Economic Value Added (EVA)
EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Edwards Lifesciences Corp. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Edwards Lifesciences Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
Edwards Lifesciences Corp., economic profit calculation
US$ in thousands
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The analysis of economic profit from 2017 to 2021 reveals a period of significant value creation characterized by a strong recovery and growth trajectory following a temporary downturn in 2020. While the cost of capital remained remarkably stable, the volatility in economic profit was primarily driven by fluctuations in net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT).
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- A general upward trend is observed in NOPAT, rising from 615,066 thousand US$ in 2017 to 1,468,252 thousand US$ in 2021. A notable contraction occurred in 2020, where NOPAT fell to 768,464 thousand US$, representing a decrease of approximately 26.8% from the previous year. However, a sharp rebound followed in 2021, with NOPAT nearly doubling from the 2020 levels, indicating a strong recovery in operational profitability.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital exhibited minimal variance over the five-year period, maintaining a tight range between 17.94% and 18.41%. This stability suggests a consistent risk profile and a steady weighted average cost of capital, providing a constant benchmark against which the company's investment performance was measured.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital grew steadily from 2,855,739 thousand US$ in 2017 to a peak of 3,937,900 thousand US$ in 2020. A slight reduction to 3,791,600 thousand US$ was noted in 2021. This pattern indicates a period of capital expansion followed by a shift toward capital optimization or a reduction in asset intensity.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit remained positive throughout the analyzed period, confirming that the company consistently generated returns in excess of its cost of capital. Economic profit grew from 102,831 thousand US$ in 2017 to 372,047 thousand US$ in 2019. A significant decline was recorded in 2020, dropping to 45,589 thousand US$, coinciding with the dip in NOPAT. The period culminated in a substantial surge in 2021, reaching 770,305 thousand US$, which represents the highest level of value creation in the sequence and highlights a significant increase in the spread between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Edwards Lifesciences Corp., NOPAT calculation
US$ in thousands
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
4 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
5 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
7 2021 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The financial data indicates variations and notable trends in profitability measures over the five-year period.
- Net Income
- Net income displayed an overall upward trend from 2017 through 2021. Starting at approximately 583.6 million US dollars in 2017, it increased to 722.2 million in 2018, followed by a significant rise to nearly 1.05 billion in 2019. Although there was a decline in 2020 to 823.4 million, the figure rebounded strongly in 2021, reaching a high of about 1.5 billion US dollars. This pattern suggests a robust profitability growth trajectory with a temporary setback in 2020.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT also showed a general upward pattern in line with net income, beginning at approximately 615.1 million US dollars in 2017 and increasing to 704.3 million in 2018. It then rose sharply to about 1.05 billion in 2019 before declining to 768.5 million in 2020. Similar to net income, NOPAT recovered in 2021, reaching approximately 1.47 billion US dollars. The fluctuations in NOPAT largely mirror those in net income, indicating consistent operational profitability trends adjusted for taxes.
In summary, both net income and NOPAT experienced significant growth over the period, with a noticeable dip in 2020 likely influenced by external factors affecting profitability that year. The strong recovery in 2021 highlights resilience and an improved operating performance post-2020.
Cash Operating Taxes
Edwards Lifesciences Corp., cash operating taxes calculation
US$ in thousands
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
An analysis of the financial data over the five-year period reveals distinct trends in both income tax provision and cash operating taxes.
- Income Tax Provision
- The income tax provision shows significant fluctuation during the period. Initially, it starts at a relatively high value in 2017, then declines sharply in 2018. This is followed by an increase in 2019, a slight decrease in 2020, and a considerable rise again in 2021. Overall, the income tax provision does not establish a consistent upward or downward trend but rather exhibits volatility with a strong rebound in the final year observed.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes depict a generally increasing trend throughout the period. Starting from a moderate level in 2017, there is a considerable drop in 2018. Following this, a continuous rise is observed through 2019, 2020, and a significant increase in 2021. This pattern indicates growing cash tax outflows, especially pronounced in the latter years, suggesting either higher taxable income or changes in tax payment practices.
- Comparative Observations
- When comparing the two metrics, cash operating taxes remain consistently below income tax provisions in most years except for 2018 when cash operating taxes are notably higher. This divergence indicates potential differences in timing or recognition between the tax expense reported under accounting standards and the actual cash taxes paid. The growing gap in recent years could imply deferred tax liabilities or other tax-related timing differences.
