AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Monsanto Co. (NYSE:MON)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 5, 2018.

Return on Capital (ROC)

Microsoft Excel

Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.


Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

Monsanto Co., ROIC calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Aug 31, 2017 Aug 31, 2016 Aug 31, 2015 Aug 31, 2014 Aug 31, 2013 Aug 31, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 2,582 1,816 2,361 2,633 2,743 2,247
Invested capital2 16,366 15,963 18,327 16,260 15,770 14,553
Performance Ratio
ROIC3 15.78% 11.38% 12.88% 16.19% 17.39% 15.44%
Benchmarks
ROIC, Competitors4
lululemon athletica inc. — — — — — —
Nike Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2017 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 2,582 ÷ 16,366 = 15.78%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) exhibited a fluctuating trajectory between 2012 and 2017, characterized by an initial peak, a multi-year contraction, and a significant recovery in the final period.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT demonstrated notable volatility over the analyzed period. After an initial increase from US$ 2,247 million in 2012 to a peak of US$ 2,743 million in 2013, a downward trend emerged, resulting in a period low of US$ 1,816 million by August 31, 2016. This trend was reversed in 2017, with NOPAT rebounding to US$ 2,582 million.
Invested Capital
The invested capital base expanded steadily from 2012 to 2015, increasing from US$ 14,553 million to a peak of US$ 18,327 million. A contraction occurred in 2016, where capital decreased to US$ 15,963 million, followed by a slight increase to US$ 16,366 million in 2017.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) Dynamics
The ROIC peaked at 17.39% in 2013, followed by a consistent decline over three consecutive years, reaching a minimum of 11.38% in 2016. This erosion in returns was driven by the simultaneous compression of NOPAT and the expansion of the invested capital base through 2015. By August 31, 2017, the ROIC recovered to 15.78%, returning to levels comparable to those observed in 2012 and 2014, primarily supported by the recovery in operating profitability.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Decomposition of ROIC

Monsanto Co., decomposition of ROIC

Microsoft Excel
ROIC = OPM1 × TO2 × 1 – CTR3
Aug 31, 2017 15.78% = 22.19% × 0.91 × 78.22%
Aug 31, 2016 11.38% = 19.12% × 0.86 × 69.40%
Aug 31, 2015 12.88% = 24.33% × 0.81 × 65.00%
Aug 31, 2014 16.19% = 24.30% × 0.96 × 69.07%
Aug 31, 2013 17.39% = 23.96% × 0.94 × 76.97%
Aug 31, 2012 15.44% = 21.99% × 0.92 × 76.05%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).

1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »

2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »

3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »


The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) exhibited a cyclical trajectory over the observed six-year period, peaking at 17.39% in 2013 before declining to a trough of 11.38% in 2016 and recovering to 15.78% by 2017.

Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
Profitability remained relatively stable and strong between 2012 and 2015, with the OPM fluctuating within a narrow range of 21.99% to 24.33%. A significant contraction occurred in 2016, where the margin dropped to 19.12%, marking the lowest point of the period. This was followed by a recovery to 22.19% in 2017, signaling a return to historical operating efficiency.
Turnover of Capital (TO)
Capital efficiency showed an initial upward trend, rising from 0.92 in 2012 to a peak of 0.96 in 2014. A sharp decline to 0.81 was recorded in 2015, indicating a decrease in the revenue generated per unit of invested capital. This metric improved incrementally over the following two years, reaching 0.91 by August 31, 2017.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (1 – CTR)
The after-tax retention component experienced a steady decline from 76.97% in 2013 to a low of 65.00% in 2015, which suggests an increase in the effective tax burden during that timeframe. A strong reversal occurred thereafter, culminating in a peak of 78.22% in 2017, which provided a positive tailwind to the overall ROIC.
Integrated ROIC Decomposition
The volatility in ROIC was driven by the synchronization of its underlying components. The growth observed through 2013 was supported by simultaneous increases in both operating margins and capital turnover. Conversely, the decline through 2016 was caused by a cumulative negative effect: the drop in capital turnover in 2015, the reduction in tax efficiency through 2015, and the sharp compression of operating margins in 2016. The recovery in 2017 was the result of a broad-based improvement across all three drivers, with the increase in tax retention and operating profit margin acting as the primary catalysts.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Profit Margin (OPM)

Monsanto Co., OPM calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Aug 31, 2017 Aug 31, 2016 Aug 31, 2015 Aug 31, 2014 Aug 31, 2013 Aug 31, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 2,582 1,816 2,361 2,633 2,743 2,247
Add: Cash operating taxes2 719 801 1,272 1,179 821 708
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 3,301 2,617 3,632 3,812 3,564 2,954
 
Net sales 14,640 13,502 15,001 15,855 14,861 13,504
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues 238 186 (68) (170) 14 (69)
Adjusted net sales 14,878 13,688 14,933 15,685 14,875 13,435
Profitability Ratio
OPM3 22.19% 19.12% 24.33% 24.30% 23.96% 21.99%
Benchmarks
OPM, Competitors4
lululemon athletica inc. — — — — — —
Nike Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2017 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × 3,301 ÷ 14,878 = 22.19%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating profit margin exhibited a period of steady expansion followed by a sharp contraction and a subsequent partial recovery between 2012 and 2017.

