Stock Analysis on Net

United States Steel Corp. (NYSE:X)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since July 28, 2023.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Apple Pay Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

United States Steel Corp., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover
Receivables turnover
Payables turnover
Working capital turnover
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period
Add: Average receivable collection period
Operating cycle
Less: Average payables payment period
Cash conversion cycle

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

The analysis of the financial ratios over the five-year period reveals several notable trends related to turnover, efficiency, and cash flow management.

Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio demonstrates a general upward trend, increasing from 5.88 in 2018 to 7.11 in 2022. This indicates improved efficiency in managing and selling inventory over the years, suggesting faster movement of stock.
Receivables Turnover
Receivables turnover experienced fluctuations but overall increased from 8.55 in 2018 to a peak of 12.88 in 2022. This suggests that the company has become more effective in collecting receivables, with a sharper increase seen in 2019 and 2022.
Payables Turnover
Payables turnover shows moderate variability, rising from 4.85 in 2018 to 5.56 in 2022, after a dip during 2020 and 2021. This points to a more consistent payment schedule with slight optimization in recent years.
Working Capital Turnover
The working capital turnover ratio shows a peak in 2019 at 10.89, followed by a significant drop in 2020 and continuing lower levels through 2022, settling at 5.39. This decline signals reduced efficiency in utilizing working capital to generate sales in the latter years.
Average Inventory Processing Period (Days)
The number of days inventory is held decreased from 62 days in 2018 to 51 days in 2022, with some stability in the middle years. This shortening inventory period supports the improved inventory turnover, indicating more rapid stock processing.
Average Receivable Collection Period (Days)
There is a clear improvement in collecting receivables, with the collection period declining from 43 days in 2018 to 28 days in 2022. This reduction suggests enhanced cash flow from receivables over time.
Operating Cycle (Days)
The operating cycle decreased from 105 days in 2018 to 79 days in 2022, reflecting improvements in both inventory management and receivables collection. This reduction in the duration of capital tied in operations is a positive indicator of operational efficiency.
Average Payables Payment Period (Days)
The payables payment period dropped from 75 days in 2018 to 66 days in 2022, showing that the company is paying its suppliers faster in recent years, though with some fluctuations.
Cash Conversion Cycle (Days)
The cash conversion cycle steadily declined from 30 days in 2018 to 13 days in 2022. This demonstrates a significant improvement in how quickly the company converts its investments in inventory and receivables into cash while delaying cash outflows.

Overall, the data suggest enhanced operational efficiencies in inventory and receivables management, leading to a shorter operating cycle and cash conversion cycle. The declining working capital turnover ratio, however, may warrant further investigation to understand underlying factors affecting working capital utilization despite improvements in other areas. The payment trends indicate a gradual acceleration in settling payables, aligning with tightened working capital controls.


Turnover Ratios


Average No. Days


Inventory Turnover

United States Steel Corp., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales
Inventories
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Materials

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Inventories
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.

The analysis of the annual financial data reveals several notable trends in key metrics over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022.

Cost of Sales
The cost of sales exhibited a fluctuating pattern. Initially, it decreased from US$ 12,305 million in 2018 to US$ 9,558 million in 2020, indicating a significant reduction over the two-year span. However, a marked increase followed, rising to US$ 14,533 million in 2021 and further to US$ 16,777 million by the end of 2022. This upward trend in the latter years suggests increased production costs or higher input prices impacting overall expenses related to goods sold.
Inventories
Inventories showed a general decline in the first three years, dropping from US$ 2,092 million in 2018 to US$ 1,402 million in 2020. Thereafter, a reversal occurred, with inventories increasing steadily to US$ 2,210 million in 2021 and US$ 2,359 million in 2022. This rebound may reflect a strategic buildup of stock, possibly in anticipation of increased sales or due to procurement adjustments aligned with changing market conditions.
Inventory Turnover Ratio
The inventory turnover ratio, which measures how efficiently inventory is managed by comparing cost of sales to average inventory, demonstrated relative stability with a slight upward trend. The ratio increased from 5.88 in 2018 to 7.11 in 2022, peaking at 6.82 in 2020 before a minor dip in 2021. The rising turnover ratio towards the end of the period indicates improved efficiency in inventory management, with the company turning over its stock more frequently relative to its cost of sales.

