- Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
- Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
- Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
- Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
- Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
- Adjusted Current Ratio
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
The analysis of income tax expenses from 2013 to 2017 reveals a period of significant volatility in both current and deferred tax obligations. While current tax expenses generally trended upward toward the end of the period, the overall tax provision for continuing operations was heavily influenced by substantial fluctuations in deferred tax accounting, culminating in a significant tax benefit in the final year.
- Current Income Tax Trends
- Current tax obligations exhibited non-linear movement over the five-year period. After a decline from 990 million USD in 2013 to 619 million USD in 2014, expenses rose sharply to a peak of 1,323 million USD in 2015. Following a moderate dip to 1,045 million USD in 2016, current taxes reached their highest point in the series at 1,711 million USD by December 31, 2017.
- Deferred Income Tax Dynamics
- Deferred taxes showed a consistent downward trajectory in value before a dramatic reversal in 2017. The expense decreased from 759 million USD in 2013 to 236 million USD in 2016. In 2017, the deferred tax position shifted from an expense to a substantial benefit of 1,010 million USD, indicating a significant reversal of deferred tax liabilities or the recognition of deferred tax assets.
- Total Tax Provision for Continuing Operations
- The total tax provision experienced considerable variance, peaking in 2013 at 1,749 million USD and 2015 at 1,651 million USD. A notable divergence occurred in 2017, where the total tax expense dropped to 701 million USD despite the record high in current taxes. This reduction was driven entirely by the offset provided by the deferred tax benefit of 1,010 million USD, which mitigated the impact of the increased current tax burden.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
| Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. federal statutory income tax rate | 35.00% | 35.00% | 35.00% | 35.00% | 35.00% | |
| Effective tax rate | 11.79% | 25.00% | 30.00% | 17.00% | 33.00% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
The company's tax profile exhibits significant volatility in its effective tax rate (ETR) despite a constant U.S. federal statutory income tax rate. Throughout the period from 2013 to 2017, the statutory rate remained fixed at 35.00%, establishing a stable benchmark against which actual tax liabilities were realized.
- Statutory Rate Consistency
- The U.S. federal statutory income tax rate showed zero variance over the five-year analysis period, remaining at 35.00% annually.
- Effective Tax Rate Volatility
- The effective tax rate demonstrated substantial fluctuations, starting at 33.00% in 2013 before experiencing a sharp decline to 17.00% in 2014. A partial recovery occurred in 2015, with the rate rising to 30.00%, followed by a moderate decrease to 25.00% in 2016.
- Analysis of Tax Divergence
- A widening gap between the statutory and effective rates is observed toward the end of the period. In 2017, the effective tax rate dropped to its lowest point of 11.79%, resulting in a variance of 23.21 percentage points below the federal statutory rate.
The overall trend indicates an increasing capacity to reduce the actual tax burden relative to the statutory requirement, characterized by an irregular but downward trajectory in the effective tax rate over the observed timeframe.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
The deferred tax position is characterized by a persistent net deferred tax liability throughout the analyzed period, with the net liability peaking in 2016 before experiencing a significant reduction in 2017. The overall movement in these accounts is driven by a gradual erosion of deferred tax assets and a substantial decrease in liabilities related to business combinations toward the end of the period.
- Deferred Tax Asset Trends
- Gross deferred tax assets before valuation allowances exhibited a downward trajectory, declining from 2,940 million US dollars in 2013 to 1,892 million US dollars in 2017. This decline was primarily influenced by a sharp reduction in tax attribute carryforwards, which fell from 1,074 million US dollars in 2013 to 292 million US dollars by 2017. Additionally, royalties, participations, and residuals showed a steady decrease after 2015, reaching 257 million US dollars in 2017.
- Valuation Allowances
- Valuation allowances fluctuated over the five-year period, indicating varying assessments of the realizability of the deferred tax assets. The allowance reached its lowest point in 2015 at 233 million US dollars before spiking to 463 million US dollars in 2016, suggesting a temporary decrease in the probability of utilizing certain tax assets during that fiscal year.
- Deferred Tax Liability Components
- The largest contributor to deferred tax liabilities was assets acquired in business combinations. This item remained relatively stable between 2,800 million and 3,300 million US dollars from 2013 to 2016, but decreased sharply to 1,688 million US dollars in 2017. Unbilled television receivables also contributed a significant liability, which remained consistent around 1,000 million US dollars until decreasing to 794 million US dollars in 2017.
- Net Deferred Tax Position
- The net deferred tax liability widened from 2,195 million US dollars in 2013 to a peak of 2,553 million US dollars in 2016. However, 2017 marked a significant reversal of this trend, with the net liability contracting to 1,473 million US dollars. This improvement was primarily the result of the substantial reduction in deferred tax liabilities associated with business combinations, which outweighed the simultaneous decline in total deferred tax assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
The financial data indicates a persistent and substantial net deferred tax liability position, characterized by a significant imbalance between deferred tax assets and liabilities over the five-year period.
- Deferred Tax Asset Trends
- Current deferred tax assets showed a sharp decline from 447 million USD in 2013 to 184 million USD in 2014, after which they were no longer reported. Noncurrent deferred tax assets appeared in 2015 at 134 million USD and exhibited a gradual downward trend, decreasing to 125 million USD in 2016 and further to 111 million USD by 2017.
- Deferred Tax Liability Trends
- Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities remained high and fluctuated between 2013 and 2016, moving from 2,642 million USD to a peak of 2,678 million USD. A significant contraction occurred in 2017, where the liability decreased to 1,584 million USD, marking a substantial reduction of approximately 41% within a single fiscal year.
- Net Tax Position Analysis
- Throughout the reported timeframe, the magnitude of noncurrent deferred tax liabilities consistently and heavily outweighed the available deferred tax assets. While the net liability position remained dominant, the overall tax burden associated with these deferred items was reduced significantly by the end of 2017 due to the sharp decline in noncurrent liabilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
Time Warner Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
The removal of deferred taxes from the financial statements results in a consistent modification of the balance sheet and income statement profile from 2013 through 2017. The adjustments primarily manifest as a reduction in both assets and liabilities, with the reduction in liabilities significantly outweighing the reduction in assets, thereby increasing the adjusted shareholders' equity across the entire period.
- Balance Sheet Structural Changes
- A consistent downward adjustment is observed in total assets and total liabilities. Between 2013 and 2017, reported total assets decreased by an average of approximately 111 million to 447 million US dollars when adjusted. More significantly, reported total liabilities were adjusted downward by substantial margins, ranging from 2,642 million US dollars in 2013 to 1,584 million US dollars in 2017. This suggests that the deferred tax liabilities held by the organization were a primary driver of the reported liability totals.
- Current Asset Convergence
- A notable convergence is observed in current assets. In 2013 and 2014, reported current assets were higher than adjusted current assets. However, starting in 2015 and continuing through 2017, the reported and adjusted current asset values became identical. This indicates that the deferred tax assets being removed were predominantly categorized as non-current assets in the latter half of the analyzed period.
- Impact on Shareholders' Equity
- The adjustment process leads to a systemic increase in shareholders' equity. Adjusted equity remained higher than reported equity in every year analyzed. For instance, in 2013, the adjusted equity of 32,099 million US dollars represented a significant increase over the reported 29,904 million US dollars. This trend persisted through 2017, where adjusted equity reached 29,848 million US dollars compared to the reported 28,375 million US dollars, effectively smoothing the volatility seen in reported equity levels.
- Net Income Variance
- The relationship between reported and adjusted net income shifted over the five-year period. From 2013 to 2016, adjusted net income was consistently higher than reported net income, suggesting that the removal of deferred tax accounting provided a more favorable view of profitability. However, 2017 marked a reversal of this pattern; reported net income rose sharply to 5,247 million US dollars, significantly exceeding the adjusted net income of 4,237 million US dollars. This divergence indicates a substantial non-recurring or tax-related gain in the reported figures for the final year of the analysis.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
Time Warner Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
The analysis of financial ratios from 2013 to 2017 reveals a notable divergence between reported figures and those adjusted for the removal of deferred taxes. While reported metrics often suggest growth in profitability and returns, the adjusted figures present a more conservative and stable trajectory, indicating that deferred tax accounting significantly influences the perception of financial performance.
