AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Ross Stores Inc. (NASDAQ:ROST)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since December 7, 2022.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Ross Stores Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Jan 29, 2022 42.43% = 12.63% × 3.36
Jan 30, 2021 2.59% = 0.67% × 3.86
Feb 1, 2020 49.44% = 17.77% × 2.78
Feb 2, 2019 48.02% = 26.14% × 1.84
Feb 3, 2018 44.69% = 23.82% × 1.88
Jan 28, 2017 40.67% = 21.05% × 1.93

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited a steady upward trajectory from 2017 through 2020, peaking at 49.44%, before experiencing a severe contraction to 2.59% in 2021. A significant recovery followed in 2022, with ROE returning to 42.43%, nearly reaching pre-2021 levels.

Return on Assets (ROA)
Operational efficiency, as measured by ROA, grew consistently from 21.05% in 2017 to a peak of 26.14% in 2019. This trend reversed sharply thereafter, with a decline to 17.77% in 2020 and a critical drop to 0.67% in 2021. By 2022, ROA showed signs of recovery, rising back to 12.63%.
Financial Leverage
The leverage ratio remained relatively stable and low between 2017 and 2019, ranging from 1.93 to 1.84. A marked shift occurred in 2020, where leverage increased to 2.78 and peaked at 3.86 in 2021. A slight moderation was observed in 2022, with the ratio decreasing to 3.36.
ROE Driver Analysis
Between 2017 and 2019, ROE growth was driven primarily by increasing asset productivity (ROA) while leverage remained stable. In 2020, a divergent pattern emerged: ROE reached its highest point (49.44%) despite a decline in ROA, indicating that financial leverage became the primary driver of equity returns. The collapse of ROE in 2021 resulted from the severity of the ROA decline, which overwhelmed the amplifying effect of peak financial leverage. The 2022 recovery was driven by a substantial rebound in ROA, which restored ROE despite a slight reduction in leverage.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Ross Stores Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Jan 29, 2022 42.43% = 9.11% × 1.39 × 3.36
Jan 30, 2021 2.59% = 0.68% × 0.99 × 3.86
Feb 1, 2020 49.44% = 10.36% × 1.72 × 2.78
Feb 2, 2019 48.02% = 10.59% × 2.47 × 1.84
Feb 3, 2018 44.69% = 9.64% × 2.47 × 1.88
Jan 28, 2017 40.67% = 8.69% × 2.42 × 1.93

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited a period of steady growth from 2017 to 2020, peaking at 49.44%, before experiencing a severe contraction in 2021 and a significant recovery by 2022. This volatility is characterized by the fluctuating interaction between profit margins, asset efficiency, and financial leverage.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability showed a consistent upward trend from 8.69% in 2017 to a peak of 10.59% in 2019. A critical collapse occurred in 2021, where the margin fell to 0.68%, acting as the primary driver for the precipitous decline in ROE. By 2022, the margin recovered to 9.11%, returning to levels closely aligned with the 2017 baseline.
Asset Turnover
Operational efficiency remained stable between 2017 and 2019, holding between 2.42 and 2.47. A downward trend emerged in 2020 (1.72) and reached a minimum in 2021 (0.99), indicating a substantial reduction in the capacity to generate revenue from the asset base. A partial recovery to 1.39 was observed in 2022, although this remains significantly lower than the levels seen prior to 2020.
Financial Leverage
Leverage was relatively stable and low from 2017 through 2019, ranging from 1.84 to 1.93. A sharp increase began in 2020 (2.78) and peaked in 2021 at 3.86. This expansion of the leverage ratio occurred inversely to the decline in profit margins and asset turnover, suggesting an increase in debt or a reduction in equity. Leverage moderated slightly to 3.36 in 2022 but remains elevated compared to the early period of analysis.

