Profitability ratios measure the company ability to generate profitable sales from its resources (assets).
Profitability Ratios (Summary)
Return on Sales
Return on Investment
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
The profitability profile of the organization between 2011 and 2015 is characterized by a period of moderate volatility followed by a severe contraction in all key metrics during the final year of the analyzed period.
- Profit Margin Trends
- Gross profit margins exhibited a general downward trajectory, declining from 30.68% in 2011 to 20.76% by 2015, despite a temporary recovery to 27.09% in 2014. A more pronounced deterioration is observed in the operating and net profit margins. The operating profit margin, which began at 20.04% in 2011, fell to -2.64% in 2015. Similarly, the net profit margin decreased from 13.60% in 2011 to -5.21% in 2015, signaling a transition from consistent profitability to net losses.
- Investment Return Performance
- Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Assets (ROA) remained relatively stable from 2011 through 2014. ROE fluctuated within a range of 10.47% to 12.31%, while ROA remained between 6.68% and 7.91%. However, 2015 saw a sharp reversal for both metrics, with ROE dropping to -4.69% and ROA falling to -2.88%, directly correlating with the collapse in net margins.
The synchronized decline across all profitability ratios in 2015 indicates a systemic impact on the financial performance. The simultaneous shift to negative values in operating margin, net margin, ROE, and ROA suggests that the cost structure exceeded revenue generation, resulting in a comprehensive loss of profitability across all levels of the income statement.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Gross Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Gross profit | 3,063) | 5,809) | 5,489) | 5,339) | 4,497) | |
| Revenue | 14,757) | 21,440) | 22,869) | 20,041) | 14,658) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| Gross profit margin1 | 20.76% | 27.09% | 24.00% | 26.64% | 30.68% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Gross Profit Margin, Competitors2 | ||||||
| SLB N.V. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 2015 Calculation
Gross profit margin = 100 × Gross profit ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 3,063 ÷ 14,757 = 20.76%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2011 through 2015 indicates a period of initial scaling followed by a severe contraction in both top-line revenue and profitability. Although absolute gross profit increased for the first four years of the period, the efficiency of generating that profit declined over time, culminating in a sharp downturn in the final year.
- Revenue and Gross Profit Trends
- Revenue experienced substantial growth between 2011 and 2013, rising from 14,658 million US$ to a peak of 22,869 million US$. Gross profit followed a similar upward trajectory during this window, peaking in 2014 at 5,809 million US$. However, 2015 marked a critical reversal, with revenue falling to 14,757 million US$ and gross profit dropping precipitously to 3,063 million US$, effectively erasing several years of growth.
- Gross Profit Margin Fluctuations
- The gross profit margin demonstrates a general downward trend with a brief recovery in 2014. The margin began at 30.68% in 2011 and declined steadily to 24.00% by 2013, suggesting that the cost of sales increased at a faster rate than revenue during the expansion phase. A temporary recovery to 27.09% was observed in 2014, despite a slight decrease in total revenue, indicating improved cost management or a more favorable product mix. This recovery was short-lived, as the margin fell to its period low of 20.76% in 2015.
- Analysis of Operational Efficiency
- An inverse relationship is observed between revenue growth and margin percentage between 2011 and 2013, where increasing scale did not translate into maintained profitability ratios. The volatility concludes with a synchronized collapse in 2015, where the sharp decline in revenue coincided with the lowest recorded gross profit margin, signaling significant operational headwinds and a reduction in pricing power or an increase in production costs.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Operating profit (loss) | (390) | 3,613) | 3,423) | 3,557) | 2,937) | |
| Revenue | 14,757) | 21,440) | 22,869) | 20,041) | 14,658) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| Operating profit margin1 | -2.64% | 16.85% | 14.97% | 17.75% | 20.04% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Operating Profit Margin, Competitors2 | ||||||
| SLB N.V. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 2015 Calculation
Operating profit margin = 100 × Operating profit (loss) ÷ Revenue
= 100 × -390 ÷ 14,757 = -2.64%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2011 to 2015 is characterized by an initial period of revenue expansion and peak operational earnings, followed by a severe contraction that culminated in an operating loss.
- Revenue and Operating Profit Trends
- Revenue demonstrated strong growth between 2011 and 2013, rising from 14,658 million US dollars to a peak of 22,869 million US dollars. Operating profit followed a generally positive trajectory during this period, reaching its highest point of 3,613 million US dollars in 2014. However, this trend reversed sharply in 2015, as revenue declined to 14,757 million US dollars and operating profit fell into negative territory, recording a loss of 390 million US dollars.
