EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Align Technology Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Total Asset Turnover since 2005
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Align Technology Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The analysis of economic value addition from 2018 to 2022 reveals a period of significant volatility in value creation, characterized by a diverging trend between expanding invested capital and fluctuating operational profitability. While the capital base grew consistently, the ability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital was inconsistent.
- Invested Capital and Capital Charge
- A consistent upward trajectory in invested capital is observed, increasing from 1,516,250 thousand USD in 2018 to 3,344,477 thousand USD by 2022. Given that the cost of capital remained remarkably stable, fluctuating minimally around 24.3%, the annual capital charge required to justify the investment grew proportionally with the capital base. This created a higher threshold for the net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) to achieve positive economic profit.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trends
- Operational profitability exhibited extreme variance over the five-year period. NOPAT grew modestly between 2018 and 2019, followed by a contraction in 2020. A substantial surge occurred in 2021, where NOPAT peaked at 1,236,388 thousand USD, representing a significant outlier in the data series. However, this gain was not sustained, as 2022 saw a sharp decline to 536,671 thousand USD, returning to levels similar to those seen in 2018 and 2020.
- Economic Profit and Value Creation
- The economic profit figures indicate alternating cycles of value creation and value destruction. The period began with positive economic profit in 2018 and 2019, which transitioned into a deficit in 2020 (-66,478 thousand USD). A strong recovery was recorded in 2021, yielding the highest economic profit of 509,579 thousand USD. This was followed by a severe reversal in 2022, resulting in the lowest economic profit of the period at -274,492 thousand USD. The negative result in 2022 is particularly notable as it coincides with the highest level of invested capital, suggesting that the operational returns were insufficient to cover the expanded capital charge.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenues.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrued warranty.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
9 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
- Net Income
- Net income exhibited significant fluctuations over the analyzed period. Starting at 400,235 thousand USD in 2018, it increased moderately to 442,776 thousand USD in 2019. A substantial rise occurred in 2020, reaching a peak of 1,775,888 thousand USD. However, this peak was followed by a sharp decline in 2021 to 772,020 thousand USD, and the downward trend continued in 2022, with net income lowering further to 361,573 thousand USD. This pattern indicates a peak in profitability in 2020, followed by notable reductions in subsequent years.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT shows a generally variable pattern with less extreme fluctuations compared to net income. It started at 520,148 thousand USD in 2018, growing to 629,227 thousand USD in 2019. Subsequently, it declined to 531,854 thousand USD in 2020 but then experienced a marked increase in 2021, reaching 1,236,388 thousand USD. In 2022, NOPAT decreased significantly to 536,671 thousand USD, approximating earlier levels. This suggests the company experienced variations in operational efficiency and profitability, with a notable peak in 2021 before retreating the following year.
- Overall Observations
- Both net income and NOPAT peaked at different points within the timeframe, with net income reaching its highest in 2020 and NOPAT peaking in 2021. The trends highlight a period of exceptional profitability followed by sharp declines that suggest potential challenges in maintaining earnings growth or operational efficiency in recent years. The divergence in peak timings between net income and NOPAT may indicate differences in non-operating factors affecting profitability versus core operating performance.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial data reveals notable fluctuations in the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes over the five-year period ending in 2022. A detailed examination of these figures uncovers several trends and significant changes.
- Provision for (benefit from) Income Taxes
-
The provision demonstrates high volatility across the analyzed years. It started at approximately $57.7 million in 2018 and showed a significant increase to $112.3 million in 2019, indicating a rising tax expense or provision for that year.
In 2020, there is a dramatic decrease resulting in a benefit recorded at about -$1.4 billion. This negative figure suggests the presence of substantial tax benefits or credits, which significantly reduced the company's tax expense for that year.
Following this, the provision reverted to positive figures in 2021 and 2022, at $240.4 million and $237.5 million respectively, stabilizing around these levels but still significantly higher than the initial years.
- Cash Operating Taxes
-
Cash operating taxes showed a generally increasing trend throughout the period. Beginning at $66.3 million in 2018, there was a modest rise to $111.9 million in 2019.
In 2020, despite the large benefit observed in the provision for income taxes, cash operating taxes decreased to $93.7 million, which could reflect timing differences, tax deferrals, or other operational tax management strategies.
From 2020 onward, cash operating taxes increased substantially to $228.6 million in 2021 and further to $279.0 million in 2022, indicating an increasing cash outflow related to income taxes consistent with the return to positive provisions.
In summary, the provision for income taxes shows significant year-to-year volatility with a major tax benefit recorded in 2020, whereas cash operating taxes have increased steadily over the latter part of the period. The divergence in 2020 between the provision and cash taxes suggests the influence of non-cash tax benefits or deferred tax assets impacting the provision without corresponding immediate cash tax relief.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenues.
