Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Turnover Ratios
Average No. Days
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The operational activity ratios indicate a shift in working capital management and asset utilization efficiency between 2018 and 2022. While receivable collections remained remarkably stable, inventory management and payables strategies showed distinct trends that influenced the overall cash conversion process.
- Inventory and Receivables Management
- Inventory turnover peaked in 2020 at 7.27 before declining to 5.53 by 2022. This corresponds with the average inventory processing period, which reached a minimum of 50 days in 2020 but expanded to 66 days by the end of the period, suggesting a slowdown in inventory liquidation. In contrast, receivables turnover remained consistent, fluctuating narrowly between 5.66 and 5.93. The average receivable collection period demonstrated high stability, maintaining a range of 62 to 65 days throughout the five-year window.
- Payables and Working Capital Efficiency
- A consistent downward trend is observed in payables turnover, falling from 6.36 in 2018 to 5.27 in 2022. This is reflected in the average payables payment period, which lengthened from 57 days to 69 days, indicating a strategic extension of payment terms to suppliers. Working capital turnover exhibited significant volatility, dropping to a low of 4.85 in 2020 before rising sharply to 23.10 in 2022, suggesting a substantial increase in the efficiency of using working capital to generate revenue or a significant reduction in the net working capital base.
- Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
- The operating cycle increased from 118 days in 2018 to 129 days in 2022, primarily driven by the lengthening of the inventory processing period. However, the cash conversion cycle remained relatively stable, ending at 60 days in 2022, nearly identical to the 61 days reported in 2018. The stability of the cash conversion cycle, despite the lengthening operating cycle, is attributed to the simultaneous increase in the average payables payment period, which effectively offset the slower movement of inventory.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Inventory Turnover
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 11,026,900) | 9,666,800) | 8,651,300) | 11,451,500) | 10,847,600) | |
| Inventories | 1,993,800) | 1,530,800) | 1,189,200) | 1,712,200) | 1,677,800) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Inventory turnover1 | 5.53 | 6.31 | 7.27 | 6.69 | 6.47 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Inventory Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 0.81 | 0.75 | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 2.54 | 2.53 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 4.04 | 4.48 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 3.19 | 3.40 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 4.04 | 4.29 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 18.68 | 19.45 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 5.03 | 5.65 | — | — | — | |
| Inventory Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 2.28 | 2.28 | — | — | — | |
| Inventory Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 4.28 | 4.03 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Inventories
= 11,026,900 ÷ 1,993,800 = 5.53
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of inventory management efficiency from 2018 to 2022 reveals a non-linear trend characterized by a peak in operational turnover during 2020, followed by a consistent decline in the turnover rate through 2022.
- Cost of Goods Sold and Inventory Volume
- The Cost of Goods Sold experienced a significant contraction in 2020, decreasing to 8.65 billion USD from a 2019 high of 11.45 billion USD, before recovering to 11.03 billion USD by the end of 2022. In parallel, inventory levels reached a five-year low of 1.19 billion USD in 2020. However, inventories grew rapidly in the subsequent two years, ending 2022 at 1.99 billion USD, the highest level recorded in the period.
- Inventory Turnover Trends
- The inventory turnover ratio demonstrated an improving trend in the early part of the period, rising from 6.47 in 2018 to a peak of 7.27 in 2020. This suggests a higher efficiency in converting inventory into sales during that window. This trajectory reversed after 2020, with the ratio dropping to 6.31 in 2021 and further decelerating to 5.53 by 2022.
- Analytical Insights
- The observed decline in the turnover ratio from 7.27 to 5.53 indicates a reduction in the velocity of inventory liquidation. This trend is primarily attributed to inventory accumulation that exceeded the growth rate of the Cost of Goods Sold. The increase in stock levels relative to sales suggests a shift in operational strategy, potentially involving the buildup of safety stock or responses to supply chain volatility, resulting in a longer average holding period for goods.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Receivables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Net revenues | 15,991,700) | 14,136,400) | 12,454,700) | 16,598,900) | 15,668,200) | |
| Accounts and notes receivable, net | 2,780,100) | 2,429,400) | 2,202,100) | 2,798,100) | 2,679,200) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Receivables turnover1 | 5.75 | 5.82 | 5.66 | 5.93 | 5.85 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Receivables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 26.46 | 23.58 | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 6.39 | 5.68 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 5.09 | 5.95 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 4.09 | 4.55 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 4.77 | 5.04 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 26.34 | 34.15 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 7.36 | 6.66 | — | — | — | |
| Receivables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 7.36 | 7.57 | — | — | — | |
| Receivables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 8.17 | 7.76 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net revenues ÷ Accounts and notes receivable, net
= 15,991,700 ÷ 2,780,100 = 5.75
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of receivables turnover from 2018 to 2022 reveals a high degree of stability in credit management and collection efficiency, despite significant fluctuations in net revenues during the period.
- Revenue and Receivable Correlation
- Net revenues experienced a notable decline in 2020, falling from approximately 16.6 billion US$ in 2019 to 12.5 billion US$. This contraction was mirrored by a corresponding reduction in net accounts and notes receivable, which decreased from 2.8 billion US$ to 2.2 billion US$. Following this dip, both metrics showed a consistent upward trajectory through 2022, with revenues returning to 16.0 billion US$ and receivables rising to 2.8 billion US$. The close alignment between revenue volume and the level of outstanding receivables suggests that the company's receivables balance is primarily driven by sales activity rather than shifts in credit terms.
- Receivables Turnover Stability
- The receivables turnover ratio remained remarkably consistent over the five-year period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 5.66 and 5.93. The slight dip observed in 2020 coincides with the overall revenue contraction, yet the ratio recovered to 5.82 in 2021 before settling at 5.75 in 2022. This lack of significant variance indicates a steady rate of conversion of receivables into cash.
- Operational Efficiency Insights
- The persistence of the turnover ratio near the 5.8 level suggests a disciplined and standardized approach to credit policy and collections. The ability to maintain this ratio despite the volatility in top-line revenue suggests that internal controls for credit granting remained effective and that customer payment behaviors remained predictable even during period of revenue instability.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Payables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 11,026,900) | 9,666,800) | 8,651,300) | 11,451,500) | 10,847,600) | |
| Accounts payable | 2,091,600) | 1,787,300) | 1,520,200) | 1,809,200) | 1,705,300) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Payables turnover1 | 5.27 | 5.41 | 5.69 | 6.33 | 6.36 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Payables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 6.18 | 6.40 | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 4.76 | 4.36 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 4.51 | 4.75 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 2.98 | 3.32 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 3.53 | 3.40 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 27.25 | 74.34 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 5.40 | 5.93 | — | — | — | |
| Payables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 5.21 | 5.60 | — | — | — | |
| Payables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 7.83 | 7.81 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Accounts payable
= 11,026,900 ÷ 2,091,600 = 5.27
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of operating activity reveals a consistent downward trend in the payables turnover ratio from 2018 to 2022. This decline indicates a deceleration in the frequency with which obligations to suppliers are settled, suggesting a strategic extension of payment terms or a change in supplier credit arrangements.
- Payables Turnover Ratio
- The turnover ratio decreased steadily from 6.36 in 2018 to 5.27 in 2022. This continuous decline reflects a slower rate of turnover, meaning the company is taking more time to pay its vendors over the five-year period.
- Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) Trends
- COGS experienced significant volatility, starting at 10.85 billion USD in 2018 and peaking at 11.45 billion USD in 2019. A sharp contraction occurred in 2020, with values dropping to 8.65 billion USD, followed by a recovery period that brought COGS back to 11.03 billion USD by the end of 2022.
- Accounts Payable Evolution
- Accounts payable balances fluctuated in alignment with COGS but exhibited a stronger upward trajectory in the latter years. After a low of 1.52 billion USD in 2020, payables increased to 2.09 billion USD by 2022, reaching the highest level recorded in the analyzed timeframe.
- Working Capital Implications
- The simultaneous increase in accounts payable and the decline in the turnover ratio suggest an optimization of short-term liquidity. By extending the payment cycle, the company has effectively increased its cash retention, utilizing supplier credit as a source of spontaneous financing to support its operations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Working Capital Turnover
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Current assets | 6,379,200) | 6,470,900) | 6,905,600) | 6,217,200) | 5,732,000) | |
| Less: Current liabilities | 5,686,800) | 4,752,400) | 4,338,900) | 4,861,900) | 4,315,700) | |
| Working capital | 692,400) | 1,718,500) | 2,566,700) | 1,355,300) | 1,416,300) | |
| Net revenues | 15,991,700) | 14,136,400) | 12,454,700) | 16,598,900) | 15,668,200) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Working capital turnover1 | 23.10 | 8.23 | 4.85 | 12.25 | 11.06 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 3.42 | 2.34 | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 4.62 | 3.54 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 8.70 | 65.65 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 7.93 | 4.94 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 7.03 | 5.86 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 12.93 | 11.52 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 20.15 | 9.75 | — | — | — | |
| Working Capital Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 6.79 | 5.01 | — | — | — | |
| Working Capital Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 10.34 | 6.90 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net revenues ÷ Working capital
= 15,991,700 ÷ 692,400 = 23.10
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2018 and 2022 reveals significant volatility in working capital management and its relationship with revenue generation. The period is characterized by a sharp contraction in operational efficiency during 2020, followed by an aggressive optimization of working capital utilization by 2022.
