Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Turnover Ratios
Average No. Days
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
The operational efficiency of the entity exhibits a general trend toward longer cycle times and reduced turnover rates over the analyzed six-year period, with a significant volatility in working capital utilization observed in the final two years.
- Inventory Management
- Inventory turnover remained relatively stable but demonstrated a slight downward trajectory, moving from 2.28 in 2012 to a peak of 2.45 in 2013, before settling at 2.01 by 2017. This correlates with the average inventory processing period, which increased from 160 days in 2012 to 182 days in 2017, indicating that goods are held in inventory for longer durations.
- Receivables and Collections
- Receivables turnover peaked at 9.17 in 2015 but subsequently declined to 6.77 by 2017. This decline is reflected in the average receivable collection period, which expanded from a minimum of 40 days in 2015 to 54 days in 2017, suggesting a slowing of cash inflows from customers.
- Payables and Obligations
- A general decrease in payables turnover is observed, dropping from 8.13 in 2012 to 6.28 in 2017. Accordingly, the average payables payment period lengthened from 45 days to 58 days over the same period, indicating an extension in the time taken to settle obligations with suppliers.
- Working Capital Efficiency
- Working capital turnover showed a marked increase in volatility, rising from 2.48 in 2012 to a peak of 9.46 in 2016, before moderating to 6.50 in 2017. This suggests a significant change in the efficiency of utilizing net working capital to generate revenue during the later years of the period.
- Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
- The operating cycle exhibits a consistent upward trend, increasing from 211 days in 2012 to 236 days in 2017. Despite the lengthening of the payables payment period, the cash conversion cycle increased from 166 days in 2012 to 178 days by 2017, signifying an overall increase in the time required to convert resource inputs into cash flows.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Inventory Turnover
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 6,703) | 6,485) | 6,819) | 7,281) | 7,208) | 6,459) | |
| Inventory, net | 3,340) | 3,241) | 3,496) | 3,597) | 2,947) | 2,839) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | |||||||
| Inventory turnover1 | 2.01 | 2.00 | 1.95 | 2.02 | 2.45 | 2.28 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Inventory Turnover, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Inventory, net
= 6,703 ÷ 3,340 = 2.01
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of inventory management from 2012 to 2017 reveals a period of initial efficiency gains followed by a stabilization phase at a lower turnover rate. The cost of goods sold exhibited moderate volatility, peaking in 2014 before settling into a range between 6,485 and 6,819 million US dollars in the latter years of the period.
- Inventory Turnover Trends
- The inventory turnover ratio reached a peak of 2.45 in 2013, representing the highest level of operational efficiency in managing stock relative to the cost of goods sold. However, a subsequent decline occurred in 2014, where the ratio dropped to 2.02. After hitting a low of 1.95 in 2015, the ratio stabilized, remaining virtually constant at approximately 2.00 through 2017.
- Inventory Level Dynamics
- A significant increase in net inventory is observed between 2013 and 2014, rising from 2,947 million to 3,597 million US dollars. This buildup of inventory outpaced the growth in the cost of goods sold, which directly contributed to the contraction of the turnover ratio during that timeframe. Following 2014, inventory levels experienced a gradual correction, declining to 3,241 million US dollars by 2016 before a slight increase to 3,340 million US dollars in 2017.
- Operational Efficiency and Stability
- The convergence of the inventory turnover ratio toward 2.00 between 2014 and 2017 suggests a standardized approach to inventory holding and liquidation. Despite fluctuations in the cost of goods sold, the consistency of the ratio in the final three years indicates that inventory levels were managed in tight alignment with operational requirements.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Receivables Turnover
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net sales | 14,640) | 13,502) | 15,001) | 15,855) | 14,861) | 13,504) | |
| Trade receivables, net | 2,161) | 1,926) | 1,636) | 2,014) | 1,715) | 1,897) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | |||||||
| Receivables turnover1 | 6.77 | 7.01 | 9.17 | 7.87 | 8.67 | 7.12 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Receivables Turnover, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Trade receivables, net
= 14,640 ÷ 2,161 = 6.77
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity indicates a period of fluctuation in the efficiency of receivables management between 2012 and 2017. The receivables turnover ratio experienced an initial upward trend, peaking in 2015, followed by a consistent decline in the final two years of the period.