5 Addition of accrued warranty.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of construction in progress.
9 Subtraction of marketable securities.
Over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022, several notable trends can be observed in the financial metrics analyzed.
- Total reported debt & leases
-
This metric exhibited some volatility during the period. Initially, there was a significant decrease from approximately 106.7 million in 2018 to 59.2 million in 2019. However, starting from 2020, the debt levels began to rise again, reaching approximately 86.2 million, then increasing substantially to around 125.4 million by 2021, and stabilizing close to this level at approximately 126.9 million in 2022. This pattern indicates a strategic increase in leveraging after 2019, potentially to finance growth or investments.
- Stockholders’ equity
-
There was a consistent and strong upward trend in stockholders’ equity throughout the period, with values growing steadily each year. The value increased from approximately 1.25 billion in 2018 to roughly 1.35 billion in 2019, then surged considerably to about 3.23 billion in 2020. The growth continued, albeit at a slower pace, reaching around 3.62 billion in 2021 and slightly declining to near 3.60 billion in 2022. This indicates significant capital accumulation and possibly successful retained earnings or equity financing activities over the period, with a minor contraction in the last year.
- Invested capital
-
Invested capital showed a steady and marked increase over the five-year timeframe. Starting at about 1.52 billion in both 2018 and 2019, invested capital rose sharply to approximately 2.46 billion in 2020. The upward trend persisted, with invested capital reaching approximately 2.99 billion in 2021 and continuing to climb to around 3.34 billion in 2022. This increase suggests ongoing investments into the company’s assets, operations, or growth initiatives, reflecting expansion or scaling efforts.
Cost of Capital
Align Technology Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | ||||||
| Elevance Health Inc. | ||||||
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | ||||||
| Medtronic PLC | ||||||
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of value creation between 2018 and 2022 reveals a pattern of significant volatility in economic performance despite a consistent expansion of the capital base. The organization experienced alternating periods of value creation and value destruction, with the economic spread ratio mirroring these fluctuations.
- Invested Capital Trends
- A continuous upward trajectory in invested capital is observed, growing from US$ 1,516,250 thousand in 2018 to US$ 3,344,477 thousand by 2022. The most substantial increase occurred between 2019 and 2020, marking a shift toward a significantly larger asset base.
- Economic Profit Volatility
- Economic profit demonstrated instability over the five-year period. While 2019 and 2021 showed positive results—peaking at US$ 509,579 thousand in 2021—the years 2020 and 2022 resulted in economic losses. The decline in 2022 to negative US$ 274,492 thousand represents the most significant contraction in value creation during the analyzed period.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio fluctuated sharply, reflecting the instability of the economic profit relative to the invested capital. Positive spreads were recorded in 2018 (10.06%), 2019 (16.98%), and 2021 (17.04%). Conversely, negative spreads occurred in 2020 (-2.70%) and 2022 (-8.21%), indicating that the return on invested capital fell below the cost of capital in those years.
Overall, the data indicates a decoupling between capital investment and consistent value generation. While the capital base more than doubled over the period, the inability to maintain a positive economic spread suggests challenges in translating increased investment into sustainable economic profit.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net revenues | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues | ||||||
| Adjusted net revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | ||||||
| Elevance Health Inc. | ||||||
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | ||||||
| Medtronic PLC | ||||||
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance between 2018 and 2022 is characterized by significant volatility in economic value creation. While adjusted net revenues generally trended upward for the majority of the period, economic profit experienced sharp fluctuations, alternating between positive value creation and economic loss.
- Revenue Growth and Scale
- Adjusted net revenues demonstrated a strong growth trajectory from 2018 to 2021, increasing from US$ 2,104,380 thousand to a peak of US$ 4,401,700 thousand. A moderate contraction occurred in 2022, with revenues declining to US$ 3,949,386 thousand.
- Economic Profit Margin Volatility
- The economic profit margin exhibited unstable patterns, beginning at 7.25% in 2018 and rising to 9.97% in 2019. This was followed by a transition to a negative margin of -2.45% in 2020. A sharp recovery was recorded in 2021, reaching a period high of 11.58%, before falling sharply to -6.95% in 2022.
- Economic Value Creation Patterns
- The absolute economic profit mirrored the margin volatility, moving from US$ 152,521 thousand in 2018 to a high of US$ 509,579 thousand in 2021. The occurrences of negative economic profit in 2020 (-US$ 66,478 thousand) and 2022 (-US$ 274,492 thousand) indicate periods where the net operating profit was insufficient to cover the cost of capital employed.
- Correlation Between Revenue and Value
- A divergence is observed between revenue growth and economic value creation. Despite the increase in revenue between 2019 and 2020, economic profit turned negative, suggesting that increased scale did not immediately translate into value creation. Similarly, the revenue decline in 2022 coincided with the most significant economic loss in the analyzed period, highlighting a high sensitivity of economic profit to revenue fluctuations and capital costs.