Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Turnover Ratios
Average No. Days
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
An analysis of the short-term activity ratios from 2017 to 2021 reveals a general lengthening of the operational cycle and a decrease in the efficiency of working capital management over the five-year period.
- Inventory and Receivables Management
- A consistent downward trend in inventory turnover is observed, declining from 6.81 in 2017 to 5.01 in 2021. This correlates with a significant increase in the average inventory processing period, which rose from 54 days in 2017 to 73 days by 2021. Receivables turnover remained relatively stable through 2019 but experienced a decline in 2020, resulting in an increase in the average receivable collection period from a low of 64 days in 2019 to 72 days in 2021.
- Payables and Working Capital Turnover
- The payables turnover ratio reached a peak of 17.35 in 2019 before moderating to 14.51 in 2021. Correspondingly, the average payables payment period has remained tight and stable, fluctuating between 21 and 26 days throughout the period. Working capital turnover demonstrated notable volatility, with a significant spike to 6.60 in 2018, followed by a period of stabilization and a subsequent increase to 4.98 in 2021.
- Operational Cycles and Liquidity Efficiency
- The operating cycle shows a clear expansion, increasing from 116 days in 2019 to 145 days in 2021. This expansion is further reflected in the cash conversion cycle, which grew from 95 days in 2019 to 120 days in 2021. The extension of the cash conversion cycle indicates that a greater amount of capital is tied up in operating assets for longer periods, primarily driven by slower inventory movement and delayed receivable collections, while payment terms to suppliers have remained largely unchanged.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Inventory Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cost of revenue | 8,489) | 7,375) | 8,187) | 8,604) | 8,309) | |
| Inventories | 1,694) | 1,189) | 1,164) | 1,318) | 1,220) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Inventory turnover1 | 5.01 | 6.20 | 7.03 | 6.53 | 6.81 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Inventory Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 0.75 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 2.53 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 4.48 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 3.40 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 4.29 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 19.45 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 5.65 | — | — | — | — | |
| Inventory Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 2.28 | — | — | — | — | |
| Inventory Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 4.03 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of revenue ÷ Inventories
= 8,489 ÷ 1,694 = 5.01
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The inventory turnover ratio exhibits a general downward trajectory over the analyzed five-year period, culminating in a significant decline by the end of 2021. While the ratio fluctuated within a relatively stable range between 6.20 and 7.03 from 2017 to 2020, a sharp decrease to 5.01 occurred in 2021, indicating a reduction in the efficiency of inventory utilization.
- Inventory Turnover Volatility
- The peak efficiency was recorded in 2019 with a turnover ratio of 7.03. This was followed by a decline to 6.20 in 2020, which coincided with the cost of revenue reaching a five-year low of 7.375 billion US dollars. The most substantial contraction in the ratio occurred in 2021, falling to 5.01, which suggests a slower rotation of stock compared to previous years.
- Inventory Level Expansion
- Inventory holdings remained comparatively stable between 1.164 billion and 1.318 billion US dollars from 2017 through 2020. A sharp increase to 1.694 billion US dollars was observed in 2021. This substantial accumulation of inventory relative to the cost of revenue served as the primary driver for the diminished turnover ratio in the final year of the period.
- Correlation with Cost of Revenue
- The cost of revenue demonstrated a recovery in 2021, rising to 8.489 billion US dollars from the 7.375 billion US dollars reported in 2020. However, the increase in inventory levels outpaced the growth in the cost of revenue, leading to a decrease in the operating activity ratio despite the rise in overall revenue costs.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Receivables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Operating revenue | 14,455) | 12,574) | 14,109) | 14,768) | 14,314) | |
| Trade receivables | 2,840) | 2,506) | 2,461) | 2,622) | 2,628) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Receivables turnover1 | 5.09 | 5.02 | 5.73 | 5.63 | 5.45 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Receivables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 23.58 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 5.68 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 5.95 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 4.55 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 5.04 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 34.15 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 6.66 | — | — | — | — | |
| Receivables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 7.57 | — | — | — | — | |
| Receivables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 7.76 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Operating revenue ÷ Trade receivables
= 14,455 ÷ 2,840 = 5.09
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2017 and 2021 reveals a period of initial efficiency gains in credit management followed by a contraction and a subsequent partial recovery.
