Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Parker-Hannifin Corp. (NYSE:PH)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 7, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check

Economic Profit

Parker-Hannifin Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The financial trajectory between June 30, 2017, and June 30, 2022, is characterized by a persistent inability to generate positive economic profit, indicating that the returns on invested capital consistently remained below the designated cost of capital.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trends
NOPAT exhibited significant volatility over the analyzed period. While peaks were reached in 2019 at 1,718,681 thousand and 2021 at 1,895,230 thousand, a sharp decline occurred by June 30, 2022, falling to 1,166,223 thousand. This final decrease represents a return to levels observed in 2017, effectively erasing operational gains achieved in the intervening years.
Invested Capital and Cost of Capital Dynamics
Invested capital showed a general upward trend, increasing from 13,507,821 thousand in 2017 to 21,994,132 thousand in 2022. The most substantial expansion occurred in the final year of the period. Concurrently, the cost of capital remained high and relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 18.52% and 20.88%.
Economic Profit Performance
Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire six-year duration, signaling a continuous destruction of economic value. The deficit reached its most severe point in 2022, with economic profit falling to -3,086,211 thousand. This deterioration was driven by the simultaneous impact of a decrease in NOPAT and a substantial increase in the invested capital base, which significantly heightened the total capital charge.

The widening gap between operating returns and the cost of capital suggests an increasing misalignment between the capital deployed and the resulting operational earnings. The significant expansion of the invested capital base in 2022, paired with the decline in NOPAT, accelerated the decline in economic value added, resulting in the most significant economic loss of the period.



Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Parker-Hannifin Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Net income attributable to common shareholders
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense6
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes7
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to common shareholders.

5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to common shareholders.


Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders
The net income attributable to common shareholders demonstrates a generally positive trend from June 30, 2017, to June 30, 2021, increasing from approximately 983 million US dollars to over 1.74 billion US dollars. This represents a significant growth over this four-year period, highlighting strong profitability. However, there is a notable decline in the year ending June 30, 2022, where net income falls to roughly 1.32 billion US dollars, which suggests some challenges or increased expenses affecting profitability in the most recent period.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT follows a similar upward trajectory from June 30, 2017, through June 30, 2021, rising from about 1.13 billion US dollars to approximately 1.90 billion US dollars. This consistent increase reflects improving operating efficiency and effective tax management during this period. However, there is a significant reduction in NOPAT in the year ending June 30, 2022, falling to nearly 1.17 billion US dollars, indicating a considerable drop in operating profitability or increased tax expenses most recently.
Summary of Trends
Both net income and NOPAT demonstrate strong growth over the initial five-year period, suggesting favorable operational performance and profitability enhancements. The peak values recorded in the year ending June 30, 2021, indicate the company's highest profitability during the timeframe examined. The sharp declines in both metrics for the year ending June 30, 2022, signal a reversal of this trend and may imply emerging financial challenges or external factors impacting profitability. The divergence in the magnitude of decrease between net income and NOPAT in 2022 could also point to changes in non-operating items or tax effects during that period.


Cash Operating Taxes

Parker-Hannifin Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).


Income Taxes
The income taxes show a fluctuating trend over the six-year period. Beginning at 344,797 thousand US dollars in 2017, the figure notably increased to 640,962 thousand US dollars in 2018. After this peak, there was a decline in 2019, with the value dropping to 420,494 thousand US dollars. The downward trajectory continued into 2020, reaching a low of 305,924 thousand US dollars. However, a substantial recovery occurred in 2021, rising again to 500,096 thousand US dollars. In 2022, income taxes decreased to 298,040 thousand US dollars, marking one of the lower points across the given years.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes exhibit more volatility and a generally increasing trend throughout the same period. Starting at 367,985 thousand US dollars in 2017, values soared to a high of 745,009 thousand US dollars in 2018, the largest increase observed. In 2019, these taxes declined to 429,023 thousand US dollars but remained higher than the 2017 baseline. The downward movement persisted into 2020, registering 357,562 thousand US dollars. However, in contrast to income taxes, cash operating taxes surged significantly in 2021, reaching 604,610 thousand US dollars, and escalated further to 703,301 thousand US dollars in 2022.
General Observations
There is a noticeable divergence in the trends of income taxes and cash operating taxes, particularly evident in the later years. While income taxes fell sharply in 2022 relative to the prior year, cash operating taxes continued to experience substantial growth. This discrepancy may indicate differences in accounting treatment, timing of tax payments, or underlying operational cash flow changes. The initial spike for both tax measures in 2018 suggests extraordinary activities or tax events occurred in that year, followed by varying recoveries and declines in subsequent periods. Overall, the analysis reveals a dynamic tax expense environment with significant annual fluctuations.


Invested Capital

Parker-Hannifin Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Notes payable and long-term debt payable within one year
Long-term debt, excluding payable within one year
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
LIFO reserve4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Noncontrolling interests
Adjusted shareholders’ equity
Construction in progress7
Marketable securities and other investments8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »

5 Addition of equity equivalents to shareholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of construction in progress.

