Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
Between 2011 and 2015, the gross property, plant and equipment (PP&E) experienced a period of significant expansion followed by a slight contraction. Total gross assets grew from 3,660 million US$ in 2011 to a peak of 5,405 million US$ in 2014, before declining to 5,276 million US$ in 2015.
- Gross Asset Component Trends
- Land and buildings showed a consistent and uninterrupted upward trajectory, increasing from 1,069 million US$ in 2011 to 1,582 million US$ in 2015. Operating equipment followed a similar growth pattern for the majority of the period, rising from 1,955 million US$ in 2011 to a peak of 3,060 million US$ in 2014, with a marginal decline observed in 2015. In contrast, rental equipment grew from 636 million US$ in 2011 to 817 million US$ in 2014, but experienced a notable reduction to 639 million US$ in 2015, returning to levels seen at the start of the analysis period.
- Depreciation and Net Book Value
- Accumulated depreciation increased steadily every year, rising from 1,215 million US$ in 2011 to 2,152 million US$ in 2015. This continuous growth in depreciation contributed to a divergence between gross and net PP&E. While gross PP&E peaked in 2014, the net PP&E reached its maximum value earlier, in 2013, at 3,408 million US$. Following 2013, the net book value declined for two consecutive years, ending at 3,124 million US$ in 2015.
- Asset Lifecycle and Utilization Insights
- The ratio of accumulated depreciation to gross PP&E increased from approximately 33.2% in 2011 to 40.8% in 2015, indicating an aging asset base or an acceleration in depreciation charges relative to new capital expenditures. The contraction in both rental equipment and total gross PP&E in 2015 suggests a shift in capital allocation or a reduction in capacity towards the end of the observed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
An analysis of the asset age ratios reveals a consistent upward trend in the aging of property, plant, and equipment over the five-year period ending December 31, 2015. The progression indicates a gradual increase in the proportion of the asset base that has been consumed, suggesting a period of limited relative investment in new fixed assets.
- Average Age Ratio
- The average age ratio demonstrated a steady increase from 33.20% in 2011 to 40.79% by 2015. While the growth remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2013, a more pronounced acceleration occurred in 2014 and 2015, reflecting a higher percentage of the total estimated useful life being exhausted.
- Asset Life Cycle and Useful Life
- The estimated total useful life of the assets remained largely constant at 13 years, with a brief increase to 14 years in 2012. Consequently, the estimated remaining life shifted from 9 years in 2011 to 8 years by 2015, confirming a contraction in the remaining operational utility of the current asset base.
- Estimated Elapsed Age
- The time elapsed since the purchase of assets increased from 4 years in 2011 to 6 years in 2015. This progression in estimated age correlates directly with the rise in the average age ratio, indicating that existing assets are maturing without being offset by sufficient acquisitions of new equipment.
Overall, the data indicates that the asset base is moving further into its useful life cycle. The increase in the average age ratio from approximately one-third to over two-fifths of the total useful life suggests that a higher proportion of the company's productive capacity is comprised of older assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ Property, plant and equipment, gross
= 100 × 2,152 ÷ 5,276 = 40.79%
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment reveals a steady aging of the asset base over the five-year period ending December 31, 2015. While the company expanded its gross asset holdings significantly in the early years of the period, the subsequent rise in the average age ratio suggests a shift toward a more mature asset profile and a potential slowdown in capital reinvestment relative to asset depreciation.
- Gross Property, Plant, and Equipment Trends
- A period of expansion is evident from 2011 to 2014, with gross assets increasing from US$ 3,660 million to a peak of US$ 5,405 million. However, this growth trend reversed in 2015, with gross assets declining to US$ 5,276 million, indicating either the disposal of assets or a reduction in new capital expenditures.
- Accumulated Depreciation Analysis
- Accumulated depreciation exhibited a consistent and uninterrupted upward trajectory throughout the entire period. Starting at US$ 1,215 million in 2011, the figure rose to US$ 2,152 million by 2015. This steady increase reflects the ongoing systemic allocation of asset costs over their useful lives.
