Profitability ratios measure the company ability to generate profitable sales from its resources (assets).
Profitability Ratios (Summary)
Return on Sales
Return on Investment
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
An analysis of profitability ratios from 2012 to 2017 indicates a resilient gross margin profile paired with periodic fluctuations in operating and net profitability. While top-line efficiency remained stable, bottom-line metrics and asset utilization experienced a notable contraction in 2016 before recovering in 2017.
- Gross Profit Margin
- The gross profit margin remained consistently strong, fluctuating within a narrow band between 51.50% and 54.54%. This stability suggests a consistent ability to manage direct production costs relative to sales revenue over the six-year period.
- Operating and Net Profit Margins
- Both metrics exhibited a synchronized trend, peaking in 2014 at 25.70% for operating margin and 17.28% for net margin. A significant decline is observed in 2016, where the operating margin fell to 17.59% and the net profit margin dropped to 9.89%. By 2017, these figures rebounded to 21.94% and 15.44%, respectively.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- ROE showed a substantial upward trajectory, rising from 17.28% in 2012 to a peak of 35.10% in 2017. Although a decrease to 29.47% occurred in 2016, the ratio remained significantly elevated compared to the 2012 and 2013 benchmarks, indicating a marked increase in the efficiency of generating profits from shareholders' equity.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The ROA trend mirrored the net profit margin, reaching a high of 12.47% in 2014 before declining to a period low of 6.77% in 2016. The ratio returned to 10.59% in 2017, reflecting the volatility in overall earnings relative to the company's total asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Gross Profit Margin
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Gross profit | 7,937) | 7,017) | 8,182) | 8,574) | 7,653) | 7,045) | |
| Net sales | 14,640) | 13,502) | 15,001) | 15,855) | 14,861) | 13,504) | |
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||
| Gross profit margin1 | 54.21% | 51.97% | 54.54% | 54.08% | 51.50% | 52.17% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Gross Profit Margin, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Gross profit margin = 100 × Gross profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 7,937 ÷ 14,640 = 54.21%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2012 to 2017 exhibits a period of volatility in both revenue and gross profitability, although the gross profit margin remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range of approximately 3 percentage points.
- Net Sales Trends
- Net sales demonstrated an upward trajectory from 2012 to 2014, peaking at 15,855 million US dollars. This growth was followed by a two-year decline, reaching a period low of 13,502 million US dollars in 2016, before recovering to 14,640 million US dollars in 2017.
- Gross Profit Performance
- Gross profit closely mirrored the movements of net sales, increasing from 7,045 million US dollars in 2012 to a peak of 8,574 million US dollars in 2014. A subsequent contraction occurred through 2016, where gross profit fell to 7,017 million US dollars, followed by a rebound to 7,937 million US dollars in 2017.
- Gross Profit Margin Analysis
- The gross profit margin exhibited resilience despite the fluctuations in sales volume. After a slight dip to 51.50% in 2013, the margin improved over the next two years, reaching a peak of 54.54% in 2015. Despite a retraction to 51.97% in 2016, the margin recovered to 54.21% by 2017, indicating a consistent capacity to manage the cost of goods sold relative to net sales.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Income from operations | 3,212) | 2,375) | 3,523) | 4,075) | 3,570) | 3,148) | |
| Net sales | 14,640) | 13,502) | 15,001) | 15,855) | 14,861) | 13,504) | |
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||
| Operating profit margin1 | 21.94% | 17.59% | 23.49% | 25.70% | 24.02% | 23.31% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Operating Profit Margin, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Operating profit margin = 100 × Income from operations ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 3,212 ÷ 14,640 = 21.94%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operational performance over the six-year period from 2012 to 2017 exhibits a cyclical pattern characterized by an initial phase of expansion, a subsequent contraction, and a recent recovery.
- Growth and Peak Efficiency (2012–2014)
- Net sales experienced steady growth, increasing from US$ 13,504 million in 2012 to a peak of US$ 15,855 million in 2014. This growth in revenue was accompanied by a rise in income from operations, which grew from US$ 3,148 million to US$ 4,075 million. Consequently, the operating profit margin climbed from 23.31% to a period high of 25.70%, indicating an increase in operational efficiency and profitability during this window.
- Operational Contraction and Margin Compression (2015–2016)
- A downward trend is observed beginning in 2015, with net sales declining to US$ 15,001 million and further dropping to US$ 13,502 million by 2016. The decline in operating income was more pronounced than the decrease in sales, falling to US$ 2,375 million in 2016. This resulted in significant margin compression, with the operating profit margin reaching a period low of 17.59% in 2016.
