Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The total balance of goodwill and other intangible assets exhibited high stability between 2018 and 2021, maintaining a range between 43.98 billion and 44.29 billion US dollars. This consistency suggests an absence of significant new acquisitions or large-scale impairment charges during the analyzed period.
- Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles
- Goodwill remained nearly constant, fluctuating marginally around 20.18 billion US dollars. Similarly, intangible assets with indefinite lives showed minimal variance, totaling approximately 22.55 billion US dollars by the end of 2021. The primary drivers of this value were brands and trade names, which together accounted for over 22 billion US dollars. A notable upward trend was observed in indefinite-lived distribution rights, which increased from an unrecorded balance in 2018 to 85 million US dollars by December 31, 2021.
- Definite-Lived Intangible Assets and Amortization
- While the gross amount of intangible assets with definite lives increased slightly from 1.95 billion US dollars in 2018 to 1.99 billion US dollars in 2021, the net book value declined steadily from 1.66 billion US dollars to 1.30 billion US dollars. This downward trend in net value is directly attributable to the consistent rise in accumulated amortization, which grew from 293 million US dollars in 2018 to 683 million US dollars in 2021.
- Analysis of Specific Definite-Lived Components
- Acquired technology represented the largest portion of definite-lived assets and remained stagnant at 1.15 billion US dollars throughout the entire four-year period. Customer relationships also demonstrated stability, maintaining a value of 638 million US dollars from 2019 through 2021.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The removal of goodwill and intangible assets from the financial statements reveals a significant disparity between reported and tangible financial positions. While reported metrics show steady, incremental growth, the adjusted figures highlight a more aggressive expansion in tangible equity and a high concentration of intangible value within the total asset base.
- Total Asset Composition and Intangible Concentration
- A consistent gap exists between reported and adjusted total assets, remaining approximately 20 billion US dollars throughout the period from 2018 to 2021. This indicates that goodwill and intangible assets comprise roughly 40% of the total asset base. This portion of the assets remained relatively static, while the tangible asset base grew from 28.9 billion US dollars in 2018 to 30.4 billion US dollars in 2021.
- Stockholders' Equity Growth Dynamics
- The impact of removing intangibles is most pronounced in the stockholders' equity. Reported equity increased by approximately 11% over the four-year period. In contrast, adjusted stockholders' equity grew from 2.5 billion US dollars in 2018 to 4.8 billion US dollars in 2021, representing an increase of approximately 90%. This divergence suggests that the growth in reported equity is heavily buffered by intangible assets, whereas the tangible equity base is expanding at a significantly faster rate.
- Tangible Equity Strengthening
- The reliance on intangible assets to support the equity position is substantial. In 2018, adjusted equity represented only 11% of reported equity. By 2021, this proportion increased to approximately 19%. This trend indicates a strengthening of the tangible financial position relative to total equity, reducing the relative weight of goodwill and intangible assets within the equity structure over the analyzed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The removal of goodwill and intangible assets reveals a significant divergence between reported financial metrics and the underlying performance of tangible assets. This adjustment highlights a company with substantially higher operational efficiency and profitability, albeit with a much higher degree of financial leverage on a tangible asset basis.
- Asset Utilization Efficiency
- A consistent upward trend is observed in both reported and adjusted total asset turnover. The reported ratio increased from 0.15 in 2018 to 0.25 in 2021, while the adjusted ratio rose from 0.26 to 0.42 over the same period. The consistently higher adjusted figures indicate that the reported turnover is heavily suppressed by the presence of significant intangible assets that do not contribute directly to revenue generation.
- Financial Leverage Analysis
- A stark contrast exists between reported and adjusted financial leverage. While reported leverage remained relatively stable, decreasing slightly from 2.17 in 2018 to 2.03 in 2021, the adjusted leverage shows a sharp downward trajectory, falling from 11.46 in 2018 to 6.35 in 2021. This suggests that the company's debt is heavily concentrated against its tangible asset base, although the risk profile relative to those assets has improved significantly over the four-year period.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- The impact of goodwill removal is most pronounced in the Return on Equity. Reported ROE grew from 2.60% in 2018 to 8.59% in 2021. However, the adjusted ROE is exponentially higher, starting at 23.24% in 2018 and reaching 44.80% by 2021. This divergence indicates that the reported equity is inflated by intangible assets, masking the true earning power of the invested capital.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- Both reported and adjusted ROA exhibit steady growth throughout the period. Reported ROA increased from 1.20% to 4.24%, while adjusted ROA improved from 2.03% to 7.06%. The widening gap between these two metrics underscores an increasing efficiency in generating profits from the tangible asset base compared to the total asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Total assets
= 12,683 ÷ 50,598 = 0.25
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 12,683 ÷ 30,416 = 0.42
The financial trajectory from 2018 to 2021 indicates a steady increase in both reported and adjusted total assets, accompanied by a consistent improvement in asset turnover efficiency. A substantial variance is maintained between reported total assets and adjusted total assets, which signifies a high concentration of goodwill and intangible assets within the overall asset structure.
- Reported Total Asset Turnover
- A positive trend is observed in the reported total asset turnover, which grew from 0.15 in 2018 to 0.25 in 2021. This upward movement suggests an increasing ability to generate revenue from the company's total asset base over the four-year period.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- The adjusted total asset turnover shows a more significant increase, rising from 0.26 in 2018 to 0.42 in 2021. This metric, which excludes the impact of intangible assets and goodwill, reveals a more aggressive improvement in the efficiency of tangible operating assets.
