Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The organization experienced substantial expansion of its asset base between 2018 and 2022, with gross property, plant, and equipment increasing from $1.06 billion to $2.41 billion. This growth was characterized by a period of accelerated capital investment between 2020 and 2021, during which gross assets rose by approximately 61% in a single fiscal year.
- Primary Asset Drivers
- Machinery and equipment served as the primary driver of growth, increasing from $403.8 million in 2018 to $1.08 billion in 2022. This represents a total increase of approximately 168%, with the most significant surge occurring between 2020 and 2021. Buildings and improvements also saw a marked increase, growing from $358.4 million to $605.0 million over the five-year period.
- Investment in Future Capacity
- A significant increase in construction in progress is observed toward the end of the analyzed period. This value rose from $16.6 million in 2020 to $206.1 million by December 31, 2022, indicating a substantial commitment to new infrastructure and facility expansions that have not yet been fully commissioned.
- Net Asset Valuation and Depreciation
- While accumulated depreciation grew from $390.1 million in 2018 to $837.7 million in 2022, the rate of asset acquisition significantly outpaced depreciation. Consequently, the net book value of property, plant, and equipment more than doubled, rising from $670.1 million to $1.57 billion.
- Lease Asset Trends
- Finance lease right-of-use assets exhibited volatility, peaking at $43.3 million in 2020 before declining sharply to $7.9 million by 2022. This suggests a strategic shift in asset procurement or the conclusion of significant lease obligations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
An analysis of the asset age ratios reveals a cyclical pattern of aging followed by a significant rejuvenation of the property, plant, and equipment base between 2018 and 2022.
- Average Age Ratio Trends
- The average age ratio exhibited a steady upward trajectory from 45.26% in 2018 to a peak of 49.11% in 2020. This trend indicates a gradual depletion of the assets' useful lives relative to their original cost. However, a sharp contraction occurred in 2021, with the ratio falling to 38.88%, before slightly increasing to 40.62% in 2022. This abrupt decrease in 2021 suggests a substantial investment in new fixed assets, which effectively lowered the overall average age of the asset portfolio.
- Useful Life and Elapsed Time Dynamics
- The estimated total useful life remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 9 and 12 years. A notable reduction to 9 years was observed in 2021, coinciding with the sharp drop in the average age ratio. Simultaneously, the estimated age—representing the time elapsed since purchase—increased from 5 years in 2018 to 6 years in 2020, before decreasing to 4 years in 2021 and remaining constant in 2022. This movement confirms that the asset base was refreshed in 2021, resetting the aging profile for a significant portion of the capital assets.
- Remaining Asset Life Stability
- Despite fluctuations in total useful life and elapsed time, the estimated remaining life of the assets remained constant at 6 years throughout the entire period from 2018 to 2022. This consistency suggests a standardized asset management strategy or accounting policy aimed at maintaining a steady window of productive utility for the company's equipment.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land and improvements)
= 100 × 837,746 ÷ (2,405,377 – 343,230) = 40.62%
The property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) profile exhibits significant expansion and a strategic shift in asset age between 2018 and 2022. Gross PP&E more than doubled over this period, increasing from $1.06 billion to $2.41 billion, while accumulated depreciation rose from $390 million to $838 million. This growth indicates a period of aggressive capital investment or the integration of acquired assets.
- Gross Asset Expansion and Land Investment
- A substantial increase in gross PP&E is observed, particularly between 2020 and 2021, where assets grew from $1.27 billion to $2.06 billion. This period of rapid expansion is mirrored in the growth of land and improvements, which rose from $206 million in 2020 to $329 million in 2021, suggesting a broadening of the operational footprint.
- Asset Age Dynamics
- The average age ratio climbed steadily from 45.26% in 2018 to a peak of 49.11% in 2020, signaling a maturing asset base. However, a sharp decline to 38.88% occurred in 2021, directly correlating with the surge in gross PP&E. This indicates a significant infusion of new, non-depreciated assets, which effectively lowered the overall average age of the asset base. By 2022, the ratio moderated to 40.62%, reflecting the natural aging and depreciation of the newly acquired assets.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- Accumulated depreciation followed a consistent upward trajectory throughout the five-year period. The increase from $390 million in 2018 to $838 million in 2022 demonstrates the ongoing consumption of the economic benefits of the assets. Notably, the growth in gross assets has outpaced the growth in depreciation since 2021, preventing the average age ratio from returning to the peak levels observed in 2020.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land and improvements) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (2,405,377 – 343,230) ÷ 194,600 = 11
Gross property, plant, and equipment exhibited significant growth over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022, increasing from $1.06 billion to approximately $2.41 billion. This expansion is further reflected in land and improvements, which rose from $198.3 million in 2018 to $343.2 million in 2022.