- Liquidity and Operational Efficiency
- A consistent downward trend is observed in the current ratio, which declined from 1.53 to 1.08 on a reported basis. The adjusted current ratio mirrors this trend almost identically, suggesting that deferred tax adjustments have a negligible impact on short-term liquidity assessments. Similarly, total asset turnover remained virtually stagnant, hovering between 0.43 and 0.45 for both reported and adjusted metrics, indicating that tax adjustments do not materially alter the perceived efficiency of asset utilization.
- Profitability Metrics
- Significant variance is evident in net profit margins. The reported net profit margin increased from 12.39% in 2013 to 16.78% in 2017. Conversely, the adjusted net profit margin declined from 14.94% to 13.55% over the same period. This divergence suggests that the growth in reported profitability was largely driven by deferred tax accounting rather than core operational improvements.
- Returns on Investment
- A similar pattern is observed in Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Assets (ROA). Reported ROE showed a strong upward trajectory, rising from 12.34% to 18.49%, while adjusted ROE remained relatively flat, ending at 14.20%. Reported ROA also increased from 5.43% to 7.58%, whereas adjusted ROA experienced a slight decline from 6.59% to 6.13%. These discrepancies highlight that deferred taxes artificially inflated the reported returns over the five-year period.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage showed fluctuations, peaking in 2016 at 2.71 on a reported basis. The adjusted leverage figures were consistently lower than the reported values throughout the period, ranging from 2.10 to 2.46. This indicates that deferred tax liabilities contribute to a higher reported leverage ratio, potentially overstating the company's financial risk profile when not adjusted.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Current Ratio
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
2017 Calculations
1 Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 15,219 ÷ 14,077 = 1.08
2 Adjusted current ratio = Adjusted current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 15,219 ÷ 14,077 = 1.08
An examination of the liquidity metrics between 2013 and 2017 reveals a period of asset growth coupled with a progressive deterioration in the current ratio. While total current assets increased over the five-year period, the capacity of these assets to cover short-term obligations declined significantly by the end of the timeframe.
- Current Asset Trends
- Reported current assets exhibited a general upward trajectory, rising from US$ 12,844 million in 2013 to US$ 15,219 million in 2017. A temporary contraction occurred in 2015, where assets dipped to US$ 12,513 million before resuming a growth trend. Adjusted current assets followed a similar pattern, though they remained below reported levels in 2013 and 2014 before converging completely with reported figures from 2015 through 2017.
- Liquidity Ratio Analysis
- The reported current ratio experienced fluctuations between 2013 and 2016, reaching a peak of 1.56 in 2015. However, a substantial decline is observed in 2017, where the ratio fell to 1.08. This downward trend indicates a tightening of the liquidity buffer, suggesting that current liabilities grew at a faster rate than current assets during the final years of the period.
- Adjustment Impact
- Adjustments to current assets and the resulting ratios were most pronounced in the early part of the analysis. In 2013, the adjusted current ratio was 1.48 compared to a reported 1.53, and in 2014, it was 1.41 versus a reported 1.43. From 2015 onward, the adjusted and reported figures are identical, indicating that the items requiring adjustment were no longer present or had become immaterial to the liquidity calculations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
2017 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income attributable to Time Warner Inc. shareholders ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 5,247 ÷ 31,271 = 16.78%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to Time Warner Inc. shareholders ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 4,237 ÷ 31,271 = 13.55%
An analysis of the profitability metrics from 2013 to 2017 reveals a diverging trend between reported and adjusted financial performance. While reported net income and margins showed significant growth toward the end of the period, adjusted figures indicate a gradual erosion of core profit margins.
- Reported Net Profit Margin
- The reported net profit margin exhibited an overall upward trajectory, increasing from 12.39% in 2013 to 16.78% in 2017. A significant spike is observed in the final year, where the margin rose by 3.39 percentage points compared to 2016, coinciding with a substantial increase in reported net income to 5,247 million US$.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- Conversely, the adjusted net profit margin demonstrated a consistent long-term decline. From a peak of 14.94% in 2013, the margin fell to 13.55% by 2017. This downward trend persists despite fluctuations in adjusted net income, suggesting that revenue growth did not keep pace with adjusted operating expenses over the five-year duration.
- Divergence Between Reported and Adjusted Performance
- A notable shift in the relationship between reported and adjusted figures occurred in 2017. Between 2013 and 2016, adjusted net income was consistently higher than reported net income, indicating that non-recurring charges typically weighed down reported results. However, in 2017, reported net income exceeded adjusted net income by approximately 1,010 million US$, suggesting the impact of significant one-time gains or tax benefits that were excluded from the adjusted calculations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
2017 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Total assets
= 31,271 ÷ 69,209 = 0.45
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 31,271 ÷ 69,098 = 0.45
The financial data indicates a period of relative stability in asset utilization efficiency from 2013 to 2017, characterized by a consistent relationship between the asset base and revenue generation despite fluctuations in total asset values.
- Asset Base Trends
- Reported total assets experienced a decrease from US$ 67,994 million in 2013 to US$ 63,259 million in 2014. Following this decline, a sustained upward trajectory was observed, with assets increasing annually to reach US$ 69,209 million by December 31, 2017. Adjusted total assets mirrored this trend closely, beginning at US$ 67,547 million and ending the period at US$ 69,098 million.
- Reported Total Asset Turnover
- The reported total asset turnover ratio remained remarkably stable over the five-year period, fluctuating within a narrow range of 0.43 to 0.45. A slight dip to 0.43 was noted in 2014, followed by a recovery to 0.44 in 2015 and 2016, eventually reaching 0.45 by the end of 2017.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- The adjusted total asset turnover ratio demonstrates a high degree of correlation with reported figures. The ratio moved from 0.44 in 2013 to 0.43 in 2014, before improving to 0.45 in 2016 and maintaining that level through 2017. The negligible variance between reported and adjusted turnover ratios indicates that the adjustments made to the total assets did not materially alter the perceived operational efficiency of the asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
2017 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total Time Warner Inc. shareholders’ equity
= 69,209 ÷ 28,375 = 2.44
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total Time Warner Inc. shareholders’ equity
= 69,098 ÷ 29,848 = 2.31
An analysis of the financial position from 2013 to 2017 reveals a period of fluctuation in asset levels and a significant shift in shareholders' equity, which directly impacted the organization's financial leverage. While assets showed a moderate dip followed by a recovery, equity experienced a more pronounced decline between 2013 and 2015 before returning to growth in the final two years of the period.
- Total Asset Trends
- Reported total assets decreased from 67,994 million US$ in 2013 to 63,259 million US$ in 2014, subsequently increasing each year to reach 69,209 million US$ by 2017. Adjusted total assets followed a nearly identical trajectory, maintaining a slight variance from reported figures, suggesting that the adjustments made to assets had a minimal impact on the overall asset base.
- Shareholders' Equity and Adjustments
- Reported shareholders' equity declined from 29,904 million US$ in 2013 to a low of 23,619 million US$ in 2015, before recovering to 28,375 million US$ by 2017. A consistent positive variance is observed between reported and adjusted equity; adjusted equity remained higher in every year analyzed. This discrepancy was most notable in 2013, where adjusted equity exceeded reported equity by approximately 2,195 million US$, indicating that adjustments significantly bolstered the equity position.
