Liquidity ratios measure the company ability to meet its short-term obligations.
Liquidity Ratios (Summary)
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current ratio | 2.78 | 2.19 | 2.46 | 2.78 | 2.24 | |
| Quick ratio | 1.18 | 1.08 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 1.26 | |
| Cash ratio | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.65 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
The liquidity profile from 2011 to 2015 demonstrates a consistent capacity to cover short-term obligations, although the composition of liquid assets shifted. The company maintained a strong solvency position, characterized by current assets that significantly exceeded current liabilities, despite a downward trend in the most liquid asset components.
- Current Ratio
- The current ratio exhibited volatility, ranging from a low of 2.19 in 2014 to a high of 2.78 in both 2012 and 2015. Throughout the analyzed period, the ratio remained well above 2.0, indicating a conservative approach to short-term liability management.
- Quick Ratio
- The quick ratio consistently remained above the 1.0 threshold, moving from 1.26 in 2011 to a peak of 1.35 in 2012, and ending at 1.18 in 2015. This suggests that the entity possessed sufficient liquid assets to meet its current obligations without relying on the sale of inventory.
- Cash Ratio
- A steady contraction is observed in the cash ratio, which declined from 0.65 in 2011 to a low of 0.48 in 2014, with a negligible increase to 0.49 in 2015. This trend highlights a diminishing proportion of cash and cash equivalents held relative to current liabilities over the five-year span.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Current Ratio
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Current assets | 11,801) | 16,162) | 16,423) | 15,678) | 12,110) | |
| Current liabilities | 4,249) | 7,374) | 6,678) | 5,649) | 5,416) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Current ratio1 | 2.78 | 2.19 | 2.46 | 2.78 | 2.24 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Current Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| SLB N.V. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 2015 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 11,801 ÷ 4,249 = 2.78
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The company's liquidity position remained strong between 2011 and 2015, with the current ratio consistently exceeding 2.0. This indicates a sustained capacity to meet short-term obligations using current assets throughout the analyzed period.
- Asset and Liability Trends
- Current assets experienced an initial growth phase from 2011 to 2013, peaking at 16,423 million US$, before contracting to 11,801 million US$ by 2015. In parallel, current liabilities demonstrated a steady upward trajectory from 5,416 million US$ in 2011 to a peak of 7,374 million US$ in 2014, followed by a significant reduction to 4,249 million US$ in 2015.
- Current Ratio Fluctuations
- The current ratio reached a peak of 2.78 in 2012, followed by a gradual decline to 2.19 by 2014. This downward trend was primarily attributed to the consistent increase in current liabilities while asset growth stalled. However, a recovery to 2.78 occurred in 2015, as the sharp decrease in current liabilities outweighed the reduction in current assets.
- Liquidity Stability
- Despite the volatility in the absolute values of assets and liabilities, the current ratio remained well above the 1.0 threshold. The return to a ratio of 2.78 in 2015 suggests a strengthened short-term financial position resulting from a substantial reduction in immediate obligations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Quick Ratio
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2,080) | 3,536) | 3,436) | 3,319) | 3,535) | |
| Receivables, net | 2,926) | 4,416) | 4,896) | 4,320) | 3,291) | |
| Total quick assets | 5,006) | 7,952) | 8,332) | 7,639) | 6,826) | |
| Current liabilities | 4,249) | 7,374) | 6,678) | 5,649) | 5,416) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Quick ratio1 | 1.18 | 1.08 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 1.26 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Quick Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| SLB N.V. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 2015 Calculation
Quick ratio = Total quick assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 5,006 ÷ 4,249 = 1.18
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The liquidity position between 2011 and 2015 is characterized by a consistent ability to meet short-term obligations using liquid assets, as the quick ratio remained above 1.00 throughout the entire period. While the absolute values of both assets and liabilities experienced significant volatility, particularly toward the end of the period, the company maintained a stable liquidity buffer.
- Quick Assets Trend
- Total quick assets grew steadily from 6,826 million in 2011 to a peak of 8,332 million in 2013. Following this peak, a downward trend emerged, with a slight decline in 2014 followed by a substantial reduction to 5,006 million by the end of 2015, indicating a significant contraction in the liquid asset base.
- Current Liabilities Trend
- Current liabilities exhibited a continuous increase from 2011 through 2014, rising from 5,416 million to a maximum of 7,374 million. This growth pattern was abruptly reversed in 2015, when liabilities dropped sharply to 4,249 million, suggesting a significant reduction in short-term debt or other current obligations.
- Quick Ratio Interpretation
- The quick ratio reached its highest point in 2012 at 1.35, reflecting an optimal liquidity margin. A subsequent decline occurred through 2014, reaching a period low of 1.08 as liabilities grew faster than liquid assets. In 2015, the ratio recovered to 1.18; this improvement was not driven by an increase in assets, but rather by a disproportionately larger decrease in current liabilities relative to the decline in quick assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Ratio
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | 2,080) | 3,536) | 3,436) | 3,319) | 3,535) | |
| Total cash assets | 2,080) | 3,536) | 3,436) | 3,319) | 3,535) | |
| Current liabilities | 4,249) | 7,374) | 6,678) | 5,649) | 5,416) | |
| Liquidity Ratio | ||||||
| Cash ratio1 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.65 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| SLB N.V. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 2015 Calculation
Cash ratio = Total cash assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 2,080 ÷ 4,249 = 0.49
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of the liquidity position reveals a progressive decline in the cash ratio from 2011 through 2014, followed by a period of stabilization in 2015. This trend indicates a reduction in the company's ability to meet short-term obligations exclusively through its most liquid assets over the majority of the observed period.
- Cash Ratio Progression
- The cash ratio decreased steadily from 0.65 in 2011 to a low of 0.48 in 2014. This represents a consistent erosion of the immediate liquidity cushion. A marginal recovery to 0.49 was observed in 2015, suggesting a plateauing of this trend.
- Total Cash Asset Fluctuations
- Cash assets remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2014, fluctuating within a narrow range between 3,319 million and 3,536 million US dollars. However, a significant contraction occurred in 2015, with cash assets dropping to 2,080 million US dollars, marking a substantial decrease in available liquid reserves.
- Current Liabilities Analysis
- Current liabilities exhibited a growth trend from 2011 to 2014, increasing from 5,416 million to 7,374 million US dollars. This expansion of short-term debt was the primary driver behind the deteriorating cash ratio during this window. In 2015, there was a sharp reduction in liabilities to 4,249 million US dollars, which offset the simultaneous decline in cash assets and prevented a further decrease in the ratio.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?