Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1, 2 See details »
The financial performance between 2018 and 2022 reveals a trajectory of operational stability coupled with significant fluctuations in free cash flow to the firm (FCFF), indicating varying levels of capital investment intensity.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Cash provided by operating activities exhibited a slight decline between 2018 and 2020, moving from 2,186,719 thousand US$ to 1,899,068 thousand US$. However, a strong recovery followed, with a marked increase in 2021 and reaching a peak of 2,905,955 thousand US$ by the end of 2022, representing a sustained upward trend in operational liquidity.
- FCFF Volatility and Capital Allocation
- Free cash flow to the firm experienced extreme volatility during the observed period. A significant deficit occurred in 2019, where FCFF dropped to negative 1,481,504 thousand US$, despite the maintenance of positive operating cash flows. This divergence suggests a period of intensive capital expenditure or substantial strategic investments. Recovery began in 2020, followed by a surge in 2021 to 2,391,362 thousand US$, before settling at 2,193,185 thousand US$ in 2022.
- Convergence of Operational and Free Cash Flow
- The relationship between operating cash flow and FCFF shifted significantly over the five-year period. While 2019 was characterized by a wide gap due to heavy outflows, the years 2021 and 2022 show a close alignment between the two metrics. This indicates a transition from a heavy investment phase to a phase of cash flow optimization, where a substantially higher proportion of operating cash is retained as free cash flow.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2 2022 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, tax = Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized × EITR
= 581,663 × 23.44% = 136,342
3 2022 Calculation
Capitalized interest, tax = Capitalized interest × EITR
= 57,426 × 23.44% = 13,461
The financial data reveals a period of significant volatility in interest-related cash outflows between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a substantial peak in expenditures during the middle of the observation period. While tax rates remained relatively stable, the actual cash paid for interest and the amount of interest capitalized showed fluctuating patterns reflecting changes in debt levels and investment activities.
- Cash Interest Expenditures
- A significant upward trend in cash paid for interest, net of tax, is observed from 2018 through 2020, with payments rising from 318,033 thousand US dollars to a peak of 581,240 thousand US dollars. This represents a substantial increase in the cost of debt servicing. Following the 2020 peak, a gradual decline occurred, with expenditures decreasing to 522,936 thousand US dollars in 2021 and further reducing to 445,321 thousand US dollars by the end of 2022.
- Interest Capitalization Patterns
- Capitalized interest, net of tax, exhibited high volatility throughout the five-year period. A sharp increase occurred in 2019, reaching 83,074 thousand US dollars, suggesting an acceleration in major capital projects. This was followed by a downward trend, reaching a period low of 19,008 thousand US dollars in 2021, before rebounding to 43,965 thousand US dollars in 2022. These fluctuations indicate varying levels of investment in long-term assets.
- Effective Income Tax Rate Stability
- The effective income tax rate remained remarkably consistent, fluctuating within a narrow range between 22.56% and 24.42%. This stability ensures that the net-of-tax calculations for interest paid and capitalized interest are influenced primarily by the gross interest amounts rather than by significant shifts in the corporate tax environment.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 42,141,201) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 2,193,185) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 19.21 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Chevron Corp. | 26.64 |
| ConocoPhillips | 22.50 |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | 28.72 |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | 11.09 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Energy | 11.62 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 42,693,473) | 41,998,057) | 34,036,023) | 43,137,106) | 35,859,514) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 2,193,185) | 2,391,362) | 342,545) | (1,481,504) | 384,615) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 19.47 | 17.56 | 99.36 | — | 93.23 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | 8.27 | 13.33 | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | 7.43 | 10.72 | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | 7.84 | 10.06 | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | 7.91 | 11.15 | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
| Energy | 8.54 | 11.54 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 42,693,473 ÷ 2,193,185 = 19.47
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Analysis of the Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow to the Firm (EV/FCFF) indicates a transition from a period of extreme valuation premiums and cash flow instability to a more stabilized and efficient cash-generation phase between 2018 and 2022.
- Enterprise Value Trends
- The enterprise value exhibited volatility, rising from approximately $35.86 billion in 2018 to a peak of $43.14 billion in 2019, before declining to $34.04 billion in 2020. In the subsequent two years, the value recovered and remained relatively stable, concluding the period at $42.69 billion by December 31, 2022.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- Cash flow generation showed significant instability in the early part of the period, characterized by a substantial deficit of $1.48 billion in 2019. However, a strong recovery followed, with FCFF increasing from $342.5 million in 2020 to a peak of $2.39 billion in 2021, and maintaining a robust $2.19 billion in 2022. This represents a significant expansion in the company's ability to generate cash available to all capital providers.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Interpretation
- The EV/FCFF ratio was exceptionally high in 2018 (93.23) and 2020 (99.36), suggesting that the enterprise value was not well-supported by the cash flow generated during those years. The ratio was undefined in 2019 due to negative FCFF. A dramatic compression occurred in 2021, with the ratio dropping to 17.56, and it remained relatively consistent at 19.47 in 2022. This downward trend indicates a fundamental shift toward a more sustainable relationship between the market valuation and the actual cash flow yield of the business.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?