- Operating Revenue and Receivables Trends
- Revenue remained relatively stable from 2017 through 2019, peaking in 2018 at 14,768 million US$. A significant contraction occurred in 2020, with revenue falling to 12,574 million US$, before rebounding to 14,455 million US$ in 2021. Trade receivables exhibited relative stability during the first four years of the period but experienced a notable increase in 2021, reaching a five-year high of 2,840 million US$.
- Receivables Turnover Performance
- The receivables turnover ratio demonstrated a positive trajectory from 2017 to 2019, increasing from 5.45 to a peak of 5.73. This trend indicates an improvement in the velocity of credit collections and more efficient working capital management. However, a sharp decline was observed in 2020, as the ratio dropped to 5.02. This deterioration occurred simultaneously with the decline in operating revenue and a slight increase in outstanding receivables, suggesting a slowdown in customer payment cycles.
- Recovery and Efficiency Analysis
- By December 31, 2021, operating revenue recovered to levels comparable to 2017. Despite this recovery, the receivables turnover ratio only marginally improved to 5.09. The fact that the ratio remains below the 2017 level, coupled with the increase in trade receivables to 2,840 million US$, suggests that the efficiency of converting receivables into cash has not yet returned to pre-2020 performance levels.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Payables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cost of revenue | 8,489) | 7,375) | 8,187) | 8,604) | 8,309) | |
| Accounts payable | 585) | 534) | 472) | 524) | 590) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Payables turnover1 | 14.51 | 13.81 | 17.35 | 16.42 | 14.08 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Payables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 6.40 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 4.36 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 4.75 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 3.32 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 3.40 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 74.34 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 5.93 | — | — | — | — | |
| Payables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 5.60 | — | — | — | — | |
| Payables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 7.81 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of revenue ÷ Accounts payable
= 8,489 ÷ 585 = 14.51
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Analysis of short-term operating activity reveals fluctuations in the payables turnover ratio between 2017 and 2021, reflecting shifts in supplier payment efficiency and working capital management.
- Payables Turnover Volatility
- The payables turnover ratio exhibited an upward trend from 2017 to 2019, rising from 14.08 to a peak of 17.35. This indicates a higher frequency of supplier payments during this interval. A significant reversal occurred in 2020, where the ratio declined sharply to 13.81, before experiencing a modest recovery to 14.51 in 2021.
- Accounts Payable Management
- Accounts payable showed a consistent decrease from 590 million US dollars in 2017 to a minimum of 472 million US dollars in 2019. This reduction in outstanding obligations contributed to the rising turnover ratios observed in the first three years. Subsequently, payables increased to 534 million US dollars in 2020 and reached 585 million US dollars in 2021, returning to levels comparable to the 2017 baseline.
- Correlation with Cost of Revenue
- Cost of revenue remained relatively stable from 2017 through 2019, peaking at 8,604 million US dollars in 2018. A notable contraction occurred in 2020, with costs falling to 7,375 million US dollars. The simultaneous increase in accounts payable during 2020, despite the reduction in cost of revenue, drove the turnover ratio to its five-year low, suggesting a strategic extension of payment terms to preserve cash flow. By 2021, the cost of revenue rebounded to 8,489 million US dollars, supporting a slight increase in the turnover ratio.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Working Capital Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Current assets | 6,374) | 6,523) | 6,253) | 5,778) | 7,278) | |
| Less: Current liabilities | 3,470) | 2,589) | 2,154) | 3,542) | 3,053) | |
| Working capital | 2,904) | 3,934) | 4,099) | 2,236) | 4,225) | |
| Operating revenue | 14,455) | 12,574) | 14,109) | 14,768) | 14,314) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Working capital turnover1 | 4.98 | 3.20 | 3.44 | 6.60 | 3.39 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 2.34 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 3.54 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 65.65 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 4.94 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 5.86 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 11.52 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 9.75 | — | — | — | — | |
| Working Capital Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 5.01 | — | — | — | — | |
| Working Capital Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 6.90 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Operating revenue ÷ Working capital
= 14,455 ÷ 2,904 = 4.98
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 reveals a volatile relationship between working capital management and revenue generation, leading to significant fluctuations in operational efficiency ratios.
- Operating Revenue Trends
- Operating revenue maintained a relatively stable trajectory between 2017 and 2019, oscillating around US$ 14 billion. A contraction is observed in 2020, where revenue fell to US$ 12,574 million, before recovering to US$ 14,455 million in 2021, marking a return to pre-2020 levels.
