Stock Analysis on Net

Parker-Hannifin Corp. (NYSE:PH)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 7, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

Economic Profit

Parker-Hannifin Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


Between June 30, 2017, and June 30, 2022, a consistent failure to generate positive economic profit is observed. Throughout the six-year period, the net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) remained insufficient to cover the capital charge, resulting in persistent value erosion from an economic perspective.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT exhibited significant volatility, reaching a peak of US$ 1,895,230 thousand in 2021 before experiencing a sharp contraction to US$ 1,166,223 thousand by June 30, 2022. While growth was evident between 2017 and 2021, the subsequent decline in 2022 suggests a marked reduction in operating performance.
Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
Invested capital demonstrated a general upward trajectory, increasing from US$ 13,507,821 thousand in 2017 to US$ 21,994,132 thousand in 2022, with a particularly steep increase in the final year. Concurrently, the cost of capital remained relatively stable but high, fluctuating within a narrow range between 18.47% and 20.82%.
Economic Profit Synthesis
Economic profit remained negative for the entire duration, indicating that the return on invested capital consistently failed to meet the required hurdle rate. The most severe deterioration occurred in 2022, where economic profit dropped to -US$ 3,074,490 thousand. This widening deficit was the result of a simultaneous increase in the capital base and a decrease in NOPAT, which significantly amplified the annual capital charge relative to operating earnings.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Parker-Hannifin Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Net income attributable to common shareholders
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense6
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes7
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to common shareholders.

5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to common shareholders.


Net Income Attributable to Common Shareholders
The net income attributable to common shareholders demonstrates a generally positive trend from June 30, 2017, to June 30, 2021, increasing from approximately 983 million US dollars to over 1.74 billion US dollars. This represents a significant growth over this four-year period, highlighting strong profitability. However, there is a notable decline in the year ending June 30, 2022, where net income falls to roughly 1.32 billion US dollars, which suggests some challenges or increased expenses affecting profitability in the most recent period.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT follows a similar upward trajectory from June 30, 2017, through June 30, 2021, rising from about 1.13 billion US dollars to approximately 1.90 billion US dollars. This consistent increase reflects improving operating efficiency and effective tax management during this period. However, there is a significant reduction in NOPAT in the year ending June 30, 2022, falling to nearly 1.17 billion US dollars, indicating a considerable drop in operating profitability or increased tax expenses most recently.
Summary of Trends
Both net income and NOPAT demonstrate strong growth over the initial five-year period, suggesting favorable operational performance and profitability enhancements. The peak values recorded in the year ending June 30, 2021, indicate the company's highest profitability during the timeframe examined. The sharp declines in both metrics for the year ending June 30, 2022, signal a reversal of this trend and may imply emerging financial challenges or external factors impacting profitability. The divergence in the magnitude of decrease between net income and NOPAT in 2022 could also point to changes in non-operating items or tax effects during that period.

Cash Operating Taxes

Parker-Hannifin Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).


Income Taxes
The income taxes show a fluctuating trend over the six-year period. Beginning at 344,797 thousand US dollars in 2017, the figure notably increased to 640,962 thousand US dollars in 2018. After this peak, there was a decline in 2019, with the value dropping to 420,494 thousand US dollars. The downward trajectory continued into 2020, reaching a low of 305,924 thousand US dollars. However, a substantial recovery occurred in 2021, rising again to 500,096 thousand US dollars. In 2022, income taxes decreased to 298,040 thousand US dollars, marking one of the lower points across the given years.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes exhibit more volatility and a generally increasing trend throughout the same period. Starting at 367,985 thousand US dollars in 2017, values soared to a high of 745,009 thousand US dollars in 2018, the largest increase observed. In 2019, these taxes declined to 429,023 thousand US dollars but remained higher than the 2017 baseline. The downward movement persisted into 2020, registering 357,562 thousand US dollars. However, in contrast to income taxes, cash operating taxes surged significantly in 2021, reaching 604,610 thousand US dollars, and escalated further to 703,301 thousand US dollars in 2022.
General Observations
There is a noticeable divergence in the trends of income taxes and cash operating taxes, particularly evident in the later years. While income taxes fell sharply in 2022 relative to the prior year, cash operating taxes continued to experience substantial growth. This discrepancy may indicate differences in accounting treatment, timing of tax payments, or underlying operational cash flow changes. The initial spike for both tax measures in 2018 suggests extraordinary activities or tax events occurred in that year, followed by varying recoveries and declines in subsequent periods. Overall, the analysis reveals a dynamic tax expense environment with significant annual fluctuations.

Invested Capital

Parker-Hannifin Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Notes payable and long-term debt payable within one year
Long-term debt, excluding payable within one year
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
LIFO reserve4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Noncontrolling interests
Adjusted shareholders’ equity
Construction in progress7
Marketable securities and other investments8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »

5 Addition of equity equivalents to shareholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of construction in progress.

8 Subtraction of marketable securities and other investments.


Total reported debt & leases

The total reported debt and leases fluctuated significantly over the period analyzed. It initially decreased from approximately 6.08 billion USD in mid-2017 to about 5.16 billion USD in mid-2018. Subsequently, it experienced a sharp increase to roughly 7.23 billion USD in mid-2019, continuing to rise to around 8.60 billion USD in mid-2020. A notable decline occurred in mid-2021, dropping to approximately 6.72 billion USD, followed by a substantial increase to nearly 11.62 billion USD by mid-2022. This trend indicates considerable volatility and an overall increasing debt load in recent years, particularly the marked increase between mid-2021 and mid-2022.

Shareholders’ equity

Shareholders' equity showed a consistent upward trend throughout the analyzed period. Starting at around 5.26 billion USD in mid-2017, it steadily increased each year, reaching approximately 5.86 billion USD in mid-2018, 5.96 billion USD in mid-2019, and 6.11 billion USD in mid-2020. A significant rise occurred between mid-2020 and mid-2021, where equity increased sharply to about 8.40 billion USD. The growth continued at a slower pace, reaching approximately 8.85 billion USD by mid-2022. This steady increase suggests strengthening equity capital and potentially retained earnings accumulated over the years.

Invested capital

Invested capital, representing the aggregate of debt and equity financing, exhibited considerable growth. Beginning at approximately 13.51 billion USD in mid-2017, it slightly declined to roughly 13.02 billion USD in mid-2018. Thereafter, a consistent upward trajectory is evident: rising to about 15.27 billion USD in mid-2019, followed by 17.53 billion USD in mid-2020. A marginal decrease to approximately 16.93 billion USD was noted in mid-2021, but invested capital surged substantially to nearly 22.0 billion USD by mid-2022. The data indicate increased resource deployment backed by both debt and equity, with particularly robust growth in the most recent year.


Cost of Capital

Parker-Hannifin Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 28.10%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 28.10%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Notes payable and long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Notes payable and long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Parker-Hannifin Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of economic value added indicates a persistent failure to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital over the six-year period from 2017 to 2022. A consistent pattern of negative economic profit is observed, suggesting that the company has not created economic value for its shareholders during this timeframe.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained negative throughout the observed period, exhibiting significant volatility. A slight improvement occurred in 2019, where losses narrowed to approximately 1.1 billion USD. However, this trend reversed sharply, culminating in a substantial increase in economic loss by June 30, 2022, reaching negative 3.07 billion USD. This final year represents the most severe deterioration in economic profit within the analyzed window.
Invested Capital Expansion
The capital base demonstrated a general upward trajectory, growing from approximately 13.51 billion USD in 2017 to 21.99 billion USD in 2022. While there were minor fluctuations in 2018 and 2021, the overall trend is one of aggressive expansion. Notably, the most significant increase in invested capital occurred between 2021 and 2022, coinciding with the period of greatest economic loss.
Economic Spread Ratio Performance
The economic spread ratio remained in negative territory for the entire duration, reflecting a consistent gap between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital. The ratio peaked in 2019 at -7.22%, marking the point of highest efficiency relative to the cost of capital. Conversely, the ratio deteriorated to its lowest point of -13.98% in 2022, indicating that the expansion of invested capital has not yet yielded returns sufficient to offset the associated costs.

In summary, the increase in invested capital has been accompanied by a widening economic loss. The synchronization of the peak in invested capital and the nadir of the economic spread ratio in 2022 suggests a period of significant capital deployment that has yet to translate into positive economic value.


Economic Profit Margin

Parker-Hannifin Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jun 30, 2022 Jun 30, 2021 Jun 30, 2020 Jun 30, 2019 Jun 30, 2018 Jun 30, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the economic value added metrics indicates that the organization consistently failed to generate positive economic profit from 2017 through 2022. Despite a general upward trajectory in net sales, the economic profit remained negative throughout the period, suggesting that the return on capital was insufficient to cover the company's cost of capital.

Net Sales Performance
Revenue demonstrated a growth trend, increasing from 12,029,312 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 15,861,608 thousand US dollars by 2022. A temporary contraction was observed in 2020, where sales declined to 13,695,520 thousand US dollars, before recovering and reaching a peak in the final year of the analyzed period.
Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained in negative territory for all six years. A period of relative improvement occurred between 2017 and 2019, with the deficit narrowing to 1,102,060 thousand US dollars. However, this trend reversed sharply after 2019, culminating in a significant increase in economic loss to 3,074,490 thousand US dollars by June 30, 2022.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin mirrored the volatility of the absolute economic profit. The margin improved from -12.18% in 2017 to its most favorable level of -7.70% in 2019. Subsequent years showed a marked deterioration, with the margin falling to -13.35% in 2020 and reaching a period low of -19.38% in 2022. This indicates a widening gap between the company's operating performance and the required return on its capital investments.

The divergence between increasing net sales and a deepening negative economic profit margin suggests that revenue growth did not translate into economic value creation. The sharp decline in the economic profit margin in 2022 specifically highlights a substantial increase in the cost of capital or a decrease in operational efficiency relative to the capital employed.