- Financial Leverage Analysis
- Reported financial leverage increased from 2.27 in 2013 to a peak of 2.71 in 2016, before declining to 2.44 in 2017. The adjusted financial leverage followed a similar arc, peaking at 2.46 in 2015 and ending at 2.31 in 2017. In all periods, the adjusted leverage ratio remained lower than the reported ratio, reflecting the impact of the higher adjusted equity base. The convergence of reported and adjusted leverage trends indicates that while the absolute level of leverage was modified by adjustments, the underlying trend of increasing and then decreasing leverage remained consistent across both metrics.
The overall trajectory suggests a period of increasing financial risk through 2016, characterized by rising leverage and declining equity, followed by a corrective phase in 2017 where equity grew and leverage ratios contracted. The consistent gap between reported and adjusted figures demonstrates that adjustments to the financial statements provided a more favorable view of the company's solvency and capital structure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
2017 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to Time Warner Inc. shareholders ÷ Total Time Warner Inc. shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 5,247 ÷ 28,375 = 18.49%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to Time Warner Inc. shareholders ÷ Adjusted total Time Warner Inc. shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 4,237 ÷ 29,848 = 14.20%
An analysis of the financial performance from 2013 to 2017 reveals a distinct divergence between reported and adjusted profitability metrics. While the reported return on equity demonstrated consistent growth, the adjusted figures indicate a different trajectory in normalized operational efficiency and shareholder returns.
- Net Income Trends
- Reported net income attributable to shareholders grew steadily from US$ 3,691 million in 2013 to a peak of US$ 5,247 million in 2017. Conversely, adjusted net income remained relatively stagnant, fluctuating between US$ 3,993 million and US$ 4,450 million over the same period. The widening gap observed in 2017 suggests that reported figures were significantly influenced by non-recurring items or tax adjustments that were excluded from the adjusted calculations.
- Shareholders' Equity Movements
- Total shareholders' equity experienced a contraction between 2013 and 2015, with reported equity falling from US$ 29,904 million to US$ 23,619 million. A recovery trend followed in 2016 and 2017, with reported equity increasing to US$ 28,375 million. Adjusted equity mirrored this pattern, although it remained consistently higher than reported equity throughout the five-year period.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Divergence
- The reported ROE exhibited a sustained upward trend, increasing from 12.34% in 2013 to 18.49% in 2017. In contrast, the adjusted ROE peaked in 2015 at 16.04% before declining to 14.20% by 2017. This divergence indicates that the growth in reported ROE was driven by specific accounting or tax-related gains rather than a steady increase in normalized operational returns.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
2017 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to Time Warner Inc. shareholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 5,247 ÷ 69,209 = 7.58%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to Time Warner Inc. shareholders ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 4,237 ÷ 69,098 = 6.13%
The financial performance of Time Warner Inc. between 2013 and 2017 is characterized by a widening divergence between reported and adjusted figures, particularly concerning net income and the resulting return on assets. While reported metrics indicate an upward trajectory, adjusted metrics suggest a more conservative and slightly declining trend in operational efficiency.
- Net Income Performance
- Reported net income exhibited consistent growth, rising from 3,691 million US dollars in 2013 to 5,247 million US dollars in 2017. In contrast, adjusted net income peaked in 2013 at 4,450 million US dollars and experienced a general decline to 4,237 million US dollars by 2017. This trend indicates that the factors necessitating adjustments had a diminishing positive impact on net income over the five-year period.
- Asset Base Stability
- Both reported and adjusted total assets remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period. Reported total assets moved from 67,994 million US dollars in 2013 to 69,209 million US dollars in 2017, while adjusted total assets followed a nearly identical path, ending at 69,098 million US dollars. The minimal variance between reported and adjusted asset values suggests that the primary drivers of financial divergence reside in the income statements rather than the balance sheets.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Divergence
- A significant inversion is observed in the ROA metrics over time. In 2013, the adjusted ROA of 6.59% exceeded the reported ROA of 5.43%. However, by 2017, this relationship reversed, with reported ROA climbing to 7.58% while adjusted ROA declined to 6.13%. This divergence suggests that reported profitability improved relative to the asset base, whereas the adjusted perspective reveals a gradual erosion of asset efficiency from 6.59% to 6.13%.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?