AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Edwards Lifesciences Corp. (NYSE:EW)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 14, 2022.

Analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment

Microsoft Excel

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure

Edwards Lifesciences Corp., balance sheet: property, plant and equipment

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Land 116,500 97,600 98,000 90,700 39,100
Buildings and leasehold improvements 1,010,100 881,500 619,800 497,400 436,800
Machinery and equipment 613,400 564,900 466,300 432,400 393,400
Equipment with customers 39,200 42,200 35,600 41,100 41,000
Software 88,200 94,200 87,900 92,400 93,400
Construction in progress 333,800 313,300 265,000 168,800 88,200
Property, plant, and equipment, cost 2,201,200 1,993,700 1,572,600 1,322,800 1,091,900
Accumulated depreciation (654,600) (598,500) (512,300) (455,300) (412,200)
Property, plant, and equipment, net 1,546,600 1,395,200 1,060,300 867,500 679,700

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


A significant expansion in the fixed asset base is observed between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a substantial increase in both gross and net property, plant, and equipment. The total cost of these assets grew from 1,091.9 million US dollars to 2,201.2 million US dollars, indicating an aggressive investment strategy in physical infrastructure and production capacity.

Infrastructure and Real Estate Growth
The most pronounced increases occurred within land and buildings. Land holdings rose from 39.1 million US dollars in 2017 to 116.5 million US dollars in 2021. Concurrently, investments in buildings and leasehold improvements more than doubled, increasing from 436.8 million US dollars to 1,010.1 million US dollars over the same period.
Operational Equipment and Software
Machinery and equipment exhibited steady growth, rising from 393.4 million US dollars to 613.4 million US dollars. In contrast, software assets and equipment with customers remained relatively flat, with software ending the period at 88.2 million US dollars and customer equipment at 39.2 million US dollars, suggesting that capital expenditure was prioritized toward facilities and production hardware rather than digital infrastructure or customer-site installations.
Future Capacity Indicators
A strong upward trend is noted in construction in progress, which grew from 88.2 million US dollars in 2017 to 333.8 million US dollars in 2021. This continuous increase indicates a pipeline of ongoing capital projects that have yet to be placed into service.
Net Asset Valuation and Depreciation
Net property, plant, and equipment increased from 679.7 million US dollars to 1,546.6 million US dollars. While accumulated depreciation rose from 412.2 million US dollars to 654.6 million US dollars, the growth in gross asset cost significantly outpaced the accumulation of depreciation, reflecting a young asset base resulting from recent heavy investments.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Asset Age Ratios (Summary)

Edwards Lifesciences Corp., asset age ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Average age ratio 31.40% 31.56% 34.74% 36.95% 39.15%
Estimated total useful life (years) 16 19 17 16 14
Estimated age, time elapsed since purchase (years) 5 6 6 6 6
Estimated remaining life (years) 11 13 11 10 9

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


An analysis of the asset age ratios indicates a consistent trend toward a younger property, plant, and equipment base between 2017 and 2021. The overall trajectory suggests a strategic rejuvenation of assets through new acquisitions and adjustments to depreciation estimates.

Average Age Ratio
A steady downward trend is observed in the average age ratio, which declined from 39.15% in 2017 to 31.40% by 2021. This consistent reduction suggests that the asset base is becoming relatively newer, as the accumulated depreciation represents a smaller percentage of the total asset cost over time.
Estimated Total and Remaining Useful Life
The estimated total useful life showed a progressive increase from 14 years in 2017 to a peak of 19 years in 2020, before declining to 16 years in 2021. Correspondingly, the estimated remaining life increased from 9 years in 2017 to 13 years in 2020, prior to a reduction to 11 years in 2021. These fluctuations indicate changes in the accounting assumptions regarding the operational longevity of the assets.
Estimated Asset Age
The estimated time elapsed since purchase remained stagnant at 6 years from 2017 through 2020. However, a decrease to 5 years was recorded in 2021, signaling a significant influx of new capital expenditures or the disposal of older assets, which contributed to the overall reduction in the average age ratio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Average Age

