Liquidity ratios measure the company ability to meet its short-term obligations.
Liquidity Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
The liquidity profile reflects a sustained downward trend from 2012 to 2017, indicating a reduction in the capacity to cover short-term obligations. A period of relative stability was observed between 2012 and 2013, followed by increased volatility and a sharp contraction in liquidity metrics during the 2016 fiscal year, with a marginal recovery noted in 2017.
- Current Ratio
- The current ratio decreased from 2.29 in 2012 to 1.35 in 2017. The most significant decline occurred between 2015 and 2016, where the ratio fell from 2.05 to 1.21, suggesting a substantial increase in current liabilities relative to current assets.
- Quick Ratio
- The quick ratio shows a corresponding decline, moving from 1.45 in 2012 to 0.76 in 2017. The drop below the 1.0 threshold in 2014 and the more severe decline in 2016 indicates an increasing reliance on inventory liquidation to meet short-term debt obligations.
- Cash Ratio
- The cash ratio experienced the most pronounced deterioration, starting at 0.85 in 2012 and ending at 0.29 in 2017. Significant volatility is evident, with sharp declines in 2014 and 2016, reflecting a diminished immediate cash cushion for liability settlement.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Current Ratio
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Current assets | 8,651) | 8,157) | 10,625) | 9,675) | 10,077) | 9,658) | |
| Current liabilities | 6,398) | 6,729) | 5,177) | 5,112) | 4,336) | 4,221) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | |||||||
| Current ratio1 | 1.35 | 1.21 | 2.05 | 1.89 | 2.32 | 2.29 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Current Ratio, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 8,651 ÷ 6,398 = 1.35
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The liquidity position of the company exhibited a general downward trend over the six-year period ending August 31, 2017. While the company maintained a strong liquidity cushion in the early part of the period, there was a notable contraction in the current ratio, reflecting a shift in the balance between short-term assets and obligations.
- Current Assets Trend
- Current assets remained relatively stable between 2012 and 2015, peaking at 10,625 million US$ in 2015. However, a significant contraction occurred in 2016, with assets falling to 8,157 million US$, before a slight recovery to 8,651 million US$ in 2017.
- Current Liabilities Trend
- Current liabilities demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory for the majority of the period. Obligations rose from 4,221 million US$ in 2012 to a peak of 6,729 million US$ in 2016. A modest decrease to 6,398 million US$ was observed in 2017, though liabilities remained significantly higher than 2012 levels.
- Current Ratio Analysis
- The current ratio peaked at 2.32 in 2013, indicating a robust ability to cover short-term debts. A substantial decline occurred between 2015 and 2016, where the ratio dropped from 2.05 to 1.21, its lowest point in the period. This deterioration was driven by the simultaneous decrease in current assets and the increase in current liabilities. The period ended with a marginal improvement to 1.35 in 2017, though the overall liquidity profile remained lean compared to the 2012-2013 baseline.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Quick Ratio
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,856) | 1,676) | 3,701) | 2,367) | 3,668) | 3,283) | |
| Short-term investments | 8) | 60) | 47) | 40) | 254) | 302) | |
| Trade receivables, net | 2,161) | 1,926) | 1,636) | 2,014) | 1,715) | 1,897) | |
| Miscellaneous receivables | 827) | 755) | 803) | 817) | 748) | 620) | |
| Total quick assets | 4,852) | 4,417) | 6,187) | 5,238) | 6,385) | 6,102) | |
| Current liabilities | 6,398) | 6,729) | 5,177) | 5,112) | 4,336) | 4,221) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | |||||||
| Quick ratio1 | 0.76 | 0.66 | 1.20 | 1.02 | 1.47 | 1.45 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Quick Ratio, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Quick ratio = Total quick assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 4,852 ÷ 6,398 = 0.76
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The liquidity position of the entity exhibited a significant downward trajectory between August 2012 and August 2017. While the company initially maintained a robust capacity to cover short-term obligations using its most liquid assets, this capability diminished over the analyzed period, eventually falling below the critical 1.0 threshold.
- Quick Ratio Analysis
- The quick ratio experienced a marked decline from 1.45 in 2012 to 0.76 in 2017. A period of stability was observed between 2012 and 2013, where the ratio peaked at 1.47. However, a sharp contraction occurred by 2014, bringing the ratio to 1.02. Despite a temporary recovery to 1.20 in 2015, the ratio dropped to its lowest point of 0.66 in 2016, indicating a period of heightened liquidity risk before a slight recovery in 2017.
- Quick Asset Volatility
- Total quick assets showed inconsistent performance, peaking at 6,385 million US dollars in 2013. A general decline followed, reaching a minimum of 4,417 million US dollars in 2016. The inability to maintain or grow these liquid assets in tandem with rising liabilities contributed directly to the erosion of the quick ratio.
- Current Liability Expansion
- Current liabilities demonstrated a consistent upward trend for the majority of the period. Obligations rose from 4,221 million US dollars in 2012 to a peak of 6,729 million US dollars in 2016. The simultaneous increase in short-term debt and the decrease in quick assets during the 2014-2016 window created a significant liquidity squeeze, as the growth in liabilities outpaced the availability of liquid resources.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Ratio
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 1,856) | 1,676) | 3,701) | 2,367) | 3,668) | 3,283) | |
| Short-term investments | 8) | 60) | 47) | 40) | 254) | 302) | |
| Total cash assets | 1,864) | 1,736) | 3,748) | 2,407) | 3,922) | 3,585) | |
| Current liabilities | 6,398) | 6,729) | 5,177) | 5,112) | 4,336) | 4,221) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | |||||||
| Cash ratio1 | 0.29 | 0.26 | 0.72 | 0.47 | 0.90 | 0.85 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Cash Ratio, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Cash ratio = Total cash assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 1,864 ÷ 6,398 = 0.29
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The overall liquidity position of the organization experienced a significant downward trend between August 31, 2012, and August 31, 2017. While the company maintained a relatively strong ability to cover current liabilities with cash in the early part of the period, this capacity diminished substantially by the end of the observed timeframe.
- Cash Asset Volatility
- Total cash assets exhibited considerable fluctuation over the six-year period. A peak was reached in 2013 at 3,922 million US$, followed by a sharp contraction in 2014. Despite a partial recovery to 3,748 million US$ in 2015, cash reserves declined steeply to 1,736 million US$ by 2016, ending the period at 1,864 million US$ in 2017.
- Current Liabilities Expansion
- There was a general upward trajectory in current liabilities, which grew from 4,221 million US$ in 2012 to a peak of 6,729 million US$ in 2016. This steady increase in short-term obligations exerted continuous pressure on the company's immediate liquidity margins, with only a marginal decrease observed in 2017.
- Cash Ratio Compression
- The cash ratio, which measures the ability to settle current liabilities using only cash and cash equivalents, declined from a high of 0.90 in 2013 to a low of 0.26 in 2016. This represents a substantial erosion of the immediate liquidity buffer. The volatility in the ratio is most evident in the transition from 2015 (0.72) to 2016 (0.26), where a simultaneous decrease in cash assets and an increase in current liabilities led to a critical reduction in the ratio.
By the conclusion of the analyzed period, the liquidity profile shifted from a state where cash could cover nearly 90% of current liabilities to a state where cash covered less than 30% of such obligations. This trajectory indicates a growing reliance on other current assets or external financing to meet short-term liabilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?