AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Diamondback Energy Inc. (NASDAQ:FANG)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since November 8, 2022.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Diamondback Energy Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 18.05% = 9.53% × 1.89
Dec 31, 2020 -51.36% = -25.64% × 2.00
Dec 31, 2019 1.81% = 1.02% × 1.78
Dec 31, 2018 6.17% = 3.92% × 1.58
Dec 31, 2017 9.18% = 6.21% × 1.48

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The financial performance between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in profitability, with a pronounced collapse in 2020 followed by a strong recovery in 2021. The two-component disaggregation of Return on Equity (ROE) reveals that while financial leverage trended upward for most of the period, the primary driver of equity returns was the drastic fluctuation in Return on Assets (ROA).

Return on Assets (ROA)
A consistent downward trajectory is observed from 2017 to 2020, with ROA declining from 6.21% to a critical low of -25.64%. This suggests a severe deterioration in operational efficiency or asset productivity during this window. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2021, where ROA rebounded to 9.53%, marking the highest level of asset productivity within the analyzed five-year period.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage exhibited a steady increase from 1.48 in 2017 to a peak of 2.00 in 2020. This indicates a progressive increase in the proportion of debt relative to equity used to finance assets. In 2021, a slight reduction to 1.89 occurred, suggesting a minor deleveraging effort or an increase in the equity base following the volatility of the previous year.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE mirrored the volatility of ROA but with amplified magnitude due to the effect of financial leverage. From 2017 to 2019, ROE declined from 9.18% to 1.81%. In 2020, the combination of a deeply negative ROA and peak leverage resulted in a severe ROE of -51.36%, illustrating how leverage magnified losses during the downturn. By 2021, the recovery in ROA, supported by a still-elevated leverage ratio of 1.89, propelled ROE to 18.05%, the peak for the period.

The analysis indicates that the company's equity returns are highly sensitive to asset performance. The increasing leverage through 2020 acted as a risk multiplier, exacerbating the negative impact of declining asset returns, but subsequently accelerating the recovery of equity returns once asset profitability returned to positive territory in 2021.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Diamondback Energy Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 18.05% = 32.34% × 0.29 × 1.89
Dec 31, 2020 -51.36% = -163.90% × 0.16 × 2.00
Dec 31, 2019 1.81% = 6.17% × 0.17 × 1.78
Dec 31, 2018 6.17% = 39.71% × 0.10 × 1.58
Dec 31, 2017 9.18% = 40.65% × 0.15 × 1.48

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a steady decline from 9.18% in 2017 to a severe contraction of -51.36% in 2020, followed by a robust recovery to 18.05% in 2021. This trajectory indicates a period of extreme instability in shareholder returns, primarily dictated by fluctuations in operational profitability.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability served as the primary driver of ROE volatility. High margins in 2017 and 2018 (approximately 40%) collapsed to 6.17% in 2019 and plummeted to -163.90% in 2020. The subsequent recovery to 32.34% in 2021 suggests a rapid restoration of pricing power or a significant reduction in operating costs following a period of severe losses.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization remained relatively low but showed a general upward trend toward the end of the period. After dipping to 0.10 in 2018, the ratio improved steadily, peaking at 0.29 in 2021. This indicates an increased efficiency in generating revenue from the asset base, which contributed positively to the ROE recovery in the final year.
Financial Leverage
There was a consistent increase in financial leverage from 2017 to 2020, rising from 1.48 to a peak of 2.00. This suggests a strategic increase in debt to amplify returns. However, this leverage acted as a multiplier for losses during the 2020 downturn, deepening the negative ROE before slightly moderating to 1.89 in 2021.

The interaction of these three components reveals that while increasing leverage and improving asset turnover provided a supportive framework for growth, they were insufficient to offset the drastic collapse in profit margins during 2020. The strong rebound in 2021 was achieved through a simultaneous recovery in profit margins and a significant improvement in asset turnover, while maintaining a higher leverage profile than observed at the start of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Diamondback Energy Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 18.05% = 0.78 × 0.94 × 44.49% × 0.29 × 1.89
Dec 31, 2020 -51.36% = — × — × -196.88% × 0.16 × 2.00
Dec 31, 2019 1.81% = 0.84 × 0.63 × 11.73% × 0.17 × 1.78
Dec 31, 2018 6.17% = 0.83 × 0.93 × 51.25% × 0.10 × 1.58
Dec 31, 2017 9.18% = 1.04 × 0.92 × 42.26% × 0.15 × 1.48

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited extreme volatility over the observed five-year period, starting at 9.18% in 2017, declining to a nadir of -51.36% in 2020, and recovering sharply to 18.05% by 2021. This trajectory indicates that the company's bottom-line performance was heavily influenced by significant operational swings, with the 2021 recovery driven by a simultaneous rebound in margins and improved asset efficiency.