- Asset Accumulation and Investment Patterns
- A consistent upward trend in gross assets is observed, with the most substantial acceleration occurring between 2020 and 2021, during which gross property, plant, and equipment increased by approximately 61%. This suggests a period of aggressive capital investment or significant asset acquisition.
- Depreciation Expense Analysis
- Depreciation expenses followed a similar growth trajectory to the total asset base, rising from $74.4 million in 2018 to $194.6 million in 2022. The sharpest increase in expense occurred in 2021, coinciding with the spike in gross assets, which indicates a rapid increase in the volume of depreciable assets.
- Useful Life Fluctuations
- The estimated total useful life of assets showed notable volatility, moving from a stable 12 years in 2018 and 2019 to 11 years in 2020, dropping to 9 years in 2021, and recovering to 11 years in 2022. The reduction to 9 years in 2021 suggests a strategic shift toward a more accelerated depreciation schedule or a change in the composition of the asset portfolio toward assets with shorter operational lifespans, which likely contributed to the intensified depreciation expense recorded in that period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 837,746 ÷ 194,600 = 4
The financial data indicates a significant transformation in the company's asset base between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a substantial increase in capital investment and a subsequent reduction in the average age of property, plant, and equipment.
- Asset Age and Replacement Cycle
- The time elapsed since purchase remained relatively stable between five and six years from 2018 to 2020. However, a notable decrease to four years occurred in 2021 and persisted through 2022. This reduction in average asset age suggests a period of aggressive capital expenditure or the acquisition of new assets, effectively refreshing the company's operational infrastructure.
- Depreciation Expense Trends
- Annual depreciation expense grew moderately from 2018 to 2020, increasing from 74,400 thousand to 94,500 thousand. A sharp inflection point is observed in 2021, where the expense doubled to 189,300 thousand, remaining elevated at 194,600 thousand in 2022. This spike correlates with the decrease in asset age, confirming the introduction of significant new depreciable assets into the balance sheet.
- Accumulated Depreciation Growth
- Accumulated depreciation exhibits a consistent upward trajectory throughout the five-year period, rising from 390,125 thousand in 2018 to 837,746 thousand by the end of 2022. The rate of accumulation accelerated markedly after 2020, reflecting both the aging of existing assets and the depreciation of the newly acquired assets introduced during the 2021 expansion.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant and equipment, net – Land and improvements) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (1,567,631 – 343,230) ÷ 194,600 = 6
An analysis of the company's asset base from 2018 to 2022 reveals a significant expansion in property, plant, and equipment, coupled with a rigid adherence to depreciation timelines. The most notable acceleration in asset acquisition occurred between 2020 and 2021, where the net value of property, plant, and equipment nearly doubled.
- Asset Base Expansion
- Net property, plant, and equipment grew from 670,075 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 1,567,631 thousand US dollars by the end of 2022. A substantial increase is observed between 2020 and 2021, moving from 749,130 thousand US dollars to 1,385,441 thousand US dollars. This trend is mirrored in land and improvements, which increased from 206,321 thousand US dollars in 2020 to 329,354 thousand US dollars in 2021, suggesting a period of aggressive capital expenditure or strategic acquisitions.
- Depreciation Expense Trends
- Depreciation expenses have risen in direct correlation with the growth of the asset base. Expenses increased incrementally from 2018 to 2020, followed by a sharp spike in 2021, where the cost rose from 94,500 thousand US dollars to 189,300 thousand US dollars. This suggests that the new assets integrated during 2021 were subject to immediate and significant depreciation charges.
- Asset Life Consistency
- Despite the rapid growth in total asset value and the increase in annual depreciation expenses, the estimated remaining life of the assets has remained constant at 6 years throughout the entire five-year period. This indicates a consistent accounting policy and a standardized expectation regarding the utility and obsolescence of the company's physical infrastructure, regardless of the volume of new assets added to the balance sheet.
The convergence of a rapidly expanding asset base and a static estimated remaining life suggests that the company is utilizing a consistent depreciation schedule to manage its growing capital investments. The sharp increase in both net assets and depreciation expenses in 2021 indicates a significant scaling of operations or a major acquisition event that did not alter the underlying depreciation methodology.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?