Paying user area
Try for free
EMC Corp. pages available for free this week:
- Cash Flow Statement
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to EMC Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
The financial data for property, plant, and equipment over the five-year period reflects consistent growth and ongoing investment in the company's operational assets. A detailed examination reveals several specific trends and notable developments.
- Furniture and Fixtures
- This category shows a steady increase from US$181 million in 2011 to US$283 million in 2015, representing an overall increase of approximately 56%. The gradual upward trend suggests continuous additions or upgrades to furniture and fixture assets over the period.
- Equipment and Software
- Equipment and software exhibit significant growth, rising from US$4,680 million in 2011 to US$7,378 million in 2015. This represents a 58% increase, indicating substantial investment in technological and operational equipment, which may reflect modernization or expansion initiatives.
- Buildings and Improvements
- Buildings and improvements increased steadily from US$1,748 million in 2011 to US$2,373 million in 2015, an increase of roughly 36%. The steady rise points to ongoing development or enhancement of physical infrastructure.
- Land
- Land values show modest growth, from US$118 million to US$171 million, equivalent to approximately 45% over the five years. This suggests incremental land acquisitions or revaluations.
- Building Construction in Progress
- The value of building construction in progress peaked at US$215 million in 2013, before declining to US$83 million by 2015. This indicates that significant construction projects were underway earlier in the period but largely completed or ceased by the end of 2015.
- Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross
- The gross property, plant, and equipment total increased consistently from US$6,873 million in 2011 to US$10,288 million in 2015, an increase of nearly 50%. This underlines ongoing capital expenditures and asset acquisition within the company.
- Accumulated Depreciation
- Accumulated depreciation steadily increased in magnitude (negative value representing accumulated charges) from -US$4,040 million in 2011 to -US$6,438 million in 2015. The continuous growth in accumulated depreciation aligns with asset aging and usage, reflecting normal wear and tear as well as systematic amortization of asset values.
- Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
- Net property, plant, and equipment, representing gross value less accumulated depreciation, shows steady growth but at a slower rate than gross assets. It increased from US$2,833 million to US$3,850 million, about a 36% increase over the period. This indicates that while new assets have been acquired or constructed, depreciation expense consistently offsets some of the asset base expansion.
Overall, the data suggests the company has actively invested in expanding and upgrading its fixed assets throughout the period under review, with substantial focus on equipment and software, as well as infrastructure development. The completion phase of major construction projects is also evident toward the end of the period. Depreciation trends are consistent with asset lifecycle expectations, supporting a balanced increase in net asset value.
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
The data reveals consistent trends regarding the average age and estimated useful life of the property, plant, and equipment over the five-year period analyzed.
- Average Age Ratio (%)
- The average age ratio shows a gradual upward trend, increasing from 59.8% in 2011 to 63.64% in 2015. This indicates that the assets, on average, are aging steadily throughout the years, with a higher proportion of their useful life being utilized by the end of 2015 compared to 2011.
- Estimated Total Useful Life (in years)
- The estimated total useful life of the assets remains relatively stable, fluctuating slightly between 9 and 10 years during the period. This suggests no significant changes in asset lifespan assumptions or major shifts in asset composition.
- Estimated Age (Time Elapsed Since Purchase) (in years)
- The estimated asset age remains constant at 6 years throughout the entire period. This stability implies consistent asset acquisition patterns or the method used to estimate age remains unchanged.
- Estimated Remaining Life (in years)
- The estimated remaining useful life of the assets remains stable at 4 years for all years reported. This consistency further confirms the overall steady condition of the asset base without major renewal or retirements.
In summary, the analysis reflects a stable asset lifecycle position with a consistent increase in the average age ratio, indicative of assets progressively approaching the end of their estimated useful life. Neither the estimated total useful life nor the age and remaining life values show significant fluctuations, suggesting a steady asset management approach over the time span covered.
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land)
= 100 × ÷ ( – ) =
The financial data for property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) over the five-year period shows distinct trends in asset growth, depreciation, and asset aging.
- Gross Property, Plant and Equipment
- There is a consistent upward trend in the gross value of PP&E, increasing from $6,873 million in 2011 to $10,288 million in 2015. This represents a substantial growth in the company’s investment in tangible assets, with an approximate 50% increase over the period. This growth indicates ongoing capital expenditures and expansion of the asset base.
- Accumulated Depreciation
- Accumulated depreciation also steadily increases from $4,040 million in 2011 to $6,438 million in 2015. The rise in depreciation aligns with the increased gross asset base but also reflects the aging and usage of the assets over time. The accumulated depreciation has grown roughly in proportion to the gross PP&E, suggesting consistent depreciation policies and asset usage.
