AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

McKesson Corp. (NYSE:MCK)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 27, 2016.

Analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment

Microsoft Excel

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure

McKesson Corp., balance sheet: property, plant and equipment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Land 228 207 221 129 68 70
Building, machinery, equipment and other 3,556 3,237 3,180 2,400 2,107 1,973
Property, plant and equipment, gross 3,784 3,444 3,401 2,529 2,175 2,043
Accumulated depreciation (1,506) (1,399) (1,179) (1,208) (1,132) (1,052)
Property, plant and equipment, net 2,278 2,045 2,222 1,321 1,043 991

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).


Between March 31, 2011, and March 31, 2016, there was a consistent expansion in the gross property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) base. Gross PP&E increased from 2,043 million US dollars to 3,784 million US dollars, representing a substantial growth in the company's physical asset investment over the six-year period.

Gross Asset Composition and Growth
Investment in land grew from 70 million US dollars in 2011 to 228 million US dollars in 2016, with the most significant acceleration occurring between 2012 and 2014. Simultaneously, building, machinery, equipment, and other assets grew steadily from 1,973 million US dollars to 3,556 million US dollars. The growth in these categories suggests a concerted effort to increase operational capacity and infrastructure.
Accumulated Depreciation Trends
Accumulated depreciation rose from 1,052 million US dollars in 2011 to 1,506 million US dollars in 2016. A notable deviation occurred in 2014, where accumulated depreciation decreased slightly to 1,179 million US dollars from 1,208 million US dollars in the prior year, which may indicate the disposal of older assets or a revaluation of existing holdings.
Net Book Value Analysis
The net book value of PP&E exhibited a strong upward trajectory, increasing from 991 million US dollars in 2011 to 2,278 million US dollars in 2016. A significant spike was observed in 2014, where net PP&E jumped to 2,222 million US dollars from 1,321 million US dollars in 2013. This was followed by a moderate decline to 2,045 million US dollars in 2015 before recovering in 2016, reflecting the interplay between aggressive capital expenditures and the ongoing impact of depreciation.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Asset Age Ratios (Summary)

McKesson Corp., asset age ratios

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Average age ratio 42.35% 43.22% 37.08% 50.33% 53.73% 53.32%
Estimated total useful life (years) 13 11 17 16 15 14
Estimated age, time elapsed since purchase (years) 5 5 6 8 8 8
Estimated remaining life (years) 7 6 11 8 7 7

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).


An examination of the asset age ratios reveals a significant shift in the composition of property, plant, and equipment occurring between 2013 and 2014. From 2011 to 2013, the asset base exhibited relative stability with a high average age ratio, suggesting a mature infrastructure with limited new capital expenditure. However, a distinct transition is observed starting in 2014, characterized by a reduction in the average age of assets and a subsequent stabilization in the low 40% range through 2016.

Average Age Ratio Trends
The average age ratio remained consistently above 50% from 2011 to 2013, peaking at 53.73% in 2012. A sharp decline to 37.08% occurred in 2014, marking the lowest point in the period analyzed. While the ratio increased slightly in 2015 to 43.22%, it remained significantly lower than the pre-2014 levels, ending at 42.35% in 2016.
Asset Lifespan and Age Dynamics
The estimated time elapsed since purchase remained constant at 8 years from 2011 through 2013, but dropped to 6 years in 2014 and further to 5 years in 2015 and 2016. This downward trend in elapsed age indicates a modernization of the asset base through the acquisition of newer equipment or the disposal of older assets. Simultaneously, the estimated total useful life showed volatility, increasing steadily from 14 to 17 years between 2011 and 2014, before dropping sharply to 11 years in 2015 and recovering slightly to 13 years in 2016.
Remaining Useful Life Analysis
The estimated remaining life of assets followed a pattern closely tied to the acquisition of newer property and equipment. After remaining steady at 7 to 8 years through 2013, the remaining life peaked at 11 years in 2014, coinciding with the lowest average age ratio. This suggests a strategic refresh of assets that extended the overall operational horizon of the equipment. By 2016, the remaining life settled at 7 years, reflecting a normalized depreciation schedule following the period of asset renewal.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Age

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 1,506 1,399 1,179 1,208 1,132 1,052
Property, plant and equipment, gross 3,784 3,444 3,401 2,529 2,175 2,043
Land 228 207 221 129 68 70
Asset Age Ratio
Average age1 42.35% 43.22% 37.08% 50.33% 53.73% 53.32%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

2016 Calculations

1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land)
= 100 × 1,506 ÷ (3,784 – 228) = 42.35%


The analysis of property, plant, and equipment indicates a period of significant capital expansion and asset modernization between 2011 and 2016. A consistent upward trend in gross asset values is observed, accompanied by a strategic shift in the average age of the asset base, particularly during the 2014 fiscal year.