- Net Sales Performance
- Revenue exhibited a non-linear trajectory, increasing from 13,504 million USD in 2012 to a peak of 15,855 million USD in 2014. A subsequent contraction occurred through 2016, with sales reaching a low of 13,502 million USD, before recovering to 14,640 million USD by August 31, 2017.
- Trade Receivables Management
- Net trade receivables showed significant variability. A notable decrease was observed in 2013 (1,715 million USD) and again in 2015 (1,636 million USD). However, the final two years of the period saw a steady increase, with balances rising to 2,161 million USD by 2017, marking the highest level of outstanding receivables in the six-year span.
- Receivables Turnover Analysis
- The turnover ratio improved from 7.12 in 2012 to a peak of 9.17 in 2015, suggesting an increase in the velocity of collections and improved credit management. These efficiency gains were reversed after 2015, with the ratio dropping to 7.01 in 2016 and further to 6.77 in 2017. The decline in the final years indicates a slowing of the collection cycle, as the growth in trade receivables outpaced the growth in net sales during the 2017 recovery.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Payables Turnover
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 6,703) | 6,485) | 6,819) | 7,281) | 7,208) | 6,459) | |
| Accounts payable | 1,068) | 1,006) | 836) | 1,111) | 995) | 794) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | |||||||
| Payables turnover1 | 6.28 | 6.45 | 8.16 | 6.55 | 7.24 | 8.13 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Payables Turnover, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Accounts payable
= 6,703 ÷ 1,068 = 6.28
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An examination of the operating activity ratios between 2012 and 2017 reveals a general decline in the payables turnover ratio, indicating a trend toward slower payment of supplier obligations over the observed period.
- Cost of Goods Sold Patterns
- Cost of goods sold exhibited moderate volatility, peaking at 7,281 million US$ in 2014. A subsequent decline occurred through 2016, reaching a low of 6,485 million US$, followed by a slight recovery to 6,703 million US$ in 2017.
- Accounts Payable Trends
- Accounts payable grew from 794 million US$ in 2012 to a peak of 1,111 million US$ in 2014. After a significant contraction to 836 million US$ in 2015, the balance rose steadily over the following two years, ending at 1,068 million US$ in 2017.
- Payables Turnover Analysis
- The payables turnover ratio experienced an overall downward trajectory, moving from 8.13 in 2012 to 6.28 in 2017. A notable anomaly occurred in 2015, where the ratio spiked to 8.16, correlating with the sharp decrease in accounts payable during that period. The general decline in the ratio suggests a strategic or operational shift toward extending the payment cycle, thereby retaining cash within the organization for longer durations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Working Capital Turnover
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Current assets | 8,651) | 8,157) | 10,625) | 9,675) | 10,077) | 9,658) | |
| Less: Current liabilities | 6,398) | 6,729) | 5,177) | 5,112) | 4,336) | 4,221) | |
| Working capital | 2,253) | 1,428) | 5,448) | 4,563) | 5,741) | 5,437) | |
| Net sales | 14,640) | 13,502) | 15,001) | 15,855) | 14,861) | 13,504) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | |||||||
| Working capital turnover1 | 6.50 | 9.46 | 2.75 | 3.47 | 2.59 | 2.48 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= 14,640 ÷ 2,253 = 6.50
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity from 2012 to 2017 reveals a period of relative stability followed by a significant structural shift in working capital management beginning in 2016.
- Net Sales Trends
- Revenue exhibited a gradual increase from 13,504 million USD in 2012 to a peak of 15,855 million USD in 2014. A subsequent decline occurred through 2016, reaching 13,502 million USD, before recovering to 14,640 million USD by 2017. These fluctuations suggest moderate volatility in top-line performance over the six-year period.
