AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

National Oilwell Varco Inc. (NYSE:NOV)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 3, 2016.

Analysis of Reportable Segments

Microsoft Excel

Segment Profit Margin

National Oilwell Varco Inc., profit margin by reportable segment

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Rig Systems 17.32% 20.27% 18.86% 23.81% —
Rig Aftermarket 24.06% 27.37% 27.08% 27.78% —
Wellbore Technologies -43.38% 16.38% 17.56% 18.96% —
Completion & Production Solutions 4.78% 14.85% 14.23% 17.13% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


An examination of segment profit margins from 2012 to 2015 reveals a systemic decline in profitability across all business lines, with a particularly sharp deterioration occurring in the final year of the period.

Rig Systems
Profitability in this segment exhibited moderate volatility, starting at 23.81% in 2012 and ending at 17.32% in 2015. Although there was a slight recovery in 2014 to 20.27%, the overall trajectory was downward.
Rig Aftermarket
This segment demonstrated the highest level of resilience and the strongest margins throughout the period. Margins remained stable between 27.08% and 27.78% from 2012 through 2014, before experiencing a decline to 24.06% in 2015.
Wellbore Technologies
A severe collapse in profitability is observed in this segment. After maintaining relatively stable margins between 16.38% and 18.96% from 2012 to 2014, the margin plummeted to -43.38% in 2015, representing the most significant negative variance in the portfolio.
Completion and Production Solutions
A consistent downward trend is evident in this segment. Margins decreased from 17.13% in 2012 to 4.78% by 2015, indicating a substantial erosion of operating efficiency or pricing power over the four-year period.

The aggregate data indicates that while the Rig Aftermarket segment provided a buffer of stability, the overall organizational profitability was heavily impacted by the volatility in Wellbore Technologies and the steady decline in Completion and Production Solutions during the 2015 fiscal year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Profit Margin: Rig Systems

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Rig Systems; segment profit margin calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating profit (loss) 1,206 1,996 1,594 1,685 —
Revenue 6,964 9,848 8,450 7,077 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment profit margin1 17.32% 20.27% 18.86% 23.81% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Operating profit (loss) ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 1,206 ÷ 6,964 = 17.32%


The Rig Systems segment experienced significant volatility in both top-line revenue and operational profitability between 2012 and 2015, characterized by a period of growth followed by a sharp contraction.

Revenue Trends
Revenue exhibited a steady upward trajectory from 2012 to 2014, rising from 7,077 million US$ to a peak of 9,848 million US$. However, this growth reversed abruptly in 2015, with revenue falling to 6,964 million US$, a level lower than that recorded at the start of the analyzed period.
Operating Profit Performance
Operating profit did not track perfectly with revenue growth. Despite an increase in revenue in 2013, operating profit decreased from 1,685 million US$ to 1,594 million US$. Profitability recovered in 2014 to reach a peak of 1,996 million US$ before declining sharply to 1,206 million US$ in 2015.
Segment Profit Margin Analysis
The segment profit margin followed a general downward trend over the four-year period. The highest margin was achieved in 2012 at 23.81%. A notable compression occurred in 2013, where the margin dropped to 18.86% despite higher revenues, suggesting increased operational costs or lower pricing power. While there was a modest recovery to 20.27% in 2014, the margin reached its lowest point in 2015 at 17.32%.

Overall, the data indicates a decline in operational efficiency over the period, as the segment ended 2015 with lower revenue, lower operating profit, and a significantly reduced profit margin compared to 2012.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Profit Margin: Rig Aftermarket

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Rig Aftermarket; segment profit margin calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating profit (loss) 605 882 729 594 —
Revenue 2,515 3,222 2,692 2,138 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment profit margin1 24.06% 27.37% 27.08% 27.78% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Operating profit (loss) ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 605 ÷ 2,515 = 24.06%


The Rig Aftermarket segment experienced a period of consistent expansion from 2012 through 2014, followed by a significant contraction in 2015. While both revenue and operating profit grew in tandem during the growth phase, the subsequent downturn in 2015 resulted in a disproportionate decline in profitability, leading to a compression of the segment's profit margin.

Revenue Performance
Revenue exhibited strong growth between 2012 and 2014, rising from US$ 2,138 million to a peak of US$ 3,222 million. This represented a cumulative increase of approximately 50.7% over three years. However, this trajectory reversed in 2015, with revenue falling to US$ 2,515 million, a decrease of 22% from the previous year's peak.
Operating Profit Trends
Operating profit followed a similar trajectory to revenue, increasing from US$ 594 million in 2012 to US$ 882 million in 2014. The growth was steady, mirroring the expansion in top-line sales. In 2015, operating profit declined sharply to US$ 605 million, marking a 31.4% reduction compared to 2014 levels.
Segment Profit Margin Analysis
The profit margin remained remarkably stable during the growth period, fluctuating narrowly between 27.08% and 27.78% from 2012 to 2014. This indicates that the segment maintained efficient cost control as it scaled. However, 2015 saw a notable margin erosion, with the profit margin dropping to 24.06%. The fact that operating profit declined more steeply than revenue suggests an increase in the relative cost of operations or a reduction in pricing power during the market downturn.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Profit Margin: Wellbore Technologies

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Wellbore Technologies; segment profit margin calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating profit (loss) (1,613) 937 915 983 —
Revenue 3,718 5,722 5,211 5,184 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment profit margin1 -43.38% 16.38% 17.56% 18.96% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Operating profit (loss) ÷ Revenue
= 100 × -1,613 ÷ 3,718 = -43.38%


The Wellbore Technologies segment experienced a period of relative operational stability between 2012 and 2014, followed by a severe financial contraction in 2015 characterized by a transition from consistent profitability to substantial operating losses.