8 Subtraction of marketable securities and other investments.


Total reported debt & leases

The total reported debt and leases fluctuated significantly over the period analyzed. It initially decreased from approximately 6.08 billion USD in mid-2017 to about 5.16 billion USD in mid-2018. Subsequently, it experienced a sharp increase to roughly 7.23 billion USD in mid-2019, continuing to rise to around 8.60 billion USD in mid-2020. A notable decline occurred in mid-2021, dropping to approximately 6.72 billion USD, followed by a substantial increase to nearly 11.62 billion USD by mid-2022. This trend indicates considerable volatility and an overall increasing debt load in recent years, particularly the marked increase between mid-2021 and mid-2022.

Shareholders’ equity

Shareholders' equity showed a consistent upward trend throughout the analyzed period. Starting at around 5.26 billion USD in mid-2017, it steadily increased each year, reaching approximately 5.86 billion USD in mid-2018, 5.96 billion USD in mid-2019, and 6.11 billion USD in mid-2020. A significant rise occurred between mid-2020 and mid-2021, where equity increased sharply to about 8.40 billion USD. The growth continued at a slower pace, reaching approximately 8.85 billion USD by mid-2022. This steady increase suggests strengthening equity capital and potentially retained earnings accumulated over the years.

Invested capital

Invested capital, representing the aggregate of debt and equity financing, exhibited considerable growth. Beginning at approximately 13.51 billion USD in mid-2017, it slightly declined to roughly 13.02 billion USD in mid-2018. Thereafter, a consistent upward trajectory is evident: rising to about 15.27 billion USD in mid-2019, followed by 17.53 billion USD in mid-2020. A marginal decrease to approximately 16.93 billion USD was noted in mid-2021, but invested capital surged substantially to nearly 22.0 billion USD by mid-2022. The data indicate increased resource deployment backed by both debt and equity, with particularly robust growth in the most recent year.



Cost of Capital

Parker-Hannifin Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 28.10%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 28.10%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »



Economic Spread Ratio

Parker-Hannifin Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of economic value added over the six-year period reveals a consistent failure to generate positive economic profit, as evidenced by the economic spread ratio remaining in negative territory throughout the entire timeframe.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained consistently negative from 2017 through 2022. A period of relative improvement was observed between 2017 and 2019, with losses narrowing from -1.47 billion US$ to -1.11 billion US$. However, this trend reversed sharply by June 30, 2022, when economic profit deteriorated to its lowest point in the series at -3.09 billion US$, indicating that the returns generated were significantly insufficient to cover the cost of the capital employed.
Invested Capital Growth
Invested capital exhibited a general upward trajectory, growing from 13.51 billion US$ in 2017 to 22.00 billion US$ in 2022. A substantial increase is observed in the final year of the period, where invested capital rose by approximately 5.07 billion US$ compared to the previous year.
Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
The economic spread ratio persisted at negative levels, reflecting a return on invested capital that remained below the cost of capital. The ratio reached its highest point in 2019 at -7.27%, before declining to a period low of -14.03% in 2022. The widening of this negative spread in 2022 correlates with the simultaneous surge in invested capital and the deepening of economic losses, suggesting a marked decline in capital efficiency and value creation during the final year of the observed period.


Economic Profit Margin

Parker-Hannifin Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the financial performance from June 30, 2017, to June 30, 2022, reveals a persistent inability to generate positive economic value. Throughout the entire six-year period, economic profit remained negative, indicating that the company's net operating profit after taxes was insufficient to cover its cost of capital.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit exhibited volatility with a significant downward trajectory toward the end of the period. While there was a moderate improvement between 2017 and 2019, where losses narrowed from -1.47 billion USD to -1.11 billion USD, this progress was reversed in subsequent years. A critical deterioration is observed in 2022, where economic profit reached its lowest point at -3.09 billion USD, representing a substantial increase in value destruction compared to previous years.
Net Sales Performance
Net sales demonstrated a general upward trend, growing from 12.03 billion USD in 2017 to 15.86 billion USD in 2022. A temporary decline occurred in 2020, dropping to 13.70 billion USD, followed by a recovery and a peak in the final year of the analysis. The growth in top-line revenue did not correlate with an improvement in economic value creation.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin remained negative throughout the observed timeframe, reflecting an ongoing gap between operational returns and the cost of invested capital. The margin peaked at -7.75% in 2019, marking the period of highest relative efficiency. However, this was followed by a sharp decline, culminating in a margin of -19.46% in 2022. The fact that the margin deteriorated significantly in 2022 despite reaching record net sales suggests that the increase in revenue was accompanied by a disproportionate increase in the cost of capital or a decrease in operating efficiency.

The divergence between increasing net sales and deepening negative economic profit suggests that the expansion in scale has not translated into economic value. The sharp decline in the economic profit margin in the final year indicates an escalating disconnect between the company's capital employment and its ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital.