Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
The balance sheet reflects a significant structural shift in the composition of long-term assets between June 30, 2017, and June 30, 2022. The most notable event occurred during the 2020 fiscal year, characterized by a substantial increase in both goodwill and identified intangible assets, suggesting a major acquisition or series of strategic acquisitions during that period.
- Goodwill Trajectory
- Goodwill remained relatively stable from 2017 to 2019, fluctuating slightly around the 5.5 billion USD mark. A sharp increase occurred in 2020, where the value rose to approximately 7.87 billion USD, a growth of roughly 43% over the previous year. Following this peak, goodwill reached its highest point in 2021 at 8.06 billion USD before experiencing a moderate decrease to 7.74 billion USD by 2022.
- Identified Intangible Assets
- The gross carrying amount of intangible assets followed a pattern similar to goodwill. From 2017 to 2019, gross intangibles were in a slight decline, moving from 3.37 billion USD to 3.24 billion USD. In 2020, there was a significant expansion to 5.53 billion USD. This growth was driven across all sub-categories: patents and technology increased nearly fourfold, trademarks rose by approximately 38%, and customer lists and other intangibles grew by 56%.
- Amortization and Net Asset Valuation
- Accumulated amortization demonstrates a consistent and linear upward trend, increasing every year from 1.07 billion USD in 2017 to 2.32 billion USD in 2022. This steady increase has exerted downward pressure on the net value of intangible assets. Consequently, net intangible assets declined steadily from 2017 to 2019, spiked in 2020 due to the acquisition of new assets, and subsequently declined from 3.80 billion USD in 2020 to 3.14 billion USD in 2022 as amortization continued to accumulate.
- Aggregate Asset Trend
- The combined total of goodwill and intangible assets transitioned from a gradual decline between 2017 and 2019, dropping from 7.89 billion USD to 7.24 billion USD, to a sharp surge in 2020, peaking at 11.67 billion USD. The total then entered a period of gradual contraction, ending at 10.88 billion USD in 2022, primarily driven by the ongoing amortization of identified intangible assets and slight adjustments in goodwill.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
Parker-Hannifin Corp., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
An analysis of the financial position from 2017 to 2022 reveals a significant divergence between reported figures and adjusted figures following the removal of goodwill and intangible assets. While reported assets and equity show a steady upward trajectory, the adjusted metrics exhibit substantially higher volatility and a lower baseline, indicating a heavy reliance on intangible valuations to support the reported balance sheet strength.
- Asset Composition and Growth Trends
- Reported total assets grew from approximately 15.49 billion USD in 2017 to 25.94 billion USD by 2022. During the same period, adjusted total assets rose from 9.90 billion USD to 18.20 billion USD. The gap between these two figures—representing the value of goodwill and intangible assets—remained substantial throughout the period, typically ranging between 5.5 billion USD and 8.0 billion USD. This suggests that a significant portion of the company's asset base is comprised of non-tangible items, which grew in absolute terms over the six-year window.
- Equity Erosion and Tangibility Analysis
- The impact of removing goodwill and intangible assets is most pronounced in the shareholders' equity. Reported shareholders' equity maintained consistent growth, rising from 5.26 billion USD in 2017 to 8.85 billion USD in 2022. However, adjusted shareholders' equity fluctuated drastically, recording negative values in 2017 (-325.23 million USD) and 2020 (-1.76 billion USD). The occurrence of negative adjusted equity indicates that in those specific years, the total tangible assets were insufficient to cover total liabilities.
- Comparative Stability and Risk Profile
- A marked contrast is observed between the stability of reported equity and the volatility of adjusted equity. While reported equity grew by approximately 68% over the period, adjusted equity shifted from a deficit in 2017 to a positive balance of 1.11 billion USD in 2022. The significant swings in adjusted equity, particularly the sharp decline in 2020 followed by a recovery in 2021 and 2022, suggest that the company's tangible net worth is highly sensitive to operational changes or acquisitions, whereas reported equity is smoothed by the inclusion of intangible assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
Parker-Hannifin Corp., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
The removal of goodwill and intangible assets from the financial calculations reveals a substantial divergence between reported and adjusted performance metrics from 2017 to 2022. The adjusted ratios consistently indicate higher operational efficiency and profitability when measured against tangible assets, while simultaneously exposing a significantly higher degree of financial leverage.
- Asset Utilization and Turnover
- A general downward trend is observed in total asset turnover for both reported and adjusted metrics toward the end of the period. Reported turnover declined from a peak of 0.93 in 2018 to 0.61 by June 30, 2022. The adjusted turnover remained consistently higher than the reported figures, peaking at 1.46 in 2018 and ending at 0.87 in 2022. The persistent gap between these two figures confirms that intangible assets significantly inflate the asset base, thereby depressing the reported efficiency of asset utilization.
- Financial Leverage and Risk Profile
- Reported financial leverage remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 2.42 and 3.23. However, the adjusted financial leverage exhibits extreme volatility and significantly higher values, reaching a peak of 36.27 in 2021. This stark contrast suggests that a vast majority of the equity is tied to goodwill and intangibles; once these are removed, the company's reliance on debt relative to its tangible asset base is far more pronounced than the reported figures suggest.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- Adjusted ROA consistently exceeded reported ROA throughout the analyzed period. Reported ROA peaked at 8.60% in 2019 and fell to 5.07% in 2022. In contrast, the adjusted ROA reached a high of 14.22% in 2021. The ability of tangible assets to generate earnings is markedly higher than the overall asset base suggests, indicating that the intangible components of the balance sheet do not contribute to returns in the same proportion as physical assets.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- The most dramatic variance is observed in the ROE metrics. While reported ROE remained within a moderate range of 14.87% to 25.37%, the adjusted ROE reached extraordinary levels, peaking at 515.65% in 2021. This extreme escalation indicates that the net income is being generated by a very small base of tangible equity, reflecting high capital efficiency on a tangible basis but also highlighting the immense scale of goodwill relative to the company's tangible net worth.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
2022 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Total assets
= 15,861,608 ÷ 25,943,943 = 0.61
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 15,861,608 ÷ 18,203,861 = 0.87
An examination of the asset base and turnover ratios between 2017 and 2022 reveals a significant expansion in total assets accompanied by a general decline in asset utilization efficiency. While reported total assets grew from US$15.5 billion to US$25.9 billion, adjusted total assets followed a similar upward trajectory, increasing from US$9.9 billion to US$18.2 billion over the same period.
- Analysis of Asset Base Discrepancy
- A consistent variance exists between reported and adjusted total assets, indicating that a substantial portion of the balance sheet is comprised of goodwill and intangible assets. The difference between these two figures represents the non-operating asset component, which significantly inflates the reported asset base relative to the tangible operating base.
- Comparative Asset Turnover Trends
- The adjusted total asset turnover consistently exceeds the reported total asset turnover across all analyzed years. This disparity demonstrates that the core operating assets are utilized more efficiently to generate revenue than the total asset base. A peak in operational efficiency occurred in 2018, with the adjusted turnover reaching 1.46, significantly higher than the reported turnover of 0.93.
- Operational Efficiency Decay
- Both turnover metrics exhibit a downward trend toward the end of the period. Reported turnover declined from 0.78 in 2017 to 0.61 in 2022, while adjusted turnover fell from 1.21 in 2017 to 0.87 in 2022. This pattern suggests that asset growth has outpaced corresponding revenue growth, leading to a reduction in the efficiency of the asset base.
- Impact of 2022 Asset Expansion
- A sharp increase in both reported and adjusted assets is observed in 2022. This expansion coincides with the lowest recorded turnover ratios for both metrics (0.61 reported and 0.87 adjusted). The significant jump in adjusted assets in 2022 suggests substantial capital investment or acquisitions of tangible assets that have not yet translated into a proportional increase in revenue.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
2022 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 25,943,943 ÷ 8,848,011 = 2.93
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 18,203,861 ÷ 1,107,929 = 16.43
An analysis of the financial structure reveals a significant divergence between reported and adjusted metrics, primarily driven by the impact of goodwill and intangible assets. While reported total assets grew from US$ 15,489,904 thousand in 2017 to US$ 25,943,943 thousand in 2022, adjusted total assets remained substantially lower throughout the period, ending at US$ 18,203,861 thousand in 2022. This consistent gap indicates a substantial portion of the asset base is comprised of non-tangible assets.
- Equity Composition and Stability
- Reported shareholders' equity exhibited a steady upward trend, increasing from US$ 5,261,649 thousand in 2017 to US$ 8,848,011 thousand in 2022. However, adjusted shareholders' equity showed extreme volatility and instability. Negative adjusted equity was recorded in 2017 (US$ -325,229 thousand) and 2020 (US$ -1,755,952 thousand), suggesting that in those years, total liabilities exceeded the value of tangible assets.