- Net Revenue Trends
- Net revenues exhibited a fluctuating pattern, increasing from 15.67 billion US$ in 2018 to 16.60 billion US$ in 2019. A substantial decline occurred in 2020, with revenues falling to 12.45 billion US$. A consistent recovery followed over the next two years, with revenues returning to 15.99 billion US$ by the end of 2022, effectively restoring top-line performance to near 2019 levels.
- Working Capital Fluctuations
- Working capital levels showed an inverse movement relative to revenue during the central period of analysis. A significant spike was observed in 2020, where working capital reached a peak of 2.57 billion US$. This was followed by a steep downward trend through 2021 and 2022, ultimately reaching a five-year low of 692.4 million US$. This represents a reduction of approximately 73% from the 2020 peak, suggesting a strategic shift toward leaner liquidity management.
- Working Capital Turnover Performance
- The working capital turnover ratio experienced extreme variance, reflecting changes in operational efficiency. The ratio declined from 12.25 in 2019 to a period low of 4.85 in 2020, indicating that a larger amount of capital was tied up to support a diminished revenue stream. In contrast, the ratio surged to 23.10 by 2022. This sharp increase is driven by the combination of recovering net revenues and a drastically reduced working capital base, signaling a high level of efficiency in utilizing short-term assets to generate sales.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Inventory Processing Period
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Inventory turnover | 5.53 | 6.31 | 7.27 | 6.69 | 6.47 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period1 | 66 | 58 | 50 | 55 | 56 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 452 | 486 | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 144 | 144 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 90 | 82 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 114 | 107 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 90 | 85 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 20 | 19 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 73 | 65 | — | — | — | |
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 160 | 160 | — | — | — | |
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 85 | 91 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.53 = 66
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of operating activity reveals a distinct inflection point in inventory management efficiency occurring in 2020. The metrics demonstrate a period of improving operational velocity followed by a sustained decline in the speed of inventory turnover through 2022.
- Inventory Turnover
- The turnover ratio exhibited a consistent upward trajectory between 2018 and 2020, increasing from 6.47 to a peak of 7.27. This indicates an initial improvement in the efficiency of converting inventory into sales. However, a reversal occurred after 2020, with the ratio dropping to 6.31 in 2021 and further declining to 5.53 by the end of 2022, signaling a reduction in the frequency of inventory replacement.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- The average inventory processing period mirrors the inverse movement of the turnover ratio. The period decreased from 56 days in 2018 to a minimum of 50 days in 2020, reflecting optimized stock movement. Following this peak, the duration increased to 58 days in 2021 and reached 66 days in 2022. This represents a 32% increase in the time required to process inventory when comparing the 2022 results to the 2020 low.
The synchronicity between the decreasing turnover ratio and the increasing processing period suggests a deterioration in short-term asset liquidity starting in 2021. The trend indicates that inventory is remaining in the system longer, which may be attributable to slower sales velocity or strategic increases in safety stock levels.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Receivable Collection Period
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Receivables turnover | 5.75 | 5.82 | 5.66 | 5.93 | 5.85 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average receivable collection period1 | 63 | 63 | 65 | 62 | 62 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 14 | 15 | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 57 | 64 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 72 | 61 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 89 | 80 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 77 | 72 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 14 | 11 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 50 | 55 | — | — | — | |
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 50 | 48 | — | — | — | |
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 45 | 47 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.75 = 63
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity indicates a high level of stability in the management of accounts receivable from 2018 through 2022. The consistency across the measured metrics suggests a disciplined approach to credit management and a predictable cash conversion cycle regarding customer payments.
