EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Hershey Co. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Hershey Co. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates a generally positive trend in economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) experienced fluctuations but ultimately increased significantly over the five-year span. Invested capital consistently rose, while the cost of capital remained relatively stable with a slight upward trend. These factors combined to drive an overall increase in economic profit.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT decreased from US$1,303,042 thousand in 2018 to US$1,243,570 thousand in 2019, representing a decline. However, it subsequently increased to US$1,432,349 thousand in 2020, US$1,600,256 thousand in 2021, and reached US$1,821,868 thousand in 2022. This indicates a strong recovery and sustained growth in operational profitability.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital exhibited a modest increase over the period, moving from 8.15% in 2018 to 8.70% in 2022. While the increases were incremental year-over-year, the overall trend suggests a slightly higher cost of funding over time. The fluctuations were minimal, remaining within a narrow range.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital showed a consistent upward trend throughout the period. It increased from US$6,545,593 thousand in 2018 to US$8,759,552 thousand in 2022. This suggests ongoing investment in the business and expansion of its asset base.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit followed an increasing trajectory. Starting at US$769,561 thousand in 2018, it decreased to US$675,002 thousand in 2019, mirroring the NOPAT decline. It then rose steadily to US$808,421 thousand in 2020, US$882,691 thousand in 2021, and peaked at US$1,060,201 thousand in 2022. The growth in economic profit demonstrates the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital.
The observed increases in both NOPAT and invested capital, coupled with a relatively stable cost of capital, contributed to the positive trend in economic profit. The most substantial gains in economic profit occurred in the later years of the period, indicating improved efficiency and value creation.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances for doubtful accounts, anticipated discounts and write-offs of uncollectible accounts receivable.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to The Hershey Company.
5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to The Hershey Company.
8 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net income attributable to The Hershey Company
- Over the five-year period, net income exhibited a generally upward trend. Starting at approximately 1.18 billion US dollars in 2018, it experienced a slight decline in 2019 to about 1.15 billion US dollars. However, the subsequent years show consistent growth, with net income increasing to roughly 1.28 billion in 2020, then to approximately 1.48 billion in 2021, and reaching about 1.64 billion by 2022. This reflects a steady improvement in profitability over the latter part of the period.
- Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT followed a trend similar to that of net income, beginning at around 1.30 billion US dollars in 2018. There was a dip in 2019 to approximately 1.24 billion, followed by a continuous increase in the following years. In 2020, NOPAT rose to about 1.43 billion, then to roughly 1.60 billion in 2021, and further up to approximately 1.82 billion by 2022. The growth trajectory suggests improvements in operating efficiency and tax management resulting in higher operating profitability.
- Overall insights
- Both net income and NOPAT demonstrate resilience and growth after a modest decline in 2019. The upward trends from 2020 to 2022 indicate enhanced financial performance, with operating profits expanding at a slightly faster pace compared to net income. This may signify effective operational strategies and favorable market conditions contributing to increased earnings and operational efficiency.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The analysis of the annual financial data reveals distinct trends in the company's tax-related expenses over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022.
- Provision for Income Taxes
- The provision for income taxes exhibited fluctuations, starting at $239,010 thousand in 2018, then slightly decreasing to $234,032 thousand in 2019, followed by a further decline to $219,584 thousand in 2020. In 2021, there was a sharp increase to $314,405 thousand, representing the highest value in the observed timeframe. This increase, however, moderated in 2022, with the provision decreasing to $272,254 thousand, remaining higher than the values prior to 2021 but lower than the 2021 peak.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes demonstrated a similar pattern. Starting at $233,444 thousand in 2018, these taxes increased notably to $281,073 thousand in 2019, then declined to $225,816 thousand in 2020. A significant rise occurred in 2021, reaching $330,049 thousand, which was the highest during the period. This trend reversed in 2022 with a decrease to $266,447 thousand, yet the value was still above the amounts recorded for 2018 and 2020.
Overall, both provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes show a comparable trajectory with a moderate decline up to 2020, followed by a pronounced increase in 2021, and a partial reduction in 2022. The peak in 2021 for both items suggests either increased taxable income or changes in tax rates or policies impacting the tax expenses distinctly during that year. The reduction in 2022 indicates some relief but still reflects a relatively higher tax burden than in the years prior to 2021.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »
5 Addition of equity equivalents to total The Hershey Company stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of construction in progress.
The financial data reveals several key trends over the five-year period ending in 2022. There is a general increase in total reported debt and leases, equity, and invested capital, which provides insight into the company's capital structure evolution and growth dynamics.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- The total reported debt and leases initially decreased from 4,683,658 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 4,479,857 thousand US dollars in 2019. Subsequently, it increased to 5,376,085 thousand US dollars by 2021, before slightly declining to 5,117,981 thousand US dollars in 2022. This indicates a modest fluctuation with an overall upward movement in debt and lease obligations over the observed period.
- Total Stockholders’ Equity
- The stockholders’ equity displayed a steady and robust growth trend throughout the five years. It more than doubled, rising from 1,398,721 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 3,299,544 thousand US dollars in 2022. This consistent increase suggests ongoing retained earnings and possibly additional capital contributions, contributing to strengthening the company's net asset base.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital exhibited an upward trajectory across the period, increasing from 6,545,593 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 8,759,552 thousand US dollars in 2022. The growth was consistent year-over-year, indicating a steady expansion in the resources committed to the company's operations, funded by both debt and equity.
Overall, the company’s financial structure appears to have been progressively strengthened through increased equity and incremental invested capital. While total debt and leases showed some variability, the level remained elevated at the end of the period relative to the beginning, which alongside rising equity, suggests a balanced approach to financing growth and operations. The increasing invested capital underscores an expanding asset base supporting the business activities.
Cost of Capital
Hershey Co., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Coca-Cola Co. | ||||||
| Mondelēz International Inc. | ||||||
| PepsiCo Inc. | ||||||
| Philip Morris International Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited a generally positive trend over the observed period. Economic profit increased consistently from 2018 to 2022, while invested capital also rose, though with some fluctuation. The economic spread ratio, reflecting the relationship between these two metrics, demonstrates the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- The economic spread ratio began at 11.76% in 2018. A decrease was observed in 2019 to 10.07%, representing a slight reduction in the margin by which returns exceeded the cost of capital. The ratio then recovered, increasing to 10.75% in 2020 and 10.35% in 2021. A notable increase occurred in 2022, with the ratio reaching 12.10%, indicating improved profitability relative to invested capital.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory throughout the period. Starting at US$769,561 thousand in 2018, it experienced a dip to US$675,002 thousand in 2019. However, it rebounded strongly, reaching US$808,421 thousand in 2020, US$882,691 thousand in 2021, and culminating in US$1,060,201 thousand in 2022. This consistent growth suggests increasing value creation.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital generally increased over the period, although the rate of increase varied. From 2018 to 2019, invested capital grew from US$6,545,593 thousand to US$6,702,394 thousand. A more substantial increase was seen from 2019 to 2020, reaching US$7,520,057 thousand. Further growth occurred in 2021 (US$8,529,610 thousand) and 2022 (US$8,759,552 thousand), though the increase between 2021 and 2022 was more moderate than in previous years.
The combination of increasing economic profit and a generally positive economic spread ratio suggests effective capital allocation and value creation. The 2022 results indicate a particularly strong performance in generating returns above the cost of capital.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Coca-Cola Co. | ||||||
| Mondelēz International Inc. | ||||||
| PepsiCo Inc. | ||||||
| Philip Morris International Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited a generally positive trend over the observed five-year period. While fluctuations occurred, the metric demonstrated overall improvement, indicating increasing efficiency in generating profit from revenue.
- Economic Profit Margin
- In 2018, the economic profit margin stood at 9.88%. A decrease was noted in 2019, with the margin declining to 8.45%. However, the margin recovered in 2020, reaching 9.92%, and remained relatively stable in 2021 at 9.84%. The most significant increase occurred in 2022, with the economic profit margin rising to 10.18%. This suggests a strengthening ability to translate sales into economic profit during that year.
The economic profit itself consistently increased throughout the period. This growth in economic profit, coupled with the increasing economic profit margin, suggests that the company not only increased its overall profitability but also improved its efficiency in generating that profit relative to its revenue. The largest absolute increase in economic profit occurred between 2021 and 2022.
- Relationship between Net Sales and Economic Profit Margin
- Net sales increased consistently year-over-year. Despite this growth in sales, the economic profit margin did not experience a corresponding linear decline, which would be expected if profitability was not improving. Instead, the margin generally increased, indicating that the company was effectively managing costs and capital allocation as sales grew.
The observed trend in the economic profit margin suggests effective financial management and a growing capacity to generate value for investors. Continued monitoring of this metric will be important to assess the sustainability of this performance.