EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Trane Technologies plc pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Trane Technologies plc for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates a fluctuating financial performance as measured by economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited volatility, while the cost of capital generally increased. Invested capital remained relatively stable, though with some variation. These factors combined to influence the trend in economic profit, which moved from substantial negative values towards near breakeven.
- NOPAT Trend
- Net operating profit after taxes increased from US$1,451,904 thousand in 2018 to US$1,640,972 thousand in 2019. A subsequent decrease was observed in 2020, falling to US$1,265,645 thousand, before recovering to US$1,673,718 thousand in 2021. The most significant increase occurred in 2022, reaching US$2,138,919 thousand.
- Cost of Capital Trend
- The cost of capital remained relatively consistent between 2018 and 2020, fluctuating around 15.4%. An increase to 15.72% was noted in 2021, followed by a further rise to 16.20% in 2022. This upward trend suggests increasing financing costs or perceived risk.
- Invested Capital Trend
- Invested capital increased from US$13,684,819 thousand in 2018 to US$15,640,000 thousand in 2019. It then decreased to US$13,835,000 thousand in 2020 and US$13,354,600 thousand in 2021. A slight increase was observed in 2022, reaching US$13,518,500 thousand. The fluctuations suggest changes in the company’s asset base or financing strategies.
- Economic Profit Trend
- Economic profit was negative throughout the observed period. The largest negative values were recorded in 2019 and 2020, at -US$768,123 thousand and -US$869,891 thousand respectively. The negative economic profit decreased in magnitude in 2021 to -US$425,170 thousand, and continued to improve significantly in 2022, reaching -US$51,458 thousand. This indicates a narrowing gap between NOPAT and the cost of capital, suggesting improved value creation, though still not exceeding the required return on invested capital.
The improvement in economic profit in the later years is primarily attributable to the substantial increase in NOPAT, partially offset by the rising cost of capital. While economic profit remains negative, the trend suggests a positive shift in the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in standard product warranty liability.
6 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings attributable to Trane Technologies plc.
7 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
8 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings attributable to Trane Technologies plc.
10 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
11 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
12 Elimination of discontinued operations.
- Net earnings attributable to Trane Technologies plc
- Net earnings exhibit variability over the five-year period analyzed. The value increased from approximately 1.34 billion US dollars in 2018 to about 1.41 billion in 2019, representing moderate growth. However, a significant decline occurred in 2020, with net earnings dropping to approximately 854.9 million US dollars. This downturn was followed by a strong recovery in 2021, when net earnings rose again to roughly 1.42 billion US dollars. The upward trend continued into 2022, reaching the highest observed value of approximately 1.76 billion US dollars, indicating overall positive growth in the latter years despite the earlier dip.
- Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT demonstrates a generally increasing trend, with fluctuations noticeable in the dataset. Starting at roughly 1.45 billion US dollars in 2018, NOPAT increased to around 1.64 billion in 2019. A decline is observed in 2020, where it decreased to nearly 1.27 billion US dollars. Subsequent years show a recovery trend: in 2021, NOPAT rose significantly to approximately 1.67 billion, followed by a substantial increase in 2022 to nearly 2.14 billion US dollars. This pattern of decrease in 2020 followed by strong growth thereafter mirrors the trend observed in net earnings and suggests resilience and effective operational performance improvements post-2020.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Tax Expense Trend
- The tax expense exhibits a fluctuating pattern over the five-year period. It increased from 281,300 thousand US dollars in 2018 to a peak of 353,700 thousand US dollars in 2019. Following this, there was a decline to 296,800 thousand US dollars in 2020, before rising again in 2021 to 333,500 thousand US dollars. In 2022, the tax expense continued to grow, reaching 375,900 thousand US dollars, the highest value in the series.
- Cash Operating Taxes Trend
- The cash operating taxes show a general downward trend with some recovery periods. After a high of 475,262 thousand US dollars in 2018, there was a notable decrease to 391,918 thousand US dollars in 2019, followed by a further decline to 328,760 thousand US dollars in 2020. In 2021, cash operating taxes rebounded to 409,078 thousand US dollars but then declined again to 356,060 thousand US dollars in 2022. Overall, the values in 2022 remain below the initial 2018 figure.
- Comparative Insights
- While tax expense shows a general upward trajectory with some volatility, cash operating taxes have generally decreased from the 2018 level, despite some recovery in 2021. This divergence suggests potential timing differences or adjustments in non-cash accounting components affecting reported tax expenses relative to actual cash outflows in taxes.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »
5 Addition of deferred revenue.
6 Addition of standard product warranty liability.
7 Addition of equity equivalents to total Trane Technologies plc shareholders’ equity.
8 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
-
The total reported debt and leases displayed an overall increasing trend from 2018 through 2022. Starting at approximately 4.64 billion USD in 2018, the figure rose significantly to about 6.14 billion USD in 2019, marking the highest value within the period. Subsequently, the debt decreased to approximately 5.69 billion USD in 2020 and continued to decline to 5.29 billion USD in 2021. In 2022, the total reported debt and leases slightly increased to around 5.31 billion USD. This pattern indicates a peak in 2019, followed by a gradual reduction and stabilization in the recent years.
