Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The cash flow profile from 2018 to 2022 is characterized by a general growth trend interrupted by a significant contraction in 2021, followed by a strong recovery in 2022. Both net cash provided by operating activities and Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) exhibit highly correlated movements, suggesting that the drivers of operating cash flow are the primary determinants of the firm's free cash flow available to all capital providers.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Net cash provided by operating activities grew steadily from 517,100 thousand US$ in 2018 to a peak of 648,000 thousand US$ in 2020. A sharp decline occurred in 2021, where cash flow fell to 513,700 thousand US$, representing a decrease of approximately 20.7% from the previous year. This was followed by a robust recovery in 2022, with values rising to 636,200 thousand US$, nearly returning to the 2020 peak.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- FCFF followed a trajectory nearly identical to operating cash flow, increasing from 467,548 thousand US$ in 2018 to 602,304 thousand US$ in 2020. The 2021 fiscal year saw a reduction to 476,505 thousand US$, a drop of roughly 20.9%. By 2022, FCFF recovered to 544,283 thousand US$, although this recovery was less pronounced in percentage terms compared to the recovery seen in operating cash flow.
- Cash Flow Conversion and Capital Expenditure
- A consistent gap is maintained between operating cash flow and FCFF across the five-year period, indicating ongoing capital expenditures. The proximity of FCFF to operating cash flow suggests that the company maintains a disciplined approach to capital reinvestment relative to its operational cash generation. The simultaneous dip in both metrics in 2021 indicates that the decrease in FCFF was driven more by a reduction in operational cash inflows than by a sudden surge in capital spending.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2 2022 Calculation
Interest and fees paid related to total indebtedness, tax = Interest and fees paid related to total indebtedness × EITR
= 47,500 × 21.30% = 10,118
The financial data indicates a volatile trend in the net-of-tax interest and fees paid related to total indebtedness over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022. While expenditures fluctuated between 2018 and 2021, a significant contraction occurred in the final year of the observed period.
- Net Interest Expense Trends
- Interest and fees paid, net of tax, exhibited an inconsistent trajectory. Following an increase from 46,648 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 49,172 thousand US dollars in 2019, a decline to 42,704 thousand US dollars was recorded in 2020. The expenditure reached a period peak of 53,005 thousand US dollars in 2021 before dropping sharply to its lowest point of 37,383 thousand US dollars in 2022.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Stability
- The effective income tax rate remained relatively stable, hovering around 21% for most of the period. A notable exception occurred in 2021, where the rate dipped to 19.20%, before returning to 21.30% in 2022.
- Correlation and Financial Impact
- The peak in net interest paid in 2021 coincided with the lowest effective tax rate of the period, suggesting that the increase in net costs was driven by a substantial rise in gross interest and fees rather than tax-related adjustments. The subsequent decline in 2022 represents a reduction of approximately 29.6% compared to 2021 levels, indicating a significant decrease in the cost of servicing indebtedness during the final year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 15,963,414) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 544,283) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 29.33 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Boeing Co. | 281.55 |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 31.92 |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 37.34 |
| GE Aerospace | 42.79 |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 15.42 |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 19.99 |
| RTX Corp. | 31.78 |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |
| Capital Goods | 41.24 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Industrials | 35.77 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 13,894,874) | 11,134,226) | 10,260,754) | 9,419,838) | 8,089,607) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 544,283) | 476,505) | 602,304) | 546,872) | 467,548) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 25.53 | 23.37 | 17.04 | 17.22 | 17.30 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 37.53 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 23.54 | 20.50 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 33.44 | 38.16 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 17.29 | 56.53 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 29.82 | 25.22 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 19.69 | 13.92 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 28.45 | 27.29 | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 25.87 | 32.16 | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 24.33 | 28.81 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 13,894,874 ÷ 544,283 = 25.53
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Analysis of the Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow to the Firm (EV/FCFF) reveals a distinct shift in valuation dynamics between 2018 and 2022. While the overall enterprise value experienced consistent growth, the cash flow generation exhibited volatility, leading to a significant expansion of the valuation multiple in the latter part of the period.
- Enterprise Value Trend
- Enterprise value demonstrated a continuous upward trajectory, increasing from $8.09 billion in 2018 to $13.89 billion by 2022. The most pronounced increase occurred between 2021 and 2022, marking a substantial rise in the overall market valuation of the entity.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- FCFF showed an initial growth phase from 2018 to 2020, peaking at $602.3 million. However, a contraction occurred in 2021, with cash flow dropping to $476.5 million, before recovering to $544.3 million in 2022. This volatility indicates that cash flow growth did not scale linearly with the growth in enterprise value.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Analysis
- The EV/FCFF ratio remained remarkably stable from 2018 through 2020, fluctuating narrowly between 17.04 and 17.30. A sharp inflection point occurred in 2021, as the ratio jumped to 23.37, and further ascended to 25.53 in 2022. This trend suggests a significant multiple expansion, indicating that the market assigned a higher premium to the enterprise value relative to the actual cash flow generation during the final two years of the observed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?