- Financial Leverage Divergence
- A stark contrast is observed between reported and adjusted financial leverage. Reported leverage remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 2.42 and 3.23. Conversely, adjusted financial leverage was significantly higher and more volatile, with values reaching 36.27 in 2021. The absence of an adjusted leverage ratio in 2020 is consistent with the negative adjusted equity reported for that period.
- Tangible Asset Risk Profile
- The disparity between the two leverage metrics indicates that the company's reported solvency is heavily supported by intangible assets. When these assets are excluded, the financial leverage increases dramatically, reflecting a much higher risk profile and a greater reliance on debt relative to tangible net worth.
By 2022, although adjusted financial leverage decreased to 16.43 from its 2021 peak, it remained disproportionately higher than the reported leverage of 2.93. This suggests that while the company has improved its tangible equity position in recent years, the underlying financial risk—when stripped of goodwill and intangibles—remains elevated compared to reported figures.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
2022 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to common shareholders ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 1,315,605 ÷ 8,848,011 = 14.87%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to common shareholders ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 1,315,605 ÷ 1,107,929 = 118.74%
The financial data reveals a significant divergence between reported and adjusted equity metrics, indicating a substantial concentration of goodwill and intangible assets within the capital structure.
- Equity Composition and Trends
- Reported shareholders' equity demonstrates a consistent upward trajectory, increasing from 5.26 billion USD in 2017 to 8.85 billion USD by 2022. In contrast, adjusted shareholders' equity exhibits extreme volatility. This figure fluctuated from a negative 325 million USD in 2017 to a peak of 1.11 billion USD in 2022, including a significant contraction to negative 1.76 billion USD in 2020. The wide variance between reported and adjusted equity confirms that non-tangible assets constitute the vast majority of the total equity base.
- Comparative Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
- Reported ROE remained relatively stable over the period, peaking at 25.37% in 2019 and reaching a low of 14.87% in 2022. However, the adjusted ROE presents an exponentially higher and more volatile profile. Adjusted ROE was recorded at 298.44% in 2018 and 297.61% in 2019, before peaking at 515.65% in 2021 and moderating to 118.74% in 2022. The absence of a value for 2020 coincides with the period of negative adjusted equity, which precludes standard ROE calculation.
- Impact of Intangible Asset Valuation
- The extreme disparity between reported and adjusted ROE suggests that earnings are being generated from a very small base of tangible equity. The volatility observed in the adjusted equity figures—specifically the shift from a negative position in 2020 to a positive 1.11 billion USD by 2022—indicates that the company's financial leverage and return profiles are heavily influenced by the accounting treatment of goodwill and intangible assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
2022 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to common shareholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 1,315,605 ÷ 25,943,943 = 5.07%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to common shareholders ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 1,315,605 ÷ 18,203,861 = 7.23%
An analysis of the financial data from 2017 to 2022 reveals a consistent expansion of the asset base and a significant divergence between reported and adjusted performance metrics. The presence of substantial goodwill and intangible assets creates a notable gap between reported total assets and adjusted total assets, which impacts the calculation of the return on assets (ROA).
- Asset Base Expansion and Composition
- Reported total assets grew from approximately 15.49 billion USD in 2017 to 25.94 billion USD by 2022. Adjusted total assets, which exclude intangible assets and goodwill, followed a similar upward trajectory, rising from 9.90 billion USD to 18.20 billion USD over the same period. A significant surge in both asset categories is observed in 2022, where reported assets increased by approximately 28% and adjusted assets increased by 48% compared to the previous year.
- Comparative Analysis of ROA Metrics
- A consistent premium is observed in the adjusted ROA compared to the reported ROA across all analyzed years. For instance, in 2021, the adjusted ROA reached a peak of 14.22%, while the reported ROA stood at 8.58%. This discrepancy indicates that the underlying tangible assets are generating returns at a significantly higher rate than the total asset base, which is weighed down by non-earning intangible assets.
- Operational Efficiency Trends
- From 2017 to 2021, a general trend of improving efficiency is evident, with adjusted ROA rising from 9.93% to 14.22%, despite a temporary dip in 2020. However, 2022 marks a sharp reversal in this trend; the adjusted ROA declined to 7.23% and the reported ROA fell to 5.07%. This decline occurs simultaneously with the largest single-year increase in the asset base, suggesting that the newly acquired or added assets have not yet reached optimal productivity or that the cost of integration has temporarily suppressed returns.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?