- Analysis of Asset Efficiency Gap
- The consistent gap between reported and adjusted turnover ratios highlights the extent to which non-physical assets weight the balance sheet. The adjusted turnover ratio is consistently higher than the reported ratio, indicating that the core tangible assets are utilized more intensively to produce revenue than the total asset base would suggest. The widening of this gap reflects enhanced operational productivity relative to the tangible asset investment.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 50,598 ÷ 24,972 = 2.03
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 30,416 ÷ 4,790 = 6.35
An analysis of the financial position from 2018 to 2021 reveals a significant disparity between reported and adjusted financial metrics, primarily driven by the substantial weight of goodwill and intangible assets on the balance sheet. While reported assets and equity show modest, steady growth, the adjusted figures provide a more conservative assessment of the company's capital structure and risk profile.
- Asset Composition and Equity Quality
- Reported total assets increased marginally from 48,918 million USD in 2018 to 50,598 million USD in 2021. However, adjusted total assets remained considerably lower, ending the period at 30,416 million USD. This suggests that a significant portion of the asset base is comprised of non-physical assets. This trend is further mirrored in the stockholders' equity, where adjusted equity grew from 2,522 million USD to 4,790 million USD, yet remained a small fraction of the reported equity of 24,972 million USD as of December 31, 2021.
- Financial Leverage Divergence
- A marked contrast is observed between reported and adjusted financial leverage. Reported financial leverage remained relatively stable and low, decreasing slightly from 2.17 in 2018 to 2.03 in 2021. Conversely, adjusted financial leverage was substantially higher, starting at 11.46 in 2018. This divergence indicates that the reported leverage ratios may understate the actual financial risk by including intangible assets that may not be readily convertible to cash during liquidation.
- Adjusted Leverage Trajectory
- Despite the elevated starting point, adjusted financial leverage exhibited a consistent and aggressive downward trend throughout the period, falling to 6.35 by December 31, 2021. This reduction indicates a systemic improvement in the tangible capital structure and a strengthening of the relationship between tangible assets and total liabilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to KDP ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,146 ÷ 24,972 = 8.59%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to KDP ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,146 ÷ 4,790 = 44.80%
An analysis of the financial metrics between 2018 and 2021 reveals a substantial disparity between reported and adjusted equity figures, indicating that a significant portion of the capital structure is comprised of goodwill and intangible assets.
- Equity Composition and Growth Trends
- Reported stockholders' equity exhibited a steady increase, rising from 22,533 million USD in 2018 to 24,972 million USD in 2021. During the same period, adjusted stockholders' equity experienced more pronounced growth, increasing from 2,522 million USD to 4,790 million USD. This trend indicates that the tangible equity base grew at a significantly faster rate than the total reported equity, suggesting a strengthening of the company's net tangible asset position.
- Analysis of Return on Equity (ROE) Divergence
- There is a marked difference between reported and adjusted ROE across all four years. Reported ROE remained in the single digits, though it trended upward from 2.60% in 2018 to 8.59% in 2021. Conversely, the adjusted ROE remained substantially higher, beginning at 23.24% in 2018 and climbing to 44.80% by 2021. This divergence demonstrates that the inclusion of intangible assets significantly suppresses the reported return, whereas the return on tangible equity reflects a much higher level of operational efficiency.
- Operational Efficiency and Performance
- The adjusted ROE indicates a strong capacity for generating returns on tangible capital. While a slight contraction occurred in 2020, where the ratio dipped to 36.35% from a 2019 peak of 40.65%, a sharp recovery followed in 2021. The rise to 44.80% suggests an acceleration in profitability relative to the adjusted equity base, confirming a positive trajectory in capital productivity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to KDP ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 2,146 ÷ 50,598 = 4.24%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to KDP ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 2,146 ÷ 30,416 = 7.06%
A consistent upward trajectory is observed in both reported and adjusted return on assets from 2018 through 2021. While the total asset base exhibited modest growth, the rate of return improved significantly, indicating an increase in operational efficiency and profitability relative to the invested capital.
- Asset Base Divergence
- A substantial variance is maintained between reported total assets and adjusted total assets across the analyzed period. Reported assets grew from 48,918 million USD in 2018 to 50,598 million USD in 2021, while adjusted assets increased from 28,907 million USD to 30,416 million USD. The persistent gap of approximately 20 billion USD highlights a significant allocation of capital toward goodwill and intangible assets.
- Reported Return on Assets (ROA)
- The reported ROA demonstrated a steady and positive trend, rising from 1.20% in 2018 to 4.24% in 2021. This progression indicates that the company improved its ability to generate net income from its entire asset base, including the non-amortizable or intangible components.
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
- The adjusted ROA exhibited more pronounced growth, increasing from 2.03% in 2018 to 7.06% in 2021. The adjusted figure consistently exceeds the reported ROA, as the removal of goodwill and intangible assets from the asset denominator eliminates the dilutive effect of these items, reflecting a higher rate of return on tangible operating assets.
- Comparative Efficiency Analysis
- The spread between adjusted and reported ROA widened over the four-year period, increasing from 0.83 percentage points in 2018 to 2.82 percentage points in 2021. This widening divergence suggests that earnings growth has outpaced the growth of the tangible asset base more significantly than it has outpaced the total asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?