Revenue Performance
Revenue demonstrated a steady upward trajectory from 2012 to 2014, rising from 5,184 million US$ to 5,722 million US$. This growth was abruptly reversed in 2015, as revenue fell to 3,718 million US$, marking a significant decrease of approximately 35% compared to the prior year.
Operating Profit Trends
Operating profit remained stable during the 2012 to 2014 period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 915 million US$ and 983 million US$. This stability vanished in 2015, when the segment reported an operating loss of 1,613 million US$, representing a total swing in profitability of over 2.5 billion US$ in a single fiscal year.
Segment Profit Margin Analysis
A gradual erosion of the segment profit margin is observed from 2012 to 2014, declining from 18.96% to 16.38%. This marginal decline was followed by a precipitous drop in 2015 to -43.38%, indicating that the decrease in operating profit far outpaced the decline in revenue, resulting in a deeply negative margin.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Profit Margin: Completion & Production Solutions

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Completion & Production Solutions; segment profit margin calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating profit (loss) 161 690 613 684 —
Revenue 3,365 4,645 4,309 3,994 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment profit margin1 4.78% 14.85% 14.23% 17.13% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Operating profit (loss) ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 161 ÷ 3,365 = 4.78%


The Completion & Production Solutions segment experienced a period of moderate growth in revenue followed by a severe contraction in both top-line performance and profitability between 2012 and 2015. While the segment maintained relatively stable operating margins from 2012 through 2014, the 2015 fiscal year marked a significant deterioration in financial efficiency.

Revenue Trajectory
Revenue demonstrated a steady upward trend for three consecutive years, rising from 3,994 million USD in 2012 to a peak of 4,645 million USD in 2014. However, this growth trend reversed sharply in 2015, with revenue falling to 3,365 million USD, representing a substantial decrease from the previous year's peak.
Operating Profit Performance
Operating profit remained relatively resilient between 2012 and 2014, fluctuating between 613 million USD and 690 million USD. This stability was disrupted in 2015, when operating profit plummeted to 161 million USD, reflecting a steep decline in the segment's ability to generate earnings from its core operations.
Segment Profit Margin Analysis
The segment profit margin exhibited a consistent downward trajectory over the analyzed period. After starting at a peak of 17.13% in 2012, the margin compressed to 14.23% in 2013 and saw a marginal recovery to 14.85% in 2014. In 2015, the margin experienced a collapse, falling to 4.78%, indicating that operating expenses decreased at a much slower rate than the decline in revenue.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Return on Assets (Segment ROA)

National Oilwell Varco Inc., ROA by reportable segment

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Rig Systems 17.81% 24.79% 20.83% 25.67% —
Rig Aftermarket 24.64% 31.62% 29.45% 30.78% —
Wellbore Technologies -18.40% 8.02% 7.71% 8.91% —
Completion & Production Solutions 2.72% 9.76% 8.41% 11.05% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


Between 2012 and 2015, a generalized decline in asset utilization efficiency is evident across all reportable segments, with a pronounced and synchronized deterioration occurring in the final year of the analyzed period.

Rig Aftermarket
This segment consistently demonstrated the highest return on assets of all analyzed divisions. Returns remained relatively resilient between 2012 and 2014, peaking at 31.62%, before experiencing a contraction to 24.64% in 2015.
Rig Systems
A pattern of volatility is observed in this segment. The return on assets decreased from 25.67% in 2012 to 20.83% in 2013, followed by a partial recovery to 24.79% in 2014, and a subsequent decline to 17.81% by the end of 2015.
Wellbore Technologies
This segment exhibited the most severe performance degradation. While returns remained marginally stable and positive between 7.71% and 8.91% from 2012 through 2014, the ROA transitioned to a significant negative value of -18.40% in 2015, indicating a substantial loss in asset productivity.
Completion & Production Solutions
A gradual downward trend is observed, with returns beginning at 11.05% in 2012 and fluctuating slightly before falling sharply to 2.72% in 2015.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment ROA: Rig Systems

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Rig Systems; segment ROA calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating profit (loss) 1,206 1,996 1,594 1,685 —
Total assets 6,772 8,052 7,654 6,563 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment ROA1 17.81% 24.79% 20.83% 25.67% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Operating profit (loss) ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 1,206 ÷ 6,772 = 17.81%


The Rig Systems segment exhibited significant volatility in profitability and asset utilization between 2012 and 2015, characterized by a period of expansion followed by a sharp contraction in the final year.

Operating Profitability
Operating profit fluctuated throughout the observed period, reaching a peak of US$ 1,996 million in 2014. Following this peak, a substantial decline occurred in 2015, with profits falling to US$ 1,206 million, marking a significant reduction in earnings capacity.
Asset Base Evolution
Total assets demonstrated a consistent upward trend from 2012 to 2014, increasing from US$ 6,563 million to a maximum of US$ 8,052 million. This growth reversed in 2015, as the asset base contracted to US$ 6,772 million.
Segment Return on Assets (ROA)
The Segment ROA began at 25.67% in 2012 and experienced a moderate decline to 20.83% in 2013. Although efficiency recovered to 24.79% in 2014, it dropped sharply to 17.81% by 2015. The decline in the final year indicates that operating profit decreased at a faster rate than the reduction in total assets, resulting in diminished asset productivity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment ROA: Rig Aftermarket

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Rig Aftermarket; segment ROA calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating profit (loss) 605 882 729 594 —
Total assets 2,455 2,789 2,475 1,930 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment ROA1 24.64% 31.62% 29.45% 30.78% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Operating profit (loss) ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 605 ÷ 2,455 = 24.64%


The Rig Aftermarket segment experienced a period of growth in both profitability and asset scale from 2012 through 2014, followed by a synchronized decline in 2015. While the segment maintained high levels of efficiency for the majority of the observed period, a significant contraction occurred in the final year.

Operating Profitability
Operating profit demonstrated a strong upward trend in the early part of the period, rising from US$ 594 million in 2012 to a peak of US$ 882 million in 2014. This growth phase was followed by a sharp reversal in 2015, with operating profit falling to US$ 605 million, effectively erasing the gains made over the previous three years.
Asset Base Dynamics
Total assets expanded significantly between 2012 and 2014, growing from US$ 1,930 million to US$ 2,789 million. This expansion indicates an increase in the segment's resource base during the growth period. In 2015, a contraction is observed, with total assets decreasing to US$ 2,455 million.
Return on Assets (ROA) Analysis
The Segment ROA remained relatively stable and high between 2012 and 2014, fluctuating within a narrow range from 29.45% to 31.62%. This indicates a consistent ability to generate substantial returns from the asset base during that interval. A notable downturn occurred in 2015, where the ROA dropped to 24.64%, reflecting a decline in operational efficiency and a reduced capacity to convert assets into operating profit.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment ROA: Wellbore Technologies

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Wellbore Technologies; segment ROA calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating profit (loss) (1,613) 937 915 983 —
Total assets 8,766 11,687 11,862 11,032 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment ROA1 -18.40% 8.02% 7.71% 8.91% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Operating profit (loss) ÷ Total assets
= 100 × -1,613 ÷ 8,766 = -18.40%


The Wellbore Technologies segment demonstrated relative financial stability between 2012 and 2014, followed by a significant deterioration in performance during the 2015 fiscal year.

Operating Profitability
Operating profit remained robust and consistent from 2012 to 2014, with values ranging between 915 million and 983 million US dollars. This stability was abruptly interrupted in 2015, where the segment shifted to a substantial operating loss of 1,613 million US dollars.
Asset Base Trends
Total assets remained relatively stable over the 2012-2014 period, peaking at 11,862 million US dollars in 2013. A sharp decline occurred in 2015, with assets falling to 8,766 million US dollars, suggesting significant asset impairments or a contraction in the segment's resource base.
Return on Assets (ROA) Analysis
The Segment ROA remained positive and stable from 2012 to 2014, fluctuating within a narrow range between 7.71% and 8.91%. The dramatic collapse to -18.40% in 2015 reflects the severe impact of the operating loss relative to the remaining asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment ROA: Completion & Production Solutions

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Completion & Production Solutions; segment ROA calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating profit (loss) 161 690 613 684 —
Total assets 5,916 7,072 7,287 6,192 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment ROA1 2.72% 9.76% 8.41% 11.05% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Operating profit (loss) ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 161 ÷ 5,916 = 2.72%


The Completion & Production Solutions segment exhibited a volatile profitability trend between 2012 and 2015, culminating in a significant contraction of financial performance in the final year of the analyzed period.

Operating Profit Trends
Operating profit remained relatively stable from 2012 through 2014, fluctuating between US$ 613 million and US$ 690 million. This stability was abruptly interrupted in 2015, when operating profit fell to US$ 161 million, representing a decrease of approximately 76.7% compared to the previous year.
Asset Base Evolution
Total assets experienced an initial expansion, rising from US$ 6,192 million in 2012 to a peak of US$ 7,287 million in 2013. Following a slight decrease in 2014, the asset base contracted further to US$ 5,916 million by December 31, 2015, indicating a reduction in the segment's total capital investment.
Segment Return on Assets (ROA)
The Segment ROA demonstrated a general decline over the four-year period. After starting at 11.05% in 2012, the ratio dropped to 8.41% in 2013, followed by a partial recovery to 9.76% in 2014. A severe decline occurred in 2015, with the ROA falling to 2.72%, marking the lowest point of efficiency in generating profit from the asset base.

The sharp deterioration in the Segment ROA in 2015 is primarily driven by the collapse in operating profit, which declined at a far greater rate than the reduction in total assets. This suggests that the segment faced significant headwinds that severely impaired its operational efficiency and earnings capacity relative to its size.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Asset Turnover

National Oilwell Varco Inc., asset turnover by reportable segment

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Rig Systems 1.03 1.22 1.10 1.08 —
Rig Aftermarket 1.02 1.16 1.09 1.11 —
Wellbore Technologies 0.42 0.49 0.44 0.47 —
Completion & Production Solutions 0.57 0.66 0.59 0.65 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


The analysis of segment asset turnover from 2012 to 2015 reveals a synchronized pattern across all reportable segments, characterized by a general peak in efficiency during 2014 followed by a universal decline in 2015. The segments exhibit distinct tiers of asset utilization, with rig-related operations demonstrating significantly higher turnover rates than wellbore and production solutions.

Rig Systems
An upward trajectory is observed from 1.08 in 2012 to a peak of 1.22 in 2014, before retreating to 1.03 by the end of 2015. This segment maintained the highest overall asset turnover among the four analyzed groups throughout the period.
Rig Aftermarket
The turnover ratio remained relatively stable between 2012 and 2013, increasing to a peak of 1.16 in 2014. In alignment with the broader trend, a decrease occurred in 2015, with the ratio falling to 1.02.
Wellbore Technologies
Turnover ratios for this segment were consistently the lowest of the group, fluctuating between a high of 0.49 in 2014 and a low of 0.42 in 2015. The data indicates a persistent limitation in asset efficiency relative to revenue generation compared to other segments.
Completion & Production Solutions
This segment experienced notable volatility, with the ratio declining from 0.65 in 2012 to 0.59 in 2013, recovering to 0.66 in 2014, and ultimately falling to 0.57 in 2015.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Asset Turnover: Rig Systems

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Rig Systems; segment asset turnover calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue 6,964 9,848 8,450 7,077 —
Total assets 6,772 8,052 7,654 6,563 —
Segment Activity Ratio
Segment asset turnover1 1.03 1.22 1.10 1.08 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Total assets
= 6,964 ÷ 6,772 = 1.03


The Rig Systems segment experienced a period of growth in both revenue and asset utilization from 2012 through 2014, followed by a significant contraction in 2015. The asset turnover ratio, which measures the efficiency of assets in generating revenue, peaked in 2014 before declining to its lowest point in the observed period.

Revenue and Asset Expansion (2012-2014)
Between 2012 and 2014, revenue increased from US$ 7,077 million to US$ 9,848 million. During this same timeframe, total assets grew from US$ 6,563 million to US$ 8,052 million. The growth in revenue outpaced the growth in assets, leading to a progressive improvement in operational efficiency.
Peak Efficiency Performance
The segment asset turnover ratio improved steadily from 1.08 in 2012 to 1.10 in 2013, reaching a peak of 1.22 in 2014. This indicates that the segment was most effective at utilizing its asset base to drive top-line growth during the 2014 fiscal year.
Operational Contraction (2015)
In 2015, a sharp decline occurred in both revenue and assets. Revenue fell to US$ 6,964 million, and total assets decreased to US$ 6,772 million. Consequently, the segment asset turnover ratio dropped to 1.03, representing a significant decrease in efficiency and falling below the 2012 baseline.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Asset Turnover: Rig Aftermarket

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Rig Aftermarket; segment asset turnover calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue 2,515 3,222 2,692 2,138 —
Total assets 2,455 2,789 2,475 1,930 —
Segment Activity Ratio
Segment asset turnover1 1.02 1.16 1.09 1.11 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Total assets
= 2,515 ÷ 2,455 = 1.02


The Rig Aftermarket segment experienced a period of growth in both scale and efficiency from 2012 through 2014, followed by a contraction in 2015. The data indicates a strong correlation between revenue growth and asset expansion during the initial three-year period, culminating in a peak of operational efficiency in 2014.

Revenue and Asset Expansion
Revenue showed a consistent upward trajectory from 2012 to 2014, rising from US$ 2,138 million to US$ 3,222 million. This growth was supported by a corresponding increase in total assets, which grew from US$ 1,930 million to US$ 2,789 million over the same period. In 2015, a reversal occurred, with revenue decreasing to US$ 2,515 million and total assets declining to US$ 2,455 million.
Asset Turnover and Operational Efficiency
The segment asset turnover ratio remained relatively stable, ranging between 1.02 and 1.16. After a marginal decrease to 1.09 in 2013, the ratio peaked at 1.16 in 2014, signaling that revenue growth had outpaced asset accumulation. However, the ratio declined to its lowest point of 1.02 in 2015, suggesting that the reduction in revenue was more pronounced than the reduction in the asset base, leading to lower overall asset productivity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Asset Turnover: Wellbore Technologies

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Wellbore Technologies; segment asset turnover calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue 3,718 5,722 5,211 5,184 —
Total assets 8,766 11,687 11,862 11,032 —
Segment Activity Ratio
Segment asset turnover1 0.42 0.49 0.44 0.47 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Total assets
= 3,718 ÷ 8,766 = 0.42


The Wellbore Technologies segment exhibited fluctuating operational efficiency between 2012 and 2015, characterized by a peak in asset utilization in 2014 followed by a notable contraction in 2015.

