Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The total value of goodwill and other intangible assets remained relatively stable over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021, although a slight overall contraction is observed. The total carrying value decreased from 1.59 billion US dollars in 2017 to 1.49 billion US dollars by the end of 2021, with goodwill acting as the primary driver of the overall balance.
- Goodwill Trends
- Goodwill exhibited minimal volatility, maintaining a range between 1.11 billion and 1.17 billion US dollars. The consistency of these figures suggests that there were no major acquisitions resulting in significant new goodwill nor any substantial impairment charges recognized during this timeframe.
- Finite-Lived Intangible Assets
- A downward trend is observed in the net carrying value of finite-lived intangible assets, which fell from 152.7 million US dollars in 2017 to 105.5 million US dollars in 2021. This decline is primarily attributed to a steady increase in accumulated amortization, which rose from 227.9 million US dollars to 246.5 million US dollars over the period.
- Indefinite-Lived Intangibles and In-Process R&D
- Both indefinite-lived intangible assets and in-process research and development showed an identical downward trajectory. These values decreased from 315.3 million US dollars in 2017 to 218.1 million US dollars by 2019, remaining stagnant at that level through 2021.
- Developed Technology and Patents
- Patent values remained remarkably stagnant, hovering around 186 million US dollars. In contrast, developed technology experienced a notable decline in 2018, dropping to 119.8 million US dollars from a 2017 high of 190.8 million US dollars, before recovering to 153.9 million US dollars by 2021.
The overall composition of intangible assets indicates a shift toward a smaller net balance of finite-lived assets due to amortization, while the long-term components of goodwill and indefinite-lived assets have largely stabilized after adjustments occurring between 2017 and 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
A longitudinal analysis of the financial position from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent growth trajectory in both reported and adjusted asset and equity values, following a marginal contraction in 2018. The removal of goodwill and intangible assets provides a conservative assessment of the company's tangible financial base, highlighting the underlying growth of physical and liquid assets.
- Impact of Intangible Asset Removal on Total Assets
- The variance between reported total assets and adjusted total assets remained remarkably stable over the five-year period, fluctuating minimally between US$ 1.1 billion and US$ 1.2 billion. While reported assets grew from US$ 5.69 billion in 2017 to US$ 8.50 billion in 2021, the consistent size of the adjustment suggests that the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets did not undergo significant impairment or substantial expansion through new acquisitions during this window.
- Adjustments to Stockholders' Equity
- Reported stockholders' equity exhibited a strong upward trend, increasing from US$ 2.96 billion in 2017 to US$ 5.84 billion in 2021. The adjusted stockholders' equity, which excludes intangible assets, followed a similar growth pattern, rising from US$ 1.83 billion to US$ 4.67 billion. The stability of the deduction amount—approximately US$ 1.17 billion from 2019 through 2021—indicates that the growth in equity is primarily driven by operational performance and retained earnings rather than the inflation of intangible asset values.
- Analysis of Tangible Financial Strength
- A significant improvement in the ratio of adjusted equity to adjusted assets is observed. In 2017, adjusted equity represented approximately 40% of adjusted assets. By 2021, this proportion increased to approximately 64%. This trend signifies a substantial increase in tangible net worth and a strengthening of the company's solvency profile, as a larger share of the tangible asset base is funded by equity rather than liabilities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of financial ratios between 2017 and 2021 indicates a significant and consistent divergence between reported figures and adjusted figures following the removal of goodwill and intangible assets. The removal of these non-operating assets systematically enhances efficiency and profitability metrics while increasing the observed financial leverage, suggesting that a substantial portion of the total asset base is composed of intangible valuations.
- Asset Efficiency and Turnover
- A persistent positive variance is observed in total asset turnover. The adjusted ratio remains consistently higher than the reported ratio across all five years, peaking in 2018 at 0.88 compared to the reported 0.70. This indicates that the core tangible assets are generating sales more efficiently than the consolidated asset base suggests, as the reported figure is diluted by the presence of goodwill.
