Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Monster Beverage Corp. (NASDAQ:MNST)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 7, 2024.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check

Economic Profit

Monster Beverage Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2023 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The analysis of economic value added from 2019 to 2023 reveals a consistent ability to generate positive economic profit, although the trajectory has been characterized by operational volatility and a steadily expanding capital base.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
An overall upward trend is observed, with NOPAT increasing from $1,081,692 thousand in 2019 to $1,640,309 thousand by 2023. This growth was interrupted in 2022, when NOPAT declined to $1,225,215 thousand, before rebounding significantly in 2023 to reach its highest point in the period analyzed.
Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
Invested capital exhibited continuous and accelerating growth, rising from $3,936,622 thousand in 2019 to $7,284,194 thousand in 2023. Throughout this expansion, the cost of capital remained remarkably stable, maintaining a range between 14.15% and 14.16%, suggesting a constant hurdle rate for value creation.
Economic Profit Performance
Economic profit remained positive throughout the five-year period, indicating that the entity consistently generated returns above its cost of capital. Profit climbed from $524,526 thousand in 2019 to a peak of $694,024 thousand in 2021. A sharp contraction occurred in 2022, with economic profit falling to $402,010 thousand; this decline was the result of a simultaneous decrease in NOPAT and an increase in the capital charge stemming from higher invested capital. By 2023, economic profit recovered to $609,392 thousand, as the substantial increase in NOPAT effectively offset the continued growth in the capital base.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Monster Beverage Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019
Net income
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts, sales returns and cash discounts2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest on finance lease liabilities
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest on finance lease liabilities
Tax benefit of interest on finance lease liabilities6
Adjusted interest on finance lease liabilities, after taxes7
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts, sales returns and cash discounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.

5 2023 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2023 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest on finance lease liabilities = Adjusted interest on finance lease liabilities × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.


The financial data reveals notable trends in profitability over the five-year period ending December 31, 2023. Both net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibit fluctuations, with discernible variations that suggest changes in operational efficiency and overall profitability.

Net Income
Net income increased significantly from approximately 1.11 billion USD in 2019 to a peak of about 1.41 billion USD in 2020. This increase was followed by a slight decline to roughly 1.38 billion USD in 2021, then a more pronounced decrease to approximately 1.19 billion USD in 2022. However, net income rebounded strongly in 2023, reaching the highest value in the period, approximately 1.63 billion USD. This trajectory indicates periods of both growth and contraction, with a robust recovery in the latest year.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT shows a similar pattern to net income but with slightly different magnitudes. It rose from about 1.08 billion USD in 2019 to approximately 1.24 billion USD in 2020, continuing to increase to about 1.38 billion USD in 2021. However, it then declined to approximately 1.23 billion USD in 2022 before surging to its highest level of approximately 1.64 billion USD in 2023. This pattern of growth, decline, and subsequent recovery parallels the net income trend, reflecting operational profitability dynamics.

Overall, the data suggests that while there were challenges in 2021 and 2022, the company managed to overcome these setbacks by improving profitability significantly in 2023. The alignment between net income and NOPAT trends supports the interpretation that improvements in core operations and tax management contributed to the strong financial performance in the final year presented.



Cash Operating Taxes

Monster Beverage Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019
Provision for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest on finance lease liabilities
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).


The analysis of the financial data over the five-year period reveals fluctuations and trends in the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes.

Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes began at $308,127 thousand at the end of 2019. There was a decline in 2020 to $216,563 thousand, indicating a significant reduction in tax provisions for that year. This was followed by a sharp increase to $423,944 thousand in 2021, nearly doubling from 2020. The value slightly decreased to $380,340 thousand in 2022 but rose again to $437,494 thousand by the end of 2023. Overall, the provision shows volatility with an upward trend after 2020, suggesting changing profitability or tax strategy impacts during the period.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes rose from $311,101 thousand in 2019 to a peak of $399,574 thousand in 2021. After the peak, cash taxes decreased substantially to $335,159 thousand in 2022. The following year, 2023, saw cash operating taxes increase again to $407,458 thousand, the highest in the five-year period. This pattern indicates some variability year over year but an overall growth trend in actual cash taxes paid, despite the fluctuations.

In summary, both provisions for income taxes and cash operating taxes demonstrate variability over the period, with an overall upward trajectory after the dip in 2020. The divergence between provision and cash taxes in certain years points to timing differences or adjustments in tax liabilities and payments. These dynamics highlight the company’s changing tax expense environment and potential shifts in earnings or tax strategies across the analyzed timeframe.



Invested Capital

Monster Beverage Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019
Current finance lease liabilities
Noncurrent finance lease liabilities
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts, sales returns and cash discounts3
Deferred revenue4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Assets under construction7
Investments, available-for-sale8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of assets under construction.

8 Subtraction of investments, available-for-sale.


The financial data reveals notable trends in the company's capital structure and equity position over the given five-year period.

Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases exhibit a fluctuating upward trend. Initially, the debt decreases from $29,948 thousand in 2019 to $21,336 thousand in 2020, showing a reduction in financial obligations. However, from 2020 onward, the debt burden increases consistently, reaching $66,015 thousand by the end of 2023. This represents more than a doubling from the 2019 level, indicating a rising reliance on debt financing or lease obligations in recent years.
Stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity demonstrates continuous and substantial growth throughout the period. It rises from approximately $4,171,281 thousand in 2019 to $8,228,744 thousand in 2023. This nearly doubles the equity base, suggesting strong retained earnings, potential equity infusions, or value appreciation over time, reflecting a solid and expanding capital foundation for the company.
Invested capital
Invested capital also shows a consistent upward trajectory, increasing from $3,936,622 thousand in 2019 to $7,284,194 thousand in 2023. The growth in invested capital aligns with the growth in equity and rising debt levels, which indicates the company’s expansion efforts or reinvestment strategies. This suggests the company has increased its resources deployed in operations or assets, supporting ongoing business growth.

Overall, the data displays a pattern of expanding financial scale with increasing equity and invested capital, accompanied by a significant rise in debt and lease obligations in recent years. The upward trends in both equity and debt signify an aggressive growth strategy, leveraging both internal funds and external financing. While the equity growth reassures financial stability, the marked increase in debt from 2021 to 2023 may warrant attention regarding leverage and associated risks moving forward.



Cost of Capital

Monster Beverage Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Finance lease liabilities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Finance lease liabilities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »



Economic Spread Ratio

Monster Beverage Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2023 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the economic value generation indicates a period of consistent capital expansion contrasted by volatile economic profitability. While the company has aggressively increased its invested capital base over the five-year period, the efficiency of this capital in generating economic profit has experienced a notable decline, followed by a partial recovery.

Invested Capital Growth
A continuous upward trend is observed in invested capital, which rose from $3,936,622 thousand in 2019 to $7,284,194 thousand by 2023. This steady increase suggests a persistent commitment to expanding the company's asset base and operational capacity.
Economic Profit Volatility
Economic profit demonstrated growth in the early part of the period, peaking at $694,024 thousand in 2021. A significant contraction occurred in 2022, with profit falling to $402,010 thousand. A recovery was observed in 2023, as economic profit rose back to $609,392 thousand, although it remained below the 2021 peak.
Economic Spread Ratio Performance
The economic spread ratio, which measures the efficiency of invested capital in producing economic profit, peaked at 14.45% in 2020. A sharp decline is evident in 2022, where the ratio dropped to 6.91%, indicating a period of reduced capital efficiency. While the ratio improved to 8.37% in 2023, it has not yet returned to the baseline levels observed between 2019 and 2021.

The divergent trends between the steadily increasing invested capital and the fluctuating economic spread ratio suggest that recent capital injections have not yielded proportional increases in economic value. The substantial drop in the spread ratio in 2022 highlights a period of diminished returns on invested capital, though the 2023 figures indicate a positive trajectory toward regaining operational efficiency.



Economic Profit Margin

Monster Beverage Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Net sales
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Coca-Cola Co.
Mondelēz International Inc.
PepsiCo Inc.
Philip Morris International Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2023 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance between 2019 and 2023 is characterized by a consistent expansion in top-line revenue contrasted with volatility in the generation of economic value. While adjusted net sales demonstrated uninterrupted growth throughout the period, economic profit and the associated margin experienced a significant contraction in 2022 before initiating a partial recovery in 2023.

Adjusted Net Sales Trend
A sustained upward trajectory is observed in adjusted net sales, which grew from 4,176,256 thousand US dollars in 2019 to 7,119,081 thousand US dollars by 2023. This represents a continuous increase in market scale and revenue generation over the five-year period.
Economic Profit Volatility
Economic profit exhibited a growth phase from 2019 to 2021, peaking at 694,024 thousand US dollars. However, a sharp decline occurred in 2022, where the value fell to 402,010 thousand US dollars, a reduction of approximately 42% from the previous year. By 2023, economic profit rebounded to 609,392 thousand US dollars, though it remained below the 2021 peak.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin fluctuated between a high of 13.65% in 2020 and a low of 6.39% in 2022. The significant compression of the margin in 2022 is particularly noteworthy as it occurred simultaneously with an increase in adjusted net sales, suggesting that the cost of capital or operating expenses grew at a rate that significantly outpaced revenue growth during that fiscal year. The subsequent increase to 8.56% in 2023 indicates a recovery in efficiency, although the margin has not yet returned to the levels observed between 2019 and 2021.

In summary, the divergence between the steady growth of adjusted net sales and the fluctuating economic profit margin suggests that the company's ability to create value above its cost of capital has become less efficient relative to its size. The period from 2019 to 2023 indicates that revenue growth has not translated linearly into increased economic value.