Revenue and Asset Trends
Revenue experienced a steady upward trajectory from 2012 to 2014, rising from US$ 5,184 million to a peak of US$ 5,722 million. However, 2015 saw a significant reversal, with revenue falling to US$ 3,718 million. Total assets followed a similar, though less volatile, pattern, increasing to US$ 11,862 million in 2013 before declining to US$ 8,766 million by the end of 2015.
Segment Asset Turnover Analysis
The asset turnover ratio remained within a narrow range of 0.42 to 0.49 throughout the period. A slight decline occurred in 2013 to 0.44, coinciding with a period of asset growth that outpaced revenue gains. Efficiency improved in 2014, reaching a period high of 0.49, indicating an optimal alignment between the asset base and revenue generation. By 2015, the ratio declined to 0.42, the lowest point in the observed period, reflecting a sharper contraction in revenue relative to the reduction in the total asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Asset Turnover: Completion & Production Solutions

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Completion & Production Solutions; segment asset turnover calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue 3,365 4,645 4,309 3,994 —
Total assets 5,916 7,072 7,287 6,192 —
Segment Activity Ratio
Segment asset turnover1 0.57 0.66 0.59 0.65 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Total assets
= 3,365 ÷ 5,916 = 0.57


The Completion & Production Solutions segment exhibited significant volatility in both revenue generation and asset utilization efficiency between 2012 and 2015. While the segment experienced a period of growth through 2014, a sharp contraction occurred in 2015, impacting the overall efficiency of the asset base.

Revenue Performance
Revenue followed an upward trajectory from 2012 to 2014, rising from 3,994 million US$ to a peak of 4,645 million US$. This growth trend reversed abruptly in 2015, with revenue falling to 3,365 million US$, representing a substantial decline from the previous year's peak.
Asset Base Trends
Total assets increased from 6,192 million US$ in 2012 to a high of 7,287 million US$ in 2013. Following this peak, the asset base underwent a gradual reduction, decreasing to 7,072 million US$ in 2014 and further declining to 5,916 million US$ by the end of 2015.
Asset Turnover Efficiency
The segment asset turnover ratio fluctuated throughout the period, reflecting inconsistent efficiency in generating revenue from its assets. The ratio declined from 0.65 in 2012 to 0.59 in 2013, as asset growth outpaced revenue increases. Efficiency recovered in 2014 to a period-high of 0.66, coinciding with peak revenue and a slight reduction in assets. However, by 2015, the ratio dropped to its lowest point of 0.57, driven by the significant contraction in revenue despite the lower asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation

National Oilwell Varco Inc., capital expenditures to depreciation by reportable segment

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Rig Systems 0.84 1.51 0.74 1.27 —
Rig Aftermarket 0.33 0.44 0.92 0.72 —
Wellbore Technologies 0.45 0.60 0.54 0.63 —
Completion & Production Solutions 0.39 0.82 1.01 1.17 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


An analysis of the capital expenditure to depreciation ratios from 2012 to 2015 reveals a general trend of declining reinvestment across most reportable segments. While the period began with several segments investing above their depreciation levels, there is a marked shift toward capital conservation by the end of 2015, suggesting a transition from growth-oriented spending to a reduction in asset replacement and expansion.

Rig Systems
This segment exhibited the highest level of volatility and the most aggressive investment profile. The ratio fluctuated significantly, dropping from 1.27 in 2012 to 0.74 in 2013, before peaking at 1.51 in 2014. However, this trend reversed in 2015, with the ratio falling to 0.84, indicating that capital expenditures no longer covered the annual depreciation of the segment's assets.
Rig Aftermarket
Investment levels in this segment remained below the depreciation threshold for most of the analyzed period. After a brief increase to a peak of 0.92 in 2013, a consistent downward trend occurred, with the ratio falling to 0.44 in 2014 and reaching a low of 0.33 by 2015.
Wellbore Technologies
This segment maintained a relatively stable but consistently low ratio throughout the period. The ratio hovered between 0.54 and 0.63 from 2012 to 2014, before experiencing a decline to 0.45 in 2015, reflecting a sustained policy of investing significantly less than the depreciation of existing assets.
Completion & Production Solutions
A continuous and steep decline is observed in this segment. Starting from a position of growth in 2012 with a ratio of 1.17, the investment level steadily eroded to 1.01 in 2013, 0.82 in 2014, and finally to 0.39 in 2015. This represents the most significant proportional reduction in capital spending relative to depreciation among all segments.

The aggregate movement across all segments indicates a systemic reduction in capital intensity. By 2015, every reportable segment operated with a ratio below 1.0, signifying that capital expenditures were insufficient to offset depreciation. This suggests an overall contraction in the company's asset base or a strategic shift toward maximizing cash flow over long-term capital expansion.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation: Rig Systems

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Rig Systems; segment capital expenditures to depreciation calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Capital expenditures 81 133 61 81 —
Depreciation and amortization 96 88 82 64 —
Segment Financial Ratio
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation1 0.84 1.51 0.74 1.27 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation = Capital expenditures ÷ Depreciation and amortization
= 81 ÷ 96 = 0.84


The Rig Systems segment exhibited significant volatility in capital allocation between 2012 and 2015, contrasted by a consistent upward trajectory in depreciation and amortization expenses. This divergence indicates a non-linear approach to asset replacement and capacity expansion during the observed period.

