Stock Analysis on Net

Abiomed Inc. (NASDAQ:ABMD)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since November 3, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Abiomed Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The financial performance from 2017 to 2022 reflects a cycle of rapid expansion followed by a contraction in economic value creation. While positive economic profit was maintained for five consecutive years, the period concluded with a transition to economic value destruction.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A significant growth trend is observed from 2017 to 2019, with NOPAT rising from 79,888 thousand US$ to 253,605 thousand US$. Performance remained relatively stable through 2021, peaking at 259,982 thousand US$, before experiencing a substantial contraction to 140,811 thousand US$ by March 31, 2022.
Invested Capital
Invested capital exhibited consistent growth from 2017 through 2021, increasing from 226,723 thousand US$ to a peak of 737,876 thousand US$. A notable acceleration in capital investment occurred between 2018 and 2019. A slight reduction in invested capital to 693,367 thousand US$ was recorded in the 2022 fiscal year.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital remained nearly constant over the analyzed period, fluctuating marginally between 21.72% and 21.79%. This stability suggests that the volatility in economic profit was driven by operational performance and capital efficiency rather than changes in the weighted average cost of capital.
Economic Profit and Value Creation
Economic profit increased sharply from 30,645 thousand US$ in 2017 to a peak of 145,280 thousand US$ in 2019. Subsequently, a downward trend emerged as the growth in invested capital began to outpace the growth in NOPAT. This trend resulted in a decline in economic profit to 99,208 thousand US$ by 2021, ultimately falling to a negative value of -10,207 thousand US$ in 2022, signaling that the company failed to generate a return exceeding its cost of capital in the final year.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Abiomed Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Net income
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in product warranty4
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents5
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability6
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense7
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes8
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in product warranty.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.

6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.


Net Income
The net income demonstrates an overall increasing trend from 2017 to 2021, starting at 52,116 thousand US dollars in 2017 and more than quadrupling to 225,525 thousand US dollars by 2021. However, in the latest period reported (2022), net income declined significantly to 136,505 thousand US dollars, representing a reduction of approximately 39.5% compared to 2021. This sharp decrease after several years of growth may indicate emerging operational challenges or external factors impacting profitability.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT follows a similar upward pattern from 2017 to 2021, increasing from 79,888 thousand US dollars to a peak of 259,982 thousand US dollars in 2021. This progressive increase suggests improving operating efficiency and strong core profitability over this period. However, like net income, NOPAT experienced a noteworthy contraction in 2022, falling to 140,811 thousand US dollars, which constitutes a decrease of approximately 45.8% relative to 2021. The decrease in NOPAT correlates with the drop in net income, reinforcing the indication of decreased operational performance in the latest year.
Comparative Insights
Both profitability measures show consistent and substantial growth over the first five years reviewed, reflecting positive business momentum. The alignment in trends between net income and NOPAT suggests that the company’s profitability changes are primarily driven by operating activities rather than non-operating factors. The pronounced decline in 2022 in both metrics represents a notable deviation from prior periods, which warrants further investigation into causes such as market conditions, cost structure changes, or other external influences.

Cash Operating Taxes

Abiomed Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Income tax provision
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).


Income Tax Provision
The income tax provision fluctuates considerably over the period analyzed. It initially increased from 39,227 thousand US dollars in March 2017 to a peak of 48,267 thousand US dollars in March 2018. Subsequently, it sharply declined to 4,344 thousand US dollars in March 2019, indicating a significant reduction in tax liabilities or adjustments for that year. However, it rebounded markedly to 53,816 thousand US dollars in March 2020 and continued to rise to 62,695 thousand US dollars in March 2021 before decreasing again to 54,055 thousand US dollars in March 2022. This pattern suggests considerable variability likely influenced by changes in taxable income, tax planning strategies, or tax legislation.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes show an inconsistent but generally upward trend over the years. Starting at 13,626 thousand US dollars in March 2017, there is a notable decline to 5,738 thousand US dollars in March 2018. This is followed by a recovery to 12,089 thousand US dollars in March 2019. From March 2020 onwards, cash operating taxes consistently increase, reaching 20,943 thousand US dollars, 33,340 thousand US dollars in March 2021, and peaking at 51,674 thousand US dollars by March 2022. The sharp increase in recent years could reflect higher taxable operational earnings or timing differences between accounting income and tax payments.
Comparative Insights
The contrasting patterns between income tax provision and cash operating taxes are of note. While income tax provision shows extreme variability, cash operating taxes trend more steadily upwards after an initial decline. This discrepancy might indicate differences between accrued tax expenses and actual cash tax payments, possibly due to deferred tax assets or liabilities, tax credits, or changes in accounting estimates. The rise in cash taxes despite fluctuations in tax provision could imply a strengthening of the company's cash tax outflows in recent years.

Invested Capital

Abiomed Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Current portion of capital lease obligation
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
Deferred revenue4
Product warranty5
Equity equivalents6
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax7
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Construction in progress8
Marketable securities9
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of product warranty.