- Recovery Trend (2017)
- The 2017 fiscal year shows a recovery in both top-line and bottom-line operational figures. Net sales rose to US$ 14,640 million, while income from operations increased to US$ 3,212 million. This recovery is reflected in the operating profit margin, which rebounded to 21.94%, although it remained below the peak levels observed in 2014.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Net Profit Margin
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net income attributable to Monsanto Company | 2,260) | 1,336) | 2,314) | 2,740) | 2,482) | 2,045) | |
| Net sales | 14,640) | 13,502) | 15,001) | 15,855) | 14,861) | 13,504) | |
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||
| Net profit margin1 | 15.44% | 9.89% | 15.43% | 17.28% | 16.70% | 15.14% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Net Profit Margin, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100 × Net income attributable to Monsanto Company ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 2,260 ÷ 14,640 = 15.44%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the financial performance between 2012 and 2017 reveals a cyclical pattern of growth, contraction, and subsequent recovery in both top-line revenue and bottom-line profitability.
- Revenue and Net Income Trends
- Net sales demonstrated a steady upward trajectory from 2012 to 2014, peaking at 15,855 million US$. This growth was closely mirrored by net income, which rose from 2,045 million US$ to a high of 2,740 million US$ in 2014. A subsequent downturn occurred between 2015 and 2016, with net sales contracting to 13,502 million US$ and net income dropping sharply to 1,336 million US$. A recovery is observed by 2017, as net sales increased to 14,640 million US$ and net income rebounded to 2,260 million US$.
- Net Profit Margin Volatility
- The net profit margin expanded during the initial growth phase, increasing from 15.14% in 2012 to a peak of 17.28% in 2014. A period of contraction followed, characterized by a significant decline in 2016, where the margin fell to 9.89%. This represents the lowest profitability efficiency within the analyzed period. By 2017, the margin recovered to 15.44%, effectively returning to the profitability levels observed in 2015.
- Profitability Analysis
- The correlation between net sales and net income remained positive through 2014, indicating scalable growth. The disproportionate drop in net income relative to net sales in 2016 suggests a compression of margins that may be attributed to increased operating expenses or one-time charges. The recovery in 2017 indicates a restoration of profit margins to historical norms, despite net sales remaining below the 2014 peak.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Return on Equity (ROE)
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net income attributable to Monsanto Company | 2,260) | 1,336) | 2,314) | 2,740) | 2,482) | 2,045) | |
| Total Monsanto Company shareowners’ equity | 6,438) | 4,534) | 6,990) | 7,875) | 12,559) | 11,833) | |
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||
| ROE1 | 35.10% | 29.47% | 33.10% | 34.79% | 19.76% | 17.28% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| ROE, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to Monsanto Company ÷ Total Monsanto Company shareowners’ equity
= 100 × 2,260 ÷ 6,438 = 35.10%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of profitability from 2012 to 2017 reveals a significant expansion in Return on Equity (ROE), driven by a combination of fluctuating net income and a substantial reduction in total shareowners' equity.
- Net Income Trends
- Net income exhibited a general upward trajectory between 2012 and 2014, reaching a peak of 2,740 million US dollars. A notable contraction followed in 2016, with income falling to 1,336 million US dollars, before recovering to 2,260 million US dollars by August 31, 2017.
- Shareowners' Equity Trends
- A pronounced downward trend in total shareowners' equity is observed from 2013 to 2016. Equity decreased from 12,559 million US dollars in 2013 to a period low of 4,534 million US dollars in 2016. A partial reversal of this trend occurred in 2017, as equity increased to 6,438 million US dollars.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
- ROE demonstrated substantial growth over the analyzed period, rising from 17.28% in 2012 to 35.10% in 2017. The most acute increase occurred between 2013 and 2014, where the ratio climbed from 19.76% to 34.79%. This surge is primarily attributable to the sharp decline in the equity base, which magnified the impact of net income on the ratio. Despite the dip in net income in 2016, ROE remained elevated at 29.47%, reflecting a structural shift in the relationship between earnings and shareholder capital. The period concluded with ROE reaching its highest point in 2017.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Return on Assets (ROA)
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net income attributable to Monsanto Company | 2,260) | 1,336) | 2,314) | 2,740) | 2,482) | 2,045) | |
| Total assets | 21,333) | 19,736) | 21,920) | 21,981) | 20,664) | 20,224) | |
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||
| ROA1 | 10.59% | 6.77% | 10.56% | 12.47% | 12.01% | 10.11% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| ROA, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to Monsanto Company ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 2,260 ÷ 21,333 = 10.59%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2012 and 2017, characterized by an initial growth phase, a sharp contraction, and a subsequent recovery.
- ROA Performance Trend
- A positive trajectory was observed from 2012 to 2014, with ROA increasing from 10.11% to a peak of 12.47%. This growth was followed by a notable decline over the next two years, reaching a period low of 6.77% in 2016. A recovery occurred in 2017, with the ratio returning to 10.59%.
- Net Income Volatility
- Net income served as the primary driver for the observed fluctuations in ROA. Earnings increased steadily from 2012 to 2014, peaking at 2,740 million US$. A significant contraction occurred in 2016, where net income fell to 1,336 million US$, contributing to the sharp drop in asset efficiency. A strong rebound was recorded in 2017, with net income rising to 2,260 million US$.
- Asset Base Stability
- Total assets remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 19,736 million US$ and 21,981 million US$. Because the asset base did not experience extreme expansion or contraction, the variations in ROA are attributed to fluctuations in net profitability rather than significant changes in the company's asset structure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?