Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial trajectory from 2018 through 2022 is characterized by steady initial growth, a significant contraction in 2020, and a robust recovery in the subsequent two years. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) serves as a primary indicator of this trend, expanding from US$ 2.42 billion in 2018 to a peak of US$ 3.55 billion by the end of 2022.
- EBITDA Performance and Volatility
- A consistent upward trend is observed between 2018 and 2019, followed by a decline in 2020 where EBITDA dropped to US$ 2.09 billion. This contraction was followed by a sharp recovery in 2021, with EBITDA increasing by approximately 59.5% to US$ 3.34 billion, and continuing to grow by 6.4% in 2022.
- Operating Profitability (EBIT)
- Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) mirrored the EBITDA pattern, reflecting the core operational health of the entity. EBIT rose from US$ 1.99 billion in 2018 to US$ 2.93 billion in 2022. The narrowing gap between EBIT and EBITDA in the early period compared to the later years suggests an increase in depreciation and amortization expenses, likely correlating with an expansion of the asset base.
- Net Income Sensitivity
- Net income attributable to the company exhibited higher volatility than the EBITDA metric. While EBITDA decreased by approximately 20% during the 2020 downturn, net income experienced a more severe contraction of roughly 52%, falling from US$ 1.28 billion in 2019 to US$ 612.8 million in 2020. The subsequent recovery in 2021 and 2022 saw net income reach US$ 1.72 billion, indicating a restoration of bottom-line profitability.
- Earnings Before Tax (EBT) Analysis
- The progression of EBT from US$ 1.52 billion in 2018 to US$ 2.25 billion in 2022 indicates that despite the 2020 dip, the company maintained a strong capacity to generate taxable income. The delta between EBIT and EBT suggests that interest obligations remained a consistent factor in the earnings structure, though the overall growth in EBT aligns with the broader recovery in operational earnings.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 42,141,201) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 3,551,723) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.87 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Chevron Corp. | 11.22 |
| ConocoPhillips | 7.16 |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | 10.53 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | 6.27 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Energy | 6.46 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 42,693,473) | 41,998,057) | 34,036,023) | 43,137,106) | 35,859,514) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 3,551,723) | 3,338,829) | 2,093,864) | 2,619,299) | 2,416,112) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 12.02 | 12.58 | 16.26 | 16.47 | 14.84 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | 4.74 | 7.18 | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | 3.82 | 6.34 | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | 4.54 | 7.07 | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | ||||||
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | 4.47 | 6.97 | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | ||||||
| Energy | 4.75 | 7.24 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 42,693,473 ÷ 3,551,723 = 12.02
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory between 2018 and 2022 is characterized by a significant shift in valuation multiples, moving from a period of expansion to one of relative compression despite growing operational earnings. The enterprise value to EBITDA ratio peaked in 2019 before entering a sustained decline through 2022.
- Enterprise Value Trends
- Enterprise value exhibited notable volatility, rising from 35.86 billion USD in 2018 to a peak of 43.14 billion USD in 2019. A sharp contraction occurred in 2020, with the value dropping to 34.04 billion USD, followed by a recovery to 42.69 billion USD by the end of 2022. This indicates a stabilization of the total company valuation toward the end of the observed period.
- EBITDA Performance
- Operational earnings demonstrated a strong upward trend over the long term. After a dip to 2.09 billion USD in 2020, EBITDA grew substantially, reaching 3.34 billion USD in 2021 and 3.55 billion USD in 2022. This represents a significant increase in cash flow generation capabilities relative to the 2018 baseline of 2.42 billion USD.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
- The EV/EBITDA ratio increased from 14.84 in 2018 to a maximum of 16.47 in 2019, suggesting a period of higher market valuation relative to earnings. However, a reversal occurred after 2020; the ratio declined to 12.58 in 2021 and further to 12.02 in 2022. This downward trend is primarily attributed to EBITDA growth outpacing the growth in enterprise value, resulting in a more favorable valuation multiple.
The convergence of a stabilizing enterprise value and accelerating EBITDA has led to a contraction of the valuation multiple. The reduction of the ratio from 16.47 to 12.02 indicates that the company is generating more earnings per unit of enterprise value than in previous years, reflecting improved operational efficiency or a shift in market pricing.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?