Gross Asset Expansion
Property, plant, and equipment gross values grew steadily from 2,043 million US dollars in 2011 to 3,784 million US dollars in 2016. A substantial increase occurred between 2013 and 2014, where gross assets rose from 2,529 million to 3,401 million US dollars, indicating a major period of investment in fixed assets.
Land Holdings Growth
Investment in land demonstrated a strong growth pattern, increasing from 70 million US dollars in 2011 to 228 million US dollars by 2016. This represents a more than threefold increase in land value, suggesting a strategic expansion of the organization's physical infrastructure.
Average Age Ratio Dynamics
The average age ratio remained relatively high and stable between 2011 and 2013, fluctuating between 53.32% and 50.33%. A sharp decline to 37.08% occurred in 2014, directly correlating with the surge in gross PP&E. This indicates that the acquisition of new, non-depreciated assets significantly lowered the average age of the portfolio. Following this dip, the ratio experienced a slight rebound and stabilized at 42.35% by 2016.
Depreciation Trends
Accumulated depreciation generally trended upward from 1,052 million US dollars in 2011 to 1,506 million US dollars in 2016. However, a marginal decrease was noted in 2014, dropping to 1,179 million US dollars from 1,208 million US dollars in 2013. This decrease, paired with the increase in gross assets, suggests that older assets may have been retired or disposed of as new investments were integrated.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Total Useful Life

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, gross 3,784 3,444 3,401 2,529 2,175 2,043
Land 228 207 221 129 68 70
Depreciation expense 281 306 186 146 140 139
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated total useful life1 13 11 17 16 15 14

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

2016 Calculations

1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (3,784 – 228) ÷ 281 = 13


The period between March 31, 2011, and March 31, 2016, is characterized by a consistent expansion of the gross property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) base and a notable fluctuation in the estimated useful life of these assets.

Gross Asset Expansion
A steady upward trend in gross PP&E is observed, increasing from 2,043 million US dollars in 2011 to 3,784 million US dollars by 2016. This growth is mirrored by a significant increase in land holdings, which rose from 70 million US dollars to 228 million US dollars over the same interval, indicating a strategic increase in physical infrastructure.
Depreciation Expense Trends
Depreciation expenses generally trended upward, rising from 139 million US dollars in 2011 to 281 million US dollars in 2016. A peak in depreciation expense occurred in 2015 at 306 million US dollars, which corresponds with a sharp decline in the estimated total useful life of assets.
Estimated Total Useful Life Volatility
The estimated total useful life of assets exhibited non-linear behavior. Between 2011 and 2014, the estimate increased incrementally from 14 years to 17 years. However, a significant downward adjustment occurred in 2015, where the useful life dropped to 11 years, before slightly recovering to 13 years in 2016. This reduction in estimated life in 2015 likely contributed to the spike in depreciation expenses recorded during that fiscal year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 1,506 1,399 1,179 1,208 1,132 1,052
Depreciation expense 281 306 186 146 140 139
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Time elapsed since purchase1 5 5 6 8 8 8

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

2016 Calculations

1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 1,506 ÷ 281 = 5


Analysis of the fixed asset lifecycle reveals a strategic shift in the capital asset base between 2011 and 2016, characterized by a significant reduction in the average age of property, plant, and equipment.

Asset Age Trends
The average time elapsed since purchase remained constant at 8 years from 2011 through 2013. A downward trend emerged in 2014, with the average age decreasing to 6 years, and further declining to 5 years by 2015, where it remained stable through 2016. This reduction indicates a modernization of the asset base through the acquisition of newer equipment.
Depreciation Expense Patterns
Annual depreciation expenses exhibited stability between 2011 and 2013, fluctuating minimally between 139 million and 146 million US dollars. A sharp upward trajectory began in 2014, with expenses rising to 186 million US dollars, and peaking at 306 million US dollars in 2015. This surge suggests a substantial increase in the cost basis of new assets added to the balance sheet.
Accumulated Depreciation and Asset Turnover
Accumulated depreciation generally increased over the period, rising from 1,052 million US dollars in 2011 to 1,506 million US dollars in 2016. However, a notable decrease occurred in 2014, where the balance dropped to 1,179 million US dollars from 1,208 million US dollars in 2013. This contraction, coinciding with the decrease in the average age of assets, is indicative of the disposal or retirement of older, fully depreciated assets as part of a capital replacement cycle.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Remaining Life

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2016 Mar 31, 2015 Mar 31, 2014 Mar 31, 2013 Mar 31, 2012 Mar 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, net 2,278 2,045 2,222 1,321 1,043 991
Land 228 207 221 129 68 70
Depreciation expense 281 306 186 146 140 139
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated remaining life1 7 6 11 8 7 7

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).

2016 Calculations

1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant and equipment, net – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (2,278 – 228) ÷ 281 = 7


An analysis of the capital asset structure between March 31, 2011, and March 31, 2016, reveals a period of significant investment and expansion in property, plant, and equipment. Net assets grew from 991 million US dollars to 2,278 million US dollars over the five-year period, representing a substantial increase in the company's long-term physical infrastructure.

Asset Accumulation and Land Investment
A pronounced upward trend in net property, plant, and equipment is observed, with a particularly sharp increase occurring between 2013 and 2014, where values rose from 1,321 million to 2,222 million US dollars. This expansion is mirrored in land holdings, which increased from 70 million US dollars in 2011 to 228 million US dollars by 2016, indicating a strategic acquisition of real estate to support operational growth.
Depreciation Expense Dynamics
Depreciation expenses remained relatively stable from 2011 to 2013, followed by a steady increase that peaked in 2015 at 306 million US dollars. This rise in depreciation expense aligns with the broader increase in the net asset base, reflecting the increased cost of amortizing a larger volume of capital assets over time.
Fluctuations in Estimated Remaining Life
The estimated remaining life of assets exhibited significant volatility during the analyzed period. After remaining stable at 7 to 8 years between 2011 and 2013, the estimate peaked at 11 years in 2014. This was followed by a sharp decline to 6 years in 2015, before returning to 7 years in 2016. These fluctuations suggest changes in the composition of the asset portfolio or adjustments in accounting estimates regarding the useful life of newly acquired assets versus older holdings.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?