6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

8 Subtraction of construction in progress.

9 Subtraction of marketable securities.


The financial data over the six-year period reveals notable trends in the capital structure and equity position. There is a pronounced fluctuation in total reported debt and leases, with an initial sharp decline from 23,800 thousand USD in 2017 to 10,089 thousand USD in 2018. This is followed by moderate increases and decreases over the subsequent years, culminating in a value of 9,507 thousand USD in 2022, which remains below the initial figure in 2017. This suggests efforts to reduce or manage debt levels with some variability year-over-year.

The stockholders’ equity demonstrates consistent and substantial growth throughout the period. Starting at 452,071 thousand USD in 2017, it more than triples by 2022, reaching 1,503,326 thousand USD. This steady increase signals strengthening equity financing and accumulation of retained earnings or capital contributions, indicating a robust equity base and potentially improved financial stability over time.

Invested capital shows an overall increasing trend from 226,723 thousand USD in 2017 to a peak of 737,876 thousand USD in 2021, before a slight decline to 693,367 thousand USD in 2022. This upward movement may reflect ongoing investments in business operations, assets, or strategic initiatives. The minor decrease in the final year could be indicative of divestments, asset disposals, or revaluation adjustments.

Total Reported Debt & Leases
Initial significant reduction followed by moderate fluctuations, ending below the initial value, suggesting active debt management.
Stockholders’ Equity
Consistent and strong growth, tripling over the period, reflecting enhanced financial strength and shareholder value.
Invested Capital
General upward trend with a peak in 2021 and slight decline in 2022, indicating increased capital investment with some recent contraction.

Cost of Capital

Abiomed Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 31.50%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 31.50%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Capital lease obligation3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Capital lease obligation. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Abiomed Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Abbott Laboratories
Elevance Health Inc.
Intuitive Surgical Inc.
Medtronic PLC
UnitedHealth Group Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from 2017 to 2022 is characterized by an initial period of rapid economic value creation followed by a consistent decline in capital efficiency, culminating in a transition to negative economic profit by the end of the period.

Economic Profit Trends
A period of significant growth occurred between 2017 and 2019, with economic profit rising from 30.65 million to a peak of 145.28 million. However, a downward trajectory followed, with profits declining steadily through 2021 before collapsing into a deficit of 10.21 million in 2022.
Invested Capital Expansion
Invested capital exhibited a strong upward trend for most of the observed period, growing from 226.72 million in 2017 to a peak of 737.88 million in 2021. This represents a substantial increase in the capital base employed to generate returns, though a slight reduction to 693.37 million was noted in 2022.
Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
The economic spread ratio reached its zenith in 2018 at 36.62%, indicating a high capacity to generate returns well above the cost of capital. From 2019 onward, a persistent contraction is observed, with the ratio falling to 29.20% in 2019, 18.53% in 2020, and 13.45% in 2021. The ratio ultimately turned negative in 2022, reaching -1.47%, which signifies that the returns on invested capital no longer covered the cost of that capital.

The divergence between the growth in invested capital and the decline in economic profit after 2019 suggests a diminishing marginal return on investment. The transition from a peak spread of 36.62% to a negative spread indicates a systemic erosion of economic value creation over the final four years of the analysis.


Economic Profit Margin

Abiomed Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Mar 31, 2022 Mar 31, 2021 Mar 31, 2020 Mar 31, 2019 Mar 31, 2018 Mar 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
 
Revenue
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted revenue
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Abbott Laboratories
Elevance Health Inc.
Intuitive Surgical Inc.
Medtronic PLC
UnitedHealth Group Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-03-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the financial performance from March 31, 2017, to March 31, 2022, reveals a significant divergence between revenue growth and the generation of economic value. While adjusted revenue maintained a consistent upward trajectory throughout the period, economic profit and the corresponding economic profit margin experienced a period of rapid growth followed by a substantial decline, ultimately turning negative in the final year.

Revenue Performance
Adjusted revenue demonstrated steady and uninterrupted growth over the six-year period. Starting at 447,021 thousand US dollars in 2017, revenue increased to 1,033,793 thousand US dollars by 2022. This represents a sustained expansion of the top line, with the most significant jump occurring between 2021 and 2022.
Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit exhibited high volatility. A sharp increase is observed from 2017 to 2019, where profit rose from 30,645 thousand US dollars to a peak of 145,280 thousand US dollars. However, a reversal occurred after 2019, with a downward trend leading to a deficit of 10,207 thousand US dollars by March 31, 2022. This indicates that in the final year, the returns generated were insufficient to cover the cost of capital.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin mirrored the trend of absolute economic profit. The margin expanded from 6.86% in 2017 to a peak of 18.85% in 2019. Subsequently, the margin contracted to 13.06% in 2020 and 11.63% in 2021, before falling to -0.99% in 2022. The transition from a peak margin of nearly 19% to a negative margin suggests a significant erosion in the efficiency of capital utilization relative to the cost of that capital, despite the continuing increase in total revenue.

The correlation between rising revenue and declining economic profit suggests that the investments required to drive revenue growth in the later years did not yield returns exceeding the company's cost of capital. The peak in economic efficiency occurred in 2019, after which the cost of growth or operational expenditures appears to have outweighed the added economic value generated.