- Financial Leverage and Capital Structure
- Adjusted financial leverage is consistently higher than reported leverage, though both metrics exhibit a clear downward trend from 2017 to 2021. Reported leverage decreased from 1.93 to 1.46, while adjusted leverage fell more sharply from 2.50 to 1.57. The higher adjusted values demonstrate that without the cushion of intangible assets, the company's reliance on debt relative to its tangible equity base is more pronounced, although the overall risk profile improved over the period.
- Profitability and Returns
- Both Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Assets (ROA) show marked improvements when adjusted for goodwill. The adjusted ROE is substantially higher than the reported ROE in every period, notably reaching 35.61% in 2018 against a reported 23.00%. Similarly, adjusted ROA consistently outperforms reported ROA, growing from 12.77% in 2017 to 20.49% in 2021. This suggests that the company's actual earning power on its operational assets is significantly higher than the reported figures indicate, as the reported returns are suppressed by the large carrying value of intangible assets.
- Comparative Trend Analysis
- A common volatility pattern is observed in both reported and adjusted metrics, particularly the dip in performance during 2020 followed by a recovery in 2021. The consistent gap between reported and adjusted ratios confirms that the impact of goodwill is stable and material, effectively masking the higher underlying efficiency and profitability of the company's tangible asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Total assets
= 5,232,500 ÷ 8,502,600 = 0.62
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 5,232,500 ÷ 7,334,700 = 0.71
Between 2017 and 2021, the organization experienced a significant expansion of its asset base. Following a marginal decrease in 2018, reported total assets rose from 5.32 billion US dollars to 8.50 billion US dollars by the end of 2021. Adjusted total assets mirrored this growth, increasing from 4.21 billion US dollars in 2018 to 7.33 billion US dollars in 2021.
- Impact of Intangible Assets on Valuation
- A persistent gap between reported and adjusted total assets is evident, confirming the substantial influence of goodwill and intangible assets on the balance sheet. The difference between these two metrics widened over time, reaching approximately 1.17 billion US dollars in 2021.
- Analysis of Asset Turnover Efficiency
- The adjusted total asset turnover consistently outperforms the reported total asset turnover across all periods. This disparity demonstrates that the company generates higher revenue relative to its tangible and operational assets than it does relative to its total asset base, which includes intangibles.
- Trend Observations in Turnover Ratios
- Both reported and adjusted turnover ratios peaked in 2018, at 0.70 and 0.88 respectively. Subsequently, a downward trend is observed in the adjusted total asset turnover, which declined steadily from 0.82 in 2019 to 0.71 in 2021.
The divergence between the growing adjusted asset base and the declining adjusted asset turnover suggests a decrease in the efficiency of capital utilization over the latter part of the period. While the operational asset base has expanded, the rate at which these assets generate revenue has diminished since the 2018 peak.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 8,502,600 ÷ 5,835,900 = 1.46
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 7,334,700 ÷ 4,668,000 = 1.57
A consistent growth trajectory is observed in both reported and adjusted total assets and stockholders' equity between 2017 and 2021. Reported total assets increased from US$ 5.69 billion to US$ 8.50 billion, while adjusted total assets rose from US$ 4.57 billion to US$ 7.33 billion over the same period. Similarly, adjusted stockholders' equity grew from US$ 1.83 billion in 2017 to US$ 4.67 billion in 2021, reflecting a substantial expansion of the tangible equity base.
- Impact of Intangible Assets on Valuation
- A persistent gap exists between reported and adjusted figures for both assets and equity, signifying a significant presence of goodwill and intangible assets. The adjustment process reveals that a considerable portion of the reported balance sheet is comprised of non-tangible valuations, which reduces the equity base when excluded.
- Reported Financial Leverage Trends
- Reported financial leverage demonstrates a general downward trend, decreasing from 1.93 in 2017 to 1.46 in 2021. This movement indicates a systematic reduction in the ratio of total assets to stockholders' equity, suggesting a strengthening of the overall solvency position.
- Adjusted Financial Leverage Trends
- Adjusted financial leverage, which excludes the influence of goodwill and intangibles, shows a more aggressive decline, falling from 2.50 in 2017 to 1.57 in 2021. The fact that adjusted leverage remains higher than reported leverage confirms that intangible assets artificially lower the perceived risk by inflating the equity denominator.