- Working Capital Dynamics
- Working capital remained relatively consistent between 2012 and 2015, fluctuating within a range of 4,563 million USD to 5,741 million USD. A sharp contraction was observed in 2016, where working capital fell to 1,428 million USD, representing a substantial reduction in the net short-term asset position. A partial recovery occurred in 2017, with the figure increasing to 2,253 million USD.
- Working Capital Turnover Analysis
- The working capital turnover ratio showed a steady range between 2.48 and 3.47 from 2012 to 2015, indicating a consistent relationship between sales generation and short-term capital employment. In 2016, the ratio experienced a dramatic increase to 9.46, driven primarily by the severe contraction in working capital rather than an increase in sales. Although the ratio moderated to 6.50 in 2017, it remained significantly elevated compared to the baseline established in the first four years of the analysis. This pattern suggests a transition toward a much leaner operating model or a fundamental change in the management of short-term assets and liabilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Inventory Processing Period
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | |||||||
| Inventory turnover | 2.01 | 2.00 | 1.95 | 2.02 | 2.45 | 2.28 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | |||||||
| Average inventory processing period1 | 182 | 182 | 187 | 180 | 149 | 160 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | |||||||
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 2.01 = 182
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a period of volatility in inventory management followed by a phase of stabilization between 2012 and 2017. Initial improvements in efficiency were observed in the early part of the period, which were subsequently offset by a lengthening of the inventory cycle.
- Inventory Turnover
- The turnover ratio experienced a peak of 2.45 in 2013, indicating the highest rate of inventory liquidation during the observed timeframe. A subsequent downward trend was noted, with the ratio declining to 2.02 in 2014 and reaching a minimum of 1.95 in 2015. From 2016 to 2017, the ratio stabilized, remaining nearly constant at approximately 2.00 to 2.01.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- The processing period mirrored the inverse movement of the turnover ratio, decreasing to a low of 149 days in 2013. A significant expansion of the inventory cycle occurred over the following two years, with the period increasing to 180 days in 2014 and peaking at 187 days in 2015. This indicates a reduction in the speed of inventory conversion. The period subsequently leveled off, maintaining a consistent duration of 182 days through 2016 and 2017.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Receivable Collection Period
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | |||||||
| Receivables turnover | 6.77 | 7.01 | 9.17 | 7.87 | 8.67 | 7.12 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | |||||||
| Average receivable collection period1 | 54 | 52 | 40 | 46 | 42 | 51 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | |||||||
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 6.77 = 54
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a cyclical pattern in credit management efficiency, characterized by a period of optimization followed by a significant decline in the speed of receivable collections.
- Receivables Turnover
- The turnover ratio experienced a general upward trajectory between 2012 and 2015, rising from 7.12 to a peak of 9.17. This progression indicates an enhanced capacity to convert accounts receivable into cash during this interval. However, a sharp reversal occurred after 2015, with the ratio dropping to 7.01 in 2016 and further declining to 6.77 by August 31, 2017, representing the lowest efficiency level in the observed period.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection period inversely mirrored the turnover trends, fluctuating between 40 and 54 days. An improvement in liquidity is evident from 2012 to 2015, as the average time to collect payments decreased from 51 days to a low of 40 days. This efficiency was not sustained, as the period lengthened to 52 days in 2016 and reached 54 days in 2017. This trend suggests a slowing of cash inflows from customers and a potential deterioration in the effectiveness of credit collection policies toward the end of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Cycle
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | |||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 182 | 182 | 187 | 180 | 149 | 160 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 54 | 52 | 40 | 46 | 42 | 51 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | |||||||
| Operating cycle1 | 236 | 234 | 227 | 226 | 191 | 211 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Operating Cycle, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 182 + 54 = 236
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operating cycle exhibits a general upward trajectory over the analyzed period, expanding from 211 days in 2012 to a peak of 236 days by 2017. While there was a temporary contraction to 191 days in 2013, the subsequent years show a consistent increase in the time required to convert current assets into cash, suggesting a slowing of the overall operating velocity.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- A significant increase in the time required to process inventory is observed. After a low of 149 days in 2013, the period rose sharply to 180 days in 2014 and peaked at 187 days in 2015. The period remained elevated and stable at 182 days through 2016 and 2017. This trend indicates a slower inventory turnover, which is the primary driver of the extended operating cycle.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection period remained relatively stable but showed increased volatility toward the end of the period. Collection times fluctuated between a minimum of 40 days in 2015 and a maximum of 54 days in 2017. A notable shift occurred after 2015, where the collection period increased by 14 days over the following two years, contributing to the overall lengthening of the operating cycle.