Invested Capital
Edwards Lifesciences Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)
US$ in thousands
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
6 Subtraction of construction in progress.
7 Subtraction of marketable securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases demonstrate a significant decrease from 1,103,939 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 676,404 thousand US dollars in 2018. After this sharp reduction, the values remain relatively stable with slight fluctuations, recorded as 678,800 thousand in 2019, 694,900 thousand in 2020, and a minor decrease to 690,300 thousand in 2021. This indicates a strategic reduction in debt levels followed by maintenance of a consistent debt position over the subsequent years.
- Stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders' equity exhibits a consistent upward trend throughout the observed period. Beginning at 2,956,200 thousand US dollars in 2017, equity grows moderately to 3,140,400 thousand in 2018. Thereafter, a more pronounced increase is observed with figures reaching 4,148,300 thousand in 2019, 4,574,300 thousand in 2020, and a significant rise to 5,835,900 thousand in 2021. This steady increase suggests ongoing equity strengthening, potential reinvestment of earnings, or capital raising activities enhancing the financial base of the entity.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital shows an initial slight increase from 2,855,739 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 2,904,204 thousand in 2018, followed by a notable increase to 3,697,400 thousand in 2019 and further to 3,937,900 thousand in 2020. However, a decrease is evident in 2021, with invested capital reducing to 3,791,600 thousand. This pattern indicates growing investment in assets or operations until 2020, with a partial reduction or divestment in 2021, reflecting a possible shift in investment strategy or asset base optimization.
Cost of Capital
Edwards Lifesciences Corp., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
Edwards Lifesciences Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | ||||||
| Elevance Health Inc. | ||||||
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | ||||||
| Medtronic PLC | ||||||
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance concerning economic value generation exhibits significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a sharp contraction in 2020 followed by a substantial recovery in 2021.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit demonstrated steady growth from 2017 to 2019, rising from 102,831 thousand USD to 372,047 thousand USD. This growth trajectory was interrupted in 2020, where profit declined sharply to 45,589 thousand USD. A strong recovery occurred in 2021, with economic profit reaching a period high of 770,305 thousand USD, representing a significant increase over previous years.
- Invested Capital Analysis
- Invested capital showed a consistent upward trend for the majority of the period, increasing from 2,855,739 thousand USD in 2017 to a peak of 3,937,900 thousand USD in 2020. A slight reduction in the capital base was observed in 2021, with the figure adjusting to 3,791,600 thousand USD.
- Economic Spread Ratio Evaluation
- The economic spread ratio, which measures the efficiency of value creation relative to invested capital, mirrored the volatility of economic profit. The ratio improved from 3.60% in 2017 to 10.06% in 2019. A significant compression occurred in 2020, with the ratio falling to 1.16%. By 2021, the ratio expanded aggressively to 20.32%, indicating a substantial increase in the spread between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital.
The correlation between the economic spread ratio and economic profit suggests that the volatility in value creation was driven primarily by fluctuations in profitability rather than significant shifts in the capital base, as invested capital remained relatively stable compared to the swings in profit.
Economic Profit Margin
Edwards Lifesciences Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | ||||||
| Elevance Health Inc. | ||||||
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | ||||||
| Medtronic PLC | ||||||
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of economic value creation between 2017 and 2021 reveals a pattern of significant volatility coupled with an overall strong growth trajectory in value generation relative to sales.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit exhibited steady growth from 2017 to 2019, rising from 102.8 million to 372.0 million. A substantial contraction occurred in 2020, where value creation dropped to 45.6 million. However, 2021 saw a sharp recovery and expansion, with economic profit reaching a peak of 770.3 million.
- Net Sales Performance
- Revenue grew consistently over the five-year period, increasing from 3.4 billion in 2017 to 5.2 billion in 2021. Notably, sales remained stable in 2020 despite the decline in economic profit, indicating that the loss in economic value was not driven by a decrease in market demand or top-line revenue.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin followed a volatile path, starting at 2.99% in 2017 and climbing to 8.56% by 2019. The margin experienced a severe compression in 2020, falling to 1.04%. This was followed by a dramatic increase to 14.72% in 2021, marking the highest level of capital efficiency and value generation observed in the analyzed period.
The disparity between the stable net sales and the sharp decline in economic profit in 2020 suggests that the reduction in value was likely caused by an increase in the cost of capital or a temporary surge in operational expenses rather than a loss of revenue. The subsequent surge in 2021 indicates a successful optimization of capital usage and a significant improvement in the capacity to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital.