Analysis of Profitability Ratios
Quarterly Data
Profitability ratios measure the company ability to generate profitable sales from its resources (assets).
Paying user area
Try for free
Monsanto Co. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Monsanto Co. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Profitability Ratios (Summary)
Monsanto Co., profitability ratios (quarterly data)
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-11-30).
The analysis of the quarterly financial ratios over the observed periods reveals distinct trends in profitability and efficiency metrics.
- Gross Profit Margin
- The gross profit margin exhibited relative stability with minor fluctuations, mostly maintaining values slightly above 50%. Starting at 52.46% in late 2012, it showed a gradual upward trend, peaking near 55% in 2015 and the concluding periods of 2017 and early 2018. This indicates steady control over production costs relative to sales revenue.
- Operating Profit Margin
- The operating profit margin experienced moderate variability. Beginning at 24.36%, it generally hovered around 24-25% until late 2014. Subsequently, a noticeable decline occurred, reaching a low of 15.64% in mid-2016, suggesting increased operating expenses or other challenges. Following this trough, the margin steadily recovered, returning to approximately 22% by early 2018.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin mirrored similar variability. Initially near 16%, it declined to a low point of 7.76% in mid-2016, reflecting reduced overall profitability impacting the bottom line. However, a recovery ensued, and by early 2018, margins rose back above 17%, nearing earlier levels. This indicates improved management of non-operating items and tax impacts after the dip.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- ROE displayed notable volatility, starting around 18-20% in 2012-2013. A sharp increase was evident in 2014, with peaks exceeding 50% in late 2015, indicative of significant shareholder value generation or possibly fluctuating equity base dynamics. Following this, ROE declined sharply, bottoming near 20% in mid-2016 before rising again to approximately 32% by early 2018. The fluctuations suggest varying leverage or profit retention affecting equity returns.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- ROA showed a steady though modest oscillation. Initial values around 10-12% declined to about 5% in mid-2016, paralleling net profit and operating margin trends. Recovery to roughly 11% by early 2018 reflected improved asset utilization and profitability. Overall, the pattern indicates effective asset management with a temporary performance setback.
In summary, the company maintained consistent gross profit margins, showing strength in core operational efficiency. However, mid-2016 marks a distinct period of reduced profitability and returns, potentially from increased costs, operational challenges, or external factors. Subsequent recovery across margins and returns signals successful corrective actions or market improvements heading into 2017 and 2018. The volatility in ROE contrasts with steadier asset returns, which may warrant further review of financial structure and equity management strategies.
Return on Sales
Return on Investment
Gross Profit Margin
Monsanto Co., gross profit margin calculation (quarterly data)
| Feb 28, 2018 | Nov 30, 2017 | Aug 31, 2017 | May 31, 2017 | Feb 28, 2017 | Nov 30, 2016 | Aug 31, 2016 | May 31, 2016 | Feb 29, 2016 | Nov 30, 2015 | Aug 31, 2015 | May 31, 2015 | Feb 28, 2015 | Nov 30, 2014 | Aug 31, 2014 | May 31, 2014 | Feb 28, 2014 | Nov 30, 2013 | Aug 31, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | Feb 28, 2013 | Nov 30, 2012 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross profit | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross profit margin1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross Profit Margin, Competitors2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nike Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-11-30).
1 Q2 2018 Calculation
Gross profit margin = 100
× (Gross profitQ2 2018
+ Gross profitQ1 2018
+ Gross profitQ4 2017
+ Gross profitQ3 2017)
÷ (Net salesQ2 2018
+ Net salesQ1 2018
+ Net salesQ4 2017
+ Net salesQ3 2017)
= 100 × ( + + + )
÷ ( + + + )
=
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Net Sales Trends
- The net sales figures exhibit seasonal volatility with discernible peaks generally occurring around the first quarter (February) and troughs in the third quarter (August) across the years. For instance, robust sales are evident in February 2013, 2014, and subsequent years, while dips are observed in August 2013, 2014, 2015, and beyond. Despite this cyclical pattern, the overall sales magnitude remains relatively stable, fluctuating between approximately 2,200 million and 5,800 million US dollars. There is no clear long-term upward or downward trend, suggesting consistent but cyclical demand.
- Gross Profit and Its Relationship to Sales
- Gross profit figures closely follow the pattern observed in net sales, indicating a strong correlation between sales volume and gross profit. Peaks in gross profit correspond with peaks in net sales, typically in the early quarters of each fiscal year. For instance, gross profit surges to above 3,000 million US dollars during peak sales periods such as February 2013 and February 2014. Conversely, the lowest gross profit values align with the lowest sales periods in August quarters. This consistency highlights stable operational cost structures relative to sales levels.
- Gross Profit Margin Analysis
- The gross profit margin percentage remains consistently above 50% across all periods, ranging roughly from 51.5% to 55.11%. Margins show minor fluctuations but generally maintain a narrow band between about 52% and 55%, with a slight increasing tendency in later periods. For example, margins peak around 55% in May 2015 and maintain levels above 54% through the last recorded quarters. This steadiness in margin indicates effective management of production costs relative to sales prices and suggests sustained profitability efficiency.
- Seasonal and Cyclical Patterns
- Seasonality is evident in both net sales and gross profit metrics, with predictable quarterly variations across multiple years. This points to an underlying business cycle that might be tied to agricultural seasons or product demand fluctuations. Despite this, the gross profit margin remains relatively insulated from seasonal impacts, suggesting that cost control mechanisms adapt correspondingly to sales changes.
- Overall Financial Performance Insights
- The financial data reflect stable profitability and consistent operational efficiency over the examined periods, with no major disruptions or anomalies in sales or profit margins. The recurrent seasonal peaks and troughs point to anticipated market behavior rather than volatility. Stability in gross profit margin percentage alongside cyclic sales performance points to robust pricing strategies and cost management. This pattern supports continued favorable profit generation through varying sales volumes.
Operating Profit Margin
Monsanto Co., operating profit margin calculation (quarterly data)
| Feb 28, 2018 | Nov 30, 2017 | Aug 31, 2017 | May 31, 2017 | Feb 28, 2017 | Nov 30, 2016 | Aug 31, 2016 | May 31, 2016 | Feb 29, 2016 | Nov 30, 2015 | Aug 31, 2015 | May 31, 2015 | Feb 28, 2015 | Nov 30, 2014 | Aug 31, 2014 | May 31, 2014 | Feb 28, 2014 | Nov 30, 2013 | Aug 31, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | Feb 28, 2013 | Nov 30, 2012 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) from operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating profit margin1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Profit Margin, Competitors2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nike Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-11-30).
1 Q2 2018 Calculation
Operating profit margin = 100
× (Income (loss) from operationsQ2 2018
+ Income (loss) from operationsQ1 2018
+ Income (loss) from operationsQ4 2017
+ Income (loss) from operationsQ3 2017)
÷ (Net salesQ2 2018
+ Net salesQ1 2018
+ Net salesQ4 2017
+ Net salesQ3 2017)
= 100 × ( + + + )
÷ ( + + + )
=
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of the quarterly financial performance reveals several notable trends across the observed periods.
- Income (loss) from operations
- Operating income exhibits considerable volatility throughout the quarters. While some quarters demonstrate strong positive income, others show notable losses, indicating fluctuations in operational efficiency or external market impacts. For instance, significant losses appear around August 2013, August 2014, and August 2015, with recoveries in subsequent quarters. The pattern suggests a cyclical trend with alternating gains and losses.
- Net sales
- Net sales show a pattern of seasonal variation, with peaks occurring typically in the February and May quarters each year, followed by declines in August and November. Despite these fluctuations, the overall net sales figures maintain a relatively stable range across the periods, with no drastic long-term upward or downward movement. This consistency points to steady demand levels, though subject to seasonal factors inherent to the business.
- Operating profit margin
- Operating profit margin percentages remain relatively stable, primarily fluctuating between approximately 18% and 26%. There is a gradual decline in margin observed starting approximately from late 2014 to mid-2016, with margins decreasing from over 25% to around 15-18%. Following this trough, margins recover somewhat but do not consistently reach prior peak levels within the observed timeframe. This suggests pressure on profitability possibly due to increased costs or pricing pressures during that period.
Overall, the financial data indicates a company with steady sales but variable operating income and margin trends. The inconsistencies in income from operations point toward episodic challenges or investments influencing profitability, while the steady sales highlight consistent market presence. The variations in operating profit margins suggest changing cost structures or competitive pressures that merit further detailed operational analysis.
Net Profit Margin
Monsanto Co., net profit margin calculation (quarterly data)
| Feb 28, 2018 | Nov 30, 2017 | Aug 31, 2017 | May 31, 2017 | Feb 28, 2017 | Nov 30, 2016 | Aug 31, 2016 | May 31, 2016 | Feb 29, 2016 | Nov 30, 2015 | Aug 31, 2015 | May 31, 2015 | Feb 28, 2015 | Nov 30, 2014 | Aug 31, 2014 | May 31, 2014 | Feb 28, 2014 | Nov 30, 2013 | Aug 31, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | Feb 28, 2013 | Nov 30, 2012 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net profit margin1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Profit Margin, Competitors2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nike Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-11-30).
1 Q2 2018 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100
× (Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ2 2018
+ Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ1 2018
+ Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ4 2017
+ Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ3 2017)
÷ (Net salesQ2 2018
+ Net salesQ1 2018
+ Net salesQ4 2017
+ Net salesQ3 2017)
= 100 × ( + + + )
÷ ( + + + )
=
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Monsanto Company
- Over the observed periods, net income displays considerable volatility with alternating positive and negative figures. Notably, there are multiple quarters with negative net income, such as August 2013, August 2014, August 2015, and August 2016, suggesting seasonal or cyclical challenges. However, many quarters show robust profitability, peaking in February 2014, February 2015, February 2017, and February 2018, evidencing a pattern of strong earnings early in the calendar year. The swings between quarters indicate fluctuating operational performance or external market factors impacting earnings substantially.
- Net Sales
- Net sales exhibit a recurring pattern of peaks typically in the fiscal quarters ending in February and May, followed by declines in subsequent quarters. The highest sales values appear in February 2013, February 2014, and February 2017, paralleling some of the peaks in net income, suggesting a correlation between sales volume and profitability. Despite quarter-to-quarter variations, net sales generally maintain a range between approximately 2,200 and 5,800 million US dollars, indicating stable revenue generation with seasonal fluctuations, likely tied to product cycles or market demand.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin demonstrates relative stability with values mostly between 12% and 17%, though there is a discernible downward trend in mid-period quarters from late 2014 through mid-2016, falling to as low as approximately 7.8%. After this period, margins progressively recover, reaching levels above 16% by early 2018. This suggests phases of reduced operational efficiency or increased costs during mid-periods, with a subsequent restoration of profitability margins. The margin generally aligns with the trends in net income, confirming profitability influences beyond mere revenue figures.
Return on Equity (ROE)
Monsanto Co., ROE calculation (quarterly data)
| Feb 28, 2018 | Nov 30, 2017 | Aug 31, 2017 | May 31, 2017 | Feb 28, 2017 | Nov 30, 2016 | Aug 31, 2016 | May 31, 2016 | Feb 29, 2016 | Nov 30, 2015 | Aug 31, 2015 | May 31, 2015 | Feb 28, 2015 | Nov 30, 2014 | Aug 31, 2014 | May 31, 2014 | Feb 28, 2014 | Nov 30, 2013 | Aug 31, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | Feb 28, 2013 | Nov 30, 2012 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Monsanto Company shareowners’ equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ROE1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ROE, Competitors2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nike Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-11-30).
1 Q2 2018 Calculation
ROE = 100
× (Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ2 2018
+ Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ1 2018
+ Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ4 2017
+ Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ3 2017)
÷ Total Monsanto Company shareowners’ equity
= 100 × ( + + + )
÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Net Income Trends
- Over the analyzed periods, net income attributable to the company exhibits significant volatility with both positive and negative results noted. Early quarters generally show strong positive net income, reaching peaks above $1.6 billion in February 2013 and February 2014. Notable dips with negative net income are observed in August 2013, August 2014, August 2015, and August 2016, indicating potential seasonal or cyclical challenges. The positive net income rebounds swiftly following these dips, suggesting resilience. The range of net income figures spans from highs exceeding $1.4 billion to lows below negative $495 million.