Operational Profitability
The EBIT Margin acted as the primary catalyst for ROE fluctuations. After peaking at 51.25% in 2018, the margin collapsed to -196.88% in 2020, reflecting severe operating losses. The subsequent recovery to 44.49% in 2021 indicates a restoration of core profitability to levels seen in the 2017-2018 period.
Asset Utilization
Asset Turnover remained relatively low but followed a generally positive trend, increasing from 0.15 in 2017 to a peak of 0.29 in 2021. This upward movement suggests a progressive improvement in the efficiency of generating revenue from the existing asset base.
Financial Leverage
Financial Leverage increased steadily from 1.48 in 2017 to a peak of 2.00 in 2020, indicating an increased reliance on debt to fund assets. A slight correction to 1.89 was observed in 2021, suggesting a modest shift toward deleveraging following the 2020 period.
Tax and Interest Burdens
The Tax Burden showed a general decline, moving from 1.04 in 2017 to 0.78 in 2021. The Interest Burden remained largely stable, though a notable dip to 0.63 occurred in 2019 before returning to 0.94 in 2021, suggesting that interest expenses fluctuated but did not fundamentally erode the recovery of the equity return.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Diamondback Energy Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2021 9.53% = 32.34% × 0.29
Dec 31, 2020 -25.64% = -163.90% × 0.16
Dec 31, 2019 1.02% = 6.17% × 0.17
Dec 31, 2018 3.92% = 39.71% × 0.10
Dec 31, 2017 6.21% = 40.65% × 0.15

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a steady decline through 2019, a severe contraction in 2020, and a robust recovery in 2021. This trajectory indicates that overall asset efficiency was primarily driven by drastic fluctuations in profitability rather than consistent changes in operational asset utilization.

Net Profit Margin
A period of relative stability is observed from 2017 to 2018, with margins maintaining levels around 40%. A sharp deterioration followed in 2019, with the margin falling to 6.17%, culminating in a severe collapse in 2020 where the margin reached -163.90%. A strong recovery occurred in 2021, with the margin returning to 32.34%, identifying this component as the primary driver of ROA volatility.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization remained relatively low and stable compared to profitability metrics, fluctuating between 0.10 and 0.17 from 2018 to 2020. However, a notable improvement is observed in 2021, where the ratio increased to 0.29, the highest level in the analyzed period, suggesting a significant increase in revenue generation per unit of asset.
ROA Component Interaction
The disaggregation reveals that the negative ROA of -25.64% in 2020 was almost exclusively a result of the collapse in net profit margins, as asset turnover remained relatively constant at 0.16. Conversely, the peak ROA of 9.53% in 2021 was the result of a synergistic effect, where the recovery of profit margins coincided with the period's highest asset turnover efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Diamondback Energy Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2021 9.53% = 0.78 × 0.94 × 44.49% × 0.29
Dec 31, 2020 -25.64% = — × — × -196.88% × 0.16
Dec 31, 2019 1.02% = 0.84 × 0.63 × 11.73% × 0.17
Dec 31, 2018 3.92% = 0.83 × 0.93 × 51.25% × 0.10
Dec 31, 2017 6.21% = 1.04 × 0.92 × 42.26% × 0.15

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility over the five-year period, characterized by a progressive decline from 2017 to 2019, a severe contraction in 2020, and a robust recovery in 2021. The four-component disaggregation reveals that operating profitability was the primary driver of these fluctuations, while asset efficiency provided a secondary boost during the recovery phase.

Operating Profitability
The EBIT margin demonstrated extreme instability, peaking at 51.25% in 2018 before collapsing to -196.88% in 2020. This precipitous decline was the dominant factor in the collapse of the ROA to -25.64% in 2020. By 2021, the margin recovered to 44.49%, signaling a restoration of operational efficiency nearly aligned with 2017 levels.
Asset Efficiency
Asset turnover remained relatively low and stable between 2017 and 2020, fluctuating between 0.10 and 0.17. However, a significant increase to 0.29 was observed in 2021. This improvement indicates a more efficient utilization of the asset base to generate revenue, which acted as a catalyst for the ROA reaching its period high of 9.53%.
Interest Burden
The interest burden remained largely stable, generally ranging between 0.92 and 0.94, with the exception of a decline to 0.63 in 2019. This suggests that interest expenses typically maintained a consistent relationship with operating profits, except during the 2019 fiscal year.
Tax Burden
A gradual downward trend is observed in the tax burden, which decreased from 1.04 in 2017 to 0.78 in 2021. This decline indicates that taxes exerted an increasing negative impact on the conversion of pre-tax profits to net income over the analyzed duration.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

Diamondback Energy Inc., decomposition of net profit margin ratio

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Dec 31, 2021 32.34% = 0.78 × 0.94 × 44.49%
Dec 31, 2020 -163.90% = — × — × -196.88%
Dec 31, 2019 6.17% = 0.84 × 0.63 × 11.73%
Dec 31, 2018 39.71% = 0.83 × 0.93 × 51.25%
Dec 31, 2017 40.65% = 1.04 × 0.92 × 42.26%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The analysis of the disaggregated net profit margin reveals a period of extreme volatility in profitability between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a severe contraction in 2020 followed by a robust recovery in 2021.

Operating Performance and Net Profitability
The net profit margin exhibits a strong positive correlation with the EBIT margin, confirming that operating efficiency is the primary driver of bottom-line results. High profitability was maintained through 2018, with the EBIT margin peaking at 51.25% and the net profit margin at 40.65%. A sharp deterioration began in 2019, leading to a critical collapse in 2020, where the EBIT margin fell to -196.88% and the net profit margin dropped to -163.90%. By 2021, a significant recovery occurred, with the EBIT margin returning to 44.49% and the net profit margin rebounding to 32.34%.
Interest Burden Analysis
The interest burden remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 0.92 and 0.94 for the majority of the analyzed period. This suggests a consistent relationship between operating income and interest obligations. A notable exception occurred in 2019, when the ratio declined to 0.63, indicating a temporary increase in the impact of interest expenses on operating earnings during that fiscal year.
Tax Burden Trends
A general downward trend is observed in the tax burden, which declined from 1.04 in 2017 to 0.78 by 2021. This reduction indicates that tax efficiencies or credits increasingly mitigated the impact of taxes on pre-tax income over the five-year period, thereby supporting the net profit margin.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?