Capital Expenditure Trends
Investment levels fluctuated markedly, beginning at $81 million in 2012, decreasing to $61 million in 2013, and reaching a peak of $133 million in 2014. By 2015, spending returned to the 2012 level of $81 million.
Depreciation and Amortization Growth
A steady year-over-year increase in depreciation and amortization is observed, rising from $64 million in 2012 to $96 million in 2015. This linear growth suggests a continuous expansion of the depreciable asset base over the four-year span.
Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation Ratio
The ratio demonstrates an inconsistent investment strategy relative to asset wear. Periods of expansion are evident in 2012 and 2014, where ratios of 1.27 and 1.51 respectively indicate that capital expenditures exceeded depreciation. In contrast, 2013 and 2015 saw ratios drop to 0.74 and 0.84, indicating that capital spending was insufficient to offset depreciation, which typically suggests a period of asset contraction or focused maintenance rather than growth.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation: Rig Aftermarket

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Rig Aftermarket; segment capital expenditures to depreciation calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Capital expenditures 10 12 24 13 —
Depreciation and amortization 30 27 26 18 —
Segment Financial Ratio
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation1 0.33 0.44 0.92 0.72 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation = Capital expenditures ÷ Depreciation and amortization
= 10 ÷ 30 = 0.33


The Rig Aftermarket segment exhibited a significant decline in its reinvestment rate relative to asset consumption between 2012 and 2015. While capital expenditures peaked in 2013, a subsequent downward trend emerged, coinciding with a steady increase in depreciation and amortization expenses.

Capital Expenditure Trends
Investment levels showed an initial increase, rising from US$ 13 million in 2012 to a peak of US$ 24 million in 2013. Following this peak, expenditures decreased consistently, falling to US$ 12 million in 2014 and reaching a low of US$ 10 million by 2015.
Depreciation and Amortization Patterns
Depreciation and amortization expenses followed a linear upward trajectory throughout the period. Expenses grew from US$ 18 million in 2012 to US$ 30 million in 2015, indicating a growing base of depreciable assets despite the later reduction in new capital spending.
Analysis of the Capital Expenditures to Depreciation Ratio
The ratio of capital expenditures to depreciation remained below 1.0 throughout the entire period, suggesting that the segment did not fully replace the value of its depreciating assets. The ratio reached its highest point of 0.92 in 2013, indicating a near-replacement level of investment. However, a sharp contraction followed, with the ratio dropping to 0.44 in 2014 and further to 0.33 in 2015. This downward trend reflects a strategic or financial shift toward significantly lower capital intensity relative to the existing asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation: Wellbore Technologies

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Wellbore Technologies; segment capital expenditures to depreciation calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Capital expenditures 180 262 226 247 —
Depreciation and amortization 400 439 420 389 —
Segment Financial Ratio
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation1 0.45 0.60 0.54 0.63 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation = Capital expenditures ÷ Depreciation and amortization
= 180 ÷ 400 = 0.45


The Wellbore Technologies segment exhibited a consistent pattern of under-investing relative to its asset depreciation between 2012 and 2015. Throughout this period, capital expenditures remained significantly lower than depreciation and amortization charges, indicating a reduction in the segment's long-term asset base or a shift toward harvesting existing infrastructure rather than expanding capacity.

Capital Expenditure Trends
Investment levels fluctuated between 2012 and 2014, peaking at 262 million US dollars in 2014. However, a sharp decline occurred in 2015, with expenditures falling to 180 million US dollars, representing the lowest investment level in the observed period.
Depreciation and Amortization Trends
Depreciation and amortization expenses showed a steady upward trajectory from 2012 to 2014, rising from 389 million US dollars to a peak of 439 million US dollars. In 2015, these charges decreased slightly to 400 million US dollars, reflecting the impact of lower historical investment levels or changes in asset utility.
Capital Expenditures to Depreciation Ratio
The ratio remained below 1.0 for the entire duration, signaling that the segment did not replace its depreciating assets at full value. After an initial decrease from 0.63 in 2012 to 0.54 in 2013, the ratio experienced a marginal recovery to 0.60 in 2014 before dropping to its lowest point of 0.45 in 2015. This downward trend suggests a strategic contraction in capital deployment or an intensified focus on cost reduction toward the end of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation: Completion & Production Solutions

National Oilwell Varco Inc.; Completion & Production Solutions; segment capital expenditures to depreciation calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Capital expenditures 87 184 212 169 —
Depreciation and amortization 221 224 210 145 —
Segment Financial Ratio
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation1 0.39 0.82 1.01 1.17 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation = Capital expenditures ÷ Depreciation and amortization
= 87 ÷ 221 = 0.39


The Completion & Production Solutions segment experienced a significant shift in its investment profile between 2012 and 2015, transitioning from a phase of asset expansion to a period of substantial capital contraction.

