EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Economic Profit
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= 297,371 – 21.75% × 1,478,485 = -24,144
The financial performance from 2018 to 2022 reflects a transition from positive economic value creation to a period of value destruction. Although operating profitability grew over the long term, the rate of capital expansion significantly outpaced the growth in net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT), leading to a deterioration in economic profit.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited an overall upward trajectory, increasing from 172,096 thousand in 2018 to 297,371 thousand in 2022. A temporary contraction occurred in 2020, where profit fell to 176,158 thousand, before rebounding strongly in the subsequent two years.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital experienced aggressive and continuous growth throughout the period. The capital base expanded from 522,609 thousand in 2018 to 1,478,485 thousand in 2022, representing a nearly threefold increase in the total capital deployed.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained nearly constant over the five-year period, maintaining a narrow range between 21.70% and 21.77%. This stability indicates a consistent required rate of return regardless of the increase in invested capital.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit shifted from a positive 58,708 thousand in 2018 to a negative 24,144 thousand by 2022. The transition into negative territory occurred in 2020 and the deficit widened annually through 2022, signaling that the returns generated by the business failed to cover the cost of the capital employed.
The divergence between growing NOPAT and declining economic profit is driven by the rapid accumulation of invested capital. Because the cost of capital remained high and stable at approximately 21.7%, the capital charge increased faster than the operating profits could grow. Consequently, while the company expanded its operational scale, the efficiency of that capital deployment decreased, resulting in a sustained erosion of economic value.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
4 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= 41,012 × 3.70% = 1,517
5 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= 4,053 × 21.00% = 851
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
The financial performance from 2018 to 2022 is characterized by an overall upward trajectory in both Net Income and Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT), despite a synchronized contraction in 2020. The convergence of these two metrics toward the end of the period indicates a shifting relationship between operating performance and bottom-line earnings.
- NOPAT Growth Trends
- NOPAT exhibited a compound growth pattern, rising from 172,096 thousand USD in 2018 to 297,371 thousand USD by 2022. A significant increase was noted between 2018 and 2019, followed by an 17.9% decline in 2020. A strong recovery occurred in 2021, with NOPAT increasing by approximately 38.7%, and continuing to grow by 21.8% in 2022.
- Comparative Analysis of Net Income and NOPAT
- Throughout the observed period, NOPAT remained consistently higher than Net Income. This gap suggests that the adjustments used to determine operating profit—such as the add-back of after-tax interest expenses—consistently enhanced the operating profit figure relative to the final net profit. The variance between the two metrics was most pronounced in 2018 and 2021, while 2022 showed the narrowest margin, suggesting that operating results and net earnings reached a higher level of alignment.
- Profitability Volatility
- Both metrics experienced a notable dip in 2020, with Net Income falling by approximately 20.6% and NOPAT falling by 17.9%. However, the subsequent rebound in 2021 and 2022 surpassed pre-2020 levels, with Net Income achieving its most aggressive annual growth rate of 43.6% in the final year of the analysis.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial trajectory from 2018 to 2022 indicates a significant escalation in tax-related expenditures, characterized by a pronounced surge in the final year of the observed period.
- Provision for Income Taxes
- A general upward trajectory is observed, with the provision rising from 37,646 thousand USD in 2018 to 108,189 thousand USD in 2022. Although a slight contraction occurred in 2020, the subsequent growth accelerated sharply between 2021 and 2022, resulting in a year-over-year increase of approximately 80%.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash tax outflows exhibited moderate fluctuations between 2018 and 2021, ranging from 16,816 thousand USD to 27,310 thousand USD. A substantial spike is recorded in 2022, where payments reached 112,250 thousand USD, representing a more than fourfold increase compared to the previous year.
- Relationship Between Provisions and Cash Outflows
- Between 2018 and 2021, cash operating taxes remained consistently lower than the provision for income taxes. This pattern diverged in 2022, when cash operating taxes exceeded the provision for the first time. This shift suggests a significant realignment of tax obligations, potentially due to the settlement of deferred tax liabilities or changes in tax jurisdiction requirements.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of deferred revenue.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
6 Subtraction of construction in progress.
Invested capital exhibited a consistent and significant upward trajectory between 2018 and 2022, increasing from 522,609 thousand US$ to 1,478,485 thousand US$. This represents a substantial expansion of the capital base utilized to generate economic value over the five-year period.
- Growth in Stockholders' Equity
- The primary driver of the increase in invested capital is the aggressive growth in stockholders' equity. Equity rose steadily from 334,753 thousand US$ in 2018 to 1,182,607 thousand US$ by the end of 2022. This consistent expansion indicates a strong reliance on retained earnings or equity financing to fund the company's operational growth.
- Debt and Lease Obligations
- In contrast to the equity growth, total reported debt and leases remained relatively stagnant. Obligations fluctuated minimally, starting at 61,588 thousand US$ in 2018, dipping to 58,790 thousand US$ in 2020, and ending at 70,012 thousand US$ in 2022. The marginal change in debt levels suggests a low-leverage strategy during this period of capital expansion.