- Total Shareowners’ Equity Trends
- Shareowners’ equity shows an overall downward trend from late 2012 through late 2016, dropping from approximately $12.3 billion to a low near $3.6 billion. This decline is intermittent with occasional increases but the general direction is downward until early 2016. From early 2017 onward, equity levels recover, rising steadily again and reaching roughly $7.7 billion by early 2018. The sharpest decrease occurs between August 2014 and November 2015, suggesting significant equity reductions likely linked to losses or other capital adjustments during that period.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
- Return on equity remains relatively stable and strong in the initial periods, hovering between 18% and 20% through most of 2012 and 2013. There is a pronounced spike starting in late 2014 into 2015, with ROE values sharply increasing to above 30% and peaking over 51% in November 2015. Despite fluctuations, ROE continues to show strong performance levels, maintaining above 30% from late 2014 through early 2018 with some volatility. The elevated ROE during this time reflects improved profitability relative to equity despite the aforementioned decreases in equity, indicating efficient use of equity capital in those periods.
- Overall Financial Insights
- The data indicates a pattern of cyclical earnings with significant net income volatility but generally strong profitability when positive. The notable equity declines mid-period likely contributed to sharp rises in ROE, illustrating the impact of smaller equity bases on performance metrics. Recovery and stabilization of equity towards the end of the period correspond with consistent, albeit slightly moderated, ROE levels and positive net income trends. The combination of these effects suggests periods of financial restructuring or substantial write-downs followed by renewed capital strengthening and operational recovery.
Return on Assets (ROA)
Monsanto Co., ROA calculation (quarterly data)
| Feb 28, 2018 | Nov 30, 2017 | Aug 31, 2017 | May 31, 2017 | Feb 28, 2017 | Nov 30, 2016 | Aug 31, 2016 | May 31, 2016 | Feb 29, 2016 | Nov 30, 2015 | Aug 31, 2015 | May 31, 2015 | Feb 28, 2015 | Nov 30, 2014 | Aug 31, 2014 | May 31, 2014 | Feb 28, 2014 | Nov 30, 2013 | Aug 31, 2013 | May 31, 2013 | Feb 28, 2013 | Nov 30, 2012 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ROA1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ROA, Competitors2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nike Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-11-30).
1 Q2 2018 Calculation
ROA = 100
× (Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ2 2018
+ Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ1 2018
+ Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ4 2017
+ Net income (loss) attributable to Monsanto CompanyQ3 2017)
÷ Total assets
= 100 × ( + + + )
÷ =
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Monsanto Company
- The net income fluctuated significantly across the periods analyzed. Initially, the company reported positive income values such as 339 million and 1483 million USD, but with intermittent losses including -249 million and -495 million USD in certain quarters. The trend shows a pattern of volatility where some quarters achieved strong earnings exceeding 1000 million USD, while others recorded negative results. This inconsistency suggests periods of financial stress or operational challenges impacting profitability. In the most recent quarters, net income returned to a positive range, albeit with more moderate figures, indicating some recovery or stabilization in earnings.
- Total Assets
- Total assets generally exhibited minor fluctuations but maintained a relatively stable base over the analysis period. Starting at approximately 22,537 million USD, assets experienced occasional declines and recoveries, with lows around 19,413 million and highs near 23,374 million USD. The variations do not show a strong upward or downward trend but rather cycles of slight decreases followed by partial rebounds. This stability in asset levels suggests consistent capital investment and asset management, without aggressive expansion or divestiture during the analyzed timeframe.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The ROA remained positive throughout all periods, with values ranging from a low of about 5.08% to a high near 12.47%. Early periods saw ROA figures generally above 10%, indicating effective use of assets to generate returns. However, a decline occurred mid-period, with ROA decreasing to single-digit percentages, reflecting weakened asset efficiency. Subsequently, a recovery trend materializes, with ROA climbing back toward and exceeding 10% in later quarters. This pattern suggests that despite fluctuations in net income, the company managed to progressively improve the profitability of its assets after periods of underperformance.