Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Paying user area
Try for free
United Rentals Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Return on Assets (ROA) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to United Rentals Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The analysis of the financial ratios over the five-year period reveals several notable trends in the company's operational efficiency and working capital management.
- Inventory Turnover and Inventory Processing Period
- The inventory turnover ratio has exhibited a steady decline from 42.96 in 2018 to 28.65 in 2022, indicating a slower rate of inventory movement. Correspondingly, the average inventory processing period has increased from 8 days in 2018 to 13 days in 2022. This suggests that the company is taking longer to sell or utilize its inventory over time, which could impact liquidity or signal changes in inventory management practices.
- Receivables Turnover and Collection Period
- The receivables turnover ratio improved from 5.21 in 2018 to 6.49 in 2020, reflecting more efficient collection of receivables. However, it decreased slightly to 5.79 in 2021 and stabilized around 5.81 in 2022. The average receivable collection period declined accordingly from 70 days in 2018 to 56 days in 2020, before rising to 63 days in the subsequent two years. This pattern suggests an initial enhancement in credit collection efficiency, followed by a moderate slowdown.
- Payables Turnover and Payment Period
- Payables turnover demonstrated significant variability, increasing sharply from 8.74 in 2018 to 12.51 in 2019, then declining steadily to 5.83 in 2022. Inversely, the average payables payment period contracted from 42 days in 2018 to 29 days in 2019, then expanded consistently to 63 days by 2022. This indicates that the company initially paid suppliers more quickly but has progressively lengthened the payment cycle, possibly to optimize cash flow.
- Working Capital Turnover
- Data for working capital turnover is incomplete but shows a high value of 67.17 at the end of 2020 and a significant decrease to 41.88 by the end of 2022. This reduction may reflect changes in the efficiency with which working capital is utilized to generate sales, potentially due to fluctuations in current assets or liabilities.
- Operating Cycle and Cash Conversion Cycle
- The operating cycle, representing the time between inventory acquisition and cash collection, decreased from 78 days in 2018 to a low of 65 days in 2020, then rose again to 76 days by 2022. Similarly, the cash conversion cycle, measuring the duration of cash tied up in operations, showed a declining trend from 36 days in 2018 to 13 days in 2022, with a temporary increase around 2019. The shortening cash conversion cycle suggests an overall improvement in cash flow management, reducing the period between outlay and recovery of funds despite fluctuations in other operational timings.
Turnover Ratios
Average No. Days
Inventory Turnover
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Cost of revenues | ||||||
Inventory | ||||||
Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
Inventory turnover1 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
Boeing Co. | ||||||
Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
GE Aerospace | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
RTX Corp. | ||||||
Inventory Turnover, Sector | ||||||
Capital Goods | ||||||
Inventory Turnover, Industry | ||||||
Industrials |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of revenues ÷ Inventory
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Cost of revenues
- The cost of revenues demonstrated a generally increasing trend over the observed period. It rose from US$4,683 million at the end of 2018 to US$5,681 million in 2019, then experienced a slight decline to US$5,347 million in 2020, before increasing again in 2021 and 2022, reaching US$6,646 million. This overall upward movement indicates growing operational expenses associated with generating revenue, with a minor interruption potentially reflecting external factors or operational adjustments during 2020.
- Inventory
- Inventory levels displayed consistent growth each year, moving from US$109 million in 2018 to US$232 million by the end of 2022. This more than doubling of inventory over five years suggests either expansion in operational capacity, increased stockpiling, or changes in inventory management strategies. The increase was especially pronounced in the final two years, reflecting a significant build-up of inventory.
- Inventory turnover
- The inventory turnover ratio showed a declining trend through the period. Starting at 42.96 in 2018, it peaked slightly at 47.34 in 2019, then declined steadily to 28.65 by the end of 2022. This decrease implies that the company is turning over its inventory less frequently each year, which could indicate slower sales, higher inventory levels relative to sales, or possible challenges in inventory management. The decline is notable and corresponds temporally with the rising inventory levels, reinforcing the notion of increased inventory holdings relative to sales.
Receivables Turnover
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Revenues | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | ||||||
Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
Receivables turnover1 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
Boeing Co. | ||||||
Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
GE Aerospace | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
RTX Corp. | ||||||
Receivables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
Capital Goods | ||||||
Receivables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
Industrials |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Revenues ÷ Accounts receivable, net
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data indicates several notable trends over the five-year period ending in 2022.
