AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Illinois Tool Works Inc. (NYSE:ITW)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 11, 2022.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

Illinois Tool Works Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 5.01 6.20 7.03 6.53 6.81
Receivables turnover 5.09 5.02 5.73 5.63 5.45
Payables turnover 14.51 13.81 17.35 16.42 14.08
Working capital turnover 4.98 3.20 3.44 6.60 3.39
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 73 59 52 56 54
Add: Average receivable collection period 72 73 64 65 67
Operating cycle 145 132 116 121 121
Less: Average payables payment period 25 26 21 22 26
Cash conversion cycle 120 106 95 99 95

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


An analysis of the short-term activity ratios from 2017 to 2021 reveals a general lengthening of the operational cycle and a decrease in the efficiency of working capital management over the five-year period.

Inventory and Receivables Management
A consistent downward trend in inventory turnover is observed, declining from 6.81 in 2017 to 5.01 in 2021. This correlates with a significant increase in the average inventory processing period, which rose from 54 days in 2017 to 73 days by 2021. Receivables turnover remained relatively stable through 2019 but experienced a decline in 2020, resulting in an increase in the average receivable collection period from a low of 64 days in 2019 to 72 days in 2021.
Payables and Working Capital Turnover
The payables turnover ratio reached a peak of 17.35 in 2019 before moderating to 14.51 in 2021. Correspondingly, the average payables payment period has remained tight and stable, fluctuating between 21 and 26 days throughout the period. Working capital turnover demonstrated notable volatility, with a significant spike to 6.60 in 2018, followed by a period of stabilization and a subsequent increase to 4.98 in 2021.
Operational Cycles and Liquidity Efficiency
The operating cycle shows a clear expansion, increasing from 116 days in 2019 to 145 days in 2021. This expansion is further reflected in the cash conversion cycle, which grew from 95 days in 2019 to 120 days in 2021. The extension of the cash conversion cycle indicates that a greater amount of capital is tied up in operating assets for longer periods, primarily driven by slower inventory movement and delayed receivable collections, while payment terms to suppliers have remained largely unchanged.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

Illinois Tool Works Inc., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of revenue 8,489 7,375 8,187 8,604 8,309
Inventories 1,694 1,189 1,164 1,318 1,220
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 5.01 6.20 7.03 6.53 6.81
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 0.75 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 2.53 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 4.48 — — — —
GE Aerospace 3.40 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 4.29 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 19.45 — — — —
RTX Corp. 5.65 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 2.28 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Industrials 4.03 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of revenue ÷ Inventories
= 8,489 ÷ 1,694 = 5.01

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The inventory turnover ratio exhibits a general downward trajectory over the analyzed five-year period, culminating in a significant decline by the end of 2021. While the ratio fluctuated within a relatively stable range between 6.20 and 7.03 from 2017 to 2020, a sharp decrease to 5.01 occurred in 2021, indicating a reduction in the efficiency of inventory utilization.

Inventory Turnover Volatility
The peak efficiency was recorded in 2019 with a turnover ratio of 7.03. This was followed by a decline to 6.20 in 2020, which coincided with the cost of revenue reaching a five-year low of 7.375 billion US dollars. The most substantial contraction in the ratio occurred in 2021, falling to 5.01, which suggests a slower rotation of stock compared to previous years.
Inventory Level Expansion
Inventory holdings remained comparatively stable between 1.164 billion and 1.318 billion US dollars from 2017 through 2020. A sharp increase to 1.694 billion US dollars was observed in 2021. This substantial accumulation of inventory relative to the cost of revenue served as the primary driver for the diminished turnover ratio in the final year of the period.
Correlation with Cost of Revenue
The cost of revenue demonstrated a recovery in 2021, rising to 8.489 billion US dollars from the 7.375 billion US dollars reported in 2020. However, the increase in inventory levels outpaced the growth in the cost of revenue, leading to a decrease in the operating activity ratio despite the rise in overall revenue costs.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

Illinois Tool Works Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating revenue 14,455 12,574 14,109 14,768 14,314
Trade receivables 2,840 2,506 2,461 2,622 2,628
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 5.09 5.02 5.73 5.63 5.45
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 23.58 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 5.68 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 5.95 — — — —
GE Aerospace 4.55 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 5.04 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 34.15 — — — —
RTX Corp. 6.66 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 7.57 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Industrials 7.76 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Operating revenue ÷ Trade receivables
= 14,455 ÷ 2,840 = 5.09

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2017 and 2021 reveals a period of initial efficiency gains in credit management followed by a contraction and a subsequent partial recovery.

Operating Revenue and Receivables Trends
Revenue remained relatively stable from 2017 through 2019, peaking in 2018 at 14,768 million US$. A significant contraction occurred in 2020, with revenue falling to 12,574 million US$, before rebounding to 14,455 million US$ in 2021. Trade receivables exhibited relative stability during the first four years of the period but experienced a notable increase in 2021, reaching a five-year high of 2,840 million US$.
Receivables Turnover Performance
The receivables turnover ratio demonstrated a positive trajectory from 2017 to 2019, increasing from 5.45 to a peak of 5.73. This trend indicates an improvement in the velocity of credit collections and more efficient working capital management. However, a sharp decline was observed in 2020, as the ratio dropped to 5.02. This deterioration occurred simultaneously with the decline in operating revenue and a slight increase in outstanding receivables, suggesting a slowdown in customer payment cycles.
Recovery and Efficiency Analysis
By December 31, 2021, operating revenue recovered to levels comparable to 2017. Despite this recovery, the receivables turnover ratio only marginally improved to 5.09. The fact that the ratio remains below the 2017 level, coupled with the increase in trade receivables to 2,840 million US$, suggests that the efficiency of converting receivables into cash has not yet returned to pre-2020 performance levels.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

Illinois Tool Works Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of revenue 8,489 7,375 8,187 8,604 8,309
Accounts payable 585 534 472 524 590
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 14.51 13.81 17.35 16.42 14.08
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 6.40 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 4.36 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 4.75 — — — —
GE Aerospace 3.32 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 3.40 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 74.34 — — — —
RTX Corp. 5.93 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 5.60 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Industry
Industrials 7.81 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of revenue ÷ Accounts payable
= 8,489 ÷ 585 = 14.51

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Analysis of short-term operating activity reveals fluctuations in the payables turnover ratio between 2017 and 2021, reflecting shifts in supplier payment efficiency and working capital management.

Payables Turnover Volatility
The payables turnover ratio exhibited an upward trend from 2017 to 2019, rising from 14.08 to a peak of 17.35. This indicates a higher frequency of supplier payments during this interval. A significant reversal occurred in 2020, where the ratio declined sharply to 13.81, before experiencing a modest recovery to 14.51 in 2021.
Accounts Payable Management
Accounts payable showed a consistent decrease from 590 million US dollars in 2017 to a minimum of 472 million US dollars in 2019. This reduction in outstanding obligations contributed to the rising turnover ratios observed in the first three years. Subsequently, payables increased to 534 million US dollars in 2020 and reached 585 million US dollars in 2021, returning to levels comparable to the 2017 baseline.
Correlation with Cost of Revenue
Cost of revenue remained relatively stable from 2017 through 2019, peaking at 8,604 million US dollars in 2018. A notable contraction occurred in 2020, with costs falling to 7,375 million US dollars. The simultaneous increase in accounts payable during 2020, despite the reduction in cost of revenue, drove the turnover ratio to its five-year low, suggesting a strategic extension of payment terms to preserve cash flow. By 2021, the cost of revenue rebounded to 8,489 million US dollars, supporting a slight increase in the turnover ratio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

Illinois Tool Works Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 6,374 6,523 6,253 5,778 7,278
Less: Current liabilities 3,470 2,589 2,154 3,542 3,053
Working capital 2,904 3,934 4,099 2,236 4,225
 
Operating revenue 14,455 12,574 14,109 14,768 14,314
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 4.98 3.20 3.44 6.60 3.39
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 2.34 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 3.54 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 65.65 — — — —
GE Aerospace 4.94 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 5.86 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 11.52 — — — —
RTX Corp. 9.75 — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 5.01 — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Industrials 6.90 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Operating revenue ÷ Working capital
= 14,455 ÷ 2,904 = 4.98

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 reveals a volatile relationship between working capital management and revenue generation, leading to significant fluctuations in operational efficiency ratios.

Operating Revenue Trends
Operating revenue maintained a relatively stable trajectory between 2017 and 2019, oscillating around US$ 14 billion. A contraction is observed in 2020, where revenue fell to US$ 12,574 million, before recovering to US$ 14,455 million in 2021, marking a return to pre-2020 levels.
Working Capital Fluctuations
Working capital exhibited substantial instability over the analyzed period. A significant decrease occurred in 2018, with values dropping to US$ 2,236 million from US$ 4,225 million in 2017. This was followed by a sharp increase in 2019 to US$ 4,099 million. After remaining relatively steady in 2020, working capital declined again to US$ 2,904 million by the end of 2021.
Working Capital Turnover Analysis
The working capital turnover ratio reflects the impact of the aforementioned volatility. A peak efficiency ratio of 6.60 was recorded in 2018, driven primarily by the reduction in working capital relative to stable revenue. The ratio subsequently corrected to 3.44 in 2019 and reached its lowest point of 3.20 in 2020, corresponding with the dip in operating revenue. By 2021, the ratio increased to 4.98, indicating improved efficiency as revenue recovered while the working capital base was reduced.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

Illinois Tool Works Inc., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 5.01 6.20 7.03 6.53 6.81
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 73 59 52 56 54
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 486 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 144 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 82 — — — —
GE Aerospace 107 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 85 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 19 — — — —
RTX Corp. 65 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector
Capital Goods 160 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry
Industrials 91 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.01 = 73

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a notable shift in inventory management efficiency over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. While performance remained relatively consistent in the initial years, a significant deceleration in inventory movement is evident in the latter part of the observation period.

Inventory Turnover
The turnover ratio demonstrated fluctuation between 2017 and 2019, reaching a peak of 7.03 in 2019. Subsequently, a downward trend emerged, with the ratio falling to 6.20 in 2020 and further declining to 5.01 in 2021. This trajectory indicates a reduction in the frequency with which inventory was cleared and replaced during the final two years of the period.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The duration required to process inventory showed a direct inverse correlation with the turnover ratio. The processing period decreased to its lowest point of 52 days in 2019, but increased to 59 days in 2020. A substantial increase occurred in 2021, with the period extending to 73 days, marking a significant increase in the time inventory remained on hand before being sold.

The combined movement of these ratios suggests a deteriorating trend in operational liquidity related to inventory. The transition from a 52-day processing period in 2019 to 73 days in 2021 indicates a slowing of the cash conversion cycle, reflecting a lower velocity of inventory throughput.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

Illinois Tool Works Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 5.09 5.02 5.73 5.63 5.45
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 72 73 64 65 67
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 15 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 64 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 61 — — — —
GE Aerospace 80 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 72 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 11 — — — —
RTX Corp. 55 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector
Capital Goods 48 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Industrials 47 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.09 = 72

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a fluctuating trend in receivables management between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a period of increasing efficiency followed by a notable deceleration in collection speed.

Receivables Turnover
A positive trend in turnover efficiency was observed from 2017 to 2019, with the ratio increasing from 5.45 to a peak of 5.73. This indicates a more rapid conversion of accounts receivable into cash during this three-year window. However, a significant decline occurred in 2020, where the ratio dropped to 5.02, the lowest point in the analyzed period. A slight recovery was noted in 2021, with the ratio rising marginally to 5.09.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period mirrored the turnover trend inversely. From 2017 to 2019, the number of days required to collect receivables decreased steadily from 67 days to 64 days, signaling improved credit management and collection effectiveness. This trend reversed sharply in 2020, as the collection period extended to 73 days, representing a 14% increase in the time taken to realize cash from sales compared to the 2019 low. In 2021, the period stabilized slightly, decreasing to 72 days.

The data suggests that the operating efficiency regarding receivables reached its optimum in 2019. The subsequent spike in the collection period and the corresponding drop in turnover in 2020 indicate a temporary disruption in the cash conversion cycle, which remained largely unresolved by the end of 2021, as metrics did not return to pre-2020 levels.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

Illinois Tool Works Inc., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 73 59 52 56 54
Average receivable collection period 72 73 64 65 67
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 145 132 116 121 121
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 501 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 208 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 143 — — — —
GE Aerospace 187 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 157 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 30 — — — —
RTX Corp. 120 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Sector
Capital Goods 208 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Industry
Industrials 138 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 73 + 72 = 145

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating cycle exhibited a general expansion between 2017 and 2021, indicating a lengthening of the time required to convert current assets into cash. After a period of relative stability and a slight contraction in 2019, the cycle experienced a significant increase in the final two years of the observed period.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory management remained relatively consistent from 2017 to 2020, fluctuating between 52 and 59 days. However, a substantial increase occurred in 2021, where the period rose to 73 days. This represents a significant extension in the time required to move inventory through the production and sales process compared to the 2019 low of 52 days.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period showed a slight improving trend from 2017 to 2019, decreasing from 67 days to 64 days. This trend reversed in 2020, with a sharp increase to 73 days, remaining nearly stagnant at 72 days in 2021. The shift indicates a slowdown in the efficiency of converting credit sales into cash starting in 2020.
Total Operating Cycle
The total operating cycle remained stable at 121 days in 2017 and 2018, reaching a five-year minimum of 116 days in 2019. Subsequently, the cycle lengthened to 132 days in 2020 and peaked at 145 days in 2021. The overall increase of 24 days from 2019 to 2021 is attributed to the concurrent rise in both inventory processing and receivable collection times.

The combined effect of these trends suggests a decline in short-term operational efficiency toward the end of the period. The sharp rise in the operating cycle in 2021 was primarily driven by the inventory processing period, while the increase in the receivable collection period provided an additional upward pressure beginning in 2020.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

Illinois Tool Works Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 14.51 13.81 17.35 16.42 14.08
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 25 26 21 22 26
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 57 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 84 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 77 — — — —
GE Aerospace 110 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 107 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 5 — — — —
RTX Corp. 62 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector
Capital Goods 65 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Industrials 47 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 14.51 = 25

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a fluctuating trend in the management of accounts payable between 2017 and 2021. A period of accelerated payment cycles was observed in the first three years, followed by a reversal and subsequent stabilization in the final two years.

Payables Turnover
The turnover ratio showed a consistent increase from 14.08 in 2017 to a peak of 17.35 in 2019, indicating an increase in the frequency of supplier payments. This trend reversed sharply in 2020, where the ratio dropped to its lowest point of 13.81, before recovering to 14.51 in 2021.
Average Payables Payment Period
The duration required to settle obligations decreased from 26 days in 2017 to a low of 21 days in 2019. In 2020, the payment period expanded back to 26 days, mirroring the 2017 level, and concluded the period at 25 days in 2021.
Working Capital Correlation
A strict inverse relationship is evident between the turnover ratio and the payment period. The most efficient payment cycle occurred in 2019, characterized by the highest turnover and the fewest days to pay. The shift observed in 2020 suggests a lengthening of the payment cycle, which increased the average payment period by five days relative to the previous year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

Illinois Tool Works Inc., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 73 59 52 56 54
Average receivable collection period 72 73 64 65 67
Average payables payment period 25 26 21 22 26
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 120 106 95 99 95
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 444 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 124 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 66 — — — —
GE Aerospace 77 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 50 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 25 — — — —
RTX Corp. 58 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector
Capital Goods 143 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry
Industrials 91 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 73 + 72 – 25 = 120

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The overall cash conversion cycle experienced a general upward trajectory between 2017 and 2021, extending from 95 days to 120 days. While the cycle remained relatively stable through 2019, a notable escalation occurred in the final two years of the period, indicating a lengthening of the time required to convert resource inputs into cash flows.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory turnover efficiency remained relatively consistent between 52 and 59 days from 2017 to 2020. However, a significant increase was recorded in 2021, reaching 73 days, which serves as a primary driver for the extension of the total cash conversion cycle.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period demonstrated a slight improvement from 67 days in 2017 to a low of 64 days in 2019. This trend reversed in 2020, with the period rising to 73 days and remaining elevated at 72 days in 2021, suggesting a slowdown in the velocity of customer payments.
Average Payables Payment Period
Payables management remained relatively tight and stable throughout the period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 21 and 26 days. The absence of a significant extension in payment terms to suppliers indicates that the company did not utilize accounts payable as a lever to offset the increased capital tied up in inventory and receivables.

The cumulative effect of these trends resulted in a 26% increase in the cash conversion cycle over the five-year analyzed period. The simultaneous increase in both inventory holding times and receivable collection periods during 2020 and 2021 suggests a heightened requirement for working capital to support operating activities.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?