Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The gross value of plant and equipment demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory between 2017 and 2021, rising from 5,161 million US dollars to 5,700 million US dollars. This growth was primarily driven by steady investments in machinery and equipment, which represent the largest portion of the asset base. Despite the increase in gross assets, the net plant and equipment remained remarkably stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 1,729 million and 1,809 million US dollars over the five-year period.
- Asset Composition and Growth
- Machinery and equipment exhibited the most significant growth, increasing from 3,465 million US dollars in 2017 to 3,898 million US dollars by 2021. Buildings and improvements remained relatively flat until 2020, after which a notable increase occurred, reaching 1,462 million US dollars in 2021. Land holdings remained the smallest component and stayed relatively constant, ending the period at 198 million US dollars.
- Capital Investment Patterns
- Construction in progress showed periodic fluctuations, peaking at 154 million US dollars in 2018 before stabilizing around 142 million US dollars by 2021. The acceleration in gross plant and equipment value observed in 2020 suggests a concentrated period of capital expenditure, particularly in machinery and buildings, which offset the ongoing depreciation of older assets.
- Depreciation and Net Value Analysis
- Accumulated depreciation increased steadily from 3,383 million US dollars in 2017 to 3,891 million US dollars in 2021. The close correlation between the rise in gross assets and the rise in accumulated depreciation explains the stability of the net book value. This pattern indicates a replacement-level investment strategy where capital expenditures are calibrated to offset depreciation, maintaining a consistent net asset base to support operations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of asset age ratios from 2017 to 2021 indicates a gradual aging of the property, plant, and equipment base. The average age ratio demonstrates a consistent upward trajectory for the majority of the period, suggesting that a larger proportion of the assets' useful lives have been consumed.
- Average Age Ratio Trends
- The average age ratio rose steadily from 68.23% in 2017 to a peak of 70.81% in 2020, before experiencing a marginal decline to 70.72% in 2021. This overall increase reflects a trend toward an older asset base relative to its total estimated utility.
- Useful Life and Asset Age
- The estimated total useful life remained constant at 19 years from 2017 through 2019, before being revised upward to 20 years in 2020 and 2021. Concurrently, the estimated age of the assets remained stable at 13 years for the first three years of the period, subsequently increasing to 14 years in 2020 and 2021.
- Remaining Life Stability
- Despite the progression of time and the increase in the average age ratio, the estimated remaining life remained unchanged at 6 years throughout the entire five-year period. This stability suggests that capital expenditures or adjustments to the estimated useful life of assets effectively offset the natural depreciation of the existing asset base to maintain a constant remaining life expectancy.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Gross plant and equipment – Land)
= 100 × 3,891 ÷ (5,700 – 198) = 70.72%
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent aging trend within the depreciable asset base. While the total value of gross plant and equipment has grown over the period, the accumulation of depreciation has occurred at a rate that has increased the overall average age ratio of the assets.
- Gross Plant and Equipment Growth
- Gross plant and equipment values rose from 5,161 million USD in 2017 to 5,700 million USD in 2021. A notable increase in investment is observed between 2019 and 2020, where the value grew from 5,227 million USD to 5,593 million USD, indicating a period of expanded capital expenditure.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- Accumulated depreciation exhibited a steady upward trajectory, increasing from 3,383 million USD in 2017 to 3,891 million USD in 2021. The most significant year-over-year increase occurred between 2019 and 2020, mirroring the timing of the growth in gross assets but contributing to a higher overall depreciation load.
- Average Age Ratio Progression
- The average age ratio increased from 68.23% in 2017 to 70.72% in 2021. This upward trend suggests that the asset base is aging, as the proportion of used-up useful life is increasing. The peak ratio of 70.81% reached in 2020 indicates that new capital investments during this period were not sufficient to offset the depreciation of existing assets and lower the average age of the equipment.
- Land Value Stability
- Land holdings remained relatively stagnant, fluctuating slightly between a low of 186 million USD in 2019 and a high of 204 million USD in 2020. Because land is not subject to depreciation, these fluctuations had a minimal impact on the calculated average age ratio of the depreciable assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = (Gross plant and equipment – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (5,700 – 198) ÷ 277 = 20
An examination of property, plant, and equipment reveals a steady expansion of the asset base coupled with a strategic adjustment in the estimation of asset longevity between 2017 and 2021.
- Asset Base Expansion
- Gross plant and equipment exhibited a general upward trajectory, rising from US$ 5,161 million in 2017 to US$ 5,700 million by 2021. The most significant growth occurred between 2019 and 2020, where the value increased from US$ 5,227 million to US$ 5,593 million, indicating a period of intensified capital investment.
- Useful Life Adjustment
- The estimated total useful life of assets remained stable at 19 years from 2017 through 2019. In 2020, this estimate was increased to 20 years and maintained at that level through 2021. This one-year extension indicates a revision in the expected operational utility of the company's equipment.
- Depreciation and Land Stability
- Depreciation expense showed a gradual increase from US$ 256 million in 2017 to US$ 277 million in 2021. While gross assets grew by approximately 10.4% over the period, depreciation expense increased by roughly 8.2%, a trend partially attributable to the extension of the estimated useful life which slows the annual depreciation rate. Land holdings remained relatively constant, fluctuating between US$ 186 million and US$ 204 million, confirming that the expansion of the asset base was driven by machinery and equipment rather than real estate acquisitions.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 3,891 ÷ 277 = 14
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment indicates a maturing asset base characterized by a steady increase in accumulated depreciation and a gradual rise in the estimated age of holdings. While annual depreciation charges have remained relatively stable, the overall trend suggests a slow progression in the age of the company's fixed assets.
- Accumulated Depreciation Growth
- A consistent upward trend is observed in accumulated depreciation, which rose from 3,383 million US dollars in 2017 to 3,891 million US dollars by 2021. A more pronounced increase occurred between 2019 and 2020, where the balance grew by approximately 318 million US dollars, reflecting the continued systematic allocation of asset costs over their useful lives.
- Depreciation Expense Stability
- Annual depreciation expenses exhibited minimal volatility throughout the period, fluctuating within a narrow band between 256 million and 277 million US dollars. This stability suggests a consistent rate of asset consumption and implies that capital expenditures during this period were likely calibrated to maintain a steady state of operational capacity.
- Asset Aging Trends
- The estimated time elapsed since purchase remained constant at 13 years from 2017 to 2019, followed by an increase to 14 years in 2020 and 2021. This shift indicates that the average age of the fixed asset portfolio is increasing, suggesting that the pace of new asset acquisition has not outstripped the aging process of the existing infrastructure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = (Net plant and equipment – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (1,809 – 198) ÷ 277 = 6
The financial profile of property, plant, and equipment exhibits stability and consistency over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. Net plant and equipment values remained within a narrow range, fluctuating between a low of US$ 1,729 million in 2019 and a peak of US$ 1,809 million in 2021, indicating a controlled approach to capital asset management.
- Asset Lifecycle and Depreciation
- The estimated remaining life of assets remained constant at 6 years for the entire duration of the analysis. This consistency suggests a standardized depreciation policy and a predictable asset replacement cycle. Concurrent with this, annual depreciation expenses showed a gradual upward trend, increasing from US$ 256 million in 2017 to US$ 277 million in 2021.
- Land Value Stability
- Land holdings remained relatively stagnant, with values oscillating between US$ 186 million and US$ 204 million. The lack of significant variance indicates that there were no major strategic shifts in real estate acquisition or divestment during this period.
- Net Asset Trend
- Despite a slight contraction in 2019, the net value of plant and equipment grew by approximately 1.7% between 2017 and 2021, reflecting a steady state of capital maintenance where investments largely offset depreciation charges.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?