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Accumulated depreciation 654,600 598,500 512,300 455,300 412,200
Property, plant, and equipment, cost 2,201,200 1,993,700 1,572,600 1,322,800 1,091,900
Land 116,500 97,600 98,000 90,700 39,100
Asset Age Ratio
Average age1 31.40% 31.56% 34.74% 36.95% 39.15%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

2021 Calculations

1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Property, plant, and equipment, cost – Land)
= 100 × 654,600 ÷ (2,201,200 – 116,500) = 31.40%


A consistent expansion of the asset base is evident between 2017 and 2021, characterized by significant capital investment and a strategic modernization of property, plant, and equipment. The growth in gross asset cost has outpaced the accumulation of depreciation, resulting in a systemic reduction in the average age of the company's productive assets.

Capital Investment and Asset Growth
The total cost of property, plant, and equipment exhibited a strong upward trajectory, increasing from 1,091,900 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 2,201,200 thousand US dollars by 2021. This represents more than a doubling of the gross asset base over the five-year period, indicating aggressive investment in infrastructure and operational capacity.
Average Age and Asset Modernization
A steady decline in the average age ratio is observed, falling from 39.15% in 2017 to 31.40% in 2021. This downward trend signifies that the acquisition of new assets is occurring at a faster rate than the depreciation of existing ones. The continuous decrease suggests a strategy of upgrading facilities and equipment, which typically enhances operational efficiency and reduces the risk of technological obsolescence.
Depreciation Analysis
Accumulated depreciation rose from 412,200 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 654,600 thousand US dollars in 2021. While the absolute value of depreciation increased as expected, the ratio of accumulated depreciation to total asset cost decreased. This inverse relationship confirms that the asset portfolio is becoming younger on average, as new, undepreciated capital expenditures are being integrated into the balance sheet.
Land Holdings
Land assets showed a general increase, rising from 39,100 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 116,500 thousand US dollars in 2021. Although land does not depreciate and therefore does not impact the average age ratio, the growth in this category supports the broader trend of physical expansion and infrastructure development.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Total Useful Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Property, plant, and equipment, cost 2,201,200 1,993,700 1,572,600 1,322,800 1,091,900
Land 116,500 97,600 98,000 90,700 39,100
Depreciation expense for property, plant, and equipment 127,000 101,800 84,700 74,900 74,100
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated total useful life1 16 19 17 16 14

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

2021 Calculations

1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant, and equipment, cost – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense for property, plant, and equipment
= (2,201,200 – 116,500) ÷ 127,000 = 16


Between 2017 and 2021, there was a significant and consistent expansion in the company's asset base. Total property, plant, and equipment cost grew from 1.09 billion US dollars to 2.20 billion US dollars, representing a more than twofold increase over the five-year period. This growth is mirrored in land holdings, which increased from 39.1 million US dollars to 116.5 million US dollars, indicating a strategic expansion of physical infrastructure.

Asset Growth and Depreciation Correlation
Depreciation expense exhibited a steady upward trajectory, rising from 74.1 million US dollars in 2017 to 127.0 million US dollars in 2021. While total asset costs increased by approximately 101% over the period, depreciation expenses grew by approximately 71%, suggesting that the growth in the asset base was not linearly offset by immediate increases in periodic depreciation charges.
Estimated Total Useful Life Trends
The estimated total useful life of assets showed a period of steady extension followed by a sharp correction. From 2017 to 2020, the estimated life increased progressively from 14 years to 19 years. This trend generally suggests a shift toward longer-lived assets or a revision in accounting estimates that effectively reduced the annual depreciation burden relative to the total asset value.
Impact of Useful Life Revisions in 2021
In 2021, the estimated total useful life decreased from 19 years to 16 years. This reduction coincides with the most significant single-year increase in depreciation expense, which jumped from 101.8 million US dollars to 127.0 million US dollars. The downward revision of useful life accelerated the depreciation rate, thereby increasing the impact on the income statement during the final year of the analyzed period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Accumulated depreciation 654,600 598,500 512,300 455,300 412,200
Depreciation expense for property, plant, and equipment 127,000 101,800 84,700 74,900 74,100
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Time elapsed since purchase1 5 6 6 6 6