- Working Capital Fluctuations
- Working capital exhibited substantial instability over the analyzed period. A significant decrease occurred in 2018, with values dropping to US$ 2,236 million from US$ 4,225 million in 2017. This was followed by a sharp increase in 2019 to US$ 4,099 million. After remaining relatively steady in 2020, working capital declined again to US$ 2,904 million by the end of 2021.
- Working Capital Turnover Analysis
- The working capital turnover ratio reflects the impact of the aforementioned volatility. A peak efficiency ratio of 6.60 was recorded in 2018, driven primarily by the reduction in working capital relative to stable revenue. The ratio subsequently corrected to 3.44 in 2019 and reached its lowest point of 3.20 in 2020, corresponding with the dip in operating revenue. By 2021, the ratio increased to 4.98, indicating improved efficiency as revenue recovered while the working capital base was reduced.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Inventory Processing Period
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Inventory turnover | 5.01 | 6.20 | 7.03 | 6.53 | 6.81 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period1 | 73 | 59 | 52 | 56 | 54 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 486 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 144 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 82 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 107 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 85 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 19 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 65 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 160 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 91 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.01 = 73
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a notable shift in inventory management efficiency over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. While performance remained relatively consistent in the initial years, a significant deceleration in inventory movement is evident in the latter part of the observation period.
- Inventory Turnover
- The turnover ratio demonstrated fluctuation between 2017 and 2019, reaching a peak of 7.03 in 2019. Subsequently, a downward trend emerged, with the ratio falling to 6.20 in 2020 and further declining to 5.01 in 2021. This trajectory indicates a reduction in the frequency with which inventory was cleared and replaced during the final two years of the period.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- The duration required to process inventory showed a direct inverse correlation with the turnover ratio. The processing period decreased to its lowest point of 52 days in 2019, but increased to 59 days in 2020. A substantial increase occurred in 2021, with the period extending to 73 days, marking a significant increase in the time inventory remained on hand before being sold.
The combined movement of these ratios suggests a deteriorating trend in operational liquidity related to inventory. The transition from a 52-day processing period in 2019 to 73 days in 2021 indicates a slowing of the cash conversion cycle, reflecting a lower velocity of inventory throughput.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Receivable Collection Period
Illinois Tool Works Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Receivables turnover | 5.09 | 5.02 | 5.73 | 5.63 | 5.45 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average receivable collection period1 | 72 | 73 | 64 | 65 | 67 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 15 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 64 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 61 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 80 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 72 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 11 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 55 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 48 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 47 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.09 = 72
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a fluctuating trend in receivables management between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a period of increasing efficiency followed by a notable deceleration in collection speed.
- Receivables Turnover
- A positive trend in turnover efficiency was observed from 2017 to 2019, with the ratio increasing from 5.45 to a peak of 5.73. This indicates a more rapid conversion of accounts receivable into cash during this three-year window. However, a significant decline occurred in 2020, where the ratio dropped to 5.02, the lowest point in the analyzed period. A slight recovery was noted in 2021, with the ratio rising marginally to 5.09.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection period mirrored the turnover trend inversely. From 2017 to 2019, the number of days required to collect receivables decreased steadily from 67 days to 64 days, signaling improved credit management and collection effectiveness. This trend reversed sharply in 2020, as the collection period extended to 73 days, representing a 14% increase in the time taken to realize cash from sales compared to the 2019 low. In 2021, the period stabilized slightly, decreasing to 72 days.
The data suggests that the operating efficiency regarding receivables reached its optimum in 2019. The subsequent spike in the collection period and the corresponding drop in turnover in 2020 indicate a temporary disruption in the cash conversion cycle, which remained largely unresolved by the end of 2021, as metrics did not return to pre-2020 levels.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Cycle
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 73 | 59 | 52 | 56 | 54 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 72 | 73 | 64 | 65 | 67 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Operating cycle1 | 145 | 132 | 116 | 121 | 121 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Operating Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 501 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 208 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 143 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 187 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 157 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 30 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 120 | — | — | — | — | |
| Operating Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 208 | — | — | — | — | |
| Operating Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 138 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 73 + 72 = 145
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operating cycle exhibited a general expansion between 2017 and 2021, indicating a lengthening of the time required to convert current assets into cash. After a period of relative stability and a slight contraction in 2019, the cycle experienced a significant increase in the final two years of the observed period.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- Inventory management remained relatively consistent from 2017 to 2020, fluctuating between 52 and 59 days. However, a substantial increase occurred in 2021, where the period rose to 73 days. This represents a significant extension in the time required to move inventory through the production and sales process compared to the 2019 low of 52 days.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection period showed a slight improving trend from 2017 to 2019, decreasing from 67 days to 64 days. This trend reversed in 2020, with a sharp increase to 73 days, remaining nearly stagnant at 72 days in 2021. The shift indicates a slowdown in the efficiency of converting credit sales into cash starting in 2020.