- Revenues
- There is an overall upward trajectory in revenues, increasing from $8,047 million in 2018 to $11,642 million in 2022. Despite a dip in 2020 to $8,530 million, likely attributable to external economic factors, the revenue rebounded strongly in 2021 and continued to grow significantly in 2022.
- Accounts Receivable, Net
- The net accounts receivable values reveal a somewhat fluctuating but generally increasing pattern. The figures remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2019 but decreased in 2020 to $1,315 million. From 2020 onwards, the accounts receivable rose substantially, rising to $2,004 million by 2022, paralleling the growth in revenues.
- Receivables Turnover Ratio
- The receivables turnover ratio shows an increase from 5.21 in 2018 to a peak of 6.49 in 2020, indicating improved efficiency in collecting receivables during this period. However, the ratio decreased in 2021 to 5.79 and remained relatively stable in 2022 at 5.81. This decline coincides with the increase in accounts receivable and revenues, suggesting a slight reduction in collection efficiency in the most recent years compared to the peak in 2020.
In summary, the company experienced strong revenue growth post-2020, accompanied by rising accounts receivable balances. While receivables turnover reached its highest level in 2020, it declined afterward, indicating a potential easing in collection efforts or extended credit terms as business expanded. This dynamic calls for attention to balance the revenue growth with effective receivables management to maintain liquidity and operational efficiency.
Payables Turnover
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Cost of revenues | ||||||
Accounts payable | ||||||
Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
Payables turnover1 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
Payables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
Boeing Co. | ||||||
Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
GE Aerospace | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
RTX Corp. | ||||||
Payables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
Capital Goods | ||||||
Payables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
Industrials |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of revenues ÷ Accounts payable
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Cost of Revenues
- The cost of revenues showed an overall increasing trend from 2018 to 2022. It rose sharply from $4,683 million in 2018 to $5,681 million in 2019, followed by a slight decline to $5,347 million in 2020. Afterward, it increased steadily to $5,863 million in 2021 and reached the highest level at $6,646 million in 2022. This pattern indicates growing operational expenses or increased sales activity impacting the cost structure over the five-year period.
- Accounts Payable
- Accounts payable exhibited a generally upward trajectory during the period analyzed. Starting at $536 million in 2018, it slightly decreased to $454 million in 2019, then gradually increased in subsequent years, reaching $466 million in 2020 and sharply rising to $816 million in 2021. The upward momentum continued with a significant increase to $1,139 million in 2022. This rise suggests either extended payment terms with suppliers or increased purchasing activity.
- Payables Turnover Ratio
- The payables turnover ratio, which measures how quickly the company pays off its suppliers, demonstrated a noticeable decline over the years. It peaked at 12.51 in 2019, indicating faster payments that year compared to others. After 2019, the ratio steadily decreased to 11.47 in 2020, then sharply dropped to 7.19 in 2021, and further to 5.83 in 2022. This declining trend indicates a slower rate of settling payables, which could imply relaxed payment terms or cash flow management strategies favoring longer payment periods.
- Summary Insights
- Collectively, the increase in cost of revenues and accounts payable, accompanied by the decreasing payables turnover ratio, suggests that the company is incurring higher costs and taking longer to pay its suppliers. This might reflect operational expansion, increased purchasing, or strategic adjustments in working capital management. The trends indicate a growing scale of operations but also a potential shift in the company's liquidity or supplier payment practices over the analyzed timeframe.
Working Capital Turnover
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Current assets | ||||||
Less: Current liabilities | ||||||
Working capital | ||||||
Revenues | ||||||
Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
Working capital turnover1 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
Boeing Co. | ||||||
Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
GE Aerospace | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
RTX Corp. | ||||||
Working Capital Turnover, Sector | ||||||
Capital Goods | ||||||
Working Capital Turnover, Industry | ||||||
Industrials |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Revenues ÷ Working capital
= ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data reveals several notable trends over the analyzed periods. Revenues demonstrate an overall upward trajectory, increasing from $8,047 million at the end of 2018 to $11,642 million by the end of 2022. This growth, however, is not uniform; there was a dip in 2020 to $8,530 million from $9,351 million in 2019, followed by a recovery and progressive increase in the subsequent years.
Working capital figures fluctuate considerably throughout the periods. Negative working capital amounts are recorded in 2018, 2019, and 2021, with values of -$355 million, -$356 million, and -$452 million respectively. Conversely, positive working capital is reported in 2020 ($127 million) and 2022 ($278 million), indicating inconsistency in the company's short-term liquidity position.
The working capital turnover ratio is available for 2020 and 2022, showing very high values of 67.17 and 41.88 respectively. These figures suggest strong efficiency in utilizing working capital to generate revenue during those years. However, the absence of turnover data for other years restricts the ability to conclude a consistent trend over time.
In summary, while revenues reflect a general growth pattern with some volatility, working capital management appears less stable, alternating between negative and positive balances. The high working capital turnover ratios in the available years point towards effective use of working capital in revenue generation during those periods. Further investigation into the causes of working capital fluctuations would be advisable to assess liquidity risks and operational efficiency comprehensively.
Average Inventory Processing Period
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data | ||||||
Inventory turnover | ||||||
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
Average inventory processing period1 | ||||||
Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
Boeing Co. | ||||||
Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
GE Aerospace | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
RTX Corp. | ||||||
Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector | ||||||
Capital Goods | ||||||
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry | ||||||
Industrials |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Inventory Turnover
- The inventory turnover ratio exhibited a declining trend over the analyzed periods. It decreased from 42.96 in 2018 to 28.65 in 2022. This downward movement indicates that the company is turning over its inventory less frequently each year. The most notable decline occurs between 2021 and 2022, where the ratio drops from 35.75 to 28.65, suggesting a potential slowdown in inventory movement or increased inventory holding.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- Conversely, the average inventory processing period showed a consistent increase throughout the years. Starting from 8 days in 2018 and 2019, it rose to 9 days in 2020, then to 10 days in 2021, culminating at 13 days in 2022. This upward trend aligns inversely with the inventory turnover ratio, implying that the company is taking longer to process its inventory over time.
- Overall Insights
- The inverse relationship between inventory turnover and average inventory processing period suggests that inventory efficiency is declining. A reduced turnover ratio combined with a longer processing period may indicate challenges in inventory management, potentially leading to increased holding costs or slower sales cycles. Monitoring these metrics could be critical for optimizing inventory control and improving operational efficiency.
Average Receivable Collection Period
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data | ||||||
Receivables turnover | ||||||
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
Average receivable collection period1 | ||||||
Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
Boeing Co. | ||||||
Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
GE Aerospace | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
RTX Corp. | ||||||
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector | ||||||
Capital Goods | ||||||
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry | ||||||
Industrials |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Receivables turnover
- The receivables turnover ratio demonstrates a rising trend from 5.21 in 2018 to 6.49 in 2020, indicative of improved efficiency in collecting receivables during this period. However, after peaking in 2020, it experienced a decline to 5.79 in 2021 and remained relatively stable at 5.81 in 2022. This suggests a slight easing in collection efficiency post-2020 but still higher than the 2018 baseline.
- Average receivable collection period
- The average receivable collection period shows an inverse pattern compared to the receivables turnover. It decreased significantly from 70 days in 2018 to 56 days in 2020, reflecting faster collection of receivables. Subsequently, the collection period lengthened to 63 days in 2021 and remained unchanged in 2022. This increase corresponds with the downward trend observed in the receivables turnover, indicating a slight slowdown in collections compared to the peak efficiency year of 2020.
- Overall observations
- Both metrics indicate an improvement in receivables management up until 2020, followed by a modest regression over the subsequent two years. Despite this, the efficiency in collecting receivables in 2021 and 2022 is still better than at the beginning of the period in 2018. The consistency of values in the final two years suggests a stabilization of the company's credit collection performance at a level higher than the initial measurement.
Operating Cycle
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data | ||||||
Average inventory processing period | ||||||
Average receivable collection period | ||||||
Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
Operating cycle1 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
Operating Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
Boeing Co. | ||||||
Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
GE Aerospace | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
RTX Corp. | ||||||
Operating Cycle, Sector | ||||||
Capital Goods | ||||||
Operating Cycle, Industry | ||||||
Industrials |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= + =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The data reflects notable shifts in the company's working capital management over the analyzed five-year period.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
-
This metric shows a gradual increase from 8 days in 2018 and 2019 to 13 days in 2022, indicating that inventory is held longer before processing. This trend suggests a potential deceleration in inventory turnover or changes in inventory management strategies, possibly due to supply chain factors or shifts in demand.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
-
The collection period exhibits a decrease from 70 days in 2018 to 56 days in 2020, reflecting improved efficiency in collecting receivables. However, it then rises back to 63 days in 2021 and maintains that level in 2022, indicating some easing in receivables collection after the initial improvement. The stabilization at 63 days suggests consistent credit policies or customer payment behaviors in recent years.
- Operating Cycle
-
This period, which combines the inventory processing and receivables collection times, decreased from 78 days in 2018 to 65 days in 2020, marking an improvement in the overall cash conversion process. Subsequently, the operating cycle lengthened to 76 days by 2022, nearing the 2018 level. This rebound aligns with the increased inventory processing period and the stabilization of the receivables collection period, underscoring a slower overall operating efficiency.
Overall, the data reveals a period of enhanced efficiency in 2019 and 2020, followed by a trend towards longer processing and collection times in the subsequent years. These shifts may reflect operational adjustments, market conditions, or changes in customer credit terms impacting the company's liquidity and working capital management.
Average Payables Payment Period
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data | ||||||
Payables turnover | ||||||
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
Average payables payment period1 | ||||||
Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
Boeing Co. | ||||||
Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
GE Aerospace | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
RTX Corp. | ||||||
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector | ||||||
Capital Goods | ||||||
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry | ||||||
Industrials |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The data presents the payables turnover ratio and the average payables payment period over a five-year span. An analysis of these metrics reveals significant variations indicative of changes in payment behavior and supply chain management practices.
- Payables Turnover Ratio
- The ratio shows a marked increase from 8.74 in 2018 to a peak of 12.51 in 2019, suggesting that the company increased the frequency with which it paid off its suppliers during that year. Following the peak, the ratio decreased to 11.47 in 2020 and then declined more sharply to 7.19 in 2021 and 5.83 in 2022. This downward trend indicates a gradual slowing in the frequency of payables turnover, which could imply longer payment cycles or changing credit terms with suppliers.
- Average Payables Payment Period (Days)
- Corresponding to the changes in the turnover ratio, the average payment period decreased from 42 days in 2018 to 29 days in 2019, reflecting quicker payments made by the company during this period. Subsequently, the payment period lengthened to 32 days in 2020, then increased considerably to 51 days in 2021 and further to 63 days in 2022. This extension in payment days aligns with the reduction in payables turnover ratio, suggesting increased days payable outstanding and possibly indicating a strategic decision to optimize cash flow or changes in supplier payment arrangements.
Overall, the trends reveal that the company initially moved towards faster payments, enhancing supplier relations or taking advantage of early payment discounts in 2019. However, from 2020 onward, there was a consistent shift towards longer payment periods, which may reflect efforts to conserve cash, adjustments in operational strategy, or external factors affecting payment capabilities. Such changes in payables management warrant monitoring, as extended payment periods can impact supplier relationships and credit terms, while also affecting the company's liquidity profile.
Cash Conversion Cycle
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data | ||||||
Average inventory processing period | ||||||
Average receivable collection period | ||||||
Average payables payment period | ||||||
Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
Cash conversion cycle1 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
Boeing Co. | ||||||
Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
GE Aerospace | ||||||
Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
RTX Corp. | ||||||
Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector | ||||||
Capital Goods | ||||||
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry | ||||||
Industrials |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= + – =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- The average inventory processing period shows a gradual increase over the analyzed years, rising from 8 days in 2018 and 2019 to 9 days in 2020, then 10 days in 2021, and reaching 13 days in 2022. This indicates a lengthening duration in the time inventory remains before being processed, suggesting potential changes in inventory management or demand patterns.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The average receivable collection period exhibited a decline from 70 days in 2018 to 60 days in 2019 and further declined to 56 days in 2020. However, it increased again to 63 days in both 2021 and 2022. This pattern reflects an initial improvement in collections efficiency followed by a slight elongation of the collection period in the latter years.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- The average payables payment period declined sharply from 42 days in 2018 to 29 days in 2019, then marginally increased to 32 days in 2020. Subsequently, it climbed significantly to 51 days in 2021 and further to 63 days in 2022. This upward trend indicates an increasing tendency to delay payments to suppliers, potentially affecting supplier relationships but also improving short-term cash flow.
- Cash Conversion Cycle
- The cash conversion cycle initially rose slightly from 36 days in 2018 to 39 days in 2019, then declined to 33 days in 2020 and further dropped to 22 days in 2021. The lowest point was reached in 2022 at 13 days, demonstrating a substantial improvement in the efficiency of converting resource inputs into cash. This decline is largely driven by the extended payables payment period and shorter receivable collection improvements observed in certain years.