2022 to approximately $535.9 million. This inconsistency suggests potential variations in taxable income, adjustments in tax strategy, or the impact of extraordinary items during the observed timeframe.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes start at approximately $727.9 million in early 2017 and increase moderately to about $761.2 million in 2018. Similar to the provision for income taxes, cash operating taxes show a marked decline in 2019, dropping to around $457.5 million, and a slight further decrease in 2020 to approximately $490.9 million. The value again dramatically decreases in 2021 to approximately $89.2 million, followed by a rise in 2022 to about $557.1 million. This pattern aligns with the trends seen in the provision for income taxes, indicating consistent fluctuations in actual tax payments, which could be influenced by changes in earnings, tax regulation modifications, or cash flow management strategies.

Overall, both tax-related items exhibit a pronounced dip in 2021 amid general declines during 2019 and 2020, followed by recovery in 2022. The significant reduction in 2021 for both metrics merits further investigation to understand the underlying causes, which might include one-time tax benefits, changes in corporate earnings, or legislative impacts.


Invested Capital

Ross Stores Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Current portion of long-term debt
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Equity equivalents3
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax4
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Construction-in-progress5
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

5 Subtraction of construction-in-progress.


Total Reported Debt & Leases
The total reported debt and leases showed a generally increasing trend from 2017 through 2019, rising from approximately $3.22 billion to $3.63 billion. In 2020, this leveled off slightly to around $3.49 billion before experiencing a significant surge in 2021 to $5.73 billion, followed by a slight decrease to $5.62 billion in 2022. This indicates a notable increase in leverage starting in 2021.
Stockholders’ Equity
Stockholders' equity increased steadily from $2.75 billion in 2017 to approximately $3.36 billion in 2020, reflecting consistent growth over these years. There was a slight decline in 2021 to $3.29 billion, which was followed by a substantial increase to $4.06 billion in 2022. Overall, equity growth has been positive with a dip in 2021, possibly influenced by broader financial adjustments during that period.
Invested Capital
Invested capital closely followed a growth pattern from 2017 to 2019, rising from $6.02 billion to about $6.88 billion, with a minor dip in 2020 to $6.81 billion. There was a sharp increase in 2021 to $8.77 billion and a further rise to $9.25 billion in 2022. This demonstrates an overall expansion in the capital base, particularly pronounced from 2021 onwards, aligning with the increased debt levels.

Cost of Capital

Ross Stores Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 34.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 34.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Senior Notes3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Senior Notes. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Ross Stores Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data reveals several notable trends and fluctuations over the analyzed periods. Economic profit exhibited an overall increase from 2017 through 2020, rising from approximately $348 million to nearly $793 million. However, this positive trajectory was interrupted sharply in 2021, where economic profit recorded a significant loss of about $1.02 billion. The subsequent year showed a recovery, with economic profit rebounding to around $612 million.

Invested capital showed a gradual growth over the six-year period, increasing from roughly $6.0 billion in 2017 to approximately $9.25 billion in 2022. The growth was steady until 2020, with a notable rise in 2021 and 2022, where investments increased substantially.

The economic spread ratio, which serves as a measure of returns relative to invested capital, followed a pattern consistent with economic profit. The ratio improved year over year from 5.79% in 2017 to 11.65% in 2020, indicating increasing profitability on invested capital during this period. However, 2021 witnessed a reversal with a steep negative spread ratio of -11.62%, reflecting the substantial economic loss that year. The ratio recovered to 6.62% in 2022, indicating a return to positive profitability, albeit at a level lower than the peak years.

In summary, the data portrays a company that was progressively enhancing its economic profit and returns on capital up to 2020, followed by a significant downturn in 2021. The decline may indicate extraordinary challenges or adverse conditions during that year. The recovery in 2022 suggests a resilience and return toward previous profitability levels, though the economic spread ratio has yet to reach its prior peak.


Economic Profit Margin

Ross Stores Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Sales
Sales exhibited a generally positive growth trend from January 2017 to January 2022, increasing from approximately $12.87 billion to $18.92 billion. There was consistent annual growth until January 2021, where a notable decline to around $12.53 billion was observed, followed by a substantial rebound in January 2022.
Economic Profit
Economic profit increased steadily from January 2017, reaching its peak in February 2020 at roughly $793 million. However, there was a significant downturn in January 2021, with economic profit turning negative at approximately -$1.02 billion, indicating a loss in value creation during this period. The situation reversed in January 2022, where economic profit recovered to $612 million, signaling a return to positive value generation.
Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin followed a trajectory similar to economic profit, improving from 2.71% in January 2017 to a high of 4.94% by February 2020. A sharp decline to -8.13% occurred in January 2021, reflecting the negative economic profit scenario. This margin improved again to 3.23% in January 2022, consistent with the recovery in economic profit.
Overall Trends and Insights
The data illustrates a period of steady growth and profitability from 2017 through early 2020, culminating in record economic profit and margin figures. The year 2021 marked a significant disruption, with both sales and economic profit experiencing considerable declines and the economic profit margin turning negative. This anomaly was temporary as the company demonstrated a robust recovery in 2022, with sales surpassing previous highs and economic profit margins recovering to positive territory. The fluctuations in economic profit and margin suggest sensitivity to external factors impacting profitability beyond sales volume alone.