- Receivables Turnover Ratio
- The turnover ratio remained remarkably stable, oscillating within a tight range between a low of 5.66 in 2020 and a high of 5.93 in 2019. A minor decline was observed in 2020, which represented the lowest efficiency point in the five-year period. However, the ratio recovered to 5.82 in 2021 and settled at 5.75 in 2022, confirming a consistent ability to turn over receivables.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The average collection period reflects a highly consistent payment cycle, remaining at 62 days throughout 2018 and 2019. A marginal increase to 65 days was recorded in 2020, aligning with the dip in the turnover ratio. This brief extension in the collection timeline was corrected by 2021, with the period stabilizing at 63 days for both 2021 and 2022.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Cycle
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 66 | 58 | 50 | 55 | 56 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 63 | 63 | 65 | 62 | 62 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Operating cycle1 | 129 | 121 | 115 | 117 | 118 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Operating Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 466 | 501 | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 201 | 208 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 162 | 143 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 203 | 187 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 167 | 157 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 34 | 30 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 123 | 120 | — | — | — | |
| Operating Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 210 | 208 | — | — | — | |
| Operating Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 130 | 138 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 66 + 63 = 129
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The overall operating cycle demonstrates a period of relative stability between 2018 and 2020, followed by a distinct upward trend in 2021 and 2022. This expansion in the operating cycle indicates a longer duration required to convert resources into cash, which is primarily attributable to changes in inventory management rather than credit collection efficiency.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- A fluctuating trend is observed, with a notable decrease to 50 days in 2020, followed by a consistent rise to 66 days by the end of 2022. The increase of 16 days between 2020 and 2022 suggests a slowdown in inventory turnover or a strategic increase in stock levels.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection period remained remarkably stable throughout the analyzed period, ranging between 62 and 65 days. This consistency indicates a disciplined credit policy and a steady rate of cash inflow from customers, regardless of the fluctuations seen in inventory levels.
- Operating Cycle
- The total operating cycle reached its lowest point of 115 days in 2020 before increasing to 129 days in 2022. Because the receivable collection period remained flat, the 14-day expansion of the cycle since 2020 is directly correlated with the increased duration of the inventory processing period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Payables Payment Period
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Payables turnover | 5.27 | 5.41 | 5.69 | 6.33 | 6.36 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average payables payment period1 | 69 | 67 | 64 | 58 | 57 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 59 | 57 | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 77 | 84 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 81 | 77 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 123 | 110 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 103 | 107 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 13 | 5 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 68 | 62 | — | — | — | |
| Average Payables Payment Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 70 | 65 | — | — | — | |
| Average Payables Payment Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 47 | 47 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.27 = 69
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a consistent trend in the management of accounts payable from 2018 through 2022. There is a clear and steady progression toward extending the duration of supplier payment cycles, which is reflected in both the turnover ratio and the average payment period.
- Payables Turnover
- A persistent downward trend is observed in the payables turnover ratio, which decreased from 6.36 in 2018 to 5.27 in 2022. This decline indicates that the frequency with which the company settles its obligations to suppliers has slowed over the five-year period.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- The average payables payment period shows a corresponding increase, rising from 57 days in 2018 to 69 days in 2022. This represents an extension of 12 days over the analyzed timeframe. The most significant year-over-year increase occurred between 2019 and 2020, when the payment period grew from 58 to 64 days.
The inverse correlation between the decreasing turnover ratio and the increasing payment period suggests a shift toward retaining cash for longer durations. This trend may indicate an improvement in the company's bargaining power with its supplier base or a deliberate effort to optimize working capital by delaying cash outflows.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Conversion Cycle
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 66 | 58 | 50 | 55 | 56 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 63 | 63 | 65 | 62 | 62 | |
| Average payables payment period | 69 | 67 | 64 | 58 | 57 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Cash conversion cycle1 | 60 | 54 | 51 | 59 | 61 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 407 | 444 | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 124 | 124 | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 81 | 66 | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 80 | 77 | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 64 | 50 | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 21 | 25 | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 55 | 58 | — | — | — | |
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 140 | 143 | — | — | — | |
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 83 | 91 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 66 + 63 – 69 = 60
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The cash conversion cycle demonstrates a period of operational efficiency improvement between 2018 and 2020, followed by a gradual increase in the time required to convert resources into cash through 2022.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- A contraction is observed from 2018 to 2020, with the period decreasing from 56 to 50 days. However, a significant upward trend followed, reaching 66 days by the end of 2022, which indicates a slowdown in inventory turnover during the latter part of the analyzed period.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection period remained relatively static, fluctuating within a narrow range between 62 and 65 days. This stability suggests a consistent application of credit policies and a steady rate of customer payment collection.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- A consistent upward trajectory is evident, rising from 57 days in 2018 to 69 days in 2022. This trend indicates that a longer duration is being utilized to settle obligations with suppliers, effectively increasing the amount of working capital financed by trade payables.
- Cash Conversion Cycle
- The overall cycle reached its peak efficiency in 2020 at 51 days. While the cycle lengthened to 60 days by 2022, the impact of the increasing inventory processing period was partially offset by the strategic extension of the payables payment period.
The operational data reveals a shift toward longer inventory holding periods and extended supplier payment terms, while maintaining a constant pace of receivable collections over the five-year period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?