- Operating Cycle Correlation
- The expansion of the total operating cycle is heavily correlated with the rise in inventory processing times. The surge observed between 2013 and 2014—where the cycle grew from 191 to 226 days—was almost entirely attributable to the 31-day increase in inventory processing. The further extension of the cycle in 2016 and 2017 was compounded by the simultaneous increase in the receivable collection period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Payables Payment Period
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | |||||||
| Payables turnover | 6.28 | 6.45 | 8.16 | 6.55 | 7.24 | 8.13 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | |||||||
| Average payables payment period1 | 58 | 57 | 45 | 56 | 50 | 45 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | |||||||
| Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 6.28 = 58
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial metrics related to accounts payable exhibit a general trend toward extended payment cycles between 2012 and 2017. This trajectory suggests a shift in working capital management characterized by a slower disbursement of cash to suppliers, thereby increasing the duration of short-term liabilities.
- Payables Turnover Trend
- A general decline in the payables turnover ratio is observed, moving from 8.13 in 2012 to 6.28 by 2017. This reduction indicates that the company is settling its average accounts payable balances less frequently over the course of the fiscal year.
- Average Payables Payment Period Analysis
- The average time taken to settle obligations to creditors increased from 45 days in 2012 to 58 days in 2017. This extension of the payment window suggests an increased reliance on supplier credit to finance operations or a strategic effort to optimize cash flow by delaying outflows.
- Analysis of 2015 Variance
- A notable anomaly occurred in 2015, during which the payables turnover spiked to 8.16 and the payment period dropped sharply back to 45 days. This deviation represents a temporary acceleration in payment activity, contradicting the broader trend of extending payment terms, before returning to an upward trajectory in 2016 and 2017.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Conversion Cycle
| Aug 31, 2017 | Aug 31, 2016 | Aug 31, 2015 | Aug 31, 2014 | Aug 31, 2013 | Aug 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | |||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 182 | 182 | 187 | 180 | 149 | 160 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 54 | 52 | 40 | 46 | 42 | 51 | |
| Average payables payment period | 58 | 57 | 45 | 56 | 50 | 45 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | |||||||
| Cash conversion cycle1 | 178 | 177 | 182 | 170 | 141 | 166 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2 | |||||||
| lululemon athletica inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Nike Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).
1 2017 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 182 + 54 – 58 = 178
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operational efficiency regarding working capital management shows a general trend toward a longer cash conversion cycle between 2012 and 2017. While a temporary improvement occurred in 2013, the subsequent years indicate a slower movement of assets through the operating cycle, primarily driven by inventory dynamics.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- A significant increase is observed starting in 2014, where the period rose from 149 days to 180 days, peaking at 187 days in 2015. The period remained elevated and stable at 182 days through 2017, indicating a slower turnover of inventory.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection period remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period, oscillating between 40 and 54 days. A slight upward trend is noted in the final two years, suggesting a marginal increase in the time required to collect payments from customers.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- The period for settling obligations to suppliers generally expanded from 45 days in 2012 to 58 days by 2017. This extension of payment terms served as a partial mitigating factor against the lengthening of the inventory and collection periods.
- Cash Conversion Cycle
- The overall cycle exhibits a volatile pattern, decreasing to 141 days in 2013 before rising and plateauing between 177 and 182 days from 2015 to 2017. The strong correlation between the cash conversion cycle and the inventory processing period identifies inventory management as the primary driver of short-term liquidity timing.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?