Stock Analysis on Net

Diamondback Energy Inc. (NASDAQ:FANG)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since November 8, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Diamondback Energy Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in financial performance as measured by economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited volatility, moving from US$521 million in 2017 to US$1,175 million in 2018, then declining to US$495 million in 2019. A substantial loss of US$5,563 million was recorded in 2020, followed by a recovery to a profit of US$3,031 million in 2021. The cost of capital decreased from 33.29% in 2017 to 24.43% in 2019, before increasing to 28.83% in 2021. Invested capital increased considerably from 2017 to 2018, peaking at US$22,002 million in 2019, then decreased in 2020, and rose again in 2021.

Economic Profit Trend
Economic profit consistently remained negative throughout the analyzed period. The magnitude of the negative economic profit increased from US$1,865 million in 2017 to US$4,955 million in 2018 and US$4,880 million in 2019. The largest negative economic profit was recorded in 2020, reaching US$9,603 million, coinciding with the significant NOPAT loss. While the loss narrowed in 2021, economic profit remained negative at US$3,090 million.
Relationship between NOPAT and Economic Profit
A clear correlation exists between NOPAT and economic profit. The years with higher NOPAT (2017, 2018, and 2021) experienced less negative economic profit compared to 2019 and particularly 2020, where NOPAT was substantially lower or negative. This indicates that while NOPAT is a key driver, it has not been sufficient to generate positive economic profit during this period.
Impact of Cost of Capital
The cost of capital plays a significant role in the negative economic profit. Although the cost of capital decreased between 2017 and 2019, it remained substantial. The increase in cost of capital in 2021, coupled with a moderate increase in NOPAT, contributed to a continued negative economic profit. The relatively high cost of capital consistently exceeded the returns generated by the invested capital.
Invested Capital and Economic Profit
The substantial increase in invested capital between 2017 and 2019 did not translate into improved economic profit. In fact, economic profit worsened during this period, suggesting that the returns on the increased capital were insufficient to cover the cost of that capital. The decrease in invested capital in 2020 did not prevent a record negative economic profit, highlighting the significant impact of the NOPAT loss in that year.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Diamondback Energy Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc.
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents2
Interest expense, less capitalized interest
Adjusted interest expense, less capitalized interest
Tax benefit of interest expense, less capitalized interest3
Adjusted interest expense, less capitalized interest, after taxes4
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income5
Investment income, after taxes6
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc..

3 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense, less capitalized interest = Adjusted interest expense, less capitalized interest × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

4 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc..

5 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

6 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Diamondback Energy, Inc.
The net income experienced significant fluctuations over the five-year period. Starting at $482 million in 2017, it increased substantially to $846 million in 2018, indicating strong profitability growth. However, a sharp decline occurred in 2019, with net income dropping to $240 million. The year 2020 saw a drastic reversal, as the company reported a substantial net loss of $4,517 million, reflecting considerable financial distress or extraordinary losses. In 2021, the company recovered strongly, posting a net income of $2,182 million, the highest figure in the period under review, signaling a robust turnaround.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT also displayed significant variability, mirroring the trends seen in net income. The value rose from $521 million in 2017 to $1,175 million in 2018, more than doubling, which suggests improved operational efficiency and profitability. In 2019, NOPAT decreased substantially to $495 million, indicating a drop in operating profitability. The year 2020 showed a severe negative NOPAT of $5,563 million, consistent with the net loss trend, indicating a substantial operational and tax burden. By 2021, NOPAT recovered to $3,031 million, reflecting a strong improvement in operational performance and effective tax management.

Cash Operating Taxes

Diamondback Energy Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense, less capitalized interest
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The financial data indicates significant volatility in the provision for income taxes over the five-year period. In 2017, the provision showed a tax benefit of $20 million, which shifted dramatically to a tax expense of $168 million in 2018. This was followed by a moderate tax expense of $47 million in 2019. The year 2020 saw a substantial reversal with a large tax benefit of $1,104 million, marking the most pronounced change within the timeframe. In 2021, the provision returned to a notable tax expense of $631 million.

Cash operating taxes also exhibited variability but on a relatively smaller scale compared to the provision for income taxes. From $14 million in 2017, cash operating taxes increased slightly to $15 million in 2018 and then rose more substantially to $35 million by 2019. In 2020, cash operating taxes decreased to a negative $22 million, implying a cash inflow or tax refund situation. By 2021, cash operating taxes had increased sharply to $64 million, the highest in the observed period.

Provision for Income Taxes:
Highly volatile with alternating tax expenses and benefits.
Significant tax benefit in 2020 contrasts with consistent tax expenses in most other years.
The peak tax expense occurred in 2021 at $631 million.
Cash Operating Taxes:
Gradual increase from 2017 through 2019.
Negative value in 2020 suggests tax refunds or credits received.
Sharp increase in 2021, reaching the highest cash tax outlay in the period.

Overall, the trends reveal considerable fluctuations in tax-related financial items, with 2020 standing out due to exceptional tax benefits and cash tax refunds. The years following show a return to positive tax expenses and increased cash tax payments, signaling potential changes in tax obligations and operational profitability.


Invested Capital

Diamondback Energy Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Current maturities of long-term debt
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities
Total reported debt & leases
Total Diamondback Energy, Inc. stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities1
Equity equivalents2
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax3
Non-controlling interest
Adjusted total Diamondback Energy, Inc. stockholders’ equity
Investment4
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

2 Addition of equity equivalents to total Diamondback Energy, Inc. stockholders’ equity.

3 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

4 Subtraction of investment.


Total reported debt & leases
The total debt and leases showed a significant increase from 2017 to 2018, rising from $1,477 million to $4,464 million. This upward trend continued in the following years, reaching $6,687 million by the end of 2021. The consistent rise indicates increasing leverage and possibly greater investments or acquisitions financed through debt.
Total stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity increased markedly from $5,255 million in 2017 to a peak of $13,699 million in 2018. After a slight decline to $13,249 million in 2019, equity decreased further to $8,794 million in 2020, before recovering to $12,088 million in 2021. This pattern suggests volatility in retained earnings or equity capital transactions over the period, with a notable dip during 2020, possibly reflecting challenging market conditions or one-time charges.
Invested capital
Invested capital followed a similar upward trajectory from $7,167 million in 2017 to $22,002 million in 2019, indicating substantial growth in the company’s asset base. However, this figure declined sharply to $16,329 million in 2020, before increasing again to $21,230 million in 2021. The fluctuation mirrors the trends seen in equity and debt, implying adjustments in asset investment and financing approaches possibly influenced by external economic factors.

Cost of Capital

Diamondback Energy Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Diamondback Energy Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Chevron Corp.
ConocoPhillips
Exxon Mobil Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic performance. Economic profit consistently registers as negative across all observed years, indicating the company’s returns are insufficient to cover the cost of capital. Invested capital exhibits substantial growth initially, peaking in 2019, followed by a decrease in 2020, and a subsequent recovery in 2021. The economic spread ratio, a key indicator of value creation, reflects these trends and reveals a concerning pattern of diminishing returns.

Economic Profit
Economic profit begins at negative US$1,865 million in 2017 and declines sharply to negative US$4,955 million in 2018. While showing a slight improvement in 2019, it experiences a substantial deterioration in 2020, reaching negative US$9,603 million. A notable recovery is observed in 2021, with economic profit improving to negative US$3,090 million, though remaining negative overall.
Invested Capital
Invested capital increases significantly from US$7,167 million in 2017 to US$20,304 million in 2018, and continues to grow to US$22,002 million in 2019. A considerable decrease is then seen in 2020, falling to US$16,329 million. The final year, 2021, shows a rebound, with invested capital rising to US$21,230 million, approaching the levels seen in 2019.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio begins at -26.02% in 2017 and remains negative throughout the period. It shows a modest improvement from -26.02% to -24.40% in 2018, and then to -22.18% in 2019. However, the ratio experiences a dramatic decline in 2020, reaching -58.81%, indicating a significant underperformance relative to the cost of capital. The ratio improves considerably in 2021 to -14.55%, but still remains substantially negative, suggesting continued value destruction.

The substantial decline in the economic spread ratio in 2020, coupled with the lowest economic profit during the period, warrants further investigation. While 2021 shows improvement in both metrics, the continued negative economic profit and economic spread ratio suggest ongoing challenges in generating returns that exceed the cost of capital. The fluctuations in invested capital may be a contributing factor to the observed performance, requiring analysis of capital allocation strategies.


Economic Profit Margin

Diamondback Energy Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Revenue from contracts with customers
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Chevron Corp.
ConocoPhillips
Exxon Mobil Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Revenue from contracts with customers
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit and, consequently, the economic profit margin. Economic profit consistently registers as negative across all observed years, indicating the company’s return on capital employed is less than its cost of capital. However, the magnitude of these losses varies considerably.

Economic Profit
Economic profit exhibits substantial volatility. Losses increased from US$1,865 million in 2017 to US$4,955 million in 2018. While a slight improvement was noted in 2019 with a loss of US$4,880 million, 2020 saw a dramatic increase in the loss to US$9,603 million. A considerable reduction in the economic loss is apparent in 2021, falling to US$3,090 million, though remaining negative.
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Revenue demonstrates an overall upward trend, though not consistently. Revenue increased significantly from US$1,186 million in 2017 to US$2,130 million in 2018 and further to US$3,887 million in 2019. A decrease was observed in 2020, with revenue falling to US$2,756 million, before a substantial increase to US$6,747 million in 2021. This suggests revenue is sensitive to external factors or company-specific strategies.
Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin mirrors the trends in economic profit, consistently negative throughout the period. The margin worsened considerably from -157.20% in 2017 to -232.64% in 2018. A moderate improvement occurred in 2019, reaching -125.55%, but the margin deteriorated sharply in 2020 to -348.45%. The most recent year, 2021, shows a substantial improvement to -45.79%, aligning with the reduced economic loss. The negative margins indicate that for each dollar of revenue, the company is destroying economic value.

The significant disparity between revenue growth and persistent economic losses suggests that while the company is increasing sales, it is not effectively managing its capital to generate returns exceeding its cost. The improvement in both economic profit and margin in 2021 is a positive sign, but continued monitoring is necessary to determine if this represents a sustained trend.