Liquidity ratios measure the company ability to meet its short-term obligations.
Liquidity Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).
Liquidity metrics between fiscal years 2011 and 2016 demonstrate a period of initial contraction followed by sustained stability. The overall trend suggests a disciplined approach to working capital management, where current assets are maintained at a consistent margin above current liabilities.
- Current Ratio
- A decline is observed from 1.19 in 2011 to a low of 1.08 in 2013, after which the ratio stabilized, concluding at 1.10 in 2016. This stabilization indicates a consistent capacity to cover short-term obligations using total current assets.
- Quick Ratio
- The quick ratio followed a trajectory similar to the current ratio, decreasing from 0.68 in 2011 to 0.58 in 2013 before recovering to 0.63 by 2016. The persistent gap between the current and quick ratios suggests that inventory represents a substantial component of the short-term asset portfolio.
- Cash Ratio
- The cash ratio exhibited the most volatility, starting at 0.19 in 2011 and dropping to 0.11 in 2013. While a moderate increase occurred through 2015, the ratio returned to 0.12 by 2016. These values indicate a low level of immediate cash availability relative to current liabilities, suggesting that the organization relies more heavily on the conversion of receivables and inventory to meet obligations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Current Ratio
| Mar 31, 2016 | Mar 31, 2015 | Mar 31, 2014 | Mar 31, 2013 | Mar 31, 2012 | Mar 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Current assets | 38,437) | 36,670) | 32,573) | 23,170) | 23,603) | 22,357) | |
| Current liabilities | 35,071) | 33,497) | 29,501) | 21,357) | 21,686) | 18,726) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | |||||||
| Current ratio1 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 1.10 | 1.08 | 1.09 | 1.19 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Current Ratio, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Elevance Health Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Medtronic PLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 38,437 ÷ 35,071 = 1.10
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The liquidity position exhibits a consistent pattern of stability despite significant growth in the scale of current operations over the six-year period. Both current assets and current liabilities experienced substantial increases, indicating a substantial expansion in the volume of the working capital base.
- Current Assets and Liabilities Trends
- Current assets increased from US$ 22,357 million in 2011 to US$ 38,437 million in 2016. A significant upward shift is observed between March 31, 2013, and March 31, 2014, where assets grew by approximately US$ 9.4 billion. Current liabilities mirrored this trajectory, rising from US$ 18,726 million in 2011 to US$ 35,071 million in 2016. The simultaneous growth in both categories suggests that the expansion of assets was largely funded by a corresponding increase in short-term obligations.
- Current Ratio Analysis
- The current ratio declined from 1.19 in 2011 to 1.08 in 2013. Following this initial decrease, the ratio entered a period of remarkable stability, remaining within a tight range of 1.09 to 1.10 from 2014 through 2016. This stabilization occurred despite the massive increase in the absolute dollar values of assets and liabilities, demonstrating a precise alignment between the acquisition of current assets and the accumulation of current liabilities.
- Liquidity Interpretation
- The consistency of the current ratio slightly above 1.0 indicates a lean approach to liquidity management. While the company maintains a sufficient buffer to meet its short-term obligations, the narrow margin suggests an optimized working capital strategy that avoids holding excessive non-productive liquid assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Quick Ratio
| Mar 31, 2016 | Mar 31, 2015 | Mar 31, 2014 | Mar 31, 2013 | Mar 31, 2012 | Mar 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 4,048) | 5,341) | 4,193) | 2,456) | 3,149) | 3,612) | |
| Receivables, net | 17,980) | 15,914) | 14,193) | 9,975) | 9,977) | 9,187) | |
| Total quick assets | 22,028) | 21,255) | 18,386) | 12,431) | 13,126) | 12,799) | |
| Current liabilities | 35,071) | 33,497) | 29,501) | 21,357) | 21,686) | 18,726) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | |||||||
| Quick ratio1 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.68 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Quick Ratio, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Elevance Health Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Medtronic PLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Quick ratio = Total quick assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 22,028 ÷ 35,071 = 0.63
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The liquidity position from 2011 to 2016 is characterized by an initial period of decline followed by a phase of stabilization. Throughout the analyzed timeframe, the quick ratio remained consistently below 1.0, indicating that liquid assets were insufficient to cover current liabilities without relying on other current assets, such as inventory.
- Quick Ratio Trajectory
- A downward trend is observed between March 31, 2011, and March 31, 2013, during which the ratio decreased from 0.68 to a minimum of 0.58. A recovery occurred in 2014, with the ratio rising to 0.62 and subsequently stabilizing at 0.63 for the fiscal years ending in 2015 and 2016.
- Analysis of Asset and Liability Growth
- There was a significant expansion in both quick assets and current liabilities over the six-year period. Total quick assets increased from US$ 12,799 million to US$ 22,028 million, while current liabilities grew from US$ 18,726 million to US$ 35,071 million. The growth in current liabilities outpaced the growth in quick assets, which maintained the ratio below the 1.0 threshold.
- Liquidity Stability
- The stabilization of the quick ratio at 0.63 from 2015 to 2016 suggests a consistent proportional relationship between the company's most liquid assets and its short-term obligations, reflecting a steady state of liquidity management in the later years of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Ratio
| Mar 31, 2016 | Mar 31, 2015 | Mar 31, 2014 | Mar 31, 2013 | Mar 31, 2012 | Mar 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 4,048) | 5,341) | 4,193) | 2,456) | 3,149) | 3,612) | |
| Total cash assets | 4,048) | 5,341) | 4,193) | 2,456) | 3,149) | 3,612) | |
| Current liabilities | 35,071) | 33,497) | 29,501) | 21,357) | 21,686) | 18,726) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | |||||||
| Cash ratio1 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.19 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Cash Ratio, Competitors2 | |||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Elevance Health Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Medtronic PLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-03-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Cash ratio = Total cash assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 4,048 ÷ 35,071 = 0.12
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The cash ratio exhibited volatility between 2011 and 2016, characterized by a general contraction in immediate liquidity relative to short-term obligations. The ratio reached a peak of 0.19 in 2011 and a trough of 0.11 in 2013, followed by a temporary recovery and a subsequent decline to 0.12 by March 31, 2016.
- Cash Asset Fluctuations
- Total cash assets showed an inconsistent trend, declining from 3,612 million USD in 2011 to a low of 2,456 million USD in 2013. A subsequent period of growth saw assets peak at 5,341 million USD in 2015, before decreasing to 4,048 million USD in 2016.
- Current Liabilities Expansion
- Current liabilities demonstrated a consistent and substantial upward trajectory over the analyzed period. Short-term obligations grew from 18,726 million USD in 2011 to 35,071 million USD in 2016, indicating a significant increase in the total volume of current commitments.
- Liquidity Ratio Dynamics
- The overall decline in the cash ratio is primarily attributed to the fact that the growth in current liabilities outpaced the growth in cash assets. While a surge in cash reserves between 2013 and 2015 provided a moderate lift to the ratio, the continued expansion of liabilities and the reduction of cash assets in 2016 suppressed the ratio back to 0.12, reflecting a tighter immediate liquidity position.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?