AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

United States Steel Corp. (NYSE:X)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since July 28, 2023.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

United States Steel Corp., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 7.11 6.58 6.82 6.77 5.88
Receivables turnover 12.88 9.71 9.80 10.99 8.55
Payables turnover 5.56 5.00 5.07 5.88 4.85
Working capital turnover 5.39 6.14 5.48 10.89 8.68
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 51 56 54 54 62
Add: Average receivable collection period 28 38 37 33 43
Operating cycle 79 94 91 87 105
Less: Average payables payment period 66 73 72 62 75
Cash conversion cycle 13 21 19 25 30

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The analysis of short-term operating activity from 2018 to 2022 reveals a consistent trend of improving operational efficiency. There is a marked reduction in the time required to convert resources into cash, characterized by faster inventory movement and accelerated receivables collection.

Inventory and Receivables Management
Inventory turnover increased steadily from 5.88 in 2018 to 7.11 in 2022, which corresponds to a reduction in the average inventory processing period from 62 days to 51 days. Receivables turnover also showed a strong upward trend, particularly in 2022 when it reached 12.88, leading to a decrease in the average collection period from 43 days to 28 days. Together, these metrics indicate a more aggressive and efficient management of current assets.
Payables and Liability Handling
Payables turnover remained relatively stable over the five-year period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 4.85 and 5.88. The average payables payment period generally decreased from 75 days in 2018 to 66 days in 2022, suggesting a trend toward faster settlement of obligations to suppliers, although this decline was less pronounced than the improvements seen in asset turnover.
Operational Cycle and Liquidity
The operating cycle contracted significantly from 105 days in 2018 to 79 days in 2022. This improvement is most evident in the cash conversion cycle, which decreased from 30 days to 13 days. The compression of this cycle indicates a substantial increase in liquidity and a reduction in the duration that capital remains locked in the operating process.
Working Capital Utilization
Working capital turnover exhibited a volatile pattern, peaking at 10.89 in 2019 before declining and stabilizing at 5.39 by the end of 2022. This fluctuation suggests shifts in the relationship between net working capital and annual sales, contrasting with the more linear improvements observed in the inventory and receivables turnover rates.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

United States Steel Corp., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales 16,777 14,533 9,558 12,082 12,305
Inventories 2,359 2,210 1,402 1,785 2,092
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 7.11 6.58 6.82 6.77 5.88
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 2.91 3.12 — — —
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Materials 4.84 5.27 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Inventories
= 16,777 ÷ 2,359 = 7.11

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2018 and 2022, a general improvement in inventory management efficiency is observed, characterized by an overall upward trend in the inventory turnover ratio. This metric rose from 5.88 in 2018 to a peak of 7.11 by the end of 2022, indicating that inventory is being cycled through the production and sales process more rapidly over the five-year period.

Cost of Sales Dynamics
Significant volatility is observed in the cost of sales, which decreased from 12,305 million US$ in 2018 to a low of 9,558 million US$ in 2020. A strong recovery followed, with costs rising to 14,533 million US$ in 2021 and reaching 16,777 million US$ in 2022, reflecting a substantial increase in operational volume.
Inventory Level Management
Inventory levels mirrored the fluctuations in sales costs, declining from 2,092 million US$ in 2018 to 1,402 million US$ in 2020. Subsequent increases brought inventory levels to 2,210 million US$ in 2021 and 2,359 million US$ in 2022. The coordination between inventory levels and cost of sales suggests a strategic alignment of stock levels with market demand.
Inventory Turnover Performance
The turnover ratio showed a consistent increase from 2018 to 2020, rising from 5.88 to 6.82. Despite a slight contraction to 6.58 in 2021, the ratio reached its highest point of 7.11 in 2022. This progression suggests that the company enhanced its ability to generate sales relative to its average inventory investment, optimizing its short-term operating activity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

United States Steel Corp., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net sales 21,065 20,275 9,741 12,937 14,178
Receivables, less allowance 1,635 2,089 994 1,177 1,659
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 12.88 9.71 9.80 10.99 8.55
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 17.05 19.56 — — —
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Materials 9.26 9.18 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Receivables, less allowance
= 21,065 ÷ 1,635 = 12.88

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The receivables turnover ratio exhibits a positive growth trend over the analyzed five-year period, reflecting enhanced efficiency in managing short-term credit and accelerating the cash conversion cycle. While the ratio fluctuated between 2019 and 2021, it concluded the period at its highest point of 12.88 in 2022.

Revenue and Receivables Correlation
Net sales experienced a contraction through 2020, reaching a low of 9,741 million US dollars, before rebounding sharply to 20,275 million US dollars in 2021 and 21,065 million US dollars in 2022. Accounts receivable followed a similar pattern of decline until 2020, though a substantial increase occurred in 2021 to 2,089 million US dollars, coinciding with the surge in sales volume.
Turnover Ratio Volatility
The turnover ratio improved from 8.55 in 2018 to 10.99 in 2019, indicating an increase in collection efficiency. A period of relative stagnation followed, with the ratio dipping slightly to 9.80 in 2020 and 9.71 in 2021, suggesting that the rapid growth in sales during 2021 was accompanied by a proportional increase in outstanding receivables.
Operational Efficiency Peak
A significant improvement in operational efficiency is observed in 2022. Despite a continued increase in net sales to 21,065 million US dollars, receivables decreased to 1,635 million US dollars. This divergence resulted in the highest receivables turnover ratio of the period at 12.88, indicating superior credit management or a reduction in the average collection period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

United States Steel Corp., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales 16,777 14,533 9,558 12,082 12,305
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities 3,016 2,908 1,884 2,054 2,535
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 5.56 5.00 5.07 5.88 4.85
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 5.59 6.89 — — —
Payables Turnover, Industry
Materials 5.82 5.41 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
= 16,777 ÷ 3,016 = 5.56

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of the payables turnover and associated components from 2018 to 2022 reveals a period of fluctuation in operating costs and a relatively stable management of supplier obligations. While cost of sales experienced significant volatility, the payables turnover ratio remained within a narrow range, suggesting a consistent approach to liquidity management regarding short-term liabilities.

Cost of Sales Trends
Expenditures associated with the cost of sales exhibited a non-linear trend, decreasing from 12,305 million US$ in 2018 to a low of 9,558 million US$ in 2020. This was followed by a substantial recovery and expansion, reaching 16,777 million US$ by December 31, 2022. This trajectory indicates a significant increase in production volume or raw material costs in the latter two years of the period.
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
The balance of accounts payable and other accrued liabilities followed a similar trajectory to the cost of sales. A contraction occurred between 2018 and 2020, with balances falling from 2,535 million US$ to 1,884 million US$. Subsequently, a sharp increase was observed in 2021, reaching 2,908 million US$, and further rising to 3,016 million US$ in 2022, reflecting the scale of increased operations.
Payables Turnover Ratio Analysis
The payables turnover ratio fluctuated between a minimum of 4.85 in 2018 and a maximum of 5.88 in 2019. After a period of stabilization around 5.00 during 2020 and 2021, the ratio rose to 5.56 in 2022. The increase in the turnover ratio toward the end of the period indicates a higher frequency of payment to suppliers relative to the average payables balance, which may suggest a shortening of the payment cycle or an increase in the velocity of procurement activities.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

United States Steel Corp., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 7,866 7,152 4,432 3,813 4,830
Less: Current liabilities 3,959 3,852 2,656 2,625 3,197
Working capital 3,907 3,300 1,776 1,188 1,633
 
Net sales 21,065 20,275 9,741 12,937 14,178
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 5.39 6.14 5.48 10.89 8.68
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 2.46 2.56 — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Materials 13.54 15.37 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= 21,065 ÷ 3,907 = 5.39

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of working capital turnover reveals a general decline in operational efficiency regarding the use of short-term assets to generate revenue between 2018 and 2022. While net sales experienced significant volatility and subsequent growth, the proportional increase in working capital has resulted in a lower turnover ratio in the latter years of the period.

