EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Builders FirstSource Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Cash Flow Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Builders FirstSource Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial performance, as measured by economic profit, exhibited a notable shift over the observed period. Initially, the company experienced negative economic profit, which gradually worsened before ultimately turning positive. This evolution is closely tied to changes in net operating profit after taxes, cost of capital, and invested capital.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory throughout the period. Starting at US$352.49 million in 2018, it increased to US$374.66 million in 2019 and US$451.16 million in 2020. A substantial surge occurred in 2021, reaching US$1,833.93 million, followed by further growth to US$2,864.59 million in 2022. This indicates improving operational profitability.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital increased from 16.36% in 2018 to 21.17% in 2019 and peaked at 25.26% in 2020. It then decreased slightly to 24.29% in 2021 and remained relatively stable at 24.38% in 2022. The initial rise suggests increasing risk or changing market conditions impacting funding costs.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital also showed an increasing trend. From US$2,393.54 million in 2018, it rose to US$2,419.82 million in 2019 and US$3,091.94 million in 2020. A significant increase was observed in 2021, reaching US$8,507.61 million, and continued to US$8,565.90 million in 2022. This expansion in invested capital likely reflects growth initiatives and potentially acquisitions.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative from 2018 through 2021. It began at a loss of US$-39.09 million in 2018, worsening to US$-137.69 million in 2019 and US$-329.74 million in 2020. The loss lessened to US$-232.32 million in 2021. However, a substantial turnaround occurred in 2022, with economic profit becoming positive at US$776.30 million. This positive shift is attributable to the significant increase in NOPAT outpacing the growth in invested capital, despite a relatively stable cost of capital.
The transition from negative to positive economic profit in 2022 suggests that the company’s investments are beginning to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital. The substantial growth in NOPAT is a key driver of this improvement, indicating enhanced operational efficiency and profitability.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
4 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
5 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense, net = Adjusted interest expense, net × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
- Net Income
- Net income showed a positive and significant upward trend over the five-year period. Starting at 205,191 thousand US dollars in 2018, the figure increased moderately to 221,809 thousand in 2019 and then experienced a more substantial rise to 313,537 thousand in 2020. A pronounced acceleration occurred in 2021, with net income exceeding 1.7 million thousand US dollars, before reaching nearly 2.75 million thousand US dollars in 2022. This trend indicates strong growth in profitability, particularly in the final two years.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT also demonstrated steady growth throughout the analyzed period. It began at 352,490 thousand US dollars in 2018 and increased incrementally to 374,658 thousand in 2019, followed by a more notable rise to 451,161 thousand in 2020. Similar to net income, a substantial surge was observed in 2021, with NOPAT exceeding 1.8 million thousand US dollars, and it continued to rise in 2022 to nearly 2.86 million thousand US dollars. This suggests improved operational efficiency and profitability after tax considerations.
- Overall Trends and Insights
- The financial data indicates a consistent and strong upward trajectory in key profitability metrics over the five-year period. Both net income and NOPAT reflected modest growth in the initial three years, followed by a dramatic increase in the latter two years. This pattern suggests either enhanced operational performance, favorable market conditions, or both, leading to a significant expansion in the company's earnings and operational profit after taxes. The parallel rise in both net income and NOPAT underscores an improvement not only in bottom-line profitability but also in the company’s operational effectiveness, which could be attributed to strategic initiatives or cost management improvements.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial data reveals a significant upward trend in both income tax expense and cash operating taxes over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022.
- Income Tax Expense
- Income tax expense displayed a steady increase from 2018 to 2020, rising from approximately $55.6 million to about $94.6 million. A substantial escalation is observed in 2021, where the expense surged to over $526 million, almost a sixfold increase compared to the prior year. This growth continued into 2022 with the expense reaching approximately $822.5 million, indicating a strong upward trajectory and possibly reflecting higher taxable income or changes in tax rates or provisions.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes similarly showed growth over the period. Starting from about $28.8 million in 2018, the figure steadily rose to approximately $110.2 million in 2020. A marked increase occurred in 2021, with cash operating taxes nearing $594.5 million—a more than fivefold increase relative to 2020. In 2022, this figure further increased to about $962.5 million, closely aligning with the trend observed in income tax expense.
Overall, both income tax expense and cash operating taxes have experienced accelerated growth starting in 2021. This pattern may reflect changes in the company's profitability, tax policy adjustments, or other operational factors leading to higher tax liabilities. The sharp rise suggests increased taxable earnings and/or shifts in tax-related strategies or regulations impacting cash tax payments.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
6 Subtraction of construction in progress.
The analysis of the financial data over the five-year period reveals several notable trends in the company's financial structure and capital management.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases demonstrated fluctuations across the years. A decrease is observed from 1,834,584 thousand USD in 2018 to 1,589,874 thousand USD in 2019, followed by an increase to 1,905,104 thousand USD in 2020. A significant rise is evident in 2021, with the figure reaching 3,401,751 thousand USD, and a slight increase to 3,489,418 thousand USD in 2022. This pattern suggests a substantial increase in debt and leasing obligations, particularly in the latest two years.
- Stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity showed a consistent upward trend from 596,338 thousand USD in 2018 to 1,152,783 thousand USD in 2020. In 2021, there is a marked surge to 4,802,481 thousand USD, which continues growing modestly to 4,962,566 thousand USD in 2022. This sharp increase in equity in 2021 and 2022 indicates a significant strengthening of the company’s capital base during this period.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital figures reveal a gradual rise from 2,393,541 thousand USD in 2018 to 3,091,935 thousand USD in 2020. A dramatic escalation occurred in 2021, reaching 8,507,614 thousand USD, with a marginal increase to 8,565,898 thousand USD in 2022. The pattern mirrors the equity and debt trends, suggesting major investments or acquisitions contributing to the surge in invested capital during these years.
Overall, the data indicates that while the company maintained relatively stable levels of debt and equity in the earlier years, a pronounced increase occurred starting in 2021. This shift points to strategic financial decisions involving increased leverage and capital infusion, reflecting potential growth initiatives or restructuring efforts. The concurrent rise in invested capital underscores a period of expansion or significant asset accumulation.
Cost of Capital
Builders FirstSource Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current maturities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current maturities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current maturities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current maturities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current maturities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | ||||||
| Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
| Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
| GE Aerospace | ||||||
| Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
| RTX Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited significant fluctuations between 2018 and 2022. Initially negative, the ratio demonstrated a substantial improvement culminating in a positive value in the most recent year analyzed. This shift is closely tied to changes in economic profit and invested capital.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- In 2018, the economic spread ratio was -1.63%. This value deteriorated considerably over the subsequent two years, reaching -5.69% in 2019 and further declining to -10.66% in 2020. A moderate recovery was observed in 2021, with the ratio increasing to -2.73%. However, a marked positive change occurred in 2022, as the ratio rose significantly to 9.06%.
The economic spread ratio’s movement mirrors the trend in economic profit. The negative ratios from 2018 to 2021 correspond with periods of negative economic profit, indicating that the company’s returns were not exceeding its cost of capital. The positive ratio in 2022 directly reflects the positive economic profit achieved in that year.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital generally increased throughout the period. From 2018 to 2020, it rose from US$2,393,541 thousand to US$3,091,935 thousand. A substantial increase occurred in 2021, reaching US$8,507,614 thousand, and remained relatively stable in 2022 at US$8,565,898 thousand. The increase in invested capital, coupled with initially negative economic profit, contributed to the widening negative spread in 2019 and 2020.
The substantial improvement in the economic spread ratio in 2022 suggests a significant enhancement in the company’s ability to generate returns above its cost of capital. This improvement is likely attributable to the positive economic profit recorded in that year, despite the high level of invested capital.
- Relationship between Economic Profit and Economic Spread
- The economic spread ratio is directly influenced by economic profit. As economic profit transitions from negative to positive, the economic spread ratio correspondingly moves from negative to positive territory. The magnitude of the economic spread ratio is also affected by the level of invested capital; a larger invested capital base requires a greater economic profit to achieve a comparable economic spread ratio.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | ||||||
| Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
| Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
| GE Aerospace | ||||||
| Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
| RTX Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited significant fluctuations between 2018 and 2022. Initially negative, the margin demonstrated a substantial improvement culminating in a positive value in the most recent year analyzed. This analysis details the observed trends and potential implications.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- In 2018, the economic profit margin stood at -0.51%. This indicates that the company’s economic profit was 0.51% of net sales below the cost of capital. The margin deteriorated considerably in 2019, reaching -1.89%, and continued to decline in 2020 to -3.85%. This suggests a widening gap between returns generated and the cost of capital during these periods. A partial recovery was observed in 2021, with the margin improving to -1.17%. However, a marked positive shift occurred in 2022, with the economic profit margin reaching 3.42%. This signifies that the company generated economic profit equivalent to 3.42% of net sales, exceeding the cost of capital.
The negative economic profit margins from 2018 through 2021 suggest the company was not generating returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital. The substantial improvement in 2022 indicates a significant change in the company’s ability to generate value for its investors. The magnitude of the shift from -3.85% in 2020 to 3.42% in 2022 warrants further investigation to understand the underlying drivers of this performance change.
- Relationship to Net Sales
- Net sales increased from US$7,724,771 thousand in 2018 to US$22,726,418 thousand in 2022. While net sales generally increased over the period, the economic profit margin did not consistently follow suit. The substantial increase in net sales in 2021 and 2022, coupled with the positive economic profit margin in 2022, suggests that increased scale contributed to improved profitability and value creation. However, the negative margins in prior years, despite reasonable sales figures, indicate that revenue growth alone was insufficient to generate economic profit.
The observed trend in economic profit margin highlights a notable turnaround in the company’s financial performance. The transition from consistently negative economic profit margins to a positive margin in 2022 is a positive development, suggesting improved efficiency, profitability, or a more favorable capital structure. Continued monitoring of this metric will be crucial to assess the sustainability of this improvement.