- Total Shareholders’ Equity
-
The total shareholders’ equity showed a decreasing trend over the five-year period. Beginning at roughly 7.02 billion USD in 2018, equity increased slightly to about 7.27 billion USD in 2019. However, from 2019 onwards, equity declined consistently to approximately 6.41 billion USD in 2020, then to 6.26 billion USD in 2021, and further to 6.09 billion USD in 2022. This steady reduction suggests a shrinking equity base over time.
- Invested Capital
-
Invested capital increased from approximately 13.68 billion USD in 2018 to a peak of about 15.64 billion USD in 2019. Following this peak, invested capital decreased to around 13.83 billion USD in 2020 and continued to decline to 13.35 billion USD in 2021. In 2022, there was a slight increase to roughly 13.52 billion USD. This trend reflects a significant build-up of capital in 2019, followed by a contraction and subsequent stabilization during the last two years.
Cost of Capital
Trane Technologies plc, cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | ||||||
| Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
| Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
| GE Aerospace | ||||||
| Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
| RTX Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited a consistent, though moderating, improvement between 2018 and 2022. Initially negative, the ratio moved closer to zero over the observed period, indicating a diminishing gap between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital. This improvement coincides with a reduction in economic profit losses.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- In 2018, the economic spread ratio stood at -4.87%. This indicates that the company’s return on invested capital was 4.87% lower than its cost of capital. A slight deterioration was observed in 2019, with the ratio reaching -4.91%.
- The ratio experienced a more substantial decline in 2020, reaching -6.29%, suggesting a widening disparity between returns and costs. However, a significant positive shift occurred in 2021, with the ratio improving to -3.18%.
- This positive trend continued into 2022, with the economic spread ratio reaching -0.38%. This represents the closest the ratio has come to zero during the analyzed period, signifying a substantial reduction in the difference between the company’s return on invested capital and its cost of capital.
Invested capital fluctuated over the period. It increased from 2018 to 2019, then decreased in 2020, followed by slight decreases in 2021 and a small increase in 2022. Despite these fluctuations, the improvement in the economic spread ratio suggests increasing efficiency in capital allocation or improved operational performance relative to the cost of capital.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the period, but the magnitude of the loss decreased substantially. The largest loss was recorded in 2020 at -869,891 US$ in thousands. The loss decreased significantly to -425,170 US$ in thousands in 2021 and further to -51,458 US$ in thousands in 2022. This reduction in economic profit loss aligns with the improving economic spread ratio.
The convergence of the economic spread ratio towards zero, coupled with the diminishing economic profit losses, suggests a positive trajectory in the company’s ability to generate returns that more closely cover its cost of capital.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net revenues | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | ||||||
| Adjusted net revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | ||||||
| Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
| Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
| GE Aerospace | ||||||
| Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
| RTX Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited a consistent, though moderating, improvement between 2018 and 2022. Initially negative and substantial, the margin moved closer to zero over the five-year period. This improvement occurred alongside fluctuations in both economic profit and adjusted net revenues.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- The economic profit margin began at -4.25% in 2018 and deteriorated to -6.98% in 2020, representing the lowest point in the observed period. A significant positive shift occurred in 2021, with the margin improving to -3.01%. This positive trend continued into 2022, reaching -0.32%, indicating a substantial reduction in the magnitude of the economic loss.
- Relationship to Economic Profit
- Economic profit itself demonstrated a similar pattern of initial decline followed by improvement. The largest negative economic profit was recorded in 2020 at -869,891 US$ in thousands. While still negative in 2021 and 2022, economic profit significantly decreased in absolute value, reaching -425,170 US$ in thousands in 2021 and further improving to -51,458 US$ in thousands in 2022. This reduction in economic loss directly contributed to the improvement in the economic profit margin.
- Relationship to Adjusted Net Revenues
- Adjusted net revenues experienced a decrease in 2020, falling to 12,456,300 US$ in thousands from 16,610,800 US$ in thousands in 2019. Revenues then recovered, increasing to 14,143,700 US$ in thousands in 2021 and reaching 15,997,700 US$ in thousands in 2022, surpassing the 2018 level. The improvement in the economic profit margin from 2020 to 2022 occurred despite the revenue not fully recovering to its 2019 peak until 2022, suggesting that improvements in operational efficiency or cost management played a key role.
In summary, the observed trend indicates a strengthening of financial performance as measured by economic profit margin. The company moved from substantial economic losses to a position of near break-even by the end of the period, driven by both improvements in profitability and revenue recovery.