- Land
- The value of land shows a modest increase from $118 million in 2011 to $171 million in 2015. This increase is smaller relative to the total PP&E growth, consistent with the typical nature of land as a non-depreciable asset. The steady increase may indicate occasional land acquisitions or revaluations.
- Average Age Ratio
- The average age ratio, expressed as a percentage, rises gradually from 59.8% in 2011 to 63.64% in 2015. This increasing trend suggests that, on average, the assets are becoming older relative to their estimated useful lives. This could imply that the company has not accelerated renewal or replacement of its asset base at a rate sufficient to reduce the aging, potentially signaling impending needs for asset renewal or increased maintenance costs.
Overall, the data demonstrates expansion in the company’s asset base alongside increasing accumulated depreciation and asset aging. The steady growth in gross PP&E indicates capital investment, while the rising average age ratio may warrant attention to asset management strategies to ensure continued operational efficiency and avoid obsolescence.
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= ( – ) ÷ =
- Property, Plant and Equipment, Gross
-
The gross value of property, plant, and equipment has shown a consistent upward trend over the five-year period. Starting at 6,873 million US dollars at the end of 2011, it increased steadily each year, reaching 10,288 million US dollars by the end of 2015. This represents a significant increase, indicating continuous investment in fixed assets.
- Land
-
The value of land held by the company has also increased, though at a more moderate pace compared to the gross PPE. It rose from 118 million US dollars in 2011 to 171 million US dollars in 2015. The increase appears to be gradual and consistent, suggesting ongoing acquisitions or revaluations of land assets.
- Depreciation Expense
-
Depreciation expense has risen each year, reflecting both the expansion in asset base and the aging of existing assets. Beginning at 728 million US dollars in 2011, depreciation expense increased to 1,019 million US dollars by 2015. The growth in depreciation expense closely aligns with the increase in gross PPE, indicating consistent asset utilization and accounting for asset depletion.
- Estimated Total Useful Life
-
The estimated useful life of the assets fluctuated slightly over the period, ranging between 9 and 10 years. This minor variation suggests relatively stable assumptions regarding the lifespan of PPE without significant changes to asset management or depreciation policies.
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= ÷ =
The accumulated depreciation of the company exhibits a consistent upward trend over the five-year period. Starting at US$ 4,040 million at the end of 2011, it increases steadily each year, reaching US$ 6,438 million by the end of 2015. This progressive accumulation indicates ongoing depreciation of property, plant, and equipment assets, reflecting continuous asset usage and aging.
Depreciation expense shows a similar increasing pattern. From US$ 728 million in 2011, it rises annually to US$ 1,019 million by 2015. The increase in annual depreciation expense suggests either additions to depreciable assets or changes in depreciation methods or estimates. The consistent growth in depreciation expense corresponds proportionally to the increase in accumulated depreciation.
The time elapsed since purchase remains constant at six years throughout the period. This stability implies that the average age of the depreciable assets has not changed, which may indicate consistent asset acquisition strategies or amortization life spans maintained over the years.
- Summary of trends:
- - Accumulated depreciation increased steadily each year, reflecting ongoing asset depreciation.
- - Depreciation expense rose annually, indicating higher periodic depreciation charges.
- - The constant time elapsed since purchase suggests stability in asset age and depreciation policies.
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant and equipment, net – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= ( – ) ÷ =
The analysis of the property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) financial data reveals several noteworthy trends over the five-year period ending December 31, 2015.
- Net Property, Plant, and Equipment
- The net value of PP&E shows a consistent upward trend from 2011 to 2015. The value increased from $2,833 million in 2011 to $3,850 million in 2015, indicating ongoing investment or capital expenditure on long-lived assets. The growth suggests either acquisitions of new assets or improvements in existing assets, contributing to asset base expansion.
- Land Value
- Land values also experienced a gradual increase over the period. Starting at $118 million in 2011, the value rose steadily each year, reaching $171 million by 2015. This steady growth in land valuation aligns with the overall increase in total PP&E and may reflect either purchases of additional land or revaluation gains.
- Depreciation Expense
- Depreciation expense exhibited a clear upward trend each year, from $728 million in 2011 to $1,019 million in 2015. This increase correlates with the expanding asset base, representing higher consumption of PP&E assets or accelerated depreciation possibly due to asset upgrades or changes in depreciation policies.
- Estimated Remaining Life
- The estimated remaining life of the PP&E remained unchanged at 4 years throughout the entire period analyzed. This consistency suggests that the company maintains a stable depreciation schedule and asset lifecycle assumption despite changes in asset values and related expenses.
Overall, these patterns indicate steady investment in tangible assets, with corresponding increases in depreciation consistent with asset growth. The fixed estimated remaining life implies a stable approach to asset management and depreciation accounting over the five years.