AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

McKesson Corp. (NYSE:MCK)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 27, 2016.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

McKesson Corp., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 11.70 11.73 9.72 11.17 11.53 11.50
Receivables turnover 10.62 11.25 9.70 12.28 12.30 12.20
Payables turnover 6.28 6.66 6.03 7.17 7.21 7.53
Working capital turnover 56.71 56.43 44.79 67.54 64.02 30.87
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 31 31 38 33 32 32
Add: Average receivable collection period 34 32 38 30 30 30
Operating cycle 65 63 76 63 62 62
Less: Average payables payment period 58 55 60 51 51 48
Cash conversion cycle 7 8 16 12 11 14

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).


An analysis of the operating activity ratios reveals a consistent pattern of high efficiency in asset management, despite a notable period of volatility during the 2014 fiscal year. The company demonstrates a strong ability to manage its short-term operational cycle, characterized by rapid inventory turnover and prompt receivable collections.

Inventory and Receivables Management
Inventory turnover remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 11.17 and 11.73, with the exception of a decline to 9.72 in 2014. Correspondingly, the average inventory processing period remained consistent at approximately 31 to 33 days, peaking at 38 days in 2014. Receivables turnover followed a similar trajectory, maintaining levels above 12.0 until 2014, when it dropped to 9.70. The collection period experienced a commensurate increase to 38 days in 2014 before stabilizing between 32 and 34 days in subsequent years.
Payables and Working Capital Efficiency
A gradual decline in payables turnover is observed, moving from 7.53 in 2011 to 6.28 in 2016. This correlates with an increase in the average payables payment period, which extended from 48 days to 58 days over the analyzed period. Working capital turnover showed significant volatility, increasing sharply from 30.87 in 2011 to a peak of 67.54 in 2013, before adjusting to a range of 44.79 to 56.71 between 2014 and 2016.
Operational and Cash Conversion Cycles
The operating cycle remained stable at approximately 62 to 65 days for most of the period, with a temporary extension to 76 days in 2014. However, the cash conversion cycle exhibits a positive downward trend, decreasing from 14 days in 2011 to 7 days by 2016. This suggests that the company has successfully optimized its liquidity by extending payment terms to suppliers while maintaining tight control over inventory and receivables.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

McKesson Corp., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales 179,468 167,634 129,300 115,471 116,167 106,114
Inventories, net 15,335 14,296 13,308 10,335 10,073 9,225
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 11.70 11.73 9.72 11.17 11.53 11.50
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

1 2016 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Inventories, net
= 179,468 ÷ 15,335 = 11.70

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between the fiscal years ending March 31, 2011, and March 31, 2016, there was a sustained increase in both the cost of sales and the level of net inventories, indicating a significant expansion in operational volume. While inventory levels grew to support this scale, the efficiency of inventory utilization remained relatively consistent over the period, despite a temporary decline in turnover velocity during the 2014 fiscal year.

Cost of Sales Trends
Cost of sales exhibited a general upward trajectory, increasing from 106,114 million in 2011 to 179,468 million in 2016. A particularly sharp acceleration is observed between 2014 and 2015, where the figure rose from 129,300 million to 167,634 million, representing a substantial growth in the volume of goods processed.
Inventory Level Growth
Net inventories grew consistently from 9,225 million in 2011 to 15,335 million in 2016. The most significant year-over-year increase occurred between 2013 and 2014, when inventories rose from 10,335 million to 13,308 million, suggesting a period of increased stock accumulation.
Inventory Turnover Performance
The inventory turnover ratio remained stable around 11.5 for the first three years before declining to a period low of 9.72 in 2014. This dip indicates that inventory growth outpaced the growth in cost of sales during that specific window. However, the ratio recovered to 11.73 in 2015 and remained at 11.70 in 2016, demonstrating a return to high operational efficiency and a strong alignment between inventory investment and sales output.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

McKesson Corp., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenues 190,884 179,045 137,609 122,455 122,734 112,084
Receivables, net 17,980 15,914 14,193 9,975 9,977 9,187
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 10.62 11.25 9.70 12.28 12.30 12.20
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

1 2016 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Revenues ÷ Receivables, net
= 190,884 ÷ 17,980 = 10.62

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Revenue exhibited consistent growth over the analyzed period, increasing from $112,084 million in 2011 to $190,884 million in 2016. Concurrently, net receivables rose from $9,187 million to $17,980 million, reflecting an expansion of the credit base to accommodate the rising volume of sales.

Period of Stability (2011–2013)
The receivables turnover ratio remained highly stable during the first three years, maintaining a narrow range between 12.20 and 12.30. This indicates a consistent relationship between credit sales and the collection of outstanding receivables.
Efficiency Decline and Fluctuations (2014–2016)
A notable decline in collection efficiency was observed in 2014, with the ratio dropping to 9.70. This shift was driven by a disproportionate increase in net receivables relative to revenue growth. A partial recovery to 11.25 occurred in 2015, followed by a secondary decrease to 10.62 in 2016.
Aggregate Trend Analysis
The overall trajectory shows that while the company successfully scaled its operations, the velocity of receivable turnover shifted from a stable higher baseline to a lower, more volatile range. The failure of the ratio to return to pre-2014 levels suggests a change in the operating cycle or a modification in the credit terms extended to customers.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

McKesson Corp., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales 179,468 167,634 129,300 115,471 116,167 106,114
Drafts and accounts payable 28,585 25,166 21,429 16,108 16,114 14,090
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 6.28 6.66 6.03 7.17 7.21 7.53
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

1 2016 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Drafts and accounts payable
= 179,468 ÷ 28,585 = 6.28

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Analysis of the operating activity ratios from 2011 to 2016 reveals a general expansion in the scale of operations accompanied by a reduction in the frequency of payables turnover.

Cost of Sales and Payables Growth
A consistent upward trend in cost of sales is observed, rising from 106,114 million USD in 2011 to 179,468 million USD by 2016. This growth is mirrored by the balance of drafts and accounts payable, which increased from 14,090 million USD in 2011 to 28,585 million USD in 2016. The most pronounced acceleration in both metrics occurred between 2014 and 2015, where cost of sales grew by approximately 30% in a single year.
Payables Turnover Ratio Trends
The payables turnover ratio exhibited a steady decline from 7.53 in 2011 to 7.17 in 2013, followed by a sharper decrease to 6.03 in 2014. Although a recovery to 6.66 was recorded in 2015, the ratio declined again to 6.28 by 2016. The overall trend indicates a reduction in the number of times accounts payable are cleared over the course of the fiscal year.
Operational Insights
The correlation between increasing accounts payable balances and a declining turnover ratio suggests an extension of the payment cycle. The transition from a ratio of 7.53 to 6.28 implies that the duration for settling supplier obligations has lengthened. This pattern typically reflects either an increase in the credit terms negotiated with suppliers or a strategic shift to utilize trade credit as a primary source of short-term financing to support the growing cost of sales.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

McKesson Corp., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 38,437 36,670 32,573 23,170 23,603 22,357
Less: Current liabilities 35,071 33,497 29,501 21,357 21,686 18,726
Working capital 3,366 3,173 3,072 1,813 1,917 3,631
 
Revenues 190,884 179,045 137,609 122,455 122,734 112,084
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 56.71 56.43 44.79 67.54 64.02 30.87
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

1 2016 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Revenues ÷ Working capital
= 190,884 ÷ 3,366 = 56.71

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operational activity between March 31, 2011, and March 31, 2016, reveals a period of consistent revenue growth coupled with significant volatility in working capital management, resulting in fluctuating turnover efficiency.