The overall analysis indicates that while ROE returned to a strong position of 42.43% in 2022, the composition of this return has shifted. The pre-2020 ROE was driven primarily by high asset turnover and steady margins with low leverage. Conversely, the 2022 recovery relies more heavily on increased financial leverage to compensate for asset turnover that has not yet returned to its historical peaks.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Ross Stores Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Jan 29, 2022 42.43% = 0.76 × 0.97 × 12.34% × 1.39 × 3.36
Jan 30, 2021 2.59% = 0.80 × 0.55 × 1.55% × 0.99 × 3.86
Feb 1, 2020 49.44% = 0.77 × 1.00 × 13.55% × 1.72 × 2.78
Feb 2, 2019 48.02% = 0.77 × 0.99 × 13.80% × 2.47 × 1.84
Feb 3, 2018 44.69% = 0.67 × 0.99 × 14.57% × 2.47 × 1.88
Jan 28, 2017 40.67% = 0.63 × 0.99 × 14.03% × 2.42 × 1.93

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited a steady growth trajectory from 40.67% in 2017 to a peak of 49.44% in 2020. This was followed by a severe contraction to 2.59% in 2021, before a rapid recovery to 42.43% in 2022. The volatility in ROE is primarily attributed to drastic shifts in operational efficiency and profitability during the 2020-2021 period, partially offset by increased financial leverage.

Profitability and Tax Efficiency
The tax burden ratio improved consistently from 0.63 in 2017 to 0.80 in 2021, indicating a higher percentage of pre-tax income being retained. EBIT margins remained relatively stable between 13.55% and 14.57% from 2017 through 2020. However, a significant collapse in the EBIT margin occurred in 2021, dropping to 1.55%, which served as a primary driver for the decline in ROE. By 2022, the margin recovered to 12.34%, returning near historical norms.
Operational Efficiency
Asset turnover was stable and high between 2017 and 2019, averaging approximately 2.45. A downward trend emerged in 2020 (1.72) and reached a low of 0.99 in 2021, suggesting a marked decrease in the ability to generate sales from the asset base. While turnover improved to 1.39 in 2022, it remained significantly below the pre-2020 efficiency levels.
Financial Structure and Interest Burden
Financial leverage remained consistent between 1.84 and 1.93 from 2017 to 2019 but increased sharply thereafter, peaking at 3.86 in 2021 and remaining elevated at 3.36 in 2022. This indicates a strategic shift toward higher debt utilization or a reduction in equity. The interest burden remained near unity (0.99-1.00) for most of the period, with the exception of 2021, where it dropped to 0.55, indicating that interest expenses consumed a much larger portion of operating income during that year.
Synthesis of ROE Drivers
The initial growth in ROE (2017-2020) was supported by stable margins and high asset turnover. The 2021 crash was a result of a simultaneous decline in EBIT margins, asset turnover, and the interest burden. The recovery in 2022 was facilitated by a rebound in operating profitability and the maintenance of higher financial leverage, which amplified the restored earnings to bring ROE back to 42.43%.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Ross Stores Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Jan 29, 2022 12.63% = 9.11% × 1.39
Jan 30, 2021 0.67% = 0.68% × 0.99
Feb 1, 2020 17.77% = 10.36% × 1.72
Feb 2, 2019 26.14% = 10.59% × 2.47
Feb 3, 2018 23.82% = 9.64% × 2.47
Jan 28, 2017 21.05% = 8.69% × 2.42

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited a period of growth followed by a severe contraction and a subsequent partial recovery between 2017 and 2022. The metric peaked at 26.14% in February 2019 before declining sharply to a low of 0.67% in January 2021, eventually recovering to 12.63% by January 2022.

Net Profit Margin Trends
Profitability showed a steady upward trajectory from 8.69% in 2017 to a peak of 10.59% in 2019. While a minor decrease occurred in 2020, a drastic collapse to 0.68% was recorded in 2021. By 2022, the margin demonstrated significant resilience, returning to 9.11%, which indicates a restoration of operational efficiency and pricing stability.
Asset Turnover Efficiency
Efficiency in asset utilization remained stable and high from 2017 to 2019, maintaining a range between 2.42 and 2.47. A significant downward trend began in 2020, with the ratio falling to 1.72, and reaching a minimum of 0.99 in 2021. Although the ratio improved to 1.39 in 2022, it remained substantially below the pre-2020 performance levels.
ROA Disaggregation Analysis
The fluctuations in ROA were driven by the interplay between profitability and asset efficiency. The growth phase from 2017 to 2019 was supported by simultaneous improvements in both net profit margin and asset turnover. The subsequent decline was initially led by a drop in asset turnover in 2020, followed by a systemic collapse of both components in 2021. The partial recovery of ROA in 2022 was primarily fueled by the rebound in net profit margin, as the asset turnover ratio has not yet returned to its historical baseline.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Ross Stores Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Jan 29, 2022 12.63% = 0.76 × 0.97 × 12.34% × 1.39
Jan 30, 2021 0.67% = 0.80 × 0.55 × 1.55% × 0.99
Feb 1, 2020 17.77% = 0.77 × 1.00 × 13.55% × 1.72
Feb 2, 2019 26.14% = 0.77 × 0.99 × 13.80% × 2.47
Feb 3, 2018 23.82% = 0.67 × 0.99 × 14.57% × 2.47
Jan 28, 2017 21.05% = 0.63 × 0.99 × 14.03% × 2.42

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited a growth trend from 2017 to 2019, peaking at 26.14%, before experiencing a significant contraction that reached a minimum of 0.67% in 2021. A partial recovery followed in 2022, with ROA rising to 12.63%.

Tax Burden
A consistent upward trend is observed from 2017 to 2021, where the ratio increased from 0.63 to 0.80. This suggests an improvement in the proportion of pre-tax income retained as net income, although a slight decrease to 0.76 occurred in 2022.
Interest Burden
The ratio remained highly stable near parity between 0.97 and 1.00 for most of the analyzed period, indicating that interest expenses had a negligible impact on earnings. However, a sharp anomaly occurred in 2021, where the ratio dropped to 0.55, signifying a temporary and substantial increase in the burden of interest payments relative to operating income.
EBIT Margin
Operating profitability remained resilient between 2017 and 2020, fluctuating within a narrow range of 13.55% to 14.57%. A severe collapse is noted in 2021, with the margin falling to 1.55%, before recovering strongly to 12.34% in 2022.
Asset Turnover
Efficiency in asset utilization remained stable at approximately 2.42 to 2.47 through 2019. A downward trend commenced in 2020, reaching a low of 0.99 in 2021, which indicates a significant decline in the ability to generate revenue from the asset base. A moderate recovery to 1.39 was observed in 2022.

The overall volatility in ROA was primarily driven by the simultaneous collapse of the EBIT Margin and Asset Turnover in 2021. While the Tax Burden improved over the long term, the dramatic operational downturn and reduced asset efficiency in 2021 neutralized these gains, though the 2022 figures suggest a return toward historical operational norms.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

Ross Stores Inc., decomposition of net profit margin ratio

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Jan 29, 2022 9.11% = 0.76 × 0.97 × 12.34%
Jan 30, 2021 0.68% = 0.80 × 0.55 × 1.55%
Feb 1, 2020 10.36% = 0.77 × 1.00 × 13.55%
Feb 2, 2019 10.59% = 0.77 × 0.99 × 13.80%
Feb 3, 2018 9.64% = 0.67 × 0.99 × 14.57%
Jan 28, 2017 8.69% = 0.63 × 0.99 × 14.03%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


The net profit margin exhibited a general upward trend from 2017 to 2019, increasing from 8.69% to a peak of 10.59%. This growth was followed by a slight contraction in 2020 and a severe collapse in 2021, where the margin dropped to 0.68%. A strong recovery was observed in 2022, with the margin returning to 9.11%.

Operating Efficiency (EBIT Margin)
The EBIT margin remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2020, fluctuating within a narrow band of 13.55% to 14.57%. A significant anomaly occurred in 2021, when the margin plummeted to 1.55%, identifying operating performance as the primary driver of the decline in net profitability. By 2022, the margin recovered to 12.34%, although it remained below the levels seen between 2017 and 2020.
Financial Leverage (Interest Burden)
For the majority of the period, the interest burden ratio remained near 1.00, indicating that interest expenses had a negligible impact on earnings before taxes. However, a sharp decline to 0.55 was recorded in 2021, suggesting a substantial increase in the relative cost of debt servicing or a significant decrease in EBIT during that fiscal year. This ratio normalized to 0.97 by 2022.
Taxation Impact (Tax Burden)
The tax burden ratio demonstrated a consistent improvement from 0.63 in 2017 to a peak of 0.80 in 2021. This upward trend indicates a reduction in the effective tax rate over time, which served as a partial buffer for net profit margins. In 2022, the ratio slightly moderated to 0.76.

The disaggregation of the net profit margin reveals that while tax efficiencies improved over the six-year period, the overall profitability was heavily dictated by operating performance. The volatility observed in 2021 was a result of a simultaneous collapse in both operating margins and the interest burden ratio, both of which largely recovered by 2022.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?