Stock Analysis on Net

Monsanto Co. (NYSE:MON)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 5, 2018.

Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
Quarterly Data

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Liquidity Ratios (Summary)

Monsanto Co., liquidity ratios (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
Feb 28, 2018 Nov 30, 2017 Aug 31, 2017 May 31, 2017 Feb 28, 2017 Nov 30, 2016 Aug 31, 2016 May 31, 2016 Feb 29, 2016 Nov 30, 2015 Aug 31, 2015 May 31, 2015 Feb 28, 2015 Nov 30, 2014 Aug 31, 2014 May 31, 2014 Feb 28, 2014 Nov 30, 2013 Aug 31, 2013 May 31, 2013 Feb 28, 2013 Nov 30, 2012
Current ratio
Quick ratio
Cash ratio

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-11-30).


Current Ratio
The current ratio exhibits a fluctuating but generally declining trend over the observed periods. Initially, it was relatively strong, peaking at 2.92 in May 2013, indicating a healthy short-term liquidity position. However, from late 2013 onward, there is a noticeable gradual decline, with values mostly remaining below 1.5 after early 2016. The lowest values appear between November 2015 and August 2016, where the ratio dips near or below 1.3, suggesting decreased ability to cover current liabilities with current assets. In the most recent quarters, a slight improvement occurs, but the current ratio remains subdued compared to earlier periods.
Quick Ratio
The quick ratio follows a similar pattern, with initial highs above 1.6, peaking at 1.96 in May 2013, before experiencing a general decline over the subsequent years. From late 2014, the ratio declines steadily, reaching a low point around 0.6 in early 2016, indicating reduced immediate liquidity excluding inventory. The ratio remains below 1.0 for the majority of the later periods, reflecting tighter liquidity constraints. There is a modest recovery observed towards early 2017, but the level remains notably lower than the earlier peaks, pointing to a cautious short-term liquidity situation.
Cash Ratio
The cash ratio displays a downward trend throughout the timeframe, starting from a relatively robust 0.8 to 1.01 range in late 2012 and early 2013, declining to values as low as 0.18 in early 2016. This sharp drop highlights a significant reduction in the most liquid asset coverage against current liabilities. Although some minor recoveries appear intermittently, the ratio remains consistently below 0.5 in the latter periods, signaling limited cash reserves relative to short-term obligations. This consistent low cash ratio may suggest a reliance on other current assets rather than cash equivalents to meet short-term liabilities.

Current Ratio

Monsanto Co., current ratio calculation (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
Feb 28, 2018 Nov 30, 2017 Aug 31, 2017 May 31, 2017 Feb 28, 2017 Nov 30, 2016 Aug 31, 2016 May 31, 2016 Feb 29, 2016 Nov 30, 2015 Aug 31, 2015 May 31, 2015 Feb 28, 2015 Nov 30, 2014 Aug 31, 2014 May 31, 2014 Feb 28, 2014 Nov 30, 2013 Aug 31, 2013 May 31, 2013 Feb 28, 2013 Nov 30, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets
Current liabilities
Liquidity Ratio
Current ratio1
Benchmarks
Current Ratio, Competitors2
lululemon athletica inc.
Nike Inc.

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-11-30).

1 Q2 2018 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Current Assets
Over the observed periods, current assets demonstrate a pattern of fluctuation without a consistent upward or downward trend. Initially, current assets decreased from around 12,060 million US dollars in late 2012 to a low point near 9,675 million US dollars by August 2014. Following this, there was a partial recovery with a peak close to 11,020 million US dollars in November 2014, though subsequent quarters reveal a tendency toward gradual decline and volatility. Notably, the lowest values in the later periods were observed in early to mid-2016, after which slight increases occurred but did not stabilize at higher levels.
Current Liabilities
Current liabilities exhibited significant variability across the quarters, marked by sharp increases and decreases. Starting at approximately 6,161 million US dollars in late 2012, current liabilities dropped to a low near 3,814 million in May 2013, then surged again to above 6,698 million by November 2013. This volatility repeated in subsequent periods with notable peaks in late 2015, reaching upwards of 8,501 million, and another peak near 8,258 million in early 2018. Such fluctuations suggest episodic changes in short-term obligations, possibly reflecting shifts in operational or financing strategies.
Current Ratio
The current ratio, a measure of short-term liquidity, experienced notable fluctuations throughout the timeline. It started at a strong ratio of 1.96 in November 2012, peaked at 2.92 by May 2013, indicating high liquidity at that time, and subsequently declined significantly in the following years. From mid-2015 onwards, the ratio generally hovered between approximately 1.2 and 1.5, with the lowest point recorded at 1.21 in August 2016. This downward adjustment suggests a tightening of liquidity, signaling potentially more strained short-term financial conditions. However, ratios above 1 maintain an acceptable liquidity position, though the decreasing trend warrants attention for future liquidity management.
Overall Insights
The data reflects a company experiencing volatility in both its current assets and liabilities over the examined quarters, which in turn impacted its liquidity as measured by the current ratio. The fluctuations in current liabilities appear more volatile relative to current assets, possibly highlighting shifts in short-term financing or payables management. The trend toward a reduced current ratio post-2014 suggests increasing pressure on the company’s short-term financial flexibility. Careful monitoring of liquidity and working capital management remains advisable given this pattern.

Quick Ratio

Monsanto Co., quick ratio calculation (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
Feb 28, 2018 Nov 30, 2017 Aug 31, 2017 May 31, 2017 Feb 28, 2017 Nov 30, 2016 Aug 31, 2016 May 31, 2016 Feb 29, 2016 Nov 30, 2015 Aug 31, 2015 May 31, 2015 Feb 28, 2015 Nov 30, 2014 Aug 31, 2014 May 31, 2014 Feb 28, 2014 Nov 30, 2013 Aug 31, 2013 May 31, 2013 Feb 28, 2013 Nov 30, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents
Short-term investments
Trade receivables, net
Miscellaneous receivables
Total quick assets
 
Current liabilities
Liquidity Ratio
Quick ratio1
Benchmarks
Quick Ratio, Competitors2
lululemon athletica inc.
Nike Inc.

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-11-30).

1 Q2 2018 Calculation
Quick ratio = Total quick assets ÷ Current liabilities
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of the quarterly financial data reveals notable fluctuations in the company's liquidity position over the reported periods. The total quick assets and current liabilities display varying patterns that collectively influence the quick ratio, a key indicator of short-term financial health.

Total Quick Assets
The total quick assets show a general decline from late 2012 through early 2016, reaching a low point in February 2016 at 3,589 million US dollars. After this period, there is a modest recovery with some fluctuations, peaking again around late 2016 and early 2017, before experiencing a slight downward adjustment towards early 2018. The variability suggests challenges in maintaining liquid asset levels during the timeframe, with a significant trough occurring in the first quarter of 2016.
Current Liabilities
Current liabilities exhibit a somewhat cyclical trend with notable peaks and troughs. Initially, there is a gradual decrease during the first part of the dataset till mid-2013, followed by an increase through late 2013. Post-2013, liabilities fluctuate but generally trend upwards, reaching a substantial peak in late 2017. The increasing liabilities towards the end of the period suggest an amplified short-term financial obligation profile that could stress liquidity conditions.
Quick Ratio
The quick ratio demonstrates considerable volatility, reflecting the interplay between quick assets and current liabilities. Early periods show relatively strong liquidity, with ratios above 1.0 and reaching as high as 1.96 in May 2013. However, from late 2014 onwards, the quick ratio drops below 1.0 for several quarters, indicating that quick assets were insufficient to cover current liabilities during these times. The lowest ratios are observed around 2015 and early 2016, coinciding with the lowest quick asset levels and rising liabilities. Although there is some recovery toward the end of the dataset, the ratio remains below the earlier peak values, signaling ongoing liquidity challenges.

Overall, the data suggest that the company faced difficulty maintaining a consistently strong liquidity position throughout the periods analyzed. The declining quick assets combined with increasing current liabilities resulted in a quick ratio often falling below the critical threshold of 1.0, which may imply potential short-term financial strain or increased reliance on less liquid resources to meet obligations. The partial recovery in quick assets and slight improvement in the quick ratio near the end of the analyzed period may indicate efforts to stabilize liquidity, but the levels remain vulnerable relative to earlier periods.


Cash Ratio

Monsanto Co., cash ratio calculation (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
Feb 28, 2018 Nov 30, 2017 Aug 31, 2017 May 31, 2017 Feb 28, 2017 Nov 30, 2016 Aug 31, 2016 May 31, 2016 Feb 29, 2016 Nov 30, 2015 Aug 31, 2015 May 31, 2015 Feb 28, 2015 Nov 30, 2014 Aug 31, 2014 May 31, 2014 Feb 28, 2014 Nov 30, 2013 Aug 31, 2013 May 31, 2013 Feb 28, 2013 Nov 30, 2012
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents
Short-term investments
Total cash assets
 
Current liabilities
Liquidity Ratio
Cash ratio1
Benchmarks
Cash Ratio, Competitors2
lululemon athletica inc.
Nike Inc.

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-02-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2015-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2014-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-11-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-08-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-05-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2013-02-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2012-11-30).

1 Q2 2018 Calculation
Cash ratio = Total cash assets ÷ Current liabilities
= ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Total Cash Assets
The total cash assets exhibit notable fluctuations over the observed periods. Starting from a peak near 4,947 million US dollars, there is a significant decline reaching as low as approximately 1,062 million by early 2016. Following this trough, modest recoveries are observed, with values rising to about 3,102 million in late 2017, then slightly declining again towards early 2018. This pattern suggests periods of both cash build-up and substantial drawdowns, implying variability in liquidity management or cash flow generation.
Current Liabilities
Current liabilities also demonstrate considerable variation, generally ranging from approximately 3,814 million to over 8,258 million US dollars. The trend indicates intermittent spikes, notably around late 2015 and late 2017, where liabilities peak significantly. This volatility suggests fluctuations in short-term obligations, possibly due to changes in operational demands or financing arrangements.
Cash Ratio
The cash ratio, representing the company's ability to cover current liabilities with cash assets, displays a downward trend overall. Initially near or above 0.8, it declines steadily to levels near 0.18 by early 2016, indicating a reduction in the company's immediate liquidity buffer relative to its current liabilities. Although some recovery occurs thereafter, with the ratio rising back to approximately 0.38 by early 2018, the ratio remains markedly lower than early period values. This decrease points to increased liquidity risk and tighter short-term financial position during much of the timeframe.
Summary of Trends
Overall, the data reveal declining liquidity characterized by falling cash assets relative to current liabilities, especially pronounced in the early 2016 timeframe. Despite subsequent partial recovery, the cash ratio remains below the initial levels, suggesting constrained capacity to cover short-term liabilities solely with cash. Simultaneously, current liabilities exhibit episodic surges, further stressing liquidity pressures. These combined trends highlight a need for effective cash management and possible evaluation of short-term obligations to sustain financial stability.