- Average Age Ratio Interpretation
- The average age ratio increased from 33.20% in 2011 to 40.79% in 2015. While the ratio remained relatively stable between 2012 and 2013, it accelerated sharply in 2014 and 2015. The spike to 40.79% in the final year is particularly significant as it coincides with the first observed decline in gross property, plant, and equipment, signifying that the asset base is aging more rapidly than it is being replaced.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = Property, plant and equipment, gross ÷ Depreciation expense
= 5,276 ÷ 391 = 13
An analysis of the fixed asset base from 2011 to 2015 reveals a period of aggressive capital expansion followed by a moderate contraction. The overall growth in gross property, plant, and equipment suggests significant investment during the early part of the period, which is mirrored by a corresponding increase in annual depreciation charges.
- Gross Property, Plant and Equipment Trends
- Gross asset values increased steadily from US$ 3,660 million in 2011 to a peak of US$ 5,405 million in 2014. This represents a substantial expansion of the asset base over a three-year period. A slight reversal occurred in 2015, with the balance decreasing to US$ 5,276 million.
- Depreciation Expense Correlation
- Depreciation expenses followed a trajectory closely aligned with the asset base, rising from US$ 279 million in 2011 to a peak of US$ 413 million in 2014. The subsequent decrease to US$ 391 million in 2015 correlates with the reduction in gross property, plant, and equipment, indicating a consistent application of depreciation relative to the volume of assets held.
- Stability of Estimated Useful Life
- The estimated total useful life of assets remained predominantly stable at 13 years. A temporary increase to 14 years was observed in 2012, but the metric returned to 13 years in 2013 and remained constant through 2015. This consistency suggests a stable accounting estimation regarding the longevity of capital assets despite the fluctuations in the total asset value.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 2,152 ÷ 391 = 6
The financial data indicates a consistent increase in the aging and cumulative wear of property, plant, and equipment between 2011 and 2015. Accumulated depreciation grew steadily throughout the period, while the average time elapsed since purchase trended upward, signaling an overall aging of the asset base.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- Accumulated depreciation rose from US$ 1,215 million in 2011 to US$ 2,152 million by 2015. This continuous growth reflects the ongoing allocation of costs over the useful lives of the assets, representing a total increase of approximately 77% over the five-year period.
- Depreciation Expense Patterns
- Annual depreciation expenses exhibited an upward trajectory from 2011 to 2014, peaking at US$ 413 million. A slight contraction to US$ 391 million occurred in 2015, suggesting a period of asset expansion followed by a reduction in the rate of new capital investment or the full depreciation of certain asset groups.
- Asset Age and Lifecycle Analysis
- The estimated time elapsed since purchase increased from 4 years in 2011 to 6 years in 2015. The average age remained stable at 5 years between 2012 and 2014, indicating a balanced cycle of asset replacement. However, the increase to 6 years by the end of 2015 suggests a shift toward a more mature asset portfolio, where the aging of existing equipment outweighed the impact of new acquisitions.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = Property, plant and equipment, net ÷ Depreciation expense
= 3,124 ÷ 391 = 8
Between 2011 and 2015, the net value of property, plant, and equipment (PPE) underwent a period of expansion followed by a moderate contraction. The asset base grew steadily from 2011, reaching a peak in 2013 before declining over the subsequent two years. This movement in total assets is mirrored by the trend in depreciation expenses, which generally rose in alignment with the increasing investment in PPE.
- Asset Base Volatility
- Net property, plant, and equipment increased from $2,445 million in 2011 to $3,408 million in 2013, representing a growth of approximately 39%. Following this peak, a downward trend was observed, with values falling to $3,362 million in 2014 and further to $3,124 million by the end of 2015.
- Depreciation Expense Trends
- Depreciation expenses grew consistently from $279 million in 2011 to a peak of $413 million in 2014. The increase in expenses through 2014 occurred even as the net PPE began to decline slightly in the final year of the growth cycle, suggesting a possible acceleration in the rate of depreciation.
- Estimated Remaining Life Adjustments
- The estimated remaining life of assets remained constant at 9 years from 2011 to 2013. However, a reduction to 8 years was recorded in 2014 and maintained through 2015. This downward revision in estimated life correlates with the peak in depreciation expenses observed in 2014, as a shorter remaining life necessitates higher annual depreciation charges to fully amortize the asset value.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?