Capital Expenditure Trends
Investment in capital expenditures peaked in 2013 at 212 million US dollars. Following this peak, spending declined to 184 million US dollars in 2014 and dropped sharply to 87 million US dollars by 2015, representing a significant reduction in the allocation of funds toward new assets.
Depreciation and Amortization Trends
Depreciation and amortization expenses followed a generally upward trajectory for the majority of the period. Costs increased from 145 million US dollars in 2012 to 224 million US dollars in 2014, before stabilizing at 221 million US dollars in 2015. This trend reflects a growing base of depreciable assets accumulated during the earlier investment phase.
Capital Expenditures to Depreciation Ratio Analysis
The ratio of capital expenditures to depreciation shows a continuous and accelerating decline. In 2012, a ratio of 1.17 indicates that the segment was investing beyond its depreciation costs, thereby expanding its productive capacity. By 2013, the ratio of 1.01 suggested a move toward maintaining the existing asset base. The subsequent decline to 0.82 in 2014 and 0.39 in 2015 confirms a trend where capital investment fell well below the rate of asset consumption. This indicates that the segment was not replacing depreciated assets, which may reflect a strategic pivot toward capital preservation or a response to declining market demand.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Revenue

National Oilwell Varco Inc., revenue by reportable segment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Rig Systems 6,964 9,848 8,450 7,077 —
Rig Aftermarket 2,515 3,222 2,692 2,138 —
Wellbore Technologies 3,718 5,722 5,211 5,184 —
Completion & Production Solutions 3,365 4,645 4,309 3,994 —
Eliminations (1,805) (1,997) (1,441) (1,199) —
Total 14,757 21,440 19,221 17,194 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


Total revenue exhibited a growth trajectory from 2012 through 2014, increasing from 17,194 million US$ to a peak of 21,440 million US$. This upward trend was reversed in 2015, where total revenue declined sharply to 14,757 million US$, representing a significant contraction relative to the previous year's peak.

Rig Systems
This segment acted as the primary driver of revenue growth between 2012 and 2014, rising from 7,077 million US$ to 9,848 million US$. However, a substantial decline occurred in 2015, with revenue falling to 6,964 million US$, which is slightly below the 2012 baseline.
Rig Aftermarket
Steady growth was observed from 2012 to 2014, with revenue increasing from 2,138 million US$ to 3,222 million US$. While this segment also experienced a decline in 2015 to 2,515 million US$, it remained higher than its 2012 levels, suggesting greater resilience compared to the Rig Systems segment.
Wellbore Technologies
Revenue remained relatively stable between 2012 and 2013, followed by an increase to 5,722 million US$ in 2014. In 2015, a sharp contraction was recorded, with revenue dropping to 3,718 million US$, the lowest level recorded in the observed period.
Completion & Production Solutions
A consistent incremental increase was noted from 2012 to 2014, with revenues moving from 3,994 million US$ to 4,645 million US$. This trend reversed in 2015, resulting in a decrease to 3,365 million US$.

Intersegment eliminations grew in tandem with total revenue, peaking at -1,997 million US$ in 2014 before reducing to -1,805 million US$ in 2015. The synchronized decline across all reportable segments in 2015 indicates a systemic reduction in demand across the entire operational portfolio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating profit (loss)

National Oilwell Varco Inc., operating profit (loss) by reportable segment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Rig Systems 1,206 1,996 1,594 1,685 —
Rig Aftermarket 605 882 729 594 —
Wellbore Technologies (1,613) 937 915 983 —
Completion & Production Solutions 161 690 613 684 —
Eliminations (749) (892) (652) (557) —
Total (390) 3,613 3,199 3,389 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


Total operating profit demonstrated relative stability and growth between 2012 and 2014, before experiencing a severe contraction in 2015. The aggregate operating profit peaked in 2014 at 3,613 million US$, followed by a sharp reversal to an operating loss of 390 million US$ by the end of 2015.

Rig Systems Performance
This segment served as the primary contributor to operating profit through 2014. Following a slight decline in 2013, it reached a peak of 1,996 million US$ in 2014 before decreasing to 1,206 million US$ in 2015.
Rig Aftermarket Trends
The Rig Aftermarket segment exhibited a consistent upward trajectory from 2012 to 2014, with profits rising from 594 million US$ to 882 million US$. This trend reversed in 2015, as operating profit fell to 605 million US$.
Wellbore Technologies Volatility
Operating profit for Wellbore Technologies remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 915 million US$ and 983 million US$ from 2012 to 2014. In 2015, the segment underwent a critical reversal, reporting an operating loss of 1,613 million US$, which served as the main driver for the overall corporate loss.
Completion and Production Solutions
This segment maintained a consistent range of profitability between 613 million US$ and 690 million US$ from 2012 through 2014. A sharp contraction occurred in 2015, with operating profit falling to 161 million US$.
Intersegment Eliminations
Eliminations consistently exerted a negative impact on total operating profit, increasing from 557 million US$ in 2012 to a peak of 892 million US$ in 2014, before moderating to 749 million US$ in 2015.