- Total Operating Cycle
- The total operating cycle remained stable at 121 days in 2017 and 2018, reaching a five-year minimum of 116 days in 2019. Subsequently, the cycle lengthened to 132 days in 2020 and peaked at 145 days in 2021. The overall increase of 24 days from 2019 to 2021 is attributed to the concurrent rise in both inventory processing and receivable collection times.
The combined effect of these trends suggests a decline in short-term operational efficiency toward the end of the period. The sharp rise in the operating cycle in 2021 was primarily driven by the inventory processing period, while the increase in the receivable collection period provided an additional upward pressure beginning in 2020.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Payables Payment Period
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Payables turnover | 14.51 | 13.81 | 17.35 | 16.42 | 14.08 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average payables payment period1 | 25 | 26 | 21 | 22 | 26 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 57 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 84 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 77 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 110 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 107 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 5 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 62 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Payables Payment Period, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 65 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Payables Payment Period, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 47 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 14.51 = 25
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a fluctuating trend in the management of accounts payable between 2017 and 2021. A period of accelerated payment cycles was observed in the first three years, followed by a reversal and subsequent stabilization in the final two years.
- Payables Turnover
- The turnover ratio showed a consistent increase from 14.08 in 2017 to a peak of 17.35 in 2019, indicating an increase in the frequency of supplier payments. This trend reversed sharply in 2020, where the ratio dropped to its lowest point of 13.81, before recovering to 14.51 in 2021.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- The duration required to settle obligations decreased from 26 days in 2017 to a low of 21 days in 2019. In 2020, the payment period expanded back to 26 days, mirroring the 2017 level, and concluded the period at 25 days in 2021.
- Working Capital Correlation
- A strict inverse relationship is evident between the turnover ratio and the payment period. The most efficient payment cycle occurred in 2019, characterized by the highest turnover and the fewest days to pay. The shift observed in 2020 suggests a lengthening of the payment cycle, which increased the average payment period by five days relative to the previous year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Conversion Cycle
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 73 | 59 | 52 | 56 | 54 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 72 | 73 | 64 | 65 | 67 | |
| Average payables payment period | 25 | 26 | 21 | 22 | 26 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Cash conversion cycle1 | 120 | 106 | 95 | 99 | 95 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 444 | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | 124 | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | 66 | — | — | — | — | |
| GE Aerospace | 77 | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | 50 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 25 | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | 58 | — | — | — | — | |
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 143 | — | — | — | — | |
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 91 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 73 + 72 – 25 = 120
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The overall cash conversion cycle experienced a general upward trajectory between 2017 and 2021, extending from 95 days to 120 days. While the cycle remained relatively stable through 2019, a notable escalation occurred in the final two years of the period, indicating a lengthening of the time required to convert resource inputs into cash flows.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- Inventory turnover efficiency remained relatively consistent between 52 and 59 days from 2017 to 2020. However, a significant increase was recorded in 2021, reaching 73 days, which serves as a primary driver for the extension of the total cash conversion cycle.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The collection period demonstrated a slight improvement from 67 days in 2017 to a low of 64 days in 2019. This trend reversed in 2020, with the period rising to 73 days and remaining elevated at 72 days in 2021, suggesting a slowdown in the velocity of customer payments.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- Payables management remained relatively tight and stable throughout the period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 21 and 26 days. The absence of a significant extension in payment terms to suppliers indicates that the company did not utilize accounts payable as a lever to offset the increased capital tied up in inventory and receivables.
The cumulative effect of these trends resulted in a 26% increase in the cash conversion cycle over the five-year analyzed period. The simultaneous increase in both inventory holding times and receivable collection periods during 2020 and 2021 suggests a heightened requirement for working capital to support operating activities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?