Operating Profit Margin Trends
The operating profit margin increased from 21.99% in 2012 to a peak of 24.33% in 2015. This growth phase reflects an improvement in operational efficiency and profitability relative to revenue. A significant decline occurred in 2016, where the margin dropped to 19.12%, marking the lowest point in the observed period. By 2017, the margin recovered to 22.19%, returning to levels comparable to the 2012 baseline.
Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
NOPBT grew from US$ 2,954 million in 2012 to a peak of US$ 3,812 million in 2014. A moderate decline followed in 2015, leading to a substantial contraction in 2016, where profit fell to US$ 2,617 million. The 2017 fiscal year saw a recovery in profitability, with NOPBT rising to US$ 3,301 million.
Adjusted Net Sales Performance
Adjusted net sales showed a positive trajectory through 2014, reaching US$ 15,685 million. A downward trend followed in 2015 and 2016, with sales reaching a period low of US$ 13,688 million in 2016. Sales rebounded in 2017 to US$ 14,878 million, approximating the revenue levels observed in 2013.

The most notable volatility occurred in 2016, characterized by a disproportionate collapse in profitability relative to sales. While adjusted net sales decreased by approximately 8.3% between 2015 and 2016, NOPBT declined by approximately 28%. This discrepancy indicates that the contraction in the operating profit margin during this period was driven not only by lower revenue but by a significant increase in operating costs or a reduction in pricing power.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Turnover of Capital (TO)

Monsanto Co., TO calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Aug 31, 2017 Aug 31, 2016 Aug 31, 2015 Aug 31, 2014 Aug 31, 2013 Aug 31, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net sales 14,640 13,502 15,001 15,855 14,861 13,504
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues 238 186 (68) (170) 14 (69)
Adjusted net sales 14,878 13,688 14,933 15,685 14,875 13,435
 
Invested capital1 16,366 15,963 18,327 16,260 15,770 14,553
Efficiency Ratio
TO2 0.91 0.86 0.81 0.96 0.94 0.92
Benchmarks
TO, Competitors3
lululemon athletica inc. — — — — — —
Nike Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).

1 Invested capital. See details »

2 2017 Calculation
TO = Adjusted net sales ÷ Invested capital
= 14,878 ÷ 16,366 = 0.91

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The turnover of capital exhibits a fluctuating trend between 2012 and 2017, characterized by an initial period of efficiency gains followed by a significant contraction and a subsequent recovery. The overall trajectory indicates a cyclical relationship between capital investment and revenue generation.

Capital Efficiency Performance (2012-2014)
A consistent upward trend in capital turnover is observed from 2012 to 2014, with the ratio increasing from 0.92 to a peak of 0.96. This improvement was supported by a steady rise in adjusted net sales, which grew from 13,435 million to 15,685 million, effectively leveraging the growth in invested capital during this interval.
Analysis of the 2015 Decline
A sharp decline in the turnover of capital occurred in 2015, where the ratio dropped to 0.81. This deterioration in efficiency was driven by a simultaneous decrease in adjusted net sales to 14,933 million and a peak in invested capital, which reached its highest point at 18,327 million. The expansion of the capital base amidst falling revenues resulted in the lowest efficiency ratio of the period analyzed.
Recovery and Trend Stabilization (2016-2017)
Following the 2015 trough, a recovery phase is evident. The turnover ratio improved to 0.86 in 2016 and further to 0.91 by 2017. This recovery was facilitated by a reduction in invested capital in 2016 and a resurgence in adjusted net sales to 14,878 million by the end of the 2017 fiscal year, returning the capital turnover efficiency to levels nearly identical to those recorded in 2012.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)

Monsanto Co., CTR calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Aug 31, 2017 Aug 31, 2016 Aug 31, 2015 Aug 31, 2014 Aug 31, 2013 Aug 31, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 2,582 1,816 2,361 2,633 2,743 2,247
Add: Cash operating taxes2 719 801 1,272 1,179 821 708
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 3,301 2,617 3,632 3,812 3,564 2,954
Tax Rate
CTR3 21.78% 30.60% 35.00% 30.93% 23.03% 23.95%
Benchmarks
CTR, Competitors4
lululemon athletica inc. — — — — — —
Nike Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-08-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2017 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 719 ÷ 3,301 = 21.78%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The effective cash tax rate (CTR) exhibited significant volatility between fiscal years 2012 and 2017, characterized by a mid-period surge followed by a notable decline toward the end of the analyzed timeframe.

Cash Operating Tax Trends
Absolute cash tax payments experienced a steady increase from 708 million USD in 2012 to a peak of 1,272 million USD in 2015. Following this peak, expenditures decreased sharply, falling to 801 million USD in 2016 and further to 719 million USD in 2017, effectively returning to 2012 levels.
Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT) Fluctuations
NOPBT grew from 2,954 million USD in 2012 to a peak of 3,812 million USD in 2014. A substantial contraction was observed in 2016, with profit dropping to 2,617 million USD, before a recovery to 3,301 million USD occurred in 2017.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR) Dynamics
The CTR remained stable at approximately 23% during 2012 and 2013 before entering a period of escalation. The rate reached a maximum of 35.00% in 2015, aligning with the period's highest absolute tax outflow. A downward reversal followed, resulting in a period low of 21.78% by August 31, 2017.

The data indicates a divergence in 2017, where a recovery in NOPBT coincided with the lowest recorded CTR. This suggests a shift toward higher tax efficiency or the impact of external tax adjustments during the final year of the period, as the tax burden decreased despite an increase in operating profit.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?