In summary, the company experienced a reduction in cost of sales and inventories through 2020, followed by significant increases in both during 2021 and 2022. Inventory turnover improved overall, suggesting enhanced inventory management efficiency despite the higher inventory levels in the recent years. These patterns may reflect external market influences affecting costs and inventory policies, alongside internal operational adjustments over the reviewed period.


Receivables Turnover

United States Steel Corp., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net sales
Receivables, less allowance
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Materials

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Receivables, less allowance
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.

Net Sales
Net sales exhibited a notable fluctuation over the analyzed period. From 2018 to 2020, there was a declining trend, with net sales decreasing from $14,178 million in 2018 to $9,741 million in 2020. However, a significant recovery occurred in 2021 and 2022, where net sales surged to $20,275 million and $21,065 million respectively, surpassing earlier years and indicating a strong rebound in revenue generation.
Receivables, Less Allowance
Receivables showed variability throughout the period. There was a general decline from $1,659 million in 2018 to $994 million in 2020, mirroring the downward sales trend. In 2021, receivables increased significantly to $2,089 million, before decreasing again to $1,635 million in 2022. This pattern suggests fluctuations in credit extended to customers aligned with changes in sales volume and possibly credit policies.
Receivables Turnover Ratio
The receivables turnover ratio, which measures the efficiency of collecting receivables, improved overall during the period. Starting at 8.55 in 2018, it increased to 10.99 in 2019, declined slightly to 9.8 in 2020, and remained relatively stable in 2021 at 9.71. In 2022, the ratio reached its peak at 12.88, indicating enhanced effectiveness in collections. Higher turnover ratios correspond with quicker collection of receivables, which can positively impact cash flow.

Payables Turnover

United States Steel Corp., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
Payables Turnover, Industry
Materials

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.

The analysis of the annual financial data reveals several notable trends over the five-year period ending in 2022.

Cost of Sales
The cost of sales experienced fluctuations with an initial slight decline from 12,305 million USD in 2018 to 12,082 million USD in 2019. This was followed by a significant decrease to 9,558 million USD in 2020, likely reflecting operational impacts during that year. Subsequently, there was a strong rebound with increases to 14,533 million USD in 2021 and continuing upward to 16,777 million USD in 2022. This upward trend in the last two years suggests a recovery phase and potentially increased production or rising input costs.
Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities decreased from 2,535 million USD in 2018 to 1,884 million USD in 2020, indicating a reduction in outstanding payables or improved cash management during this period. However, a notable rise occurred in 2021, reaching 2,908 million USD, and a slight increase to 3,016 million USD in 2022. This recovery and growth in payables could reflect increased purchasing activities or extended payment terms to suppliers as volumes rose.
Payables Turnover Ratio
The payables turnover ratio showed variability but remained around the mid-range levels without dramatic shifts. It increased from 4.85 in 2018 to a peak of 5.88 in 2019, suggesting faster payment cycles before slowing to 5.07 in 2020. It then slightly declined to 5.00 in 2021 but improved to 5.56 in 2022. These figures indicate relatively stable payment behavior with a tendency towards quicker payment in some years, possibly corresponding to operational strategies or supplier negotiations.

In summary, the data points to a period of disruption around 2020, followed by a marked recovery in cost of sales and payables figures through 2021 and 2022. The payables turnover ratio reflects fairly consistent management of supplier payments with some fluctuations that may coincide with operational changes or market conditions during this timeframe.


Working Capital Turnover

United States Steel Corp., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets
Less: Current liabilities
Working capital
 
Net sales
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Materials

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.

The analysis of the data over the five-year period reveals discernible trends in key financial metrics indicative of operational and financial dynamics.

