Paying user area
Try for free
Time Warner Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Cash Flow Statement
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Time Warner Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
The financial data reveals an overall positive trend in profitability and earnings performance over the five-year period.
- Net Income Attributable to Shareholders
-
There is a consistent increase in net income from 2013 to 2017. Starting at 3,691 million USD in 2013, net income showed moderate growth annually, reaching 3,926 million USD by 2016. The most significant increment occurred between 2016 and 2017, with net income rising sharply by approximately 33.7% to 5,247 million USD. This suggests an improvement in the company’s bottom-line profitability, potentially driven by operational efficiencies, revenue growth, or cost management.
- Earnings Before Tax (EBT)
-
EBT fluctuated somewhat within the period but generally exhibited an upward trajectory. It decreased from 5,303 million USD in 2013 to 4,679 million USD in 2014, indicating a short-term decline. However, EBT recovered in 2015 to 5,446 million USD and remained relatively stable in 2016 at 5,195 million USD. A strong increase occurred in 2017, with EBT rising to 5,945 million USD, the highest in the five years, reflecting improved pre-tax profitability.
- Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT)
-
EBIT data follows a similar pattern to EBT, starting at 6,586 million USD in 2013 and decreasing to 6,032 million USD in 2014. It rebounded in 2015 to 6,828 million USD but slightly declined again in 2016 to 6,583 million USD. In 2017, EBIT increased to 7,159 million USD, marking the peak within the dataset. This variability indicates some operational challenges or cost fluctuations in the middle years but a stronger operating profit position by 2017.
- Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA)
-
EBITDA grew steadily throughout the period, starting at 14,734 million USD in 2013 and showing modest annual gains through 2016. The most notable rise occurred in 2017, reaching 17,015 million USD, an increase of approximately 9.2% over 2016. The consistent growth in EBITDA suggests improving cash operating profitability and a healthy ability to generate earnings before accounting for non-cash expenses and financing costs.
In summary, all key earnings metrics show upward trends over the five-year period with some fluctuations in the middle years. The pronounced jumps in 2017 across net income, EBT, EBIT, and EBITDA indicate a year of particularly strong financial performance. This pattern reflects enhanced profitability and operational efficiency toward the end of the period analyzed.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
Enterprise value (EV) | |
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | |
Valuation Ratio | |
EV/EBITDA | |
Benchmarks | |
EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
Alphabet Inc. | |
Comcast Corp. | |
Meta Platforms Inc. | |
Netflix Inc. | |
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. | |
Walt Disney Co. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Enterprise value (EV)1 | ||||||
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | ||||||
Valuation Ratio | ||||||
EV/EBITDA3 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
Alphabet Inc. | ||||||
Comcast Corp. | ||||||
Meta Platforms Inc. | ||||||
Netflix Inc. | ||||||
Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. | ||||||
Walt Disney Co. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
3 2017 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- The enterprise value exhibited an overall increasing trend from 2013 to 2017, with a notable decline in 2015. Starting at approximately $76 billion in 2013, the EV rose to about $88 billion in 2014, then dropped to around $74 billion in 2015. Subsequently, it increased significantly to nearly $98 billion in 2016 before slightly decreasing to approximately $95 billion in 2017. This pattern suggests fluctuations potentially associated with market valuation or strategic changes within the company during this period.
- Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA)
- EBITDA showed a steady increase throughout the analyzed periods. Beginning at roughly $14.7 billion in 2013, it experienced incremental growth each year, reaching approximately $17 billion by the end of 2017. This upward trajectory indicates improving operational profitability and effective cost management over the five-year period.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio
- The EV/EBITDA ratio fluctuated between 4.78 and 6.29, reflecting varying market assessments of the company’s valuation relative to its earnings. Starting at 5.16 in 2013, the ratio increased to a peak of 5.97 in 2014, then declined to its lowest point of 4.78 in 2015. In 2016, the ratio reached the highest value observed at 6.29, followed by a decrease to 5.57 in 2017. These oscillations suggest changes in investor sentiment or underlying operational factors impacting perceived value during this time frame.