Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
An analysis of the cash flow dynamics from 2018 to 2022 reveals a general upward trajectory in operating performance contrasted by significant volatility in free cash flow to the firm (FCFF). While the ability to generate cash from core operations strengthened over the five-year period, the funds available to all capital providers fluctuated, indicating shifts in capital expenditure or investment strategies.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Net cash provided by operating activities exhibited consistent long-term growth, rising from US$ 2,853 million in 2018 to US$ 4,433 million by 2022. A marginal contraction occurred in 2020, where cash flow dipped to US$ 2,658 million, but this was followed by a period of rapid acceleration. Between 2020 and 2022, operating cash flows increased by approximately 66.8%, signaling a robust improvement in the operational efficiency and cash-generating capacity of the business.
- FCFF Volatility and Peaks
- The FCFF trend did not mirror the linear growth of operating cash flows. FCFF grew steadily from 2018 to 2020, reaching a peak of US$ 2,713 million. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2021, with FCFF dropping to US$ 1,717 million, a decline of approximately 36.7% from the previous year's peak. A partial recovery was observed in 2022, with the figure rising to US$ 1,990 million.
- Divergence Between Operations and Free Cash Flow
- A notable divergence is observed between 2020 and 2021. During this period, while operating cash flow increased significantly from US$ 2,658 million to US$ 3,689 million, FCFF decreased sharply. This inverse relationship suggests a substantial increase in capital expenditures or other investments during 2021, which absorbed a larger portion of the operating cash flow. By 2022, although operating cash flow reached its highest point in the period at US$ 4,433 million, FCFF remained well below its 2020 high, indicating continued heavy investment in the firm's asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2 2022 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, tax = Cash paid for interest × EITR
= 406 × 24.88% = 101
The financial data indicates a period of volatility in net interest cash outflows and fluctuating effective tax rates between 2018 and 2022.
- Net Interest Cash Outflow Trends
- Cash paid for interest, net of tax, experienced a sharp increase from 338 million USD in 2018 to a peak of 451 million USD in 2019. This peak was followed by a sustained downward trend over the next two fiscal years, reaching a period low of 294 million USD in 2021. A marginal increase to 305 million USD was observed in 2022, suggesting a stabilization of interest costs at a level lower than those seen at the beginning of the analyzed period.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Dynamics
- The effective income tax rate followed a non-linear trajectory, starting at 25.75% in 2018 and declining to its lowest point of 21.86% in 2020. Following this trough, the rate returned to higher levels, recording 24.92% in 2021 and 24.88% in 2022, effectively returning to the baseline established in 2018.
- Interrelationship Analysis
- The increase in net interest payments in 2019 occurred while the effective tax rate was decreasing, implying that the rise in cash outflows was driven by an increase in gross interest obligations rather than tax-related impacts. Conversely, the decrease in net interest payments from 2020 to 2021 took place despite a rising effective tax rate, which indicates a significant reduction in gross interest expenses that outweighed the impact of the higher tax rate on the net calculation.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 38,486) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 1,990) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 19.34 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Boeing Co. | 275.30 |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 32.28 |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 37.96 |
| GE Aerospace | 43.56 |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 15.44 |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 19.79 |
| RTX Corp. | 31.48 |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |
| Capital Goods | 41.36 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Industrials | 35.71 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 38,486) | 31,830) | 26,539) | 22,700) | 20,938) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 1,990) | 1,717) | 2,713) | 1,938) | 1,587) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 19.34 | 18.54 | 9.78 | 11.72 | 13.19 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 37.53 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 23.54 | 20.50 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 33.44 | 38.16 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 17.29 | 56.53 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 29.82 | 25.22 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 19.69 | 13.92 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 28.45 | 27.29 | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 25.87 | 32.16 | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 24.33 | 28.81 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 38,486 ÷ 1,990 = 19.34
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2018 and 2022, a significant divergence emerged between the growth of enterprise value and the stability of free cash flow to the firm. While the enterprise value climbed consistently over the five-year period, the valuation multiple expanded sharply after 2020, indicating a shift in how the market valued the firm's cash-generating capacity.
- Enterprise Value Expansion
- A consistent upward trajectory is observed in the enterprise value, which rose from 20,938 million USD in 2018 to 38,486 million USD in 2022. This steady increase represents a substantial growth in the total market valuation of the company's operations.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm Volatility
- Free cash flow to the firm exhibited non-linear growth. After increasing from 1,587 million USD in 2018 to a peak of 2,713 million USD in 2020, a sharp contraction occurred in 2021, where the value dropped to 1,717 million USD. A partial recovery followed in 2022, with cash flow reaching 1,990 million USD.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Dynamics
- The EV/FCFF ratio experienced two distinct phases. An initial compression phase occurred between 2018 and 2020, with the ratio declining from 13.19 to 9.78, suggesting that cash flow growth initially outpaced the growth in enterprise value. This was followed by a rapid expansion phase in 2021 and 2022, where the ratio surged to 18.54 and 19.34, respectively. This spike indicates a significant increase in the valuation multiple, as the enterprise value continued to grow despite the volatility and overall lower levels of free cash flow compared to the 2020 peak.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?