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

2021 Calculations

1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense for property, plant, and equipment
= 654,600 ÷ 127,000 = 5


The financial data indicates a consistent expansion of the asset base and a strategic shift in capital investment toward the end of the observed period. A steady increase in both accumulated depreciation and annual depreciation expenses is evident from 2017 through 2021, suggesting a growing volume of property, plant, and equipment (PP&E).

Accumulated Depreciation Trends
Accumulated depreciation grew steadily from US$ 412.2 million in 2017 to US$ 654.6 million by 2021. This continuous upward trajectory reflects the ongoing systematic allocation of the cost of tangible assets over their useful lives and indicates that the company has maintained a substantial capital asset base throughout the five-year period.
Depreciation Expense Growth
Annual depreciation expenses exhibited an accelerating growth pattern. While the increase between 2017 and 2018 was marginal, the expense rose more sharply from 2019 (US$ 84.7 million) to 2021 (US$ 127.0 million). The significant jump in the final two years suggests the integration of new, high-value assets into the operational framework, which increased the annual non-cash charges to earnings.
Asset Age and Investment Cycle
The time elapsed since purchase remained stagnant at six years from 2017 through 2020, implying a period of relative stability or maintenance of existing assets without major disruptive acquisitions. However, a decrease to five years in 2021 signifies a meaningful infusion of new capital expenditures. This reduction in the average age of assets, coinciding with the peak in depreciation expense, confirms a transition toward a more modern asset portfolio.

In summary, the convergence of rising depreciation expenses and a decreasing average asset age in 2021 points to a significant capital investment cycle. This indicates that the company has recently modernized or expanded its production and operational capacity, effectively lowering the overall age of its property, plant, and equipment.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Estimated Remaining Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Property, plant, and equipment, net 1,546,600 1,395,200 1,060,300 867,500 679,700
Land 116,500 97,600 98,000 90,700 39,100
Depreciation expense for property, plant, and equipment 127,000 101,800 84,700 74,900 74,100
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated remaining life1 11 13 11 10 9

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

2021 Calculations

1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant, and equipment, net – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense for property, plant, and equipment
= (1,546,600 – 116,500) ÷ 127,000 = 11


A consistent upward trajectory is observed in the net value of property, plant, and equipment from 2017 to 2021, indicating a period of sustained capital expansion. The net asset base grew from 679.7 million US dollars to 1.547 billion US dollars, representing a significant increase in the company's physical infrastructure over the five-year period.

Net Property, Plant, and Equipment Growth
The net book value of assets experienced uninterrupted year-over-year growth, with the most pronounced increase occurring between 2019 and 2020, where the value rose by approximately 31.5%. This suggests a strategic acceleration of capital expenditures during that period.
Depreciation Expense Trends
Depreciation expenses followed a similar growth pattern, rising from 74.1 million US dollars in 2017 to 127.0 million US dollars in 2021. The steady increase in annual depreciation is commensurate with the expansion of the depreciable asset base.
Estimated Remaining Life Fluctuations
The estimated remaining useful life of the assets showed a general increase from 9 years in 2017 to a peak of 13 years in 2020, before moderating to 11 years in 2021. The expansion of the remaining life through 2020 typically indicates the acquisition of newer assets with longer useful lives or a revision in accounting estimates regarding asset longevity. The decrease to 11 years in 2021 suggests a shift in the composition of the asset portfolio or a conservative adjustment in life expectancy estimates.
Land Asset Acquisition
Land holdings grew from 39.1 million US dollars in 2017 to 116.5 million US dollars in 2021. A substantial jump occurred between 2017 and 2018, nearly doubling the land value, which suggests significant early-stage investment in real estate to support operational growth.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?