Revenue Growth Trends
A steady upward trajectory in revenues is observed, increasing from 112,084 million US dollars in 2011 to 190,884 million US dollars by 2016. A notable acceleration in growth occurred between 2014 and 2015, where revenues rose by approximately 30% in a single fiscal year.
Working Capital Volatility
Working capital experienced a sharp decline between 2011 and 2013, falling from 3,631 million US dollars to a low of 1,813 million US dollars. Following this period, a recovery phase is noted from 2014 through 2016, with working capital steadily increasing to 3,366 million US dollars.
Working Capital Turnover Performance
The working capital turnover ratio exhibited significant variance, reflecting the inverse relationship between revenue growth and working capital levels. A peak in efficiency was observed in 2013, with the ratio reaching 67.54, driven by the simultaneous increase in revenues and a decrease in working capital. A subsequent contraction occurred in 2014, where the ratio dropped to 44.79 as working capital increased more rapidly than revenues.
Operational Efficiency Stabilization
In the final two years of the period, the turnover ratio stabilized in the mid-50s, recording 56.43 in 2015 and 56.71 in 2016. This stabilization suggests that the increase in working capital was effectively offset by the substantial expansion in the revenue base, maintaining a consistent level of asset utilization relative to sales volume.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

McKesson Corp., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 11.70 11.73 9.72 11.17 11.53 11.50
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 31 31 38 33 32 32
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

1 2016 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 11.70 = 31

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operational efficiency regarding inventory management exhibits a high degree of stability over the observed period, characterized by a consistent ability to cycle through stock rapidly, despite a notable temporary fluctuation in 2014.

Inventory Turnover Trends
The inventory turnover ratio remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2013, ranging from 11.17 to 11.53. A marked decline was recorded in 2014, where the ratio fell to 9.72, indicating a decrease in the velocity of inventory sales. This downward movement was short-lived, as the ratio rebounded to 11.73 in 2015 and remained nearly constant at 11.70 in 2016, suggesting a return to optimal operational levels.
Average Inventory Processing Period Analysis
The inventory processing period consistently hovered between 31 and 33 days for the majority of the period. An increase to 38 days was observed in 2014, aligning with the dip in turnover ratios and representing a peak in the duration required to process inventory. Following this peak, the processing period tightened to 31 days in both 2015 and 2016, indicating an improvement in liquidity and inventory management efficiency.

The correlation between the turnover ratio and the processing period demonstrates a stable inventory cycle. The surge in the processing period during 2014 indicates a temporary inefficiency that was successfully corrected in the subsequent two fiscal years, resulting in the most efficient processing times of the six-year span by 2016.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

McKesson Corp., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 10.62 11.25 9.70 12.28 12.30 12.20
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 34 32 38 30 30 30
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

1 2016 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 10.62 = 34

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a period of high stability in credit management from 2011 to 2013, followed by a period of volatility in the efficiency of receivable conversions between 2014 and 2016.

Receivables Turnover
The turnover ratio remained remarkably steady between 2011 and 2013, maintaining a range between 12.20 and 12.30. A notable decline occurred in 2014, where the ratio dropped to 9.70, indicating a decrease in the velocity of receivable collections. A partial recovery was observed in 2015 as the ratio rose to 11.25, although it experienced a subsequent moderate decline to 10.62 by March 31, 2016.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period remained constant at 30 days from 2011 through 2013, demonstrating consistent liquidity management. In 2014, the collection period extended to 38 days, representing a peak in the time required to collect outstanding payments. Efficiency improved in 2015 with the period shortening to 32 days, before settling at 34 days in 2016.