- Operating Profit Margin Analysis
- The operating profit margin exhibited a consistent decline during the growth phase, dropping from 20.04% in 2011 to 14.97% in 2013, suggesting that operating expenses grew at a faster rate than revenue. A brief recovery occurred in 2014, with the margin increasing to 16.85%. This recovery was short-lived, as the margin collapsed to -2.64% in 2015, reflecting a total erosion of operational profitability and a failure to maintain a positive spread between revenue and operating costs.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Net Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to Company | (769) | 2,502) | 2,327) | 2,491) | 1,994) | |
| Revenue | 14,757) | 21,440) | 22,869) | 20,041) | 14,658) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| Net profit margin1 | -5.21% | 11.67% | 10.18% | 12.43% | 13.60% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Net Profit Margin, Competitors2 | ||||||
| SLB N.V. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 2015 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to Company ÷ Revenue
= 100 × -769 ÷ 14,757 = -5.21%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2011 to 2015 is characterized by an initial phase of revenue expansion and stable profitability, followed by a severe contraction in both top-line and bottom-line results by the end of the period.
- Revenue Trajectory
- Revenue exhibited a strong upward trend between 2011 and 2013, increasing from 14,658 million US$ to a peak of 22,869 million US$. This growth reversed in 2014 and accelerated downward in 2015, with revenue falling to 14,757 million US$, effectively returning to 2011 levels.
- Net Income Performance
- Net income remained positive and grew overall between 2011 and 2014, reaching a high of 2,502 million US$ in 2014. A significant reversal is observed in 2015, as the company transitioned from a substantial profit to a net loss of 769 million US$, marking a sharp decline in earnings capacity.
- Net Profit Margin Analysis
- The net profit margin demonstrated a gradual decline during the period of revenue growth, dropping from 13.60% in 2011 to 10.18% in 2013, suggesting that expenses grew at a faster pace than sales. Despite a marginal recovery to 11.67% in 2014, the margin collapsed to -5.21% in 2015, reflecting a total erosion of profitability and a shift to negative returns on sales.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Return on Equity (ROE)
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to Company | (769) | 2,502) | 2,327) | 2,491) | 1,994) | |
| Total Company stockholders’ equity | 16,383) | 20,692) | 22,230) | 20,239) | 17,619) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| ROE1 | -4.69% | 12.09% | 10.47% | 12.31% | 11.32% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROE, Competitors2 | ||||||
| SLB N.V. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 2015 Calculation
ROE = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to Company ÷ Total Company stockholders’ equity
= 100 × -769 ÷ 16,383 = -4.69%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2011 to 2015 is characterized by a period of stable profitability and equity growth followed by a sharp contraction in the final year. While the company maintained consistent returns for the majority of the period, a significant shift in net income in 2015 led to a negative return on equity.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
- Between 2011 and 2014, ROE remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a range of 10.47% to 12.31%. A peak was observed in 2012 at 12.31%, followed by a slight dip in 2013 and a recovery to 12.09% in 2014. This stability was abruptly interrupted in 2015, when ROE plummeted to -4.69%, indicating a total reversal in the company's ability to generate a positive return for its shareholders.
- Net Income Trends
- Net income showed resilience and growth for four consecutive years, increasing from US$ 1,994 million in 2011 to a peak of US$ 2,502 million in 2014. However, the 2015 fiscal year saw a dramatic decline, resulting in a net loss of US$ 769 million. This transition from significant profit to a net loss is the primary driver behind the collapse of the ROE in the final year of the analysis.
- Stockholders' Equity Movements
- Total stockholders' equity experienced an upward trajectory from 2011 to 2013, rising from US$ 17,619 million to a peak of US$ 22,230 million. A downward trend commenced in 2014, with equity falling to US$ 20,692 million, and accelerating in 2015 to US$ 16,383 million. The reduction in equity during the final two years, particularly the sharp drop in 2015, aligns with the reported net loss and suggests a depletion of retained earnings.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Return on Assets (ROA)
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to Company | (769) | 2,502) | 2,327) | 2,491) | 1,994) | |
| Total assets | 26,725) | 33,562) | 34,812) | 31,484) | 25,515) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| ROA1 | -2.88% | 7.45% | 6.68% | 7.91% | 7.82% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROA, Competitors2 | ||||||
| SLB N.V. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 2015 Calculation
ROA = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to Company ÷ Total assets
= 100 × -769 ÷ 26,725 = -2.88%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The profitability trajectory between 2011 and 2015 is characterized by a period of stability and growth followed by a sharp downturn in the final year. The efficiency of asset utilization remained relatively consistent for the first four years before experiencing a significant collapse.
- Net Income Performance
- Earnings remained positive and robust from 2011 through 2014, with net income increasing from 1,994 million US dollars to a peak of 2,502 million US dollars. This trend was abruptly reversed in 2015, when the company reported a net loss of 769 million US dollars.
- Asset Base Fluctuations
- Total assets exhibited an upward trend in the early part of the period, rising from 25,515 million US dollars in 2011 to a maximum of 34,812 million US dollars in 2013. A subsequent contraction occurred, with assets decreasing to 26,725 million US dollars by December 31, 2015.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Interpretation
- The ROA demonstrated stability between 2011 and 2014, fluctuating within a narrow band between 6.68% and 7.91%. This suggests a consistent ability to generate profit relative to the investment in assets during this window. In 2015, the ROA dropped to -2.88%, reflecting the combined impact of the net loss and the reduction in the total asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?