The shift from a substantial profit in 2014 to a total operating loss in 2015 indicates a widespread decline across all reportable segments. The magnitude of the loss in Wellbore Technologies was particularly significant, as it completely offset the combined positive contributions of the Rig Systems, Rig Aftermarket, and Completion and Production Solutions segments.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Capital expenditures

National Oilwell Varco Inc., capital expenditures by reportable segment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Rig Systems 81 133 61 81 —
Rig Aftermarket 10 12 24 13 —
Wellbore Technologies 180 262 226 247 —
Completion & Production Solutions 87 184 212 169 —
Eliminations 95 108 91 59 —
Total 453 699 614 569 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


Total capital expenditures experienced a period of growth between 2012 and 2014, rising from 569 million US dollars to a peak of 699 million US dollars. This upward trend was followed by a sharp contraction in 2015, where total spending decreased by approximately 35% to 453 million US dollars.

Wellbore Technologies
This segment consistently required the highest level of capital investment across the analyzed period. Expenditures remained relatively stable between 2012 and 2014, fluctuating between 226 million and 262 million US dollars, before declining to 180 million US dollars in 2015.
Completion and Production Solutions
Investment in this segment showed a peak of 212 million US dollars in 2013. A significant downward trend is observed in 2015, with expenditures falling to 87 million US dollars, representing a decrease of over 50% compared to the 2014 level of 184 million US dollars.
Rig Systems
Capital spending for Rig Systems exhibited volatility. After a decrease in 2013 to 61 million US dollars, spending spiked to 133 million US dollars in 2014 before returning to 81 million US dollars in 2015, matching the expenditure level seen in 2012.
Rig Aftermarket and Eliminations
Rig Aftermarket maintained the lowest capital intensity, with spending peaking at 24 million US dollars in 2013 and ending at 10 million US dollars in 2015. Eliminations trended upward from 59 million US dollars in 2012 to 108 million US dollars in 2014, before slightly moderating to 95 million US dollars in 2015.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Depreciation and amortization

National Oilwell Varco Inc., depreciation and amortization by reportable segment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Rig Systems 96 88 82 64 —
Rig Aftermarket 30 27 26 18 —
Wellbore Technologies 400 439 420 389 —
Completion & Production Solutions 221 224 210 145 —
Total 747 778 738 616 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


Total depreciation and amortization expenses for the reportable segments exhibited an upward trajectory from 2012 to 2014, peaking at US$ 778 million before experiencing a moderate contraction to US$ 747 million in 2015. This overall trend suggests a period of significant capital asset accumulation followed by a slight reduction or stabilization in the final year of the period.

Wellbore Technologies
As the largest contributor to total depreciation and amortization, this segment saw expenses rise from US$ 389 million in 2012 to a peak of US$ 439 million in 2014, before declining to US$ 400 million in 2015.
Completion & Production Solutions
This segment experienced the most rapid growth in expenses early in the period, increasing from US$ 145 million in 2012 to US$ 210 million in 2013. Expenses peaked at US$ 224 million in 2014 and remained relatively stable at US$ 221 million in 2015.
Rig Systems and Rig Aftermarket
Both segments demonstrated consistent, uninterrupted growth throughout the analyzed period. Rig Systems expenses increased steadily from US$ 64 million in 2012 to US$ 96 million in 2015, while Rig Aftermarket expenses rose from US$ 18 million to US$ 30 million over the same timeframe.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Total assets

National Oilwell Varco Inc., total assets by reportable segment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Rig Systems 6,772 8,052 7,654 6,563 —
Rig Aftermarket 2,455 2,789 2,475 1,930 —
Wellbore Technologies 8,766 11,687 11,862 11,032 —
Completion & Production Solutions 5,916 7,072 7,287 6,192 —
Eliminations 2,816 3,962 3,351 3,394 —
Discontinued operations — — 2,183 2,373 —
Total 26,725 33,562 34,812 31,484 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


Total assets exhibited a period of growth from 2012 to 2013, peaking at US$ 34,812 million, before entering a contraction phase. A significant reduction in the asset base occurred in 2015, where total assets declined to US$ 26,725 million, representing a decrease of approximately 23% from the 2013 peak.

Wellbore Technologies
This segment remained the largest contributor to the total asset base throughout the period. Assets grew from US$ 11,032 million in 2012 to a peak of US$ 11,862 million in 2013, followed by a sharp contraction to US$ 8,766 million by 2015.
Rig Systems
A consistent upward trend was observed from 2012 through 2014, with assets increasing from US$ 6,563 million to US$ 8,052 million. This growth reversed in 2015, with assets falling to US$ 6,772 million.
Rig Aftermarket
Assets in this segment followed a trajectory similar to Rig Systems, increasing from US$ 1,930 million in 2012 to a peak of US$ 2,789 million in 2014, before declining to US$ 2,455 million in 2015.
Completion and Production Solutions
This segment saw an initial increase from US$ 6,192 million in 2012 to US$ 7,287 million in 2013. Subsequently, a gradual decline was observed, ending at US$ 5,916 million in 2015.
Discontinued Operations
Assets attributed to discontinued operations were present in 2012 and 2013, totaling US$ 2,373 million and US$ 2,183 million respectively, before being completely removed from the balance sheet by 2014.

The synchronized decline across all major operating segments in 2015 suggests a broad systemic reduction in asset holdings. The reduction in eliminations from US$ 3,962 million in 2014 to US$ 2,816 million in 2015 further aligns with the overall contraction of the reported asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?