Net Sales Performance
Net sales exhibited significant volatility, characterized by a sharp decline to US$ 9,741 million in 2020, followed by a robust recovery to US$ 21,065 million by 2022. This trajectory indicates a period of severe contraction followed by a substantial expansion in revenue generation.
Working Capital Expansion
A consistent upward trend in working capital is observed from 2019 through 2022, with values rising from US$ 1,188 million to US$ 3,907 million. This suggests a significant increase in the net current assets maintained by the organization to support its operational requirements.
Working Capital Turnover Dynamics
The turnover ratio reached a peak of 10.89 in 2019 before declining to 5.39 by 2022. The precipitous drop in 2020 was primarily driven by the contraction in net sales. Although sales surged in 2021 and 2022, the turnover ratio did not return to previous levels because the growth in working capital outpaced the growth in sales. This indicates a decreasing efficiency in utilizing working capital to drive top-line growth compared to the 2018-2019 period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

United States Steel Corp., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 7.11 6.58 6.82 6.77 5.88
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 51 56 54 54 62
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 125 117 — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry
Materials 75 69 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 7.11 = 51

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the operating activity ratios indicates a general improvement in inventory management efficiency between 2018 and 2022. The inverse relationship between inventory turnover and the processing period demonstrates an acceleration in the movement of goods through the operational cycle.

Inventory Turnover
A consistent upward trajectory is observed in the inventory turnover ratio, which rose from 5.88 in 2018 to 7.11 by the end of 2022. While a slight contraction occurred in 2021, where the ratio dipped to 6.58 from 6.82 in the previous year, the overall trend reflects an increased capacity to convert inventory into sales.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The time required to process inventory experienced a notable reduction over the five-year period. The processing period decreased from 62 days in 2018 to 51 days in 2022. Stability was noted between 2019 and 2020 at 54 days, followed by a marginal increase to 56 days in 2021, before reaching a period low in 2022.

The convergence of an increasing turnover ratio and a decreasing processing period suggests enhanced operational agility. The reduction of 11 days in the inventory cycle from 2018 to 2022 implies a more efficient utilization of working capital and a reduced risk of inventory obsolescence.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

United States Steel Corp., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 12.88 9.71 9.80 10.99 8.55
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 28 38 37 33 43
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 21 19 — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Materials 39 40 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 12.88 = 28

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The management of accounts receivable exhibits a general trend toward increased efficiency over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022. A notable reduction in the time required to collect outstanding payments is observed, contributing to improved liquidity and working capital management.

Receivables Turnover Performance
The receivables turnover ratio demonstrated moderate volatility but ended the period on a strong upward trajectory. An initial increase from 8.55 in 2018 to 10.99 in 2019 was followed by a slight contraction to 9.80 and 9.71 in 2020 and 2021, respectively. A significant surge to 12.88 occurred by the end of 2022, marking the highest turnover rate within the analyzed timeframe.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period mirrored the turnover trends, starting at 43 days in 2018 and declining to 33 days in 2019. A moderate increase to 37 and 38 days during 2020 and 2021 suggests a temporary slowing of collections. This trend reversed sharply in 2022, with the collection period dropping to a five-year low of 28 days.
Correlation and Operational Insight
A consistent inverse relationship exists between the turnover ratio and the collection period. The substantial improvement observed in 2022, where the collection period reached its minimum of 28 days while turnover reached its peak of 12.88, indicates a heightened effectiveness in credit collection processes or a shift in customer payment behavior toward shorter terms.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

United States Steel Corp., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 51 56 54 54 62
Average receivable collection period 28 38 37 33 43
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 79 94 91 87 105
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 146 136 — — —
Operating Cycle, Industry
Materials 114 109 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 51 + 28 = 79

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The overall operating cycle demonstrates a general downward trend over the analyzed five-year period, reflecting a measurable improvement in the efficiency of the working capital cycle. The total duration required to convert inventory into cash decreased from 105 days in 2018 to 79 days in 2022, indicating an acceleration in operational liquidity and a reduction in the time capital is tied up in operating assets.

Average Inventory Processing Period
An improvement in inventory management efficiency is observed, with the processing period declining from 62 days in 2018 to 51 days in 2022. Although the period remained stagnant at 54 days between 2019 and 2020 and saw a slight increase to 56 days in 2021, the overall trajectory indicates a more streamlined movement of goods through the production and sales pipeline.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period exhibits higher volatility than inventory processing but concludes the period at its most efficient level. A sharp decrease from 43 days in 2018 to 33 days in 2019 was followed by a period of slight fluctuation between 37 and 38 days in 2020 and 2021. However, a significant reduction to 28 days in 2022 suggests a substantial optimization in credit collection processes or a shift in customer payment behavior.
Operating Cycle Integration
The contraction of the total operating cycle is the cumulative result of improvements in both the inventory and receivable components. The most pronounced reductions occurred between 2018 and 2019 and again between 2021 and 2022. The 26-day overall reduction in the cycle from 2018 to 2022 suggests a strengthened ability to generate cash from operations more rapidly.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

United States Steel Corp., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 5.56 5.00 5.07 5.88 4.85
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 66 73 72 62 75
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 65 53 — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Materials 63 67 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.56 = 66

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a fluctuating trend in the management of accounts payable between 2018 and 2022. The company has demonstrated inconsistent patterns in its payment velocity, characterized by periods of accelerated settlements followed by extensions of credit utilization.

Payables Turnover
The turnover ratio experienced an initial increase from 4.85 in 2018 to a peak of 5.88 in 2019, indicating a more rapid settlement of obligations. This was followed by a two-year decline, reaching a low of 5.00 in 2021. A recovery was observed in 2022, with the ratio rising to 5.56, suggesting an improvement in the efficiency of payment cycles relative to the previous two years.
Average Payables Payment Period
The payment period mirrored the turnover trends, starting at 75 days in 2018 before dropping significantly to 62 days in 2019. A subsequent extension of the payment cycle occurred in 2020 and 2021, where the period lengthened to 72 and 73 days, respectively. By the end of 2022, the payment period contracted to 66 days, reflecting a shift toward faster payment of supplier obligations compared to the 2020-2021 peak.

Overall, the data indicates a lack of a linear trend, with the company alternating between aggressive payment schedules and the preservation of working capital through extended payment terms. The convergence of a higher turnover ratio and a lower payment period in 2022 suggests a recent move toward more accelerated payables management.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

United States Steel Corp., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 51 56 54 54 62
Average receivable collection period 28 38 37 33 43
Average payables payment period 66 73 72 62 75
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 13 21 19 25 30
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc. 81 83 — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry
Materials 51 42 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 51 + 28 – 66 = 13

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The cash conversion cycle exhibits a consistent downward trend from 2018 to 2022, decreasing from 30 days to 13 days. This reduction indicates a significant improvement in operational efficiency and a more rapid conversion of working capital into cash.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory turnover efficiency improved over the analyzed period, with the processing period declining from 62 days in 2018 to 51 days in 2022. Although there was a slight increase to 56 days in 2021, the overall trajectory demonstrates a reduction in the time capital remains tied up in raw materials and finished goods.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection of receivables shows overall improvement, ending at a five-year low of 28 days in 2022, compared to 43 days in 2018. While the period experienced moderate fluctuations between 2019 and 2021, the sharp decline in the final year suggests more aggressive collection strategies or improved customer payment terms.
Average Payables Payment Period
The payment period for accounts payable has remained relatively high but volatile, shifting from 75 days in 2018 to 66 days in 2022. The company consistently maintains a payables period that exceeds both the inventory processing and receivable collection periods, effectively utilizing supplier credit to finance short-term operations.
Cash Conversion Cycle Integration
The contraction of the cash conversion cycle is driven by the simultaneous reduction in inventory holding times and receivable collection periods. By decreasing the cycle from 30 days to 13 days, the company has minimized the funding gap between the payment for inputs and the receipt of cash from sales, thereby enhancing overall liquidity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?