A notable convergence is observed between reported and adjusted financial leverage over the five-year period. The variance between the two ratios narrowed from 0.57 in 2017 to 0.11 in 2021. This convergence suggests that the company's financial structure has evolved such that the relative impact of intangible assets on its leverage profile has diminished, resulting in a more transparent and tangible equity-to-asset relationship.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 1,503,100 ÷ 5,835,900 = 25.76%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Net income ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 1,503,100 ÷ 4,668,000 = 32.20%
The financial performance between 2017 and 2021 demonstrates a consistent expansion of the equity base alongside a significant variance between reported and adjusted return on equity (ROE) metrics. This variance indicates a substantial presence of goodwill and intangible assets that dilute reported profitability relative to tangible equity.
- Equity Base Expansion
- Reported stockholders' equity grew from 2,956,200 thousand US$ in 2017 to 5,835,900 thousand US$ by 2021. During the same period, adjusted stockholders' equity increased from 1,829,700 thousand US$ to 4,668,000 thousand US$. The persistent gap between these two figures suggests a stable volume of intangible assets across the five-year period, which reduces the denominator when calculating adjusted returns.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Divergence
- Adjusted ROE consistently outperformed reported ROE throughout the analyzed timeframe. In 2017, the adjusted ROE was 31.90% compared to a reported 19.74%. Both metrics followed a similar trajectory, peaking in 2019 before experiencing a synchronized decline in 2020, where reported ROE fell to 18.00% and adjusted ROE fell to 24.21%. By 2021, both metrics rebounded, with reported ROE reaching 25.76% and adjusted ROE reaching 32.20%.
- Analysis of the Adjustment Impact
- The adjustment for goodwill and intangible assets reveals a higher underlying efficiency in capital utilization. The spread between the two ROE metrics was most pronounced between 2017 and 2019, with adjusted figures exceeding reported figures by approximately 10 to 13 percentage points. Although this spread narrowed in 2020 and 2021, the adjusted ROE continues to provide a more elevated view of performance by focusing on tangible net assets.
The overall trend indicates a scaling operation with steady equity growth. The systematic difference between reported and adjusted ROE highlights that the inclusion of intangible assets serves to moderate the perceived return on equity, while the adjusted metric emphasizes the returns generated specifically from the tangible asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 1,503,100 ÷ 8,502,600 = 17.68%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Net income ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 1,503,100 ÷ 7,334,700 = 20.49%
An examination of the financial metrics from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent divergence between reported and adjusted figures, primarily driven by the exclusion of goodwill and intangible assets from the adjusted asset base. While total assets experienced a brief decline in 2018, a strong growth trajectory was established from 2019 through 2021, with reported total assets increasing from US$ 5.32 billion to US$ 8.50 billion over that period.
- Asset Base Analysis
- A persistent gap exists between reported and adjusted total assets. Adjusted total assets remained consistently lower than reported assets, indicating a significant portion of the balance sheet is comprised of intangible assets and goodwill. This gap remained relatively stable in proportion, with adjusted assets representing approximately 85% to 86% of reported assets throughout the five-year period.
- Reported vs. Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
- The adjusted ROA consistently outperformed the reported ROA in every year of the analyzed period. In 2017, the adjusted ROA was 12.77% compared to a reported 10.25%. By 2021, this premium increased, with adjusted ROA reaching 20.49% against a reported 17.68%. This trend demonstrates that the presence of goodwill and intangible assets suppresses the reported efficiency of asset utilization.
- Performance Trends and Volatility
- Both ROA metrics exhibit a similar trajectory, characterized by growth from 2017 to 2019, a notable contraction in 2020, and a recovery to peak levels in 2021. The dip in 2020 affected both metrics, with reported ROA falling to 11.38% and adjusted ROA falling to 13.58%, before rebounding strongly in the following year.
- Operational Efficiency Insights
- The expansion of the adjusted ROA from 12.77% in 2017 to 20.49% in 2021 suggests a significant improvement in the company's ability to generate earnings from its tangible and operating asset base. The fact that adjusted ROA is systematically higher confirms that the assets generating the returns are more lean than the full reported balance sheet suggests.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?