Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial performance from 2018 through 2022 is characterized by a general upward trajectory in profitability, interrupted by a temporary contraction in 2020. A significant acceleration in growth is evident in the final two years of the period, with all measured earnings metrics reaching their peak in 2022.
- EBITDA Growth and Volatility
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization exhibited steady growth from 3,628 million USD in 2018 to 4,200 million USD in 2019. A moderate decline occurred in 2020, with values falling to 3,796 million USD, before recovering to 4,253 million USD in 2021. The most substantial increase occurred between 2021 and 2022, where EBITDA surged to 5,464 million USD, representing a significant expansion in operating cash flow potential.
- Operational Leverage and Depreciation
- A substantial and consistent gap exists between EBIT and EBITDA across all reporting years. In 2022, for instance, the difference between EBITDA (5,464 million USD) and EBIT (3,247 million USD) indicates high non-cash charges related to depreciation and amortization. This pattern suggests a capital-intensive operational model where significant investments in fixed assets are being amortized over time.
- Net Income and Bottom-Line Acceleration
- Net income demonstrated more volatility than EBITDA, dropping from 1,174 million USD in 2019 to 890 million USD in 2020. However, the subsequent recovery was aggressive; net income grew by approximately 55% in 2021 and further increased to 2,105 million USD by 2022. The fact that net income nearly doubled between 2021 and 2022, while EBITDA grew by a smaller percentage in the same period, suggests improved net profit margins and potential efficiencies in interest or tax obligations.
- Earnings Consistency
- The correlation between EBT, EBIT, and EBITDA remains tight, indicating that the fluctuations in profitability are primarily driven by operating performance and top-line revenue rather than erratic swings in interest expenses or one-time tax events.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 38,486) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 5,464) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.04 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Boeing Co. | 21.93 |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 19.97 |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 22.04 |
| GE Aerospace | 27.65 |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 11.12 |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 17.27 |
| RTX Corp. | 19.49 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Capital Goods | 29.03 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Industrials | 23.29 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 38,486) | 31,830) | 26,539) | 22,700) | 20,938) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 5,464) | 4,253) | 3,796) | 4,200) | 3,628) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 7.04 | 7.48 | 6.99 | 5.40 | 5.77 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 13.86 | 12.43 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 19.18 | 17.06 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 14.82 | 95.57 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 18.01 | 15.57 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 14.98 | 11.97 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 14.92 | 15.48 | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 19.01 | 19.87 | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 16.46 | 16.30 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 38,486 ÷ 5,464 = 7.04
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2018 and 2022, a consistent upward trajectory in enterprise value was observed, increasing from 20,938 million USD to 38,486 million USD. This represents a substantial expansion in the overall valuation of the entity over the five-year period. Concurrently, earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization demonstrated a general growth trend, rising from 3,628 million USD in 2018 to 5,464 million USD by 2022, despite a temporary contraction observed in 2020.
- Enterprise Value Expansion
- The enterprise value grew steadily each year, with the most significant nominal increases occurring between 2020 and 2022. The value shifted from 26,539 million USD in 2020 to 38,486 million USD in 2022, indicating a strong increase in the market's valuation of the business operations and capital structure.
- EBITDA Volatility and Recovery
- Operational profitability showed resilience. After growing from 3,628 million USD in 2018 to 4,200 million USD in 2019, EBITDA experienced a decline to 3,796 million USD in 2020. However, a robust recovery followed, with 2022 marking the peak of the period at 5,464 million USD.
- EV/EBITDA Multiple Analysis
- The EV/EBITDA ratio exhibited a non-linear trend. The multiple remained relatively compressed in 2018 and 2019, reaching a low of 5.40. A notable expansion occurred in 2020 and 2021, where the ratio peaked at 7.48. This suggests that the enterprise value grew at a faster rate than operational earnings during this interval, reflecting higher valuation multiples. By 2022, the ratio moderated slightly to 7.04, as the growth in EBITDA began to align more closely with the increase in enterprise value.
The divergence between the growth of enterprise value and EBITDA between 2019 and 2021 resulted in a valuation premium. While the absolute earnings capacity increased by approximately 50% over the full period, the enterprise value increased by approximately 84%, leading to a higher ending valuation multiple compared to the 2018 baseline.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?