The inverse correlation between the turnover ratio and the collection period is evident throughout the period. The most significant disruption occurred in 2014, marking a shift from a highly predictable 30-day collection cycle to a more variable window of 32 to 38 days in the subsequent years.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

McKesson Corp., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 31 31 38 33 32 32
Average receivable collection period 34 32 38 30 30 30
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 65 63 76 63 62 62
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

1 2016 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 31 + 34 = 65

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating efficiency of the company remained largely consistent between 2011 and 2016, characterized by a significant deviation in 2014 followed by a return to baseline levels. The synchronicity between inventory movement and receivable collections indicates a stable operational model, despite a temporary spike in the cash conversion timeline.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory turnover efficiency remained steady between 31 and 33 days for the majority of the analyzed period. A notable increase to 38 days occurred on March 31, 2014, representing a temporary deceleration in inventory movement. By 2015, this metric returned to its historical baseline of 31 days, where it remained through 2016.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection of receivables was highly stable at 30 days from 2011 through 2013. Similar to the inventory trend, a sharp increase to 38 days was recorded in 2014, suggesting a temporary expansion in the time required to collect payments from customers. In the subsequent two years, the collection period moderated and stabilized between 32 and 34 days.
Operating Cycle
The total operating cycle exhibited a consistent range of 62 to 65 days across most of the period. The anomaly observed in March 2014 resulted in a peak of 76 days, driven by the simultaneous increase in both inventory processing and receivable collection times. Following this peak, the cycle normalized to 63 days in 2015 and 65 days in 2016, indicating a restoration of short-term operational liquidity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

McKesson Corp., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 6.28 6.66 6.03 7.17 7.21 7.53
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 58 55 60 51 51 48
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — — —
Elevance Health Inc. — — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — — —
UnitedHealth Group Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

1 2016 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 6.28 = 58

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a consistent trend toward the extension of the payables cycle between 2011 and 2016. The relationship between payables turnover and the payment period demonstrates a clear inverse correlation, suggesting a strategic shift in working capital management.

Payables Turnover
A general decline in the payables turnover ratio is observed, falling from 7.53 in 2011 to 6.28 by 2016. The most pronounced decrease occurred in 2014, where the ratio reached a period low of 6.03. Although a temporary recovery to 6.66 was recorded in 2015, the overall trajectory remains downward over the six-year horizon.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average duration required to settle obligations to suppliers increased from 48 days in 2011 to 58 days in 2016. The payment period remained stable at 51 days during 2012 and 2013 before peaking at 60 days in 2014. Despite a moderate contraction to 55 days in 2015, the period concluded at a level 20.8% higher than the initial 2011 measurement.
Operational Implications
The expansion of the payment cycle indicates a systematic increase in the time taken to remunerate creditors. This trend suggests that the organization has successfully extended its credit terms or shifted its payment strategy to retain cash for longer durations, thereby utilizing accounts payable as a primary source of spontaneous short-term financing to support operational liquidity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

McKesson Corp., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 31 31 38 33 32 32
Average receivable collection period 34 32 38 30 30 30
Average payables payment period 58 55 60 51 51 48
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 7 8 16 12 11 14
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Abbott Laboratories — — — — — —
Intuitive Surgical Inc. — — — — — —
Medtronic PLC — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

1 2016 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 31 + 34 – 58 = 7

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the short-term activity ratios reveals a general improvement in the efficiency of the working capital cycle between 2011 and 2016. The Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) exhibits a net decrease, falling from 14 days in 2011 to 7 days by March 31, 2016, indicating a more streamlined transition of resources into cash.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory turnover remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 31 and 33 days for most of the analyzed period. A temporary increase to 38 days occurred in 2014, but the period subsequently returned to 31 days by 2015 and 2016.
Average Receivable Collection Period
Collection times were constant at 30 days from 2011 to 2013. Following a peak of 38 days in 2014, the period normalized to 32 days in 2015 and 34 days in 2016.
Average Payables Payment Period
A consistent upward trend is observed in the payment period, which increased from 48 days in 2011 to 58 days in 2016. This expansion in payment terms suggests a strategic utilization of supplier credit to finance operations, which significantly offsets the time required to sell inventory and collect receivables.
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) Dynamics
The CCC peaked at 16 days in 2014, a result of synchronized increases in both inventory processing and receivable collection times. However, a sharp decline followed, reaching a minimum of 7 days by 2016. This compression is primarily attributed to the widening gap between the payables payment period and the combined inventory and receivable cycles.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?