EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Diamondback Energy Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Return on Assets (ROA) since 2012
- Current Ratio since 2012
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2012
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2012
- Analysis of Revenues
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Diamondback Energy Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The analysis of economic value added indicates a consistent failure to generate positive economic profit over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. Despite fluctuations in operating performance, the returns generated were insufficient to cover the cost of the capital employed, resulting in a sustained erosion of shareholder value.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trends
- NOPAT exhibited extreme volatility, characterized by a peak in 2018 followed by a severe contraction. A critical decline occurred in 2020, where NOPAT fell to negative 5,563 million US dollars. While a significant recovery was observed in 2021 with NOPAT rising to 3,031 million US dollars, the inconsistency of these earnings underscores a high degree of operational risk.
- Invested Capital and Cost of Capital Dynamics
- Invested capital grew aggressively from 7,167 million US dollars in 2017 to a peak of 22,002 million US dollars in 2019, before stabilizing at 21,230 million US dollars by 2021. Concurrently, the cost of capital remained elevated, fluctuating between 23.98% and 32.66%. The substantial increase in the capital base significantly raised the financial hurdle required to achieve positive economic profit.
- Economic Profit Trajectory
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire period, with losses deepening from 1,819 million US dollars in 2017 to a maximum deficit of 9,529 million US dollars in 2020. This peak loss was the result of the simultaneous occurrence of negative NOPAT and a high capital charge. Although the economic loss narrowed to 2,975 million US dollars in 2021 due to improved operating profits, the company failed to reach a break-even point where NOPAT exceeded the cost of invested capital.
The overall trend suggests that while operational efficiency improved in the final year, the heavy capital investment combined with a high cost of capital continues to act as a primary driver of negative economic value.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc..
3 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense, less capitalized interest = Adjusted interest expense, less capitalized interest × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
4 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc..
5 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc.
- The net income experienced significant fluctuations over the five-year period. Starting at $482 million in 2017, it increased substantially to $846 million in 2018, indicating strong profitability growth. However, a sharp decline occurred in 2019, with net income dropping to $240 million. The year 2020 saw a drastic reversal, as the company reported a substantial net loss of $4,517 million, reflecting considerable financial distress or extraordinary losses. In 2021, the company recovered strongly, posting a net income of $2,182 million, the highest figure in the period under review, signaling a robust turnaround.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT also displayed significant variability, mirroring the trends seen in net income. The value rose from $521 million in 2017 to $1,175 million in 2018, more than doubling, which suggests improved operational efficiency and profitability. In 2019, NOPAT decreased substantially to $495 million, indicating a drop in operating profitability. The year 2020 showed a severe negative NOPAT of $5,563 million, consistent with the net loss trend, indicating a substantial operational and tax burden. By 2021, NOPAT recovered to $3,031 million, reflecting a strong improvement in operational performance and effective tax management.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The financial data indicates significant volatility in the provision for income taxes over the five-year period. In 2017, the provision showed a tax benefit of $20 million, which shifted dramatically to a tax expense of $168 million in 2018. This was followed by a moderate tax expense of $47 million in 2019. The year 2020 saw a substantial reversal with a large tax benefit of $1,104 million, marking the most pronounced change within the timeframe. In 2021, the provision returned to a notable tax expense of $631 million.
Cash operating taxes also exhibited variability but on a relatively smaller scale compared to the provision for income taxes. From $14 million in 2017, cash operating taxes increased slightly to $15 million in 2018 and then rose more substantially to $35 million by 2019. In 2020, cash operating taxes decreased to a negative $22 million, implying a cash inflow or tax refund situation. By 2021, cash operating taxes had increased sharply to $64 million, the highest in the observed period.
- Provision for Income Taxes:
- Highly volatile with alternating tax expenses and benefits.
- Significant tax benefit in 2020 contrasts with consistent tax expenses in most other years.
- The peak tax expense occurred in 2021 at $631 million.
- Cash Operating Taxes:
- Gradual increase from 2017 through 2019.
- Negative value in 2020 suggests tax refunds or credits received.
- Sharp increase in 2021, reaching the highest cash tax outlay in the period.
Overall, the trends reveal considerable fluctuations in tax-related financial items, with 2020 standing out due to exceptional tax benefits and cash tax refunds. The years following show a return to positive tax expenses and increased cash tax payments, signaling potential changes in tax obligations and operational profitability.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
2 Addition of equity equivalents to total Diamondback Energy, Inc. stockholders’ equity.
3 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
4 Subtraction of investment.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total debt and leases showed a significant increase from 2017 to 2018, rising from $1,477 million to $4,464 million. This upward trend continued in the following years, reaching $6,687 million by the end of 2021. The consistent rise indicates increasing leverage and possibly greater investments or acquisitions financed through debt.
- Total stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity increased markedly from $5,255 million in 2017 to a peak of $13,699 million in 2018. After a slight decline to $13,249 million in 2019, equity decreased further to $8,794 million in 2020, before recovering to $12,088 million in 2021. This pattern suggests volatility in retained earnings or equity capital transactions over the period, with a notable dip during 2020, possibly reflecting challenging market conditions or one-time charges.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital followed a similar upward trajectory from $7,167 million in 2017 to $22,002 million in 2019, indicating substantial growth in the company’s asset base. However, this figure declined sharply to $16,329 million in 2020, before increasing again to $21,230 million in 2021. The fluctuation mirrors the trends seen in equity and debt, implying adjustments in asset investment and financing approaches possibly influenced by external economic factors.
Cost of Capital
Diamondback Energy Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2017 through 2021 is characterized by a persistent inability to generate positive economic value, as evidenced by consistently negative economic profit and economic spread ratios. While there is a notable recovery in 2021, the overall trend indicates that the return on invested capital remained below the cost of capital throughout the analyzed period.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit remained negative for all five years, indicating that the company did not create value above its required return. A significant deterioration occurred between 2017 and 2020, with losses expanding from -1,819 million USD to a peak deficit of -9,529 million USD in 2020. However, 2021 saw a substantial recovery, with economic profit improving to -2,975 million USD, although it remained in negative territory.
- Invested Capital Volatility
- Invested capital experienced sharp fluctuations, beginning at 7,167 million USD in 2017 and surging to 20,304 million USD by 2018. After peaking at 22,002 million USD in 2019, capital levels contracted to 16,329 million USD in 2020 before rising again to 21,230 million USD in 2021. This volatility suggests significant shifts in asset acquisition or capital restructuring during this timeframe.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio remained negative throughout the period, confirming a consistent failure to exceed the cost of capital. The ratio showed marginal improvement from 2017 (-25.39%) to 2019 (-21.73%), followed by a severe collapse in 2020 to -58.36%, aligning with the period of maximum economic loss. By 2021, the ratio improved significantly to -14.01%, marking the most favorable position within the five-year window and indicating a trend toward potential value creation.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Revenue from contracts with customers | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Revenue from contracts with customers
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by a persistent inability to generate positive economic value, although a significant recovery trend is evident in the final year. The relationship between revenue growth and economic profit suggests a period of high capital intensity or a high cost of capital relative to earnings.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the analyzed period, indicating that the company did not exceed its required return on capital. The deficit widened from -1,819 million US$ in 2017 to a peak loss of -9,529 million US$ in 2020, before moderating to -2,975 million US$ in 2021.
- Revenue Trajectory
- Revenue demonstrated an overall upward trend, rising from 1,186 million US$ in 2017 to 3,887 million US$ in 2019. Following a contraction to 2,756 million US$ in 2020, a sharp increase occurred in 2021, with revenue expanding to 6,747 million US$.
- Economic Profit Margin Volatility
- The economic profit margin remained consistently negative, reaching its lowest point of -345.77% in 2020, which coincided with the maximum economic profit deficit and a decline in revenue. A substantial improvement was observed in 2021, where the margin rose to -44.09%, driven by the significant expansion in revenue relative to the reduction in the economic profit deficit.