Working Capital
Working capital exhibited a fluctuating pattern initially, decreasing from $1633 million in 2018 to $1188 million in 2019, followed by a rebound in 2020 to $1776 million. Subsequently, a pronounced increase occurred in the last two years, reaching $3300 million in 2021 and further rising to $3907 million in 2022. This reflects a strengthening liquidity position and suggests enhanced short-term financial stability in recent periods.
Net Sales
Net sales showed variability, with an initial decline from $14178 million in 2018 to $12937 million in 2019, and a more significant drop to $9741 million in 2020. However, a strong recovery and growth trajectory is evident in 2021 and 2022, with net sales surging to $20275 million and $21065 million respectively. This trend indicates a considerable improvement in revenue generation post-2020, potentially linked to market conditions or operational adjustments.
Working Capital Turnover
The working capital turnover ratio decreased sharply from 8.68 in 2018 to 5.48 in 2020, reflecting a reduced efficiency in using working capital to generate sales. Despite a slight improvement to 6.14 in 2021, the ratio dropped again to 5.39 in 2022. The overall downward trend indicates that sales growth has not been proportional to the increase in working capital, suggesting either accumulation of working capital elements or less efficient utilization over time.

In summary, while working capital and net sales have both increased substantially in the most recent years, the declining working capital turnover ratio points to a potential area for efficiency enhancement. The company appears to have bolstered its liquidity and sales capacity but may need to optimize working capital management to improve operational efficiency going forward.


Average Inventory Processing Period

United States Steel Corp., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry
Materials

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.

Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio exhibited a generally increasing trend over the five-year period. Starting from 5.88 in 2018, it rose to 6.77 in 2019, remained relatively stable at 6.82 in 2020, slightly decreased to 6.58 in 2021, and then increased again to 7.11 in 2022. This pattern indicates an improvement in the efficiency of inventory management, with more frequent inventory turnover by the end of the period compared to the beginning.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period showed a consistent decline from 2018 to 2022. The period decreased from 62 days in 2018 to 51 days in 2022. This reduction corresponds to increasing inventory turnover and suggests that inventory was held for shorter durations each year, reflecting enhanced inventory management and possibly faster sales cycles or improved supply chain efficiencies.
Summary of Trends
The data reveals a clear trend of improved inventory efficiency. The increasing inventory turnover ratio combined with the decreasing average inventory processing period indicates that inventory is being converted to sales more rapidly over the years. Despite a minor dip in turnover ratio in 2021, the overall movement points to strengthened operational performance related to inventory management.

Average Receivable Collection Period

United States Steel Corp., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Materials

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.

Receivables Turnover
The receivables turnover ratio experienced some fluctuations over the analyzed period. Starting at 8.55 in 2018, it rose sharply to 10.99 in 2019, indicating improved efficiency in collecting receivables. In 2020 and 2021, the ratio decreased slightly to 9.8 and 9.71, respectively, suggesting a modest decline in collection efficiency during these years. However, in 2022, the ratio increased significantly to 12.88, marking the highest level in the period under review and reflecting a strong improvement in the management of receivables.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average receivable collection period displayed an inversely related trend compared to receivables turnover. Beginning at 43 days in 2018, it improved notably to 33 days in 2019, demonstrating accelerated cash inflows from receivables. The collection period then lengthened slightly to 37 days in 2020 and 38 days in 2021, which aligns with the small drop seen in the turnover ratio. By 2022, the collection period shortened significantly to 28 days, the lowest in the time series, underscoring efficient receivable collections consistent with the peak receivables turnover ratio of that year.
Overall Insights
Overall, the data reveals a pattern of increased efficiency in receivable management over five years. Despite minor setbacks in 2020 and 2021, possibly linked to external or operational factors, the company substantially improved its collection processes by 2022. The combination of the highest receivables turnover and the shortest collection period at the end of the period suggests strengthened liquidity and potentially improved cash flow management.

Operating Cycle

United States Steel Corp., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period
Average receivable collection period
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
Operating Cycle, Industry
Materials

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= + =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.

The analysis of the metrics related to inventory processing, receivable collection, and the operating cycle reveals notable trends over the period from December 31, 2018, to December 31, 2022.

Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period declined overall from 62 days in 2018 to 51 days in 2022. This reduction suggests improved efficiency in managing and turning over inventory, with relatively stable performance during 2019 and 2020 (54 days), a slight rise in 2021 (56 days), and then a further decrease in 2022.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average receivable collection period experienced a significant decrease over the analyzed timeframe, falling from 43 days in 2018 to 28 days in 2022. Notably, there was a marked improvement in 2019 to 33 days, a modest increase in 2020 and 2021 (37 and 38 days respectively), followed by a sharp decrease in 2022. This indicates enhanced effectiveness in collecting receivables, contributing positively to cash flow management.
Operating Cycle
The operating cycle, which combines inventory processing and receivable collection periods, also exhibited a downward trend, shrinking from 105 days in 2018 to 79 days in 2022. Despite minor fluctuations in 2020 and 2021, the overall decline signifies operational improvements leading to faster conversion of inventory and receivables into cash.

Overall, these patterns reflect strengthened efficiency in working capital management, with benefits likely extending to liquidity and operational cash flow. The company appears to have optimized inventory turnover and receivables collection, thereby reducing the time between cash outflow and inflow effectively.


Average Payables Payment Period

United States Steel Corp., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Materials

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.

The analysis of the payables turnover and average payables payment period over the five-year span reveals certain fluctuations and trends that offer insights into the company's payment efficiency and supplier relationship dynamics.

Payables Turnover
This ratio demonstrates an overall variable pattern. Starting at 4.85 in 2018, it increased significantly to 5.88 in 2019, indicating faster payment to suppliers or better management of accounts payable. Subsequently, a decline is observed in 2020 to 5.07 and a minor decrease in 2021 to 5.00. However, the ratio again rises to 5.56 in 2022, suggesting a potential improvement in payment efficiency or cost control measures during the most recent year.
Average Payables Payment Period
The number of days for payment to suppliers inversely correlates with the payables turnover ratio, as expected. It decreased notably from 75 days in 2018 to 62 days in 2019, indicating quicker payments during that year. In 2020 and 2021, the payment period extended again, reaching 72 and 73 days respectively, signifying a slowdown in payments. By 2022, there is a reduction to 66 days, pointing toward an acceleration in the payment process compared to the previous two years but still not as rapid as in 2019.

Overall, the data suggests a period of relatively faster supplier payments in 2019 followed by a gradual deceleration in 2020 and 2021. The year 2022 shows a modest recovery in payment speed. These shifts could reflect changes in working capital management strategies, supplier negotiations, or external economic factors influencing liquidity and operational decisions.


Cash Conversion Cycle

United States Steel Corp., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period
Average receivable collection period
Average payables payment period
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry
Materials

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= + =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Over the five-year period, the average inventory processing period demonstrated a general decline. Starting at 62 days in 2018, there was a notable decrease to 54 days by 2019, remaining stable through 2020, marginally increasing to 56 days in 2021, then improving further to 51 days in 2022. This trend indicates enhanced efficiency in inventory management, reflecting shorter holding times.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average receivable collection period showed a decreasing trend overall. It began at 43 days in 2018, improved significantly to 33 days in 2019, slightly increased to 37 days in 2020, then stabilized around 38 days in 2021 before declining substantially to 28 days in 2022. This suggests increasingly effective receivables management, resulting in faster cash inflows.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average payables payment period experienced fluctuations but ended with a decline. Initially, it reduced from 75 days in 2018 to 62 days in 2019, rose again to 72 days in 2020, remained steady near 73 days in 2021, and finally decreased to 66 days in 2022. These changes indicate varying payment strategies over time, with a recent move towards quicker settlement of obligations compared to earlier years.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle consistently decreased over the period, moving from 30 days in 2018 down to 13 days in 2022. Brief fluctuations occurred, with minor increases in 2021 compared to 2020, but the overall trend reflects an improving ability to convert investments in inventory and other resources into cash flows swiftly, enhancing working capital efficiency.