- Capital Composition and Trends
- The composition of invested capital shifted heavily toward equity funding. While debt remained a negligible component of the total capital structure, the overall invested capital grew by approximately 183% over the analyzed period. This indicates that the company scaled its investment base primarily through internal accruals or equity injections rather than through credit markets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cost of Capital
Paycom Software Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 17,792,735) | 17,792,735) | ÷ | 17,862,747) | = | 1.00 | 1.00 | × | 21.82% | = | 21.73% | ||
| Long-term debt3 | 29,000) | 29,000) | ÷ | 17,862,747) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 3.70% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.00% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 41,012) | 41,012) | ÷ | 17,862,747) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 3.70% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.01% | ||
| Total: | 17,862,747) | 1.00 | 21.75% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 19,012,528) | 19,012,528) | ÷ | 19,072,595) | = | 1.00 | 1.00 | × | 21.82% | = | 21.75% | ||
| Long-term debt3 | 29,155) | 29,155) | ÷ | 19,072,595) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 3.30% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.00% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 30,912) | 30,912) | ÷ | 19,072,595) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 3.30% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.00% | ||
| Total: | 19,072,595) | 1.00 | 21.76% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 23,185,491) | 23,185,491) | ÷ | 23,244,281) | = | 1.00 | 1.00 | × | 21.82% | = | 21.77% | ||
| Long-term debt3 | 30,894) | 30,894) | ÷ | 23,244,281) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 3.30% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.00% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 27,896) | 27,896) | ÷ | 23,244,281) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 3.30% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.00% | ||
| Total: | 23,244,281) | 1.00 | 21.77% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 17,488,062) | 17,488,062) | ÷ | 17,549,380) | = | 1.00 | 1.00 | × | 21.82% | = | 21.74% | ||
| Long-term debt3 | 32,633) | 32,633) | ÷ | 17,549,380) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 3.90% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.01% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 28,685) | 28,685) | ÷ | 17,549,380) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 3.90% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.01% | ||
| Total: | 17,549,380) | 1.00 | 21.75% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 10,217,070) | 10,217,070) | ÷ | 10,278,658) | = | 0.99 | 0.99 | × | 21.82% | = | 21.69% | ||
| Long-term debt3 | 34,389) | 34,389) | ÷ | 10,278,658) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 1.50% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.00% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 27,199) | 27,199) | ÷ | 10,278,658) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 1.50% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.00% | ||
| Total: | 10,278,658) | 1.00 | 21.70% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × -24,144 ÷ 1,478,485 = -1.63%
A significant deterioration in economic value creation is evident between 2018 and 2022. The financial trajectory indicates a transition from generating positive economic value to a state of value destruction, where the returns on invested capital failed to cover the cost of capital.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- A sharp downward trend is observed in the economic spread ratio, which fell from 11.23% in 2018 to -1.63% by 2022. The ratio shifted into negative territory in 2020, indicating that the company began destroying economic value during that period. While there was a marginal recovery in 2021, the ratio declined again in 2022, confirming a persistent inability to achieve a positive spread.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit experienced a severe decline, moving from a surplus of US$ 58.7 million in 2018 to a deficit of US$ 24.1 million in 2022. The most critical inflection point occurred between 2019 and 2020, when economic profit flipped from US$ 57.3 million to a loss of US$ 11.1 million. The losses expanded progressively each year thereafter.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital demonstrated consistent and aggressive growth throughout the period, increasing from US$ 522.6 million in 2018 to US$ 1.48 billion in 2022. This represents a near-tripling of the capital base. The divergence between the rapidly increasing invested capital and the declining economic profit suggests that the additional capital deployments did not yield the necessary returns to sustain economic value.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Economic Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × -24,144 ÷ 1,391,208 = -1.74%
An analysis of the financial performance between 2018 and 2022 reveals a significant divergence between revenue growth and the creation of economic value. While the organization experienced consistent expansion in its top-line figures, there was a simultaneous and marked decline in economic profit, culminating in a sustained period of economic value destruction.
- Revenue Growth Trends
- Adjusted revenues exhibited a strong and uninterrupted upward trajectory throughout the five-year period. Revenues increased from 579,363 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 1,391,208 thousand US dollars by 2022. This represents a substantial scaling of operations, with the most significant annual growth occurring between 2021 and 2022.
- Economic Profit Transition
- Economic profit shifted from a positive position of 58,708 thousand US dollars in 2018 to a negative position of 24,144 thousand US dollars by 2022. A critical inflection point occurred in 2020, where the figure dropped from 57,272 thousand US dollars in 2019 to negative 11,084 thousand US dollars. This downward trend intensified annually thereafter, indicating that the returns generated failed to cover the cost of the capital employed.
- Economic Profit Margin Erosion
- The economic profit margin mirrored the decline in absolute economic profit, falling from 10.13% in 2018 to negative 1.74% in 2022. The most precipitous decline occurred between 2019 and 2020, where the margin transitioned from 7.64% to negative 1.30%. The continued negative margins in 2021 and 2022, despite the rapid increase in adjusted revenues, suggest that the cost of growth has outpaced the incremental economic returns.
The data indicates a period of aggressive expansion that has not yet translated into economic value creation. The widening gap between increasing revenues and decreasing economic profit suggests that the investments required to drive the revenue